Skip to content

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00168337
Enrollment
554
Registered
2005-09-15
Start date
2005-05-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2014-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intravitreal implant of dexamethasone for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Interventions

DRUGDexamethasone

350 µg or 700 µg dexamethasone posterior segment drug delivery system - injection into the vitreous cavity not less than every 6 months for up to 36 months.

OTHERSham

Sham posterior segment drug delivery system-needle-less drug delivery system without study medication not less than every 6 months for up to 36 months.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * 18 years of age or older with diabetic macular edema; * Decrease in visual acuity in at least one eye as a result of macular edema (20/50 or worse); * Visual acuity in other eye no worse than 20/200 Key

Exclusion criteria

* Known anticipated need for ocular surgery within next 12 months; * History of glaucoma or current high eye pressure requiring more than 1 medication; * Uncontrolled systemic disease; * Known steroid-responder; * Use of systemic steroids; * Use of Warfarin/Heparin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With a Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study EyeBaseline, Month 39/Final VisitBCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeBaseline, 39 MonthsBCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). The average BCVA is calculated across study visits for each patient. A positive number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative number change from baseline indicates a worsening.
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeBaseline, Month 39/Final VisitBCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative number change from baseline indicates a worsening.
Percentage of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥10 Letters From Baseline in the Study EyeBaseline, Month 39/Final VisitBCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.
Change From Baseline in Retinal Thickness as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Baseline, Month 39/Final VisitOCT is a laser-based, noninvasive, diagnostic system that provides high-resolution, three-dimensional images of the retina from which retinal thickness can be measured. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening.

Countries

Brazil, Canada, Colombia, France, Hungary, India, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dexamethasone 700 μg
700 µg Dexamethasone posterior segment drug delivery system - injection into the vitreous cavity not less than every 6 months for up to 36 months.
188
Dexamethasone 350 μg
350 µg Dexamethasone posterior segment drug delivery system - injection into the vitreous cavity not less than every 6 months for up to 36 months.
181
Sham
Sham posterior segment drug delivery system - needle-less drug delivery system without study medication not less than every 6 months for up to 36 months.
185
Total554

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalDexamethasone 700 μgDexamethasone 350 μgSham
Age, Customized
45 to 65 years
333 Participants116 Participants109 Participants108 Participants
Age, Customized
<45 years
16 Participants2 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Age, Customized
>65 years
205 Participants70 Participants64 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
222 Participants77 Participants75 Participants70 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
332 Participants111 Participants106 Participants115 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
180 / 187172 / 178157 / 186
serious
Total, serious adverse events
63 / 18768 / 17849 / 186

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients With a Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 39/Final Visit

Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With a Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye22.3 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With a Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye18.2 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With a Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye10.8 Percentage of Patients
Secondary

Average Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). The average BCVA is calculated across study visits for each patient. A positive number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative number change from baseline indicates a worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, 39 Months

Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dexamethasone 700 μgAverage Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeAverage Change from Baseline Over 39 months2.9 LettersStandard Deviation 8.55
Dexamethasone 700 μgAverage Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeBaseline55.9 LettersStandard Deviation 9.83
Dexamethasone 350 μgAverage Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeAverage Change from Baseline Over 39 months2.9 LettersStandard Deviation 7.67
Dexamethasone 350 μgAverage Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeBaseline55.2 LettersStandard Deviation 9.69
ShamAverage Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeBaseline57.0 LettersStandard Deviation 8.76
ShamAverage Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeAverage Change from Baseline Over 39 months2.0 LettersStandard Deviation 8.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative number change from baseline indicates a worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 39/Final Visit

Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dexamethasone 700 μgChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeBaseline55.9 LettersStandard Deviation 9.83
Dexamethasone 700 μgChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 39/Final Visit1.3 LettersStandard Deviation 17.03
Dexamethasone 350 μgChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeBaseline55.2 LettersStandard Deviation 9.69
Dexamethasone 350 μgChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 39/Final Visit1.4 LettersStandard Deviation 15.17
ShamChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 39/Final Visit-0.0 LettersStandard Deviation 15.41
ShamChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeBaseline57.0 LettersStandard Deviation 8.76
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Retinal Thickness as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

OCT is a laser-based, noninvasive, diagnostic system that provides high-resolution, three-dimensional images of the retina from which retinal thickness can be measured. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 39/Final Visit

Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dexamethasone 700 μgChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Baseline486.0 MicronsStandard Deviation 163.12
Dexamethasone 700 μgChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Change from Baseline at Month 39/Final Visit-117.9 MicronsStandard Deviation 227.16
Dexamethasone 350 μgChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Baseline475.4 MicronsStandard Deviation 160.7
Dexamethasone 350 μgChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Change from Baseline at Month 39/Final Visit-131.2 MicronsStandard Deviation 204.33
ShamChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Baseline453.7 MicronsStandard Deviation 135.36
ShamChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Change from Baseline at Month 39/Final Visit-70.4 MicronsStandard Deviation 180.82
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥10 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 39/Final Visit

Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥10 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye34.6 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥10 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye29.8 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥10 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye24.9 Percentage of Patients
Post Hoc

10th Percentile for Time to BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). Shorter durations of time to improvement are best. The 10th percentile represents the first 10% of patients to reach a BCVA improvement of ≥15 letters from baseline in the study eye.

Time frame: Baseline, 39 Months

Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexamethasone 700 μg10th Percentile for Time to BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye50 Days
Dexamethasone 350 μg10th Percentile for Time to BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye49 Days
Sham10th Percentile for Time to BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye186 Days
Post Hoc

Percentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month Intervals

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, Month 24, Month 27, Month 30, Month 33, Month 36, Month 39/Final Visit

Population: Intent to Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 311.7 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 68.5 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 915.4 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 1212.8 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 1512.8 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 3018.6 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 3318.6 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 3619.7 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 39/Final Visit22.3 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 1812.2 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 2115.4 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 2418.1 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 700 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 2716.5 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 2712.2 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 3012.2 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 249.4 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 3314.4 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 219.4 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 3616.6 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 39/Final Visit18.2 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 314.4 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 66.1 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 914.4 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 129.9 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 1810.5 Percentage of Patients
Dexamethasone 350 μgPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 1514.4 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 39/Final Visit10.8 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 2710.3 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 189.2 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 129.7 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 3010.3 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 32.7 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 97.0 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 339.7 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 2410.3 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 63.2 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 3610.8 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 2110.3 Percentage of Patients
ShamPercentage of Patients With BCVA Improvement of ≥15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at 3-month IntervalsMonth 159.7 Percentage of Patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026