Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Hip Replacement

Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of the MIS Anterolateral Approach (MIS Watson Jones, G3) Versus Anterolateral Mini or Posterolateral Mini Approaches in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Status

Completed

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT00175461

Enrollment

156

Registered

2005-09-15

Start date

2005-09-30

Completion date

2011-08-31

Last updated

2017-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

Comparison of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the MIS anterolateral approach (MIS Watson Jones, G3) versus anterolateral mini or posterolateral mini approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty

Interventions

PROCEDUREhip surgery

Study design

Allocation

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

19 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

No contralateral hip symptoms, no major comorbidity

Exclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
3-months WOMAC score	3 months

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Cost-effectiveness at 2-years	Two years

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026