Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Letrozole and Tamoxifen on Bone and Lipids in Postmenopausal Women With Breast Cancer

A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Letrozole and Tamoxifen on Bone and Lipids in Postmenopausal Women With Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00171704
Enrollment
263
Registered
2005-09-15
Start date
2005-04-30
Completion date
2011-03-31
Last updated
2017-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hormone Sensitive Resected Primary Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women

Keywords

Breast Cancer, Letrozole, Bone Mineral Density, Bone Markers, Serum lipid, Postmenopausal

Brief summary

Estrogen is known to be a regulator of bone and lipid metabolism. Letrozole is a potent inhibitor of estrogen synthesis. This study evaluated the effects of letrozole and tamoxifen on bone and lipid metabolism in postmenopausal women with resected, receptor positive early breast cancer.

Interventions

DRUGLetrozole

2.5 mg tablets and supplied in bottles with 6-monthly supplies.

DRUGTamoxifen

20 mg tablets in bottles as 6-monthly supplies (supplied to Novartis as Tamofen from Schering Oy, Subsidiary of Schering AG, Pansiontie 47, FIN-2010 Turku, Finland)

Sponsors

Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Sheffield
CollaboratorOTHER
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female * Post-menopausal hormone status defined as: * Patients with menostasis (amenorrhea) \> 12 months or history of oophorectomy. * Patients ≥ 55 years with history of hysterectomy or having continued/renewed menstruation on cyclic hormone treatment. * Patients of 50-54 years: Menopausal status was determined on the basis of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)/luteinizing hormone (LH) values. * Histologically confirmed resected breast cancer and eligible for adjuvant endocrine therapy. As a minimum, patients had to have receptor-positive tumors, which were defined either as estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR) ≥ 10 fmol/mg cytosol protein; or ≥ 10% of the tumor cells positive by immunocytochemical evaluation. * Adequate bone marrow function (white blood cell count \[WBC\] \> 3.0 x 109 /L, platelets ≥ 100.0 x 109 /L, and hemoglobin \> 10 g/dL). * Documented evidence of adequate renal function (creatinine \< 180 µmol/L) and hepatic function (bilirubin \< 30 µmol/L, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \< 1.5 x upper normal limit of the laboratory). * Life expectancy of at least 24 months at the time of enrollment. * Written voluntary informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedure. * Willingness to undergo all scheduled tests and examinations for evaluation of bone density and bone metabolism, and lipid profiles in addition to the standard assessments for monitoring their breast cancer status.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with distant metastases as defined by the criteria of the Danish Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (DBCCOG). * Pre-existing bone disease (e.g. osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, Paget's disease). * Patients receiving bisphosphonates for more than 3 months before randomization. * Chronic treatment with drugs known to interfere with bone metabolism, e.g. * Anti-convulsants within the past year. * Corticosteroids at doses greater than the equivalent of 5 mg/day prednisone for more than two weeks in the past 6 months (prior to randomization). * Any previous treatment with sodium fluoride at daily doses ≥ 5 mg/day for a period exceeding 1 month. * Anabolic steroids in the past 12 months. * Long term use of coumarin derivatives and heparin at the time of randomization. * Metabolic diseases known to interfere with bone metabolism (e.g., Hyperparathyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, uncontrolled thyroid disease, Cushing's disease, vitamin D deficiency, malabsorption syndrome, etc.). * Treatment with lipid-lowering agents within the 3 months prior to randomization (this exclusion criterion did not apply to patients randomized in the United Kingdom). * Patients receiving other anti-cancer treatment. * Previous neoadjuvant / adjuvant chemotherapy and /or previous adjuvant endocrine therapy (e.g., anti-estrogens, AIs). * History of previous or concomitant malignancy within the past 5 years other than adequately treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix. Patients who had a previous other malignancy must have been disease free for five years. Patients with endometrial cancer and/or invasive breast cancer at any time in their medical history were excluded. Patients with invasive bilateral breast cancer were excluded. Patients with vaginal discharge/ vaginal bleeding with evidence of malignancy were excluded. * Any other non-malignant systemic diseases (cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, lung embolism, etc.) which would prevent prolonged follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine (L2-l4)Baseline, 24 monthsLumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD measurements by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were performed after surgery and within 2 weeks prior to randomization and repeated every 6 months for the first 2 years and annually thereafter until 5 years after enrollment. The primary scanning site was the lumbar spine (L2 to L4) and the secondary scanning site was the total hip. All DXA scans were evaluated by a central reader.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total HipBaseline, 60 monthsTotal hip BMD measurements by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were performed after surgery and within 2 weeks prior to randomization and repeated every 6 months for the first 2 years and annually thereafter until 5 years after enrollment. All DXA scans were evaluated by a central reader.
Median Percent Change From Baseline of Serum Markers of Bone TurnoverBaseline, 60 monthsBone turnover markers (fasting serum procollagen-I extension peptide \[P1NP\], C-telopeptide \[CTX\], skeletal bone-specific alkaline phosphatase \[BSAP, N-telopeptide \[NTX\]) were measured at baseline/screening and at each visit thereafter. A central laboratory was used to analyze the samples. The analysis of bone markers was based on analysis of variance of the regression slopes calculated for each individual patient and each bone marker over time. In the following summary, only the median treatment group percent change from baseline (and range) at 5 years is presented for each bone marker.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Serum Lipids at 5 YearsBaseline, 60 monthsSerum lipid profile (fasting serum cholesterol \[total, HDL and calculated LDL\], triglycerides, and lipoprotein \[a\]) were measured at baseline/screening and at each visit thereafter. A central laboratory was used to analyze the samples. The analysis of serum lipids was on the treatment group median percent change from baseline (and range) at 5 years.
Percent Change From Baseline of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar SpineBaseline, 60 monthsLumbar spine (L2-L4)BMD measurements by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were performed after surgery and within 2 weeks prior to randomization and repeated every 6 months for the first 2 years and annually thereafter until 5 years after enrollment. The primary scanning site was the lumbar spine (L2 to L4) and the secondary scanning site was the total hip. All DXA scans were evaluated by a central reader.
Time to Disease Recurrence or Death60 monthsDisease-free survival was defined as the interval between randomization and earliest confirmed event of loco-regional recurrence, distant metastases, invasive contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause.
Time to Overall Survival Events60 MonthsOverall survival was measured from date of randomization to date of death.
Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in CholesterolBaseline, 60 monthsSerum lipid profile (fasting serum cholesterol \[total, HDL and calculated LDL\], triglycerides, and lipoprotein \[a\]) were measured at baseline/screening and at each visit thereafter. A central laboratory was used to analyze the samples. Numbers are not additive, as patients could be included in multiple rows.

