Skip to content

Comparing Two Ways of Controlling Blood Sugar With Insulin in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Comparison of Two Approved Insulin Infusion Protocols for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00166491
Enrollment
238
Registered
2005-09-14
Start date
2005-07-31
Completion date
2007-03-31
Last updated
2011-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness, Hyperglycemia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is any difference between two ways of controlling blood sugar with insulin. In patients admitted to the intensive care unit, blood sugar levels often rise due to the stress of illness or surgery. Studies have shown that patients do better if their blood sugar is kept normal. In order to maintain normal blood sugar levels, the investigators often give insulin (a substance made by the body), and they decide how much to give based on how high the blood sugar is. This study will compare two different ways of deciding how much insulin to give and compare how well each method keeps the blood sugar in a normal range. Both ways of controlling blood sugar are institutionally-approved protocols and part of routine care.

Detailed description

Improved outcomes have been demonstrated with tight control of blood glucose in critically ill patients. A number of look-up algorithms based on hourly glucose measurements and titrated intravenous insulin have been developed for the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite the numerous published algorithms, no study has investigated which algorithm results in optimal glycemic control in critically ill patients. The purpose of this trial is to compare two institutionally approved intravenous insulin administration algorithms and describe subsequent glycemic control. We hypothesize that the protocol that allows for variable insulin administration for a given blood glucose (multiple algorithms) will be associated with more optimal glycemic control. Optimal glycemic control will be defined by time spent within a predetermined blood glucose range. In addition, the number of hypoglycemic episodes and mean and maximum blood glucose concentrations will also be measured. This trial will determine which insulin infusion algorithm is most effective in terms of glycemic control, and allow for standardization of glucose management in accordance with best practice.

Interventions

DRUGInsulin

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients admitted to the 7MB D/E ICU will be eligible for this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of time points within range during protocol (serum glucose 60-150 mg/dl) [%]
Mean blood glucose level during study period [mg/dl]

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time enrolled in the trial [hours]
Time from initiation of protocol to first measurement in target range (serum glucose 60-150 mg/dl) [hours]
Mean hourly intravenous (IV) insulin dose calculated daily [units/hour]
Maximum blood glucose level during study period [mg/dl]
Number of time points below range (hypoglycemic episodes with serum glucose < 60) normalized by study period [hypoglycemic glucose determinations/total glucose determinations]

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026