Skip to content

A Long Term Extension Study Evaluating Safety Of Sildenafil Citrate When Used To Treat Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) In Children

A Multicenter, Long-Term Extension Study to Assess Safety of Oral Sildenafil Citrate In The Treatment Of Subjects Who Have Completed Study A1481131

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00159874
Enrollment
234
Registered
2005-09-12
Start date
2004-01-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2021-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Keywords

children

Brief summary

Active treatment, dose-blinded extension study evaluating the safety and long term efficacy of sildenafil citrate in children with PAH.

Interventions

DRUGSildenafil citrate

Oral, subjects with body weight ≥8 - 20 kg: 20 mg 3 times a day (tid) subjects with body weight \>20 - 45 kg: 40 mg 3 times a day (tid) subjects with body weight \>45 kg: 80 mg 3 times a day (tid)

Sponsors

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must complete the 16 Week double-blind efficacy study A1481131.

Exclusion criteria

* Any patient who did not complete Study A1481131.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Reporting at Least One Adverse EventUp to Follow-Up visit (30 to 40 days after study completion or treatment discontinuation)Safety was measured according to standard adverse event collection as described in the adverse event section of the results. Complete tables of the adverse events according to the A1481156 treatment groups are provided in the reported adverse event section.
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Adverse EventsUp to Follow-Up visit (30 to 40 days after study completion or treatment discontinuation)Safety was measured according to standard adverse event collection as described in the adverse event section of the results.
Number of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse EventUp to Follow-Up visit (30 to 40 days after study completion or treatment discontinuation)Safety was measured according to standard adverse event collection as described in the adverse event section of the results. Complete tables of the serious adverse events according to the A1481156 treatment groups are provided in the reported adverse event section.
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Serious Adverse EventsUp to Follow-Up visit (30 to 40 days after study completion or treatment discontinuation)All serious adverse events regardless of treatment group or suspected relationship to study drug were reported. Investigators were to provide independent determination of possible causality of any serious adverse event.
Number of Deaths Reported in the Study Prior to the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) Recommendation of Dose Down TitrationPre-DMC Recommendation dose down titration (04 August 2011)Deaths were reported immediately independent of the circumstances or suspected cause at any time during the study through the last follow-up visit or 30 days after the last administration of study drug, whichever comes later.
Number of Deaths Reported During This StudyLast follow-up visit or 30 days after the last administration of study drugDeaths were reported immediately independent of the circumstances or suspected cause at any time during the study through the last follow-up visit or 30 days after the last administration of study drug, whichever comes later.
Discontinuation Due to IntolerabilityThroughout the treatment duration (median treatment duration 1689 to 1744 days)Participant who experienced drug-related intolerance, the participant's dose was reduced by 50%. If, after a dose reduction, the participant continued to appear intolerant, they were discontinued from study treatment.
Downtitration in Dose Due to Intolerability.Pre-DMC recomendation (04 August 2011)Based on review of the survival data, DMC concluded that the high dose of sildenafil was associated with a harmful effect on survival when compared to the low dose. The DMC also expressed concern as to the potential dose-response relationship between increasing dose and mortality. Therefore, on 04 August 2011, the DMC recommended discontinuation of the 40 mg and 80 mg three times a day (TID) doses, as well as the 20 mg TID dose in children with body weight ≤20 kg. The protocol was amended per DMC recommendations.
Number of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Visual Acuity Safety TestsWeek 36Visual Acuity is measured either using the reduced Snellen test or via Teller cards, and was assessed in the left and right eyes separately. There were 9 lines on the reduced Snellen chart which were coded as 6/60, 6/36, 6/24, 6/18, 6/12, 6/9, 6/6, 6/5, 6/4 (where 6/60 was the easiest to read and 6/4 was the most difficult to read). If a participant experienced a visual adverse event the investigator was asked to perform additional ocular assessments either at the visit when the participant reported the visual adverse event or at an unplanned visit.
Number of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Color Vision Monitoring Safety Tests.Week 36Colour vision was measured where appropriate via the Farnsworth-Munsell D-15 Hue test. This test was performed in both eyes simultaneously or just in a single specific eye. If using a single eye the same eye was used throughout the study. In case of young participants an age-and-ability-appropriate evaluation such as the Ishihara Test for Unlettered Persons were conducted.
Pediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Week 16Participant's cognitive development status was assessed at A1481156 baseline (Week 16 in A1481131; NCT00159913) using the physician assessment questions. Assessment question (i.e., compared to other children the participant's age group is this participant's cognitive development limited?) included the following criteria : severely limited, moderately limited, mildly limited and not limited.
Pediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Week 52Participant's cognitive development status was assessed at Week 52 using the physician assessment questions. Assessment question (i.e., compared to other children the participant's age group is this participant's cognitive development limited?) included the following criteria : severely limited, moderately limited, mildly limited and not limited.
Pediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Week 16Participant's motor development status was assessed at A1481156 baseline (Week 16 in A1481131; NCT00159913) using the physician assessment questions. Assessment question (i.e., compared to other children the participant's age group is this participant's motor development limited?) included the following criteria : severely limited, moderately limited, mildly limited and not limited.
Pediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Week 52Participant's motor development status was assessed at Week 52 using the physician assessment questions. Assessment question (i.e., compared to other children the participant's age group is this participant's motor development limited?) included the following criteria : severely limited, moderately limited, mildly limited and not limited.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Physical Scale at Year 1.Baseline, Year 1CHQ: 50-item, 15 subscale parent or legal guardian assessed instrument of child's physical, emotional, social well-being, and relative burden of disease on the parents; rated on Likert-type scale: range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a more positive health status. Global indicators for Physical Health and Psychosocial Health are weighted composites derived from subscale items using scoring algorithms (transformed scores); range 0 to 100: higher scores indicate more positive health status.