Countries

Denmark, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Letrozole
2.5 mg once daily (q.d.)orally for 5 years
133
Tam-Let
Tamoxifen 20 mg once daily (q.d.) orally for 2 years followed by Letrozole 2.5 mg q.d. orally for 3 years.
130
Total263

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative Problems21
Overall StudyAdverse Event2433
Overall StudyDeath22
Overall StudyDisease Progression149
Overall StudyNew therapy for 2nd non-breast prim canc10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLetrozoleTam-LetTotal
Age, Continuous61.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
133 Participants130 Participants263 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
113 / 133110 / 130
serious
Total, serious adverse events
50 / 13341 / 130

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine (L2-l4)

Lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD measurements by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were performed after surgery and within 2 weeks prior to randomization and repeated every 6 months for the first 2 years and annually thereafter until 5 years after enrollment. The primary scanning site was the lumbar spine (L2 to L4) and the secondary scanning site was the total hip. All DXA scans were evaluated by a central reader.

Time frame: Baseline, 24 months

Population: The safety population consisted of only patients who took randomized therapy for at least one day. The number of patients in each treatment arm who had completed 2 years of the study and had centrally assessed measurements of lumbar spine or total hip BMD.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LetrozolePercent Change From Baseline of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine (L2-l4)-4.63 Percent Change
Tam-LetPercent Change From Baseline of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine (L2-l4)0.37 Percent Change
Secondary

Median Percent Change From Baseline of Serum Markers of Bone Turnover

Bone turnover markers (fasting serum procollagen-I extension peptide \[P1NP\], C-telopeptide \[CTX\], skeletal bone-specific alkaline phosphatase \[BSAP, N-telopeptide \[NTX\]) were measured at baseline/screening and at each visit thereafter. A central laboratory was used to analyze the samples. The analysis of bone markers was based on analysis of variance of the regression slopes calculated for each individual patient and each bone marker over time. In the following summary, only the median treatment group percent change from baseline (and range) at 5 years is presented for each bone marker.

Time frame: Baseline, 60 months

Population: The safety population consisted of only patients who took randomized therapy for at least one day. During different time points, participants with observations at that time point were included in the analysis. The analysis of bone markers over time consisted of patients with measurements of specific markers at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
LetrozoleMedian Percent Change From Baseline of Serum Markers of Bone TurnoverProcollagen-I (PINP) (n=86, 78)-14.15 Percent Change
LetrozoleMedian Percent Change From Baseline of Serum Markers of Bone TurnoverBone Specific alkaline Phosphatase (n=87,78)16.2 Percent Change
LetrozoleMedian Percent Change From Baseline of Serum Markers of Bone TurnoverC-telopeptide (CTX) (n=88, 78)-12.05 Percent Change
LetrozoleMedian Percent Change From Baseline of Serum Markers of Bone TurnoverN-telopeptide (NTX) (n=-88, 77)-53.05 Percent Change
Tam-LetMedian Percent Change From Baseline of Serum Markers of Bone TurnoverN-telopeptide (NTX) (n=-88, 77)-50.7 Percent Change
Tam-LetMedian Percent Change From Baseline of Serum Markers of Bone TurnoverProcollagen-I (PINP) (n=86, 78)-0.5 Percent Change
Tam-LetMedian Percent Change From Baseline of Serum Markers of Bone TurnoverC-telopeptide (CTX) (n=88, 78)4.55 Percent Change
Tam-LetMedian Percent Change From Baseline of Serum Markers of Bone TurnoverBone Specific alkaline Phosphatase (n=87,78)19.15 Percent Change
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Cholesterol

Serum lipid profile (fasting serum cholesterol \[total, HDL and calculated LDL\], triglycerides, and lipoprotein \[a\]) were measured at baseline/screening and at each visit thereafter. A central laboratory was used to analyze the samples. Numbers are not additive, as patients could be included in multiple rows.

