Skip to content

Role of Doppler Ultrasound in Severe Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage

Role of Doppler Ultrasound in Severe Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage: Can it Guide the Use of and Predict Failure of Endoscopic Treatment? A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00164905
Enrollment
121
Registered
2005-09-14
Start date
2004-09-30
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2012-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage

Keywords

Peptic ulcer hemorrhage, Doppler ultrasound

Brief summary

The aim of study is to evaluate whether Doppler ultrasound can accurately identify patients who are at risk of recurrent bleeding, who will require endoscopic therapy, and who will fail endoscopic therapy.

Detailed description

Bleeding peptic ulcer is a life-threatening emergency. Endoscopic therapy is a proven technique in the acute hemostasis of bleeding ulcers. Currently there is no objective assessment of adequacy of endoscopic therapy. Endoscopic Doppler ultrasound enables endoscopists in detecting blood flow in a vessel beneath an ulcer. A persistent signal after endoscopic therapy predicts recurrent bleeding. The current study proposes to compare assessment of ulcer base using either Doppler ultrasound or endoscopists' interpretation of ulcer floors. The trial design is one of a prospective randomized controlled cross-over study in which patients with severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding and documented peptic ulcers at endoscopy are enrolled.

Interventions

DEVICEDoppler ultrasound probe

Applying to ulcer base to assess the blood flow underneath the ulcer

Sponsors

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clean base ulcer with severe upper GIB (defined as melaena, hematochezia, hematemesis, and/or gross blood in NG lavage), and any one of the following: 1. SBP ≤ 90mmHg; P of ≥110 bpm; or orthostatic changes with SBP drops 20mmHg or P increases 20 bpm; or, 2. Transfusion of 2 or more units of packed red blood cells within 12 hrs of admission; or, 3. A documented HCT drop of at lest 6% from baseline. * Endoscopically confirmed bleeding from GU, DU, pyloric ulcer, or anastomotic ulcer * Pt can either have primary or secondary acute UGI haemorrhage

Exclusion criteria

* Bleeding site from lesion other than GU, DU, pyloric or anastomotic ulcer * there is more than one type of significant bleeding lesion * Documented hx of cirrhosis / portal HT * ESRF requiring any form of dialysis * Expected or persistent (\>24hrs) coagulopathy with INR\> 1.5 * Platelet count is under 50000/mm3 * Aspirin User / Plavix \[Clopidogrel\] User * If the ulcer is neoplastic * Cannot obtained consent * Age \< 18 or is pregnant * Severe comorbid of which life expectancy \<30 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recurrent bleedingWithin 30 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ICU utilizationWithin 56 days
Blood Transfusion during hospitalWithin 56 days
Length of stayWithin 56 days
Need for angiographic treatment of bleedingWithin 56 days
Deathwithin 56 days
Need for urgent/emergent ulcer surgery for bleedingWithin 56 days

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026