Peak Volume of Oxygen (VO2) Consumed at Year 1 Using a Bicycle Ergometry Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)1 yearExercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to determine the peak volume of VO2 consumed. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant
Physician Global Assessment at Year 1Year 1The physician global assessment of disease severity was assessed at Year 1 in this extension study. The number and percentage of participants with markedly improved, moderately improved, mild improvement, no change, slightly worse, moderately worse, markedly worse were evaluated. Participants who withdrew from study treatment after at least 10 weeks of treatment were requested to perform the global assessments.
Participant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Year 1The participant (parent) global assessment of disease severity was assessed at Year 1 in this extension study. The number and percentage of participants markedly improved, moderately improved, mild improvement, no change, slightly worse, moderately worse, markedly worse were evaluated. Participants who withdrew from study treatment after at least 10 weeks of treatment were requested to perform the global assessments.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Peak VO2 at Year 1.Baseline, Year 1Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to measure the percent predicted peak VO2 at Week 16 and Year 1. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant.
Percent Change From Baseline in Time to Maximum VO2 at Year 1Baseline, Year 1Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to determine the time to maximum VO2. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant.
Percent Change From Baseline in Respiratory Exchange Ratio at Year 1Baseline, Year 1This is the ratio of carbon dioxide (CO2) produced to O2 consumed \[VCO2/VO2\]. Exercise Tolerance Test was performed on developmentally able participants to determine the respiratory exchange ratio on week 16 and Year 1. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913).
Percent Change From Start of Sildenafil in Total Ventilation (VE) to Year 1Year 1Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to determine the total ventilation. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant.
Percentage Change From Baseline in End Tidal Oxygen (O2) at Year 1.Baseline, Year 1Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to measure the End Tidal O2 at Year 1. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant.
Percentage Change From Baseline in End Tidal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) at Year 1.Baseline, Year 1Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to measure the End Tidal CO2 at Year 1. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Anaerobic Threshold at Year 1.Baseline, Year 1Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to measure the anaerobic threshold at Week 16 and Year 1. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant.
Summary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Baseline, Year 1The WHO PH functional classification was as follows: Class I : Participants with PH but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Class II : Participants with PH resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III : Participants with PH resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV : Participants with PH with inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Changes from baseline in functional class were summarized at Years 1, 2, 3, and 4. Numbers of participants improving by 3 classes, improving by 2 classes, improving by 1 class, not changing, worsening by 1 class, worsening by 2 classes or worsening by 3 classes from A1481131 baseline at Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 were evaluated.
Summary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Baseline, Year 2The WHO PH functional classification was as follows: Class I : Participants with PH but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Class II : Participants with PH resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III : Participants with PH resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV : Participants with PH with inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Changes from baseline in functional class were summarised at Years 1, 2, 3, and 4. Numbers of participants improving by 3 classes, improving by 2 classes, improving by 1 class, not changing, worsening by 1 class, worsening by 2 classes or worsening by 3 classes from A1481131 baseline at Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 were evaluated.
Summary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Baseline, Year 3The WHO PH functional classification was as follows: Class I : Participants with PH but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Class II : Participants with PH resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III : Participants with PH resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV : Participants with PH with inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Changes from baseline in functional class were summarised at Years 1, 2, 3, and 4. Numbers of participants improving by 3 classes, improving by 2 classes, improving by 1 class, not changing, worsening by 1 class, worsening by 2 classes or worsening by 3 classes from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline at Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 were evaluated.
Summary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Baseline, Year 4The WHO PH functional classification was as follows: Class I : Participants with PH but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Class II : Participants with PH resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III : Participants with PH resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV : Participants with PH with inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Changes from baseline in functional class were summarised at Years 1, 2, 3, and 4. Numbers of participants improving by 3 classes, improving by 2 classes, improving by 1 class, not changing, worsening by 1 class, worsening by 2 classes or worsening by 3 classes from A1481131 baseline at Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 were evaluated.
Additions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyUp to the end of studyThis was defined as an addition or discontinuation in the class(es) of drugs used as background medication (e.g., anticoagulants, oxygen, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, and digoxin) compared to baseline of Study A1481131 (NCT00159913).
Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Psychosocial Scale at Year 1.Baseline, Year 1CHQ: 50-item, 15 subscale parent or legal guardian assessed instrument of child's physical, emotional, social well-being, and relative burden of disease on the parents; rated on Likert-type scale: range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a more positive health status. Global indicators for Physical Health and Psychosocial Health are weighted composites derived from subscale items using scoring algorithms (transformed scores); range 0 to 100: higher scores indicate more positive health status.

