Skip to content

Nutritional Therapy for Stroke Patients

Nutritional Therapy for Patients With Acute Stroke and With Poor Nutritional Status or at Risk of Poor Nutritional Status

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00163007
Enrollment
125
Registered
2005-09-13
Start date
2005-05-31
Completion date
2008-06-30
Last updated
2009-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysphagia, Malnutrition, Stroke, Weight Loss

Brief summary

Prospective, short-term studies in patients admitted for acute stroke have shown an increased risk of infections, bedsores, impaired functional outcome, slower rate of recovery, poorer rehabilitation potential and higher mortality in patients with a poor nutritional status. In hospitals without routine nutritional assessment and individual nutrition management plans, the risk of patients developing malnutrition may be increased. In this study, patients admitted for acute stroke are randomised into either receiving nutritional therapy derived from estimated individual nutritional intake and nutritional needs, or nutritional therapy based on routine care without routine assessment of nutritional status, intake, or needs. The primary outcome measure is the percentage of patients with weight loss ≥ 5 % at three month follow-up.

Detailed description

Prospective, short-term studies in patients admitted for acute stroke have shown an increased risk of infections, bedsores, impaired functional outcome, slower rate of recovery, poorer rehabilitation potential and higher mortality in patients with a poor nutritional status. Sixteen percent of stroke patients are already malnourished on admission to hospital. The incidence of dysphagia in patients with acute stroke ranges from 30 to 45%. Dysphagia increases the risk of developing poor nutritional status, and new cases of malnutrition develop during the hospital stay, even during the first week. In hospitals without routine nutritional assessment and individual nutrition management plans, the risk of patients developing malnutrition may be increased. In this study patients admitted for acute stroke are randomised into either receiving nutritional therapy derived from estimated individual nutritional intake and nutritional needs, or nutritional therapy based on routine care; without routine assessment of nutritional status, intake or needs. Nutritional therapy: enriched meals, sip-feedings or enteral feedings. Parameters of nutritional status: Weight, BMI, TSF thickness, mid upper arm circumference, body composition, s-albumin and s-transferrin. Estimation of nutritional intake: Daily registration of food and drink intake. Estimating functional status: Hand grip strength, Barthels ADL index and Scandinavian stroke scale. Estimating quality of life: EQ-5D. Before the inclusion started we decided to use the percentage of patients with weight loss ≥ 5 % at 3 months follow-up as the primary outcome measure because this is correlated better to clinical outcomes as e.g. mortality and comorbidity. Secondary outcome measures were then defined as handgrip strength, quality of life, nutritional status, nutrient intake and length of hospital stay.

Interventions

PROCEDURENutritional support

Sponsors

University of Oslo
CollaboratorOTHER
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acute stroke based on clinical symptoms * 18 years old and above * \< 7 days since debut of stroke symptoms and either body mass index (BMI) = or \< 20 * Weight loss \> 5% in 3-6 months or there has been little or is likely to be no or very little nutritional intake for \> 5 days

Exclusion criteria

* Subarachnoidal bleeding and planned operation * Severe dementia * Reduced consciousness * Immobility * Expected short-time survival

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of patients with weight loss >=5 % at three month follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of life, handgrip strength and nutritional status at three months. Dietary intake in hospital. Length of hospital stay.

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026