Time frame: Baseline, 60 months

Population: The safety population consisted of only patients who took randomized therapy for at least one day. The number of patients with pre-defined clinically relevant changes in serum lipids over the course of 5 years in each treatment arm is presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in CholesterolPatients with one or more change30 Participants
LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Cholesterol≥8 mmol/L total (T) cholesterol7 Participants
LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Cholesterol≥7 mmol/L T.choles. & ≥1 risk for cardiac disease18 Participants
LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Cholesterol≥6 mmol/L T. choles. & ≥2 risk for cardiac disease11 Participants
Tam-LetNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Cholesterol≥6 mmol/L T. choles. & ≥2 risk for cardiac disease9 Participants
Tam-LetNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in CholesterolPatients with one or more change21 Participants
Tam-LetNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Cholesterol≥7 mmol/L T.choles. & ≥1 risk for cardiac disease12 Participants
Tam-LetNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Cholesterol≥8 mmol/L total (T) cholesterol5 Participants
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Serum Lipids at 5 Years

Serum lipid profile (fasting serum cholesterol \[total, HDL and calculated LDL\], triglycerides, and lipoprotein \[a\]) were measured at baseline/screening and at each visit thereafter. A central laboratory was used to analyze the samples. The analysis of serum lipids was on the treatment group median percent change from baseline (and range) at 5 years.

Time frame: Baseline, 60 months

Population: The safety population consisted of only patients who took randomized therapy for at least one day. During different time points, participants with observations at that time point were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
LetrozolePercentage Change From Baseline in Serum Lipids at 5 YearsTotal Cholesterol (n=91, 82)-7.3 Percent ChangeFull Range 17.64
LetrozolePercentage Change From Baseline in Serum Lipids at 5 YearsLDL Cholesterol (n=91, 82)-12.7 Percent ChangeFull Range 24.947
LetrozolePercentage Change From Baseline in Serum Lipids at 5 YearsHDL Cholesterol (n=91, 82)8.7 Percent ChangeFull Range 16.388
Tam-LetPercentage Change From Baseline in Serum Lipids at 5 YearsTotal Cholesterol (n=91, 82)-2.45 Percent ChangeFull Range 16.63
Tam-LetPercentage Change From Baseline in Serum Lipids at 5 YearsLDL Cholesterol (n=91, 82)-11.05 Percent ChangeFull Range 23.958
Tam-LetPercentage Change From Baseline in Serum Lipids at 5 YearsHDL Cholesterol (n=91, 82)8.9 Percent ChangeFull Range -38.5
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip

Total hip BMD measurements by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were performed after surgery and within 2 weeks prior to randomization and repeated every 6 months for the first 2 years and annually thereafter until 5 years after enrollment. All DXA scans were evaluated by a central reader.

Time frame: Baseline, 60 months

Population: The safety population consisted of only patients who took randomized therapy for at least one day. The analysis of BMD at 5 years included all patients enrolled with centrally assessed measurements of total hip BMD.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LetrozolePercent Change From Baseline of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip-5.77 Percent Change
Tam-LetPercent Change From Baseline of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip-3.98 Percent Change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine

Lumbar spine (L2-L4)BMD measurements by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were performed after surgery and within 2 weeks prior to randomization and repeated every 6 months for the first 2 years and annually thereafter until 5 years after enrollment. The primary scanning site was the lumbar spine (L2 to L4) and the secondary scanning site was the total hip. All DXA scans were evaluated by a central reader.

Time frame: Baseline, 60 months

Population: The safety population consisted of only patients who took randomized therapy for at least one day. The analysis at 5 years included all patients enrolled and who had centrally assessed measurements of lumbar spine and/or total hip BMD.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LetrozolePercent Change From Baseline of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine-5.66 Percent change
Tam-LetPercent Change From Baseline of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine-3.3 Percent change
Secondary

Time to Disease Recurrence or Death

Disease-free survival was defined as the interval between randomization and earliest confirmed event of loco-regional recurrence, distant metastases, invasive contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause.

Time frame: 60 months

Population: Analysis of disease-free survival was based on the ITT principle, with all enrolled (and randomized) patients included. The Kaplan-Meier product-limit approach was used.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LetrozoleTime to Disease Recurrence or DeathNA Days
Tam-LetTime to Disease Recurrence or DeathNA Days
Secondary

Time to Overall Survival Events

Overall survival was measured from date of randomization to date of death.

Time frame: 60 Months

Population: All randomized patients constituted the ITT Population, unless withdrawal of consent occurred after randomization but before the start of study treatment assigned.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LetrozoleTime to Overall Survival EventsNA days
Tam-LetTime to Overall Survival EventsNA days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026