Countries

Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Guatemala, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Sweden, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This extension study included 220 participants at 31 sites. 14 participants did not go from A1481131 (NCT00159913) to A1481156. Participants from one center in Canada participated in base study A1481131 (NCT00159913) but not in this extension study.

Pre-assignment details

Participants remained in the same dose group as in study A1481131 (NCT00159913). Participants randomized to placebo in NCT00159913 were rerandomized to sildenafil in A1481156. Placebo participants in low weight category were rerandomized to medium or high dose (1:2) and other weight categories were rerandomized to low, medium or high dose (1:1:1).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sildenafil Low/Low Dose
Participants randomized to sildenafil low dose in study A1481131 (NCT00159913) and in the extension study A1481156
42
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium Dose
Participants randomized to sildenafil medium dose in study A1481131 (NCT00159913) and in the extension study A1481156
55
Sildenafil High/ High Dose
Participants randomized to sildenafil high dose in study A1481131 (NCT00159913) and in the extension study A1481156
77
Placebo/ Low Dose
Participants randomized to placebo in study A1481131 (NCT00159913) and randomized to sildenafil low dose in study A1481156
13
Placebo/ Medium Dose
Participants randomized to placebo in study A1481131 (NCT00159913) and randomized to sildenafil medium dose in study A1481156
19
Placebo/ High Dose
Participants randomized to placebo in study A1481131 (NCT00159913) and randomized to sildenafil high dose in study A1481156
23
Placebo Non-randomized
This group comprised those placebo participants who either discontinued from base study A1481131 (NCT00159913) or chose not to enter study A1481156 and hence not randomly assigned to a sildenafil dose group at the start of study A1481156
5
Total234

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Overall StudyAdverse Event2251120
Overall StudyDeath38150120
Overall StudyDoes Not Meet Entrance Criteria1010000
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2011030
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1030121
Overall StudyOther8880213
Overall StudyPregnancy1100000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0520000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2684321

