Skip to content

A Study Assessing Efficacy of Brivaracetam in Subjects With Persistent Pain After Shingles (Post-herpetic Neuralgia)

An Exploratory, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study, for the Assessment of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Ucb 34714 50 mg Oral Capsules in b.i.d. Administration at the Doses of 200 mg/Day and 400 mg/Day, in Subjects (at Least 18 Years Old) Suffering From Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00160667
Enrollment
152
Registered
2005-09-12
Start date
2004-10-11
Completion date
2006-01-05
Last updated
2019-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuralgia, Postherpetic

Keywords

Post-herpetic Neuralgia (PHN), Brivaracetam

Brief summary

Study will assess efficacy, safety and tolerability of brivaracetam in post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). Duration of 7 weeks divided into 3 periods with no up-titration, nor down-titration.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Daily oral dose of two equal intakes.

DRUGBrivaracetam

Daily oral dose of two equal intakes.

Sponsors

UCB Pharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Male/female subject aged 18 years or older. * Pain present for at least 6 months after healing of the acute herpes zoster skin rash. * Pain intensity score assessed on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale with a score of at least 4 at the screening visit and with an average weekly score of at least 4 on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale during baseline period.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject getting any kind of psychological support to help cope with pain such as biofeedback or behavioral cognitive therapy. * Subject who had undergone or who is scheduled for neurolytic or neurosurgical therapy for post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) or who receives trans-electrical neural stimulation (TENS. * Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) or permitted opioid analgesics ('strong' opioids are forbidden) that started less than 30 days and/or are not stabilized prior to screening and/or are not expected to be kept stable during the study. * Intake of more than two pain treatments at trial entry (screening visit) including Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or permitted opioid analgesics. * Subject being treated with Carbamazepine for any indication. * Known coexistent source of painful peripheral neuropathy or other systemic disease associated with a secondary painful neuropathy. * Subject being treated in the four weeks prior to screening visit with 'strong' opioid analgesics.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change in Average Pain Intensity Score From Baseline to the Last Week of the 4-week Treatment PeriodBaseline, last week of the 4-week Treatment PeriodPain intensity was scored on a 11-point numeric pain rating scale, ranging from 0 to 10 where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. A negative value in percent change from Baseline indicates a decrease in average pain intensity score from Baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreBaseline, each Evaluation visit (up to Week 4)Pain intensity was scored on a 11-point numeric pain rating scale, ranging from 0 to 10 where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. A negative value in percent change from Baseline indicates a decrease in average pain intensity score from Baseline.
Percent Change From the Baseline Period to the Last Week of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreBaseline, last assessment during the 4-week Treatment PeriodSleep interference was scored on a 11-point numerical sleep interference rating scale, ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 = 'pain does not interfere with sleep', 10 = 'pain completely interferes with sleep'. A negative value in percent change from Baseline indicates a decrease in average sleep interference score from Baseline.
Percent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreBaseline, each Evaluation visit (up to Week 4)Sleep interference was scored on a 11-point numerical sleep interference rating scale, ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 = 'pain does not interfere with sleep', 10 = 'pain completely interferes with sleep'. A negative value in percent change from Baseline indicates a decrease in average sleep interference score from Baseline.
Absolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Total Pain Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)Randomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)The SF-MPQ has three components: the first one consists of 15 subscales (descriptors: 11 sensory, 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale with 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. Three pain scores are derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory, affective and total subscales (descriptors). The SF-MPQ also includes a Present Pain Intensity (PPI) index and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Each of the 15 subscales is rated from 0=none to 3=severe pain. The Total Pain Score of the SF-MPQ is the sum of all 15 ratings and can hence vary from 0 (15\*0=0: no pain) to 60 (15\*4=60: severe pain). The mean change in total score is reported.
Absolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Sensory Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)Randomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)The main component of the SF-MPQ consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. The sensory score ranges from 0 to 33. Change = observation mean at Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit minus Randomization mean. A negative value in absolute change indicates an improvement.
Absolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Affective Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)Randomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)The main component of the SF-MPQ consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. The affective score ranges from 0 to 12. Change = observation mean at Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit minus Randomization mean. A negative value in absolute change indicates an improvement.
Responder Rate in Average Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of the Treatment Period Compared to the Baseline PeriodBaseline, last week of the 4-week Treatment PeriodA responder is defined as a subject with a \>= 30 % reduction in average pain intensity score at the Evaluation Week (last week of the Treatment Period) compared to the Baseline Period.
Absolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the SF-MPQRandomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)Pain burden was rated by the subject using the visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). A negative value in absolute change indicates an improvement in pain burden.
Percentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitRandomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)Patient´s global assessment of change in pain was performed using a seven-point scale (7= Marked improvement, 6= Moderate improvement, 5= Slight improvement, 4= No change, 3= Slight worsening, 2= Moderate worsening, 1= Marked worsening).
Percentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitRandomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)Investigator´s global assessment of change was performed using a seven-point scale (7= Marked improvement, 6= Moderate improvement, 5= Slight improvement, 4= No change, 3= Slight worsening, 2= Moderate worsening, 1= Marked worsening).
Percent Change From Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation in the Brush-evoked Allodynia Intensity Rated by the PatientRandomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)Brush-evoked allodynia intensity was assessed by the subject on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0= no pain to 10= unbearable Pain. A negative value in percent change indicates an improvement in brush-evoked allodynia intensity.
Percent Change From Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation in the Brush-evoked Allodynia Area Measured by the InvestigatorRandomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)Allodynia is pain due to a normally non-painful stimulus. The brush-evoked allodynia areas were assessed by the Investigator (location and contour of the allodynic regions drawn on a standard dermatomal map). Areas (mm²) of the allodynic regions drawn by the Investigator were afterwards computed by means of appropriate tools and calibrated templates. The larger the area in square centimeters the more allodynia. A negative value in percent change in the brush-evoked allodynia area indicates improvement.
Absolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) Score of the SF-MPQRandomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)Present pain intensity (PPI) was rated by the subject. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 5 (excruciating). A negative value in absolute change indicates an improvement in PPI.

