Skip to content

Beta-Blocker Continuation Versus Interruption in Heart Failure Worsening

Beta-Blocker Continuation Versus Interruption in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure Hospitalized for Heart Failure Worsening (B-CONVINCED)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00162565
Acronym
BConvinced
Enrollment
180
Registered
2005-09-13
Start date
2004-11-30
Completion date
2009-02-28
Last updated
2009-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Congestive

Keywords

Heart Failure, Congestive, beta-Adrenergic Blockers

Brief summary

The objective of the B-Convinced study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of beta-blocker continuation compared to its interruption in patients with congestive heart failure who are treated by a beta-blocker and present with an episode of heart failure worsening with pulmonary oedema requiring hospital admission. 162 patients will be randomized in cardiology centers in France. Clinical status (primary endpoint) will be evaluated with a standardized questionnaire 3 days after hospital admission.

Detailed description

Therapeutic strategy of beta-blocker treatment during an episode of heart failure worsening remains unclear. The objective of the B-Convinced study is to demonstrate that continuation of beta-blocker treatment in case of hospitalisation for heart failure worsening is as safe as the interruption of such treatment. Hypothesis: The proportion of patients clinically improving within 3 days is not inferior when beta-blocker treatment is maintained compared to beta-blocker interruption in case of hospitalisation for heart failure worsening with pulmonary oedema. Design: Open, randomized non-inferiority trial on two parallel groups of patients. Randomization performed centrally with a vocal server. Tested Hypothesis: 90% of success in the interruption group, power of 80%, non-inferiority limit of 15% (relative reduction). 162 patients are required with such a hypothesis. Primary Endpoint: Clinical improvement within 3 days of hospital admission evaluated by the investigator by a standardized questionnaire. Secondary Endpoints: Clinical improvement at day 8 or at hospital discharge, morbidity-mortality at 4 months. 34 participating centres in France.

Interventions

DRUGbeta-blocker treatment

beta-blocker treatment

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with heart failure treated with beta-blocker; hospitalisation for heart failure worsening with pulmonary oedema. * Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%

Exclusion criteria

* Indication of intravenous positive inotropic treatment * Indication to withdraw beta-blocker treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical status (questionnaire): the percentage (%) of patients with clinical improvement is the primary endpoint criterion.at day 3 of hospital admission

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical status (evaluation by investigator and autoevaluation by patient)at day 8 after hospital admission
BNP changebetween admission, day 3 and day 8
Mortality, hospital admission, % of patients with beta-blocker treatmentat 3 months

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026