Skip to content

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Macular Edema Resulting From Retinal Vein Occlusion

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00168324
Enrollment
599
Registered
2005-09-15
Start date
2004-10-01
Completion date
2008-10-01
Last updated
2019-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intravitreal implant of dexamethasone for the treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion.

Interventions

700 µg dexamethasone intravitreal implant administered on Day 0 and/or Day 180.

350 µg Dexamethasone intravitreal implant administered on Day 0.

OTHERSham Injection

Sham injection on Day 0.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older with macular edema resulting from retinal vein occlusion * Decrease in visual acuity in at least one eye as a result of macular edema (20/50 or worse) * Visual acuity in other eye no worse than 20/200

Exclusion criteria

* Known anticipated need for ocular surgery within next 12 months * History of glaucoma or current high eye pressure requiring more than 1 medication * Diabetic retinopathy * Uncontrolled systemic disease * Known steroid-responder * Use of systemic steroids * Use of warfarin/heparin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementUp to 180 DaysThe cumulative response rate of 15 or more letter improvement was based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. A Kaplan-Meier analysis takes into account patients who dropped out from the study prior to achieving the 15 letter improvement. Values ranged from 0-1, with a higher number indicating a higher probability of response.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeDay 90, Day 180BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The numbers of patients with at least a 15 or more letter improvement in BCVA in the study eye at each visit are presented.
Change From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeBaseline, Day 90, Day 180Retinal thickness is assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the study eye. The retina is the light-sensitive part of the eye. OCT is a laser-based, noninvasive, diagnostic system providing high-resolution, three-dimensional images of the retina. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by CategoryBaseline, Day 90BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Data are grouped into the following 5 categories based on change from baseline: ≥15 Letters Improvement, ≥5 and \<15 Letters Improvement, No Change (Between -5 to +5 Letters), ≥5 and \<15 Letters Worsening, and ≥15 Letters Worsening.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Israel, Mexico, Philippines, Portugal, South Africa, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Patients were randomly assigned during the double-blind period of the study to treatment with 700 µg dexamethasone, 350 µg dexamethasone, or sham injection on Day 0. Patients who qualified to continue in the open-label period of the study received 700 µg dexamethasone on Day 180.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
700 µg Dexamethasone
700 µg dexamethasone intravitreal implant administered on Day 0 and Day 180.
201
350 µg Dexamethasone Followed by 700 µg Dexamethasone
350 µg dexamethasone intravitreal implant administered on Day 0 and 700 µg dexamethasone intravitreal implant on Day 180.
196
Sham Injection Followed by 700 µg Dexamethasone
Sham injection on Day 0 and 700 µg dexamethasone intravitreal implant on Day 180.
202
Total599

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal700 µg Dexamethasone350 µg Dexamethasone Followed by 700 µg DexamethasoneSham Injection Followed by 700 µg Dexamethasone
Age, Customized
45-65 years
257 participants83 participants84 participants90 participants
Age, Customized
<45 years
25 participants9 participants7 participants9 participants
Age, Customized
>65 years
317 participants109 participants105 participants103 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
272 Participants95 Participants92 Participants85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
327 Participants106 Participants104 Participants117 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
119 / 196107 / 19763 / 202
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 19628 / 19714 / 202

Outcome results

Primary

Cumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter Improvement

The cumulative response rate of 15 or more letter improvement was based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. A Kaplan-Meier analysis takes into account patients who dropped out from the study prior to achieving the 15 letter improvement. Values ranged from 0-1, with a higher number indicating a higher probability of response.

Time frame: Up to 180 Days

Population: Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
700 µg DexamethasoneCumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementDay 300.101 Kaplan-Meier Estimate
700 µg DexamethasoneCumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementDay 600.258 Kaplan-Meier Estimate
700 µg DexamethasoneCumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementDay 900.359 Kaplan-Meier Estimate
700 µg DexamethasoneCumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementDay 1800.397 Kaplan-Meier Estimate
350 µg DexamethasoneCumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementDay 1800.349 Kaplan-Meier Estimate
350 µg DexamethasoneCumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementDay 300.092 Kaplan-Meier Estimate
350 µg DexamethasoneCumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementDay 900.292 Kaplan-Meier Estimate
350 µg DexamethasoneCumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementDay 600.204 Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Sham InjectionCumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementDay 1800.225 Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Sham InjectionCumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementDay 600.100 Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Sham InjectionCumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementDay 900.165 Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Sham InjectionCumulative Response Rate of 15 or More Letter ImprovementDay 300.045 Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye

