Skip to content

An Extension Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of STI571 in Participants With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Refractory to or Intolerant of Interferon-Alpha

An Extension to a Phase II Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of STI571 in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Refractory to or Intolerant of Interferon-Alpha

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00171223
Enrollment
532
Registered
2005-09-15
Start date
1999-12-06
Completion date
2013-11-29
Last updated
2021-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive

Keywords

Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, CML, Philadelphia Chromosome, Accelerated phase, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, AML, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, ALL, Imatinib mesylate

Brief summary

During the Core Phase of the study, participants received STI571 at a dose of 400 milligrams (mg) daily for up to 12 months. Participants completing 12 months of therapy were eligible to continue treatment in the Extension Phase of the study provided that, in the opinion of the investigator, they had benefited from treatment with STI571 and there were no safety concerns.

Interventions

DRUGSTI571

STI571 oral capsules or tablets.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants included in the study were: * Consenting males or females greater than or equal to (≥)18 years of age with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). * With a documented failure of interferon-alpha (IFN) or an IFN-containing therapy, characterized as resistance or refractoriness defined as any of the following: * Hematologic Resistance - Failure to achieve a complete hematological response (CHR), lasting for at least 1 month despite 6 or more months of IFN or an IFN-containing regimen, in which IFN was administered at a dose of at least 25 million international units (MIU) per week. During this treatment period the cumulative duration of hydroxyurea therapy may not have exceeded 50% of the treatment period with the IFN-containing regimen. * Cytogenetic Resistance - Bone marrow cytogenetics showing ≥65% Ph+ after one year of IFN-based therapy, * Cytogenetic Refractoriness - An increase in the Ph+ chromosome in BM cells by at least 30 percentage points (e.g. from 20% to 50%, or from 30% to 60%) confirmed by two samples at least 1 month apart, or an absolute increase to ≥65%, * Hematologic Refractoriness - A rising white blood cell count (WBC) \[to a level ≥20 x 10\^9/L confirmed by two samples taken at least two weeks apart\] for participants achieving a complete hematologic response while receiving IFN or an IFN-containing regimen. This regimen must have included IFN at a dose of at least 25 MIU administered per week. During this treatment period the cumulative duration of hydroxyurea therapy may not have exceeded 50% of the treatment period with the IFN-containing regimen. In this report all refractory populations were referred to as relapsed populations. * With a documented intolerance to IFN therapy defined as a ≥Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity persisting for at least one month, for participants receiving IFN or an IFN- containing regimen. IFN was to be administered at a dose of at least 25 MIU/week. Participants who were intolerant of IFN were to have been diagnosed ≥6 months prior to the time of entry into the study.