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSildenafil Low/Low DoseTotalPlacebo Non-randomizedPlacebo/ High DosePlacebo/ Medium DosePlacebo/ Low DoseSildenafil High/ High DoseSildenafil Medium/ Medium Dose
Age, Customized
13-17
17 Participants73 Participants2 Participants7 Participants6 Participants1 Participants22 Participants18 Participants
Age, Customized
1-4
0 Participants35 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants19 Participants9 Participants
Age, Customized
>=18
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
5-12
25 Participants126 Participants2 Participants14 Participants10 Participants11 Participants36 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants145 Participants3 Participants15 Participants11 Participants9 Participants51 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants89 Participants2 Participants8 Participants8 Participants4 Participants26 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
51 / 5570 / 7487 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 5537 / 7448 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Discontinuation Due to Intolerability

Participant who experienced drug-related intolerance, the participant's dose was reduced by 50%. If, after a dose reduction, the participant continued to appear intolerant, they were discontinued from study treatment.

Time frame: Throughout the treatment duration (median treatment duration 1689 to 1744 days)

Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseDiscontinuation Due to Intolerability2 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseDiscontinuation Due to Intolerability1 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseDiscontinuation Due to Intolerability3 Participants
Primary

Downtitration in Dose Due to Intolerability.

Based on review of the survival data, DMC concluded that the high dose of sildenafil was associated with a harmful effect on survival when compared to the low dose. The DMC also expressed concern as to the potential dose-response relationship between increasing dose and mortality. Therefore, on 04 August 2011, the DMC recommended discontinuation of the 40 mg and 80 mg three times a day (TID) doses, as well as the 20 mg TID dose in children with body weight ≤20 kg. The protocol was amended per DMC recommendations.

Time frame: Pre-DMC recomendation (04 August 2011)

Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseDowntitration in Dose Due to Intolerability.0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseDowntitration in Dose Due to Intolerability.0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseDowntitration in Dose Due to Intolerability.3 Participants
Placebo/ Low DoseDowntitration in Dose Due to Intolerability.0 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DoseDowntitration in Dose Due to Intolerability.2 Participants
Placebo/ High DoseDowntitration in Dose Due to Intolerability.1 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedDowntitration in Dose Due to Intolerability.0 Participants
Primary

Number of Deaths Reported During This Study

Deaths were reported immediately independent of the circumstances or suspected cause at any time during the study through the last follow-up visit or 30 days after the last administration of study drug, whichever comes later.

Time frame: Last follow-up visit or 30 days after the last administration of study drug

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who had taken at least one dose of study medication in A1481131 (NCT00159913).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseNumber of Deaths Reported During This Study5 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseNumber of Deaths Reported During This Study13 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseNumber of Deaths Reported During This Study24 Participants
Primary

Number of Deaths Reported in the Study Prior to the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) Recommendation of Dose Down Titration

Deaths were reported immediately independent of the circumstances or suspected cause at any time during the study through the last follow-up visit or 30 days after the last administration of study drug, whichever comes later.

Time frame: Pre-DMC Recommendation dose down titration (04 August 2011)

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who had taken at least one dose of study medication in A1481131 (NCT00159913).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseNumber of Deaths Reported in the Study Prior to the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) Recommendation of Dose Down Titration5 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseNumber of Deaths Reported in the Study Prior to the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) Recommendation of Dose Down Titration10 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseNumber of Deaths Reported in the Study Prior to the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) Recommendation of Dose Down Titration22 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Reporting at Least One Adverse Event

Safety was measured according to standard adverse event collection as described in the adverse event section of the results. Complete tables of the adverse events according to the A1481156 treatment groups are provided in the reported adverse event section.

Time frame: Up to Follow-Up visit (30 to 40 days after study completion or treatment discontinuation)

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who had taken at least one dose of study medication in A1481131 (NCT00159913).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Adverse Event41 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Adverse Event55 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Adverse Event73 Participants
Placebo/ Low DoseNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Adverse Event13 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DoseNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Adverse Event19 Participants
Placebo/ High DoseNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Adverse Event22 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Adverse Event3 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event

Safety was measured according to standard adverse event collection as described in the adverse event section of the results. Complete tables of the serious adverse events according to the A1481156 treatment groups are provided in the reported adverse event section.