Retinal thickness is assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the study eye. The retina is the light-sensitive part of the eye. OCT is a laser-based, noninvasive, diagnostic system providing high-resolution, three-dimensional images of the retina. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90, Day 180

Population: Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
700 µg DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Day 90-199.3 Microns (µm)Standard Deviation 194.54
700 µg DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeBaseline548.9 Microns (µm)Standard Deviation 185.45
700 µg DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Day 180-105.0 Microns (µm)Standard Deviation 197.83
350 µg DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Day 90-144.1 Microns (µm)Standard Deviation 166.59
350 µg DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeBaseline541.6 Microns (µm)Standard Deviation 183.68
350 µg DexamethasoneChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Day 180-91.4 Microns (µm)Standard Deviation 198.16
Sham InjectionChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeBaseline534.4 Microns (µm)Standard Deviation 187.38
Sham InjectionChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Day 180-110.3 Microns (µm)Standard Deviation 175.59
Sham InjectionChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Day 90-78.2 Microns (µm)Standard Deviation 150.05
Secondary

Number of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The numbers of patients with at least a 15 or more letter improvement in BCVA in the study eye at each visit are presented.

Time frame: Day 90, Day 180

Population: Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
700 µg DexamethasoneNumber of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeDay 9045 Number of Participants
700 µg DexamethasoneNumber of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeDay 18039 Number of Participants
350 µg DexamethasoneNumber of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeDay 9041 Number of Participants
350 µg DexamethasoneNumber of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeDay 18032 Number of Participants
Sham InjectionNumber of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeDay 9025 Number of Participants
Sham InjectionNumber of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeDay 18037 Number of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Data are grouped into the following 5 categories based on change from baseline: ≥15 Letters Improvement, ≥5 and \<15 Letters Improvement, No Change (Between -5 to +5 Letters), ≥5 and \<15 Letters Worsening, and ≥15 Letters Worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Population: Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
700 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥5 and <15 Letters Worsening7.0 Percentage of Patients
700 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by CategoryNo Change (Between -5 to +5 Letters)27.4 Percentage of Patients
700 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥15 Letters Improvement22.4 Percentage of Patients
700 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥5 and <15 Letters Improvement39.8 Percentage of Patients
700 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥15 Letters Worsening3.5 Percentage of Patients
350 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by CategoryNo Change (Between -5 to +5 Letters)23.5 Percentage of Patients
350 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥15 Letters Improvement20.9 Percentage of Patients
350 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥5 and <15 Letters Improvement42.3 Percentage of Patients
350 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥5 and <15 Letters Worsening9.2 Percentage of Patients
350 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥15 Letters Worsening4.1 Percentage of Patients
Sham InjectionPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥15 Letters Worsening5.4 Percentage of Patients
Sham InjectionPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥5 and <15 Letters Worsening13.4 Percentage of Patients
Sham InjectionPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥15 Letters Improvement12.4 Percentage of Patients
Sham InjectionPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by CategoryNo Change (Between -5 to +5 Letters)34.7 Percentage of Patients
Sham InjectionPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥5 and <15 Letters Improvement34.2 Percentage of Patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Data are grouped into the following 5 categories based on change from baseline: ≥15 Letters Improvement, ≥5 and \<15 Letters Improvement, No Change (Between -5 to +5 Letters), ≥5 and \<15 Letters Worsening, and ≥15 Letters Worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 180

Population: Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
700 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥5 and <15 Letters Worsening10.9 Percentage of Patients
700 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by CategoryNo Change (Between -5 to +5 Letters)29.4 Percentage of Patients
700 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥15 Letters Improvement19.4 Percentage of Patients
700 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥5 and <15 Letters Improvement34.8 Percentage of Patients
700 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥15 Letters Worsening5.5 Percentage of Patients
350 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by CategoryNo Change (Between -5 to +5 Letters)25.5 Percentage of Patients
350 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥15 Letters Improvement16.3 Percentage of Patients
350 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥5 and <15 Letters Improvement37.8 Percentage of Patients
350 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥5 and <15 Letters Worsening10.7 Percentage of Patients
350 µg DexamethasonePercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥15 Letters Worsening9.7 Percentage of Patients
Sham InjectionPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥15 Letters Worsening8.9 Percentage of Patients
Sham InjectionPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥5 and <15 Letters Worsening14.9 Percentage of Patients
Sham InjectionPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥15 Letters Improvement18.3 Percentage of Patients
Sham InjectionPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by CategoryNo Change (Between -5 to +5 Letters)30.2 Percentage of Patients
Sham InjectionPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by Category≥5 and <15 Letters Improvement27.7 Percentage of Patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026