Exclusion criteria

Participants excluded from the study were: * Females of childbearing potential without a negative pregnancy test prior to the initiation of study drug. Barrier contraceptive precautions were to be used throughout the trial in both sexes. * With serum bilirubin and creatinine concentrations more than twice the upper limit of the normal range (ULN). * With serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) more than twice the ULN. * With \>15% of blasts or basophils in peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM). * With ≥30% of blasts plus promyelocytes in PB or BM. * With a platelet count of less than (\<)100 x 10\^9/L. * With an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score ≥3. * Receiving busulfan within 6 weeks of Day 1. * Receiving treatment with IFN or cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) within 14 days of Day 1. * Receiving treatment with hydroxyurea within 7 days of Day 1. * Receiving other investigational agents within 28 days of Day 1. * With prior marrow or stem cell transplantation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response (Complete Cytogenetic Response and Major Cytogenetic Response) to STI571Up to 6 years after the start of treatmentResponse was evaluated from bone marrow aspirates and biopsy samples. Bone marrow cytogenetic studies were performed every 3 months during the core phase of the study, then twice yearly, then annually to evaluate Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+). Cytogenetic response was defined as the best response the participant achieved during study. Based on the percentage of Ph+ cells = (positive cells/ examined cells) x100, at each BM assessment the cytogenetic response was classified as: Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR):, 0% Ph+ cells; Partial Cytogenetic Response (PCyR):, \>0 - 35% Ph+ cells; Minor: \>35 - 65% Ph+ cells; and Minimal: \>65 - 95% Ph+ cells, None: \>95 % Ph+ cells and Not done: \<20 metaphases were examined and/or response could not be assigned. Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) was defined as sum of the CCyR plus PCyR rates.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Complete Hematologic Response to STI57112 months after the start of treatmentDuration of hematologic response was defined as the time from the first documentation of the complete hematologic response to the date the loss of complete hematologic response is documented. Loss of complete hematological response was defined as a rising WBC count (increased to a level above the ULN at the laboratory where the analysis was performed confirmed by two samples obtained one month apart). The mean survival time and its standard error were underestimated because the largest observation was censored and the estimation was restricted to the largest event time. Complete hematological response was defined as normalization of peripheral blood counts (WBC and platelet count \< ULN at the laboratory where the analysis was performed), with a normal WBC differential, and no immature granulocytes present, lasting for 4 weeks.
Time to Complete Hematologic Response to STI57112 months after the start of treatmentTime to Complete Hematologic Response was defined for all participants with calculated confirmed complete hematologic response as the time until first documented response (which was confirmed \>= 4 weeks). Complete hematological response was defined as normalization of peripheral blood counts (WBC and platelet count \< ULN at the laboratory where the analysis was performed), with a normal WBC differential, and no immature granulocytes present, lasting for 4 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response to STI57112 months after the start of treatmentHematologic response was evaluated from hematology measurements in the peripheral blood. Complete hematological response was defined as normalization of peripheral blood counts \[WBC and platelet count \< upper limit of normal (ULN) at the laboratory where the analysis was performed\], with a normal WBC differential, and no immature granulocytes present, lasting for 4 weeks.
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusUp to 9 months after the start of treatmentThe ECOG performance status was recorded at baseline and every 3 months during the core study. The ECOG Performance Scale has 5 grades. 0 = Fully active, able to carry out all pre-disease activities; 1 = Restricted in strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of light or sedentary nature; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out work activities. Active about 50% of waking hours; 3 = Capable of limited self-care, confined to bed/chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = Completely disabled; cannot carry on self-care. Totally confined to bed/chair.
Percentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144 and 156 monthsOverall survival was defined as the time from the first dose of STI571 to the death of the participant. If a participant is not known to have died, survival was censored at the time of last contact. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants at each time point was calculated.
Number of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsUp to 9 months after the start of treatmentNational Cancer Institute (NCI)/ National Institute of Health (NIH) provides a grading (severity) scale for each adverse event (AE) term, the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). Grade 3 refers to severe AE and Grade 4 refers to life-threatening or disabling AE. Cancer-related symptoms included fever, night sweats, bone pain, arthralgia, abdominal discomfort, fatigue and anorexia.

Countries

France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hematologic Failure
Participants failed to achieve a complete hematologic response, defined as lasting for at least 1 month despite 6 or more months of an interferon-alpha containing regimen, or had a rising WBC (to a level 20 x 10\^9/L) confirmed by two samples taken at least two weeks apart after achieving a complete hematological response while receiving an interferon- alpha containing regimen of at least 25 MIU per week. Participants received STI571, capsules or tablets, orally, once a day at a dose of 400 mg. During the Core Phase of the study, participants received STI571 daily for up to 12 months. Participants completing 12 months of therapy were eligible to continue treatment in the Extension Phase of the study, and they continued STI571 for as long as the therapy was beneficial or until death, intolerable toxicity or the decision to discontinue by the investigator, whichever came first. (Maximum duration on study was approximately 14 years).
152
Cytogenetic Failure
Participants' BM cytogenetics showed \>= 65% Philadelphia chromosome positivity after one year of an interferon-alpha containing regimen or an increase in the Philadelphia chromosome positive BM cells by at least 30 percentage points (e.g., from 20% to 50%, or from 30% to 60%) confirmed by two samples at least 1 month apart, or an increase to \>= 65%. Participants received STI571, capsules or tablets, orally, once a day at a dose of 400 mg. During the Core Phase of the study, participants received STI571 daily for up to 12 months. Participants completing 12 months of therapy were eligible to continue treatment in the Extension Phase of the study, and they continued STI571 for as long as the therapy was beneficial or until death, intolerable toxicity or the decision to discontinue by the investigator, whichever came first. (Maximum duration on study was approximately 14 years).
188
Interferon-alpha Intolerance
Participants demonstrated intolerance to interferon-alpha therapy defined as a documented \> Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity persisting for more than 1 month after receiving an interferon-alpha containing regimen of at least 25 MIU/week. Participants must have been more than 6 months from time of diagnosis. Participants received STI571, capsules or tablets, orally, once a day at a dose of 400 mg. During the Core Phase of the study, participants received STI571 daily for up to 12 months. Participants completing 12 months of therapy were eligible to continue treatment in the Extension Phase of the study, and they continued STI571 for as long as the therapy was beneficial or until death, intolerable toxicity or the decision to discontinue by the investigator, whichever came first. (Maximum duration on study was approximately 14 years).
192
Total532