Countries

Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, France, Germany, Poland, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study started to enroll patients in October 2004 and concluded in January 2006.

Pre-assignment details

Participant Flow refers to the Randomized Set.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Matching placebo tablets administered twice a day.
50
Brivaracetam 200 mg/Day
Brivaracetam 200 mg/day (100 mg administered twice a day).
51
Brivaracetam 400 mg/Day
Brivaracetam 400 mg/day (200 mg administered twice a day).
51
Total Title152
Total304

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event314
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy010
Overall StudyPatient decision001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject201

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboBrivaracetam 200 mg/DayBrivaracetam 400 mg/DayTotal Title
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
33 Participants29 Participants28 Participants90 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants22 Participants23 Participants62 Participants
Age, Continuous66.06 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
65.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.95
65.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.21
65.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.59
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants28 Participants30 Participants87 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants23 Participants21 Participants65 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 510 / 51
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 5019 / 5118 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 511 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Change in Average Pain Intensity Score From Baseline to the Last Week of the 4-week Treatment Period

Pain intensity was scored on a 11-point numeric pain rating scale, ranging from 0 to 10 where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. A negative value in percent change from Baseline indicates a decrease in average pain intensity score from Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, last week of the 4-week Treatment Period

Population: Only subjects with valid data for average pain intensity score at Baseline and the last week of the 4-week Treatment Period are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage Change in Average Pain Intensity Score From Baseline to the Last Week of the 4-week Treatment Period-26.16 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 30.2
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage Change in Average Pain Intensity Score From Baseline to the Last Week of the 4-week Treatment Period-26.11 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 33.73
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage Change in Average Pain Intensity Score From Baseline to the Last Week of the 4-week Treatment Period-27.36 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 34.58
p-value: =0.96595% CI: [-12.82, 13.41]ANCOVA
p-value: =0.82595% CI: [-11.69, 14.65]ANCOVA
Secondary

Absolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Affective Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)

The main component of the SF-MPQ consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. The affective score ranges from 0 to 12. Change = observation mean at Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit minus Randomization mean. A negative value in absolute change indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Randomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)

Population: Only subjects having values at randomization and at evaluation (V5) / early discontinuation are included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Affective Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)-1.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Affective Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)-0.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Affective Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)-0.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.07
Secondary

Absolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) Score of the SF-MPQ

Present pain intensity (PPI) was rated by the subject. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 5 (excruciating). A negative value in absolute change indicates an improvement in PPI.