Time frame: Up to Follow-Up visit (30 to 40 days after study completion or treatment discontinuation)

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who had taken at least one dose of study medication in A1481131 (NCT00159913).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event13 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event33 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event38 Participants
Placebo/ Low DoseNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event1 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DoseNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event4 Participants
Placebo/ High DoseNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event10 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedNumber of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Adverse Events

Safety was measured according to standard adverse event collection as described in the adverse event section of the results.

Time frame: Up to Follow-Up visit (30 to 40 days after study completion or treatment discontinuation)

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who had taken at least one dose of study medication in A1481131 (NCT00159913).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Adverse Events20 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Adverse Events24 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Adverse Events41 Participants
Placebo/ Low DoseNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Adverse Events9 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DoseNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Adverse Events9 Participants
Placebo/ High DoseNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Adverse Events11 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Adverse Events3 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Serious Adverse Events

All serious adverse events regardless of treatment group or suspected relationship to study drug were reported. Investigators were to provide independent determination of possible causality of any serious adverse event.

Time frame: Up to Follow-Up visit (30 to 40 days after study completion or treatment discontinuation)

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who had taken at least one dose of study medication in A1481131 (NCT00159913).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Serious Adverse Events1 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Serious Adverse Events1 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Serious Adverse Events4 Participants
Placebo/ Low DoseNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DoseNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
Placebo/ High DoseNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Color Vision Monitoring Safety Tests.

Colour vision was measured where appropriate via the Farnsworth-Munsell D-15 Hue test. This test was performed in both eyes simultaneously or just in a single specific eye. If using a single eye the same eye was used throughout the study. In case of young participants an age-and-ability-appropriate evaluation such as the Ishihara Test for Unlettered Persons were conducted.

Time frame: Week 36

Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Color Vision Monitoring Safety Tests.2 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Color Vision Monitoring Safety Tests.2 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Color Vision Monitoring Safety Tests.1 Participants
Placebo/ Low DoseNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Color Vision Monitoring Safety Tests.0 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DoseNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Color Vision Monitoring Safety Tests.0 Participants
Placebo/ High DoseNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Color Vision Monitoring Safety Tests.1 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Color Vision Monitoring Safety Tests.1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Visual Acuity Safety Tests

Visual Acuity is measured either using the reduced Snellen test or via Teller cards, and was assessed in the left and right eyes separately. There were 9 lines on the reduced Snellen chart which were coded as 6/60, 6/36, 6/24, 6/18, 6/12, 6/9, 6/6, 6/5, 6/4 (where 6/60 was the easiest to read and 6/4 was the most difficult to read). If a participant experienced a visual adverse event the investigator was asked to perform additional ocular assessments either at the visit when the participant reported the visual adverse event or at an unplanned visit.

Time frame: Week 36

Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Visual Acuity Safety Tests10 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Visual Acuity Safety Tests11 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Visual Acuity Safety Tests17 Participants
Placebo/ Low DoseNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Visual Acuity Safety Tests0 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DoseNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Visual Acuity Safety Tests4 Participants
Placebo/ High DoseNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Visual Acuity Safety Tests4 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedNumber of Participants With Deterioration Post Baseline in Visual Acuity Safety Tests0 Participants
Primary

Pediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.

Participant's cognitive development status was assessed at A1481156 baseline (Week 16 in A1481131; NCT00159913) using the physician assessment questions. Assessment question (i.e., compared to other children the participant's age group is this participant's cognitive development limited?) included the following criteria : severely limited, moderately limited, mildly limited and not limited.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913). Participants with observed data were included in table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited2 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited5 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited6 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited26 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited38 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited7 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited4 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited6 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited12 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited8 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited2 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited54 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited0 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited1 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited1 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited11 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited1 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited12 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited5 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited1 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited2 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited1 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited1 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited19 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedPediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited0 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedPediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited0 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedPediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited1 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedPediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited1 Participants
Primary

Pediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.

