Skip to content

Comparative Trial of Botox in the Management of Children With Congenital Muscular Torticollis

Comparative Trial of Botox Versus Conventional Treatment Used in the Management of Children With Congenital Muscular Torticollis (CMT)

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00175604
Enrollment
0
Registered
2005-09-15
Start date
2004-08-31
Completion date
2008-02-29
Last updated
2015-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Torticollis

Keywords

Botox, torticollis, Congenital Muscular Torticollis (CMT)

Brief summary

The primary purpose is to investigate the effect of Botox on the treatment of congenital muscular torticollis (CMT). The investigators' hypothesis is that a Botox injection will be an effective treatment when used in conjunction with current treatment procedures.

Detailed description

The babies that require a neck collar for CMT will be randomly placed into two groups. One group will receive standard treatment which includes physiotherapy and occupational therapy. The other group will receive standard treatment plus an injection of Botox. The babies will be monitored to determine if one group has a more favorable outcome than the other in terms of range of motion, length of treatment time and number of required surgeries.

Interventions

DRUGBotox

The babies that require a neck collar for CMT will be randomly placed into two groups. One group will receive standard treatment which includes physiotherapy and occupational therapy. The other group will receive standard treatment plus an injection of Botox.

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Months to 1 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Infants diagnosed with CMT and referred by family physician, pediatrician or orthopaedic surgeon * Initial assessment and initiation of treatment prior to 4 months of age * Cervical spine radiograph, no focal bony abnormality * Head tilt greater than 5 degrees at 5 months of age * Lateral head righting past neutral in upright suspension * Restricted neck range of movement in lateral flexion or rotation or both * Signed consent form and willingness to participate in the study * Compliance with attending bi-weekly follow-up appointments

Exclusion criteria

* Any other diagnosis affecting tone or muscle function * Any condition that would preclude an anesthetic * Any vertebral abnormalities identified by radiograph * Attending other health practitioners for treatment, i.e., massage therapist, chiropractor * Any associated ocular problems as determined by a pediatric ophthalmologist

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome will be range of motion.assessed bi-weekly until treatment is complete

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary outcomes will be length of treatment time and number of required surgeries.assessed bi-weekly until treatment is complete

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026