Skip to content

A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Two Strategies for the Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis in High-risk Haematology Patients

A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Current Standard Diagnostic Strategy for Invasive Aspergillosis to the New Diagnostic Strategy for Invasive Aspergillosis in High-Risk Haematology Patients in Order to Determine Which Strategy Results in the Lower Rates of Use of Empiric Antifungal Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00163722
Enrollment
240
Registered
2005-09-14
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2013-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Invasive Aspergillosis

Brief summary

Aspergillus is a fungus found in soil, on farms and on construction sites. In those whose immune system is impaired it causes severe infection. The people who are particularly at high-risk of infection with Aspergillus (which is called Invasive Aspergillosis)are those with acute leukaemia who are having chemotherapy and those post bone marrow transplantation. Currently 15% of those at high-risk develop Invasive Aspergillosis and 60-90% of those with Invasive Aspergillosis die. The main reason for this high death rate is that our current diagnostic tests are not good at detecting infection or often only detect the infection at advanced stages when treatment is ineffective. Because of the limitations of current diagnostic tests the current practice is to give empiric antifungal therapy (EAFT) early to treat suspected Invasive Aspergillosis. However studies have demonstrated that this therapy has only resulted in a minor reduction in the mortality rates and it also causes significant drug toxicity. It is a suboptimal treatment modality. New tests have recently been developed to diagnose Invasive Aspergillosis. These tests are for the detection of an Aspergillus protein in blood and for the detection of Aspergillus DNA in blood. Available data suggests that these new tests make an early diagnosis and seem to be able to monitor responses to treatment. However no study has been reported to date which demonstrates that the use of these tests can impact on important patient outcomes. This trial is being performed to determine whether the use of the new diagnostic tests to guide antifungal therapy will help improve treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis, reduce drug toxicity and reduce the death rate in the high-risk patients as compared with the current standard method of diagnosis and treatment with EAFT.

Interventions

OTHERCulture and histology
OTHERAspergillus galactomannan and PCR

Sponsors

National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
CollaboratorOTHER
Bayside Health
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients fulfilling all the following criteria will be eligible for enrolment 1. Aged 18-80 years 2. Undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for any reason OR Undergoing intensive combination chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) 3. Has given written informed consent. \-

Exclusion criteria

Patients with any of the following will be ineligible for enrolment 1. Other immunocompromised states (e.g. HIV infection, solid organ transplantation, autoimmune conditions treated with immunosuppressants etc.) besides those outlined in the inclusion criteria above 2. Currently enrolled in an antifungal treatment trial (not an antifungal prophylaxis trial) 3. Past history of proven or probable IA (as per standardized definitions) during a previous cycle of chemotherapy 4. Currently have active IA or other active invasive fungal infection 5. Prior enrolment in this study \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The proportion of patients treated with at least 1 course of empiric antifungal therapy as per protocol definition at 26 weeks following randomisation26 weeks of follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Invasive Aspergillosis related mortality rates26 weeks of follow-up
Other invasive fungal infection-related (IFI) mortality rates26 weeks of follow-up
All-cause mortality rates26 weeks of follow-up
Nephrotoxicity rates26 weeks of follow-up
Total number of courses of empiric antifungal therapy26 weeks of follow-up
Cost data associated with treatment and complications.26 weeks of follow-upTo include number of hospital admissions, hospital length of stay, total duration of antifungal therapy and number of invasive procedures to diagnose invasive aspergillosis
Incidence of proven, probable and possible invasive aspergillosis26 weeks of follow-up
Incidence of proven, probable and possible other invasive fungal disease besides invasive aspergillosis26 weeks of follow-up
Hepatotoxicity rates26 weeks of follow-up

Other

MeasureTime frame
Sub-group analysis according to type of antifungal prophylaxis, underlying disease and centre26 weeks of follow-up

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026