Skip to content

Risperidone Augmentation Therapy in Patients Who Have Failed or Only Partially Responded to a Trial of Antidepressant

Risperidone Augmentation Therapy in Patients Who Have Failed or Only Partially Responded to an Adequate Trial of Antidepressant

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00174577
Enrollment
84
Registered
2005-09-15
Start date
2003-02-28
Completion date
2005-02-28
Last updated
2005-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depression

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of risperidone augmentation in patients who have failed to respond or only partially responded to an adequate trial of an antidepressant.

Detailed description

Specific Aims: The goal of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of risperidone augmentation in patients with major depression who failed to respond, or only partially responded, to an adequate trial of an antidepressant medication. Patients who met this criteria received adjunctive risperidone (1- 3 mg.) for an additional four-week treatment trial. Subject Population: A total sample of 84 patients completed the study at two sites (Rhode Island Hospital/Brown University, n=42, Emory University, n=42). Methods/Design: Patients who met criteria for unipolar depression and failed to respond, or partially responded, to an adequate trial of antidepressant medication were randomized to risperidone or a placebo for an additional 4 week treatment trial while continuing on the same dose of their antidepressant medication. Randomization was at a 2:1 ratio of risperidone to placebo. Data Analysis: Patient outcome (recovery status) of the two treatment conditions were compared using a MADRS rating \< 10 to denote remission while improvement was defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to end of study. Odds ratio were examined to see if risperidone augmentation significantly affected the chance of recovery from depression at the end of 4 weeks of treatment.

Interventions

DRUGRisperidone

Sponsors

Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Emory University
CollaboratorOTHER
Rhode Island Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with major depression or partially remitted depression * currently receiving an adequate trial of an antidepressant

Exclusion criteria

* diagnosis of bipolar I or bipolar II disorder * psychotic features * substance dependence or abuse in the past three months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Depression symptoms,change score on MADRS scale at 4 weeks
Group differences on HRS-D scores
Group differences on remission and improvement

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Between group differences on quality-of-life measures
Group differences of anxiety and psychosocial factors

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026