Clinical Comparison of RPDs Retained by Conical and Galvanoformed Double Crowns.

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT00176215

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2005-09-15

Start date

2003-05-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2005-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Prosthesis Retention, Denture, Partial, Removable, Oral Health, Tooth Abrasion

Brief summary

The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to investigate the clinical performance and complication rate of RPDs (Removable partial dentures) retained on conventional conical double crowns in comparison to galvanoformed telscopic double crowns. Additionally the OHIP (Oral Health related Qualitiy of Life)and the abrasion of the teeth were investigated.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsurvival failure of more than 20 %

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Indication for RPDs retained by double crowns; 2 to 6 Abutment teeth;

Exclusion criteria

* limited contractual capability and absence of consent of the patient

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026