Participant's cognitive development status was assessed at Week 52 using the physician assessment questions. Assessment question (i.e., compared to other children the participant's age group is this participant's cognitive development limited?) included the following criteria : severely limited, moderately limited, mildly limited and not limited.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913). Participants with observed data were included in table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Severely Limited1 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Mildly Limited3 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Moderately Limited5 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Not Limited27 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Moderately Limited10 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Not Limited36 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Severely Limited1 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Mildly Limited5 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Not Limited50 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Severely Limited2 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Moderately Limited6 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Mildly Limited8 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Not Limited11 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Severely Limited0 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Mildly Limited0 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Moderately Limited1 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Moderately Limited5 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Severely Limited0 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Mildly Limited3 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Not Limited10 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Not Limited15 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Moderately Limited2 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Mildly Limited3 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Cognitive Development Status at Week 52.Severely Limited0 Participants
Primary

Pediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.

Participant's motor development status was assessed at A1481156 baseline (Week 16 in A1481131; NCT00159913) using the physician assessment questions. Assessment question (i.e., compared to other children the participant's age group is this participant's motor development limited?) included the following criteria : severely limited, moderately limited, mildly limited and not limited.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913). Participants with observed data were included in table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited24 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited10 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited5 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited11 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited5 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited39 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited20 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited7 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited49 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited12 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited0 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited0 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited1 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited5 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited1 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited9 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited4 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited1 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited2 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited0 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited20 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedPediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Not Limited1 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedPediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Severely Limited0 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedPediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Moderately Limited1 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedPediatric Motor Development Status at Week 16.Mildly Limited0 Participants
Primary

Pediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52

Participant's motor development status was assessed at Week 52 using the physician assessment questions. Assessment question (i.e., compared to other children the participant's age group is this participant's motor development limited?) included the following criteria : severely limited, moderately limited, mildly limited and not limited.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913). Participants with observed data were included in table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Severely Limited0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Not Limited24 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Mildly Limited8 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Moderately Limited4 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Not Limited35 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Moderately Limited9 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Severely Limited0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Mildly Limited8 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Mildly Limited15 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Moderately Limited5 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Severely Limited0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Not Limited46 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Mildly Limited3 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Moderately Limited0 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Severely Limited0 Participants
Placebo/ Low DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Not Limited9 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Not Limited10 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Moderately Limited2 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Severely Limited0 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Mildly Limited6 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Moderately Limited0 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Severely Limited0 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Not Limited17 Participants
Placebo/ High DosePediatric Motor Development Status at Week 52Mildly Limited3 Participants
Secondary

Additions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of Study

This was defined as an addition or discontinuation in the class(es) of drugs used as background medication (e.g., anticoagulants, oxygen, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, and digoxin) compared to baseline of Study A1481131 (NCT00159913).

Time frame: Up to the end of study

Population: An ITT population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAll Classes (N = 18, 26, 43, 7, 8, 14, 4)6 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAt least one class (N = 42, 55, 77, 13, 19, 23, 5)13 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAt least one class (N = 42, 55, 77, 13, 19, 23, 5)13 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAll Classes (N = 18, 26, 43, 7, 8, 14, 4)5 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAll Classes (N = 18, 26, 43, 7, 8, 14, 4)11 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAt least one class (N = 42, 55, 77, 13, 19, 23, 5)23 Participants
Placebo/ Low DoseAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAt least one class (N = 42, 55, 77, 13, 19, 23, 5)3 Participants
Placebo/ Low DoseAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAll Classes (N = 18, 26, 43, 7, 8, 14, 4)2 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DoseAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAll Classes (N = 18, 26, 43, 7, 8, 14, 4)1 Participants
Placebo/ Medium DoseAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAt least one class (N = 42, 55, 77, 13, 19, 23, 5)5 Participants
Placebo/ High DoseAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAll Classes (N = 18, 26, 43, 7, 8, 14, 4)2 Participants
Placebo/ High DoseAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAt least one class (N = 42, 55, 77, 13, 19, 23, 5)2 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAt least one class (N = 42, 55, 77, 13, 19, 23, 5)1 Participants
Placebo Non-randomizedAdditions From Baseline in Background Therapy up to the End of StudyAll Classes (N = 18, 26, 43, 7, 8, 14, 4)1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Physical Scale at Year 1.