Time frame: Randomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)

Population: Only subjects having values at randomization and at evaluation (V5) / early discontinuation are included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) Score of the SF-MPQ-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) Score of the SF-MPQ-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) Score of the SF-MPQ-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Absolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Sensory Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)

The main component of the SF-MPQ consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. The sensory score ranges from 0 to 33. Change = observation mean at Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit minus Randomization mean. A negative value in absolute change indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Randomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)

Population: Only subjects having values at randomization and at Evaluation (V5) / Early Discontinuation are included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Sensory Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)-2.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Sensory Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)-3.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Sensory Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)-4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.05
Secondary

Absolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Total Pain Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)

The SF-MPQ has three components: the first one consists of 15 subscales (descriptors: 11 sensory, 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale with 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. Three pain scores are derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory, affective and total subscales (descriptors). The SF-MPQ also includes a Present Pain Intensity (PPI) index and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Each of the 15 subscales is rated from 0=none to 3=severe pain. The Total Pain Score of the SF-MPQ is the sum of all 15 ratings and can hence vary from 0 (15\*0=0: no pain) to 60 (15\*4=60: severe pain). The mean change in total score is reported.

Time frame: Randomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)

Population: Only subjects having values at randomization and at evaluation (V5) / early discontinuation are included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Total Pain Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)-3.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.92
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Total Pain Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)-4.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Total Pain Score of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)-4.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.71
Secondary

Absolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the SF-MPQ

Pain burden was rated by the subject using the visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). A negative value in absolute change indicates an improvement in pain burden.

Time frame: Randomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)

Population: Only subjects having values at randomization and at evaluation (V5) / early discontinuation are included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the SF-MPQ-13.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.2
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the SF-MPQ-15.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.2
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayAbsolute Change From the Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the SF-MPQ-17.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.8
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit

Patient´s global assessment of change in pain was performed using a seven-point scale (7= Marked improvement, 6= Moderate improvement, 5= Slight improvement, 4= No change, 3= Slight worsening, 2= Moderate worsening, 1= Marked worsening).

Time frame: Randomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)

Population: Only subjects with valid data at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitModerate improvement29.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitSlight worsening6.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitNo change34.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitMarked improvement14.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitMarked worsening0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitModerate worsening2.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitSlight improvement12.8 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitNo change31.4 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitMarked improvement9.8 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitModerate improvement27.5 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitSlight improvement25.5 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitSlight worsening5.9 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitModerate worsening0 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitMarked worsening0 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitSlight worsening6.4 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitModerate improvement27.7 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitMarked worsening0 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitModerate worsening2.1 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitNo change29.8 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitSlight improvement10.6 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Pain Assessed by Patient's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitMarked improvement23.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation Visit

Investigator´s global assessment of change was performed using a seven-point scale (7= Marked improvement, 6= Moderate improvement, 5= Slight improvement, 4= No change, 3= Slight worsening, 2= Moderate worsening, 1= Marked worsening).

Time frame: Randomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)

Population: Only subjects with valid data at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitModerate improvement28.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitSlight worsening2.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitNo change34.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitMarked improvement10.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitMarked worsening0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitModerate worsening2.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitSlight improvement22.4 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitNo change39.2 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitMarked improvement9.8 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitModerate improvement23.5 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitSlight improvement27.5 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitSlight worsening0 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitModerate worsening0 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitMarked worsening0 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitSlight worsening13.7 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitModerate improvement23.5 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitMarked worsening0 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitModerate worsening0 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitNo change27.5 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitSlight improvement17.6 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercentage of Subjects With Categorized Change in Post-herpetic Neuralgia Assessed by Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation VisitMarked improvement17.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation in the Brush-evoked Allodynia Area Measured by the Investigator

Allodynia is pain due to a normally non-painful stimulus. The brush-evoked allodynia areas were assessed by the Investigator (location and contour of the allodynic regions drawn on a standard dermatomal map). Areas (mm²) of the allodynic regions drawn by the Investigator were afterwards computed by means of appropriate tools and calibrated templates. The larger the area in square centimeters the more allodynia. A negative value in percent change in the brush-evoked allodynia area indicates improvement.

Time frame: Randomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)

Population: Only subjects with valid data at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation in the Brush-evoked Allodynia Area Measured by the Investigator-5.39 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 17.18
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercent Change From Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation in the Brush-evoked Allodynia Area Measured by the Investigator-25.18 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 32.1
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercent Change From Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation in the Brush-evoked Allodynia Area Measured by the Investigator6.88 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 92.5
Secondary

Percent Change From Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation in the Brush-evoked Allodynia Intensity Rated by the Patient

Brush-evoked allodynia intensity was assessed by the subject on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0= no pain to 10= unbearable Pain. A negative value in percent change indicates an improvement in brush-evoked allodynia intensity.