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAbnormal Laboratory Value (s)423
Overall StudyAbnormal Procedure100
Overall StudyAdministrative Problems476
Overall StudyAdverse Event (Non-fatal)6519
Overall StudyAdverse Event (Serious Fatal)689
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up523
Overall StudyNo Longer Requires Study Drug (Bone Marrow Transplant)242
Overall StudyNot Specified (No Data Collected After Cut-off)414758
Overall StudyParticipant Withdrew Consent122115
Overall StudyProtocol Violation223
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory Therapeutic Effect574352

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHematologic FailureCytogenetic FailureInterferon-alpha IntoleranceTotal
Age, Continuous55.5 years53.0 years59.0 years57.0 years
Age, Customized
>= 50 to <= 60 years
38 Participants65 Participants50 Participants153 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 60 to <= 70 years
47 Participants44 Participants68 Participants159 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 70 years
10 Participants15 Participants27 Participants52 Participants
Age, Customized
Less than (<) 50 years
57 Participants64 Participants47 Participants168 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
50 Participants77 Participants94 Participants221 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
102 Participants111 Participants98 Participants311 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 532

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response (Complete Cytogenetic Response and Major Cytogenetic Response) to STI571

Response was evaluated from bone marrow aspirates and biopsy samples. Bone marrow cytogenetic studies were performed every 3 months during the core phase of the study, then twice yearly, then annually to evaluate Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+). Cytogenetic response was defined as the best response the participant achieved during study. Based on the percentage of Ph+ cells = (positive cells/ examined cells) x100, at each BM assessment the cytogenetic response was classified as: Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR):, 0% Ph+ cells; Partial Cytogenetic Response (PCyR):, \>0 - 35% Ph+ cells; Minor: \>35 - 65% Ph+ cells; and Minimal: \>65 - 95% Ph+ cells, None: \>95 % Ph+ cells and Not done: \<20 metaphases were examined and/or response could not be assigned. Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) was defined as sum of the CCyR plus PCyR rates.

Time frame: Up to 6 years after the start of treatment

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response (Complete Cytogenetic Response and Major Cytogenetic Response) to STI571Complete Cytogenetic Response29.6 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response (Complete Cytogenetic Response and Major Cytogenetic Response) to STI571Major Cytogenetic Response45.4 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response (Complete Cytogenetic Response and Major Cytogenetic Response) to STI571Complete Cytogenetic Response37.2 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response (Complete Cytogenetic Response and Major Cytogenetic Response) to STI571Major Cytogenetic Response63.8 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response (Complete Cytogenetic Response and Major Cytogenetic Response) to STI571Complete Cytogenetic Response45.8 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response (Complete Cytogenetic Response and Major Cytogenetic Response) to STI571Major Cytogenetic Response65.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Complete Hematologic Response to STI571

Duration of hematologic response was defined as the time from the first documentation of the complete hematologic response to the date the loss of complete hematologic response is documented. Loss of complete hematological response was defined as a rising WBC count (increased to a level above the ULN at the laboratory where the analysis was performed confirmed by two samples obtained one month apart). The mean survival time and its standard error were underestimated because the largest observation was censored and the estimation was restricted to the largest event time. Complete hematological response was defined as normalization of peripheral blood counts (WBC and platelet count \< ULN at the laboratory where the analysis was performed), with a normal WBC differential, and no immature granulocytes present, lasting for 4 weeks.

Time frame: 12 months after the start of treatment

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hematologic FailureDuration of Complete Hematologic Response to STI57119.3672 monthsStandard Error 0.6383
Cytogenetic FailureDuration of Complete Hematologic Response to STI57123.9389 monthsStandard Error 0.506
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceDuration of Complete Hematologic Response to STI57124.6818 monthsStandard Error 0.6507
Secondary

Number of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related Symptoms

National Cancer Institute (NCI)/ National Institute of Health (NIH) provides a grading (severity) scale for each adverse event (AE) term, the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). Grade 3 refers to severe AE and Grade 4 refers to life-threatening or disabling AE. Cancer-related symptoms included fever, night sweats, bone pain, arthralgia, abdominal discomfort, fatigue and anorexia.