CHQ: 50-item, 15 subscale parent or legal guardian assessed instrument of child's physical, emotional, social well-being, and relative burden of disease on the parents; rated on Likert-type scale: range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a more positive health status. Global indicators for Physical Health and Psychosocial Health are weighted composites derived from subscale items using scoring algorithms (transformed scores); range 0 to 100: higher scores indicate more positive health status.

Time frame: Baseline, Year 1

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug in base study; certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4, 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline. Participants \>= 5 years at baseline with questionnaire translated were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Physical Scale at Year 1.14.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.06
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Physical Scale at Year 1.9.34 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.45
Sildenafil High/ High DoseChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Physical Scale at Year 1.5.91 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.17
Placebo/ Low DoseChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Physical Scale at Year 1.8.51 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.27
Placebo/ Medium DoseChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Physical Scale at Year 1.9.86 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.93
Placebo/ High DoseChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Physical Scale at Year 1.4.64 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.03
Placebo Non-randomizedChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Physical Scale at Year 1.NA Units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Psychosocial Scale at Year 1.

CHQ: 50-item, 15 subscale parent or legal guardian assessed instrument of child's physical, emotional, social well-being, and relative burden of disease on the parents; rated on Likert-type scale: range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a more positive health status. Global indicators for Physical Health and Psychosocial Health are weighted composites derived from subscale items using scoring algorithms (transformed scores); range 0 to 100: higher scores indicate more positive health status.

Time frame: Baseline, Year 1

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug in base study; certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4, 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline. Participants \>= 5 years at baseline with questionnaire translated were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Psychosocial Scale at Year 1.5.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Psychosocial Scale at Year 1.3.92 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.25
Sildenafil High/ High DoseChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Psychosocial Scale at Year 1.3.48 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.55
Placebo/ Low DoseChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Psychosocial Scale at Year 1.13.74 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.42
Placebo/ Medium DoseChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Psychosocial Scale at Year 1.5.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Placebo/ High DoseChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Psychosocial Scale at Year 1.4.27 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.19
Placebo Non-randomizedChange From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF28) as Assessed by the Psychosocial Scale at Year 1.NA Units on a scale
Secondary

Participant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1

The participant (parent) global assessment of disease severity was assessed at Year 1 in this extension study. The number and percentage of participants markedly improved, moderately improved, mild improvement, no change, slightly worse, moderately worse, markedly worse were evaluated. Participants who withdrew from study treatment after at least 10 weeks of treatment were requested to perform the global assessments.

Time frame: Year 1

Population: An ITT population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Markedly Improved9 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Markedly Worse0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1No Change13 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Missing2 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Slightly Worse1 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Died0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Moderately Improved13 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Moderately Worse0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Discontinued5 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Mild Improvement12 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Slightly Worse2 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Markedly Improved14 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Moderately Improved27 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Mild Improvement15 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1No Change6 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Moderately Worse1 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Markedly Worse0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Discontinued4 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Died0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Missing5 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Markedly Worse0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Moderately Improved26 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Slightly Worse0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Discontinued10 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Markedly Improved21 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1No Change21 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Missing6 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Moderately Worse0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Mild Improvement15 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseParticipant (Parent) Global Assessment at Year 1Died1 Participants
Secondary

Peak Volume of Oxygen (VO2) Consumed at Year 1 Using a Bicycle Ergometry Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)

Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to determine the peak volume of VO2 consumed. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant

Time frame: 1 year

Population: An ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline. Only developmentally able participants were used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePeak Volume of Oxygen (VO2) Consumed at Year 1 Using a Bicycle Ergometry Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)19.97 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 5.17
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePeak Volume of Oxygen (VO2) Consumed at Year 1 Using a Bicycle Ergometry Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)18.69 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 5.92
Sildenafil High/ High DosePeak Volume of Oxygen (VO2) Consumed at Year 1 Using a Bicycle Ergometry Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPX)17.93 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.02
Comparison: Analyses were performed using analysis of covariance with etiology, weight, day of assessment and baseline peak VO2 as the covariates.p-value: 0.25395% CI: [-19.13, 5.09]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analyses were performed using analysis of covariance with etiology, weight, day of