Time frame: Randomization visit, Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit (up to Week 4)

Population: Only subjects with valid data at the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation visit are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation in the Brush-evoked Allodynia Intensity Rated by the Patient-27.4 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 34.8
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercent Change From Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation in the Brush-evoked Allodynia Intensity Rated by the Patient-12.9 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 39.3
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercent Change From Randomization Visit to the Evaluation / Early Discontinuation in the Brush-evoked Allodynia Intensity Rated by the Patient-18.2 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 70.6
Secondary

Percent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity Score

Pain intensity was scored on a 11-point numeric pain rating scale, ranging from 0 to 10 where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. A negative value in percent change from Baseline indicates a decrease in average pain intensity score from Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, each Evaluation visit (up to Week 4)

Population: Intention-To-Treat set included 50 subjects treated with Placebo, 51 subjects treated with brivaracetam (BRV) 200 mg/day, 51 subjects treated with BRV 400 mg/day. Only subjects with valid data for pain intensity score at the respective visit (week) are included in the analysis. Number of participants analyzed is given separately per visit (week).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreWeek 2-20.8 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 26.4
PlaceboPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreWeek 1-10.3 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 13.8
PlaceboPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreWeek 3-24.3 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 29.3
PlaceboPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreWeek 4-27.5 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 29.6
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreWeek 4-25.8 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 37.2
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreWeek 3-20.2 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 36.6
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreWeek 1-5.2 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 27
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreWeek 2-10.5 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 25.6
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreWeek 1-8.5 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 20.2
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreWeek 2-18.7 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 22
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreWeek 3-25.5 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 29.2
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean in the Pain Intensity ScoreWeek 4-29.1 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 33.7
Secondary

Percent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference Score

Sleep interference was scored on a 11-point numerical sleep interference rating scale, ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 = 'pain does not interfere with sleep', 10 = 'pain completely interferes with sleep'. A negative value in percent change from Baseline indicates a decrease in average sleep interference score from Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, each Evaluation visit (up to Week 4)

Population: ITT set included 50 subjects treated with Placebo, 51 subjects treated with brivaracetam (BRV) 200 mg/day, 51 subjects treated with BRV 400 mg/day. Only subjects with valid data for Sleep Interference Score at the respective visit (week) are included in the analysis. Number of participants analyzed is given separately per visit (week).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreWeek 1-13.06 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 23.83
PlaceboPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreWeek 2-33.28 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 35.27
PlaceboPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreWeek 3-34.75 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 38.22
PlaceboPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreWeek 4-42.92 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 36.37
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreWeek 4-22.05 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 54.92
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreWeek 1-6.96 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 28.63
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreWeek 3-12.86 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 55.79
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreWeek 2-5.69 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 46.43
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreWeek 4-37.60 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 55.77
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreWeek 2-27.38 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 49.76
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreWeek 3-35.46 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 55.88
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to Each Weekly Mean of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference ScoreWeek 1-18.01 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 45.27
Secondary

Percent Change From the Baseline Period to the Last Week of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference Score

Sleep interference was scored on a 11-point numerical sleep interference rating scale, ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 = 'pain does not interfere with sleep', 10 = 'pain completely interferes with sleep'. A negative value in percent change from Baseline indicates a decrease in average sleep interference score from Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, last assessment during the 4-week Treatment Period

Population: Only subjects with valid data for Sleep Interference Score are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From the Baseline Period to the Last Week of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference Score-42.00 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 37.41
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to the Last Week of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference Score-23.33 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 51.34
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayPercent Change From the Baseline Period to the Last Week of the Treatment Period in the Sleep Interference Score-30.17 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 59.27
Secondary

Responder Rate in Average Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of the Treatment Period Compared to the Baseline Period

A responder is defined as a subject with a \>= 30 % reduction in average pain intensity score at the Evaluation Week (last week of the Treatment Period) compared to the Baseline Period.

Time frame: Baseline, last week of the 4-week Treatment Period

Population: Only subjects with valid data for average pain intensity score at Baseline and the last week of the 4-week Treatment Period are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboResponder Rate in Average Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of the Treatment Period Compared to the Baseline Period33.3 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 200 mg/DayResponder Rate in Average Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of the Treatment Period Compared to the Baseline Period37.3 percentage of participants
Brivaracetam 400 mg/DayResponder Rate in Average Pain Intensity Score at the Last Week of the Treatment Period Compared to the Baseline Period40.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026