Time frame: Up to 9 months after the start of treatment

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsArthralgia Grade 30 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsFever Grade 30 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsArthralgia Grade 40 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsBone Pain Grade 40 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsAbdominal Discomfort Grade 30 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsBone Pain Grade 30 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsAnorexia Grade 30 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsFever Grade 40 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsFatigue Grade 40 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsAbdominal Discomfort Grade 40 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsNight Sweats Grade 30 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsFatigue Grade 31 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsAnorexia Grade 40 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsNight Sweats Grade 40 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsFever Grade 30 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsFever Grade 40 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsNight Sweats Grade 40 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsAbdominal Discomfort Grade 30 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsAbdominal Discomfort Grade 40 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsAnorexia Grade 40 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsArthralgia Grade 30 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsAnorexia Grade 30 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsArthralgia Grade 40 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsBone Pain Grade 31 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsBone Pain Grade 40 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsFatigue Grade 30 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsFatigue Grade 40 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsNight Sweats Grade 30 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsBone Pain Grade 30 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsFever Grade 40 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsBone Pain Grade 40 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsAnorexia Grade 30 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsNight Sweats Grade 40 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsFatigue Grade 30 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsAbdominal Discomfort Grade 30 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsNight Sweats Grade 30 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsAnorexia Grade 40 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsArthralgia Grade 31 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsFatigue Grade 40 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsArthralgia Grade 40 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsAbdominal Discomfort Grade 40 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related SymptomsFever Grade 30 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

The ECOG performance status was recorded at baseline and every 3 months during the core study. The ECOG Performance Scale has 5 grades. 0 = Fully active, able to carry out all pre-disease activities; 1 = Restricted in strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of light or sedentary nature; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out work activities. Active about 50% of waking hours; 3 = Capable of limited self-care, confined to bed/chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = Completely disabled; cannot carry on self-care. Totally confined to bed/chair.

Time frame: Up to 9 months after the start of treatment

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusGrade 31 Participants
Hematologic FailureNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusGrade 40 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusGrade 30 Participants
Cytogenetic FailureNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusGrade 40 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusGrade 40 Participants
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusGrade 30 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates

Overall survival was defined as the time from the first dose of STI571 to the death of the participant. If a participant is not known to have died, survival was censored at the time of last contact. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants at each time point was calculated.

Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144 and 156 months

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates84 Months68.5 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates120 Months61 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates156 Months55.5 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates24 Months88.1 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates144 Months57 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates48 Months78.4 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates12 Months94.7 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates72 Months70.1 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates36 Months84 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates132 Months59.7 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates96 Months66.5 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates108 Months63.3 percentage of participants
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates60 Months73.3 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates36 Months91.5 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates12 Months98.9 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates60 Months83.8 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates72 Months79.7 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates108 Months78.4 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates144 Months73.8 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates24 Months93.6 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates48 Months87.1 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates84 Months79.7 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates96 Months79.1 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates120 Months77 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates132 Months75.4 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates156 Months70.1 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates60 Months73.6 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates96 Months65.9 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates144 Months60.8 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates12 Months97.4 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates120 Months63.8 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates84 Months67.2 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates156 Months60.8 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates36 Months83.8 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates24 Months89.5 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates132 Months62.3 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates48 Months76.3 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates72 Months71.4 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates108 Months65.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response to STI571

Hematologic response was evaluated from hematology measurements in the peripheral blood. Complete hematological response was defined as normalization of peripheral blood counts \[WBC and platelet count \< upper limit of normal (ULN) at the laboratory where the analysis was performed\], with a normal WBC differential, and no immature granulocytes present, lasting for 4 weeks.

Time frame: 12 months after the start of treatment

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hematologic FailurePercentage of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response to STI57194.1 percentage of participants
Cytogenetic FailurePercentage of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response to STI57197.9 percentage of participants
Interferon-alpha IntolerancePercentage of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response to STI57191.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Complete Hematologic Response to STI571

Time to Complete Hematologic Response was defined for all participants with calculated confirmed complete hematologic response as the time until first documented response (which was confirmed \>= 4 weeks). Complete hematological response was defined as normalization of peripheral blood counts (WBC and platelet count \< ULN at the laboratory where the analysis was performed), with a normal WBC differential, and no immature granulocytes present, lasting for 4 weeks.

Time frame: 12 months after the start of treatment

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Hematologic FailureTime to Complete Hematologic Response to STI5711.64 months
Cytogenetic FailureTime to Complete Hematologic Response to STI5710.72 months
Interferon-alpha IntoleranceTime to Complete Hematologic Response to STI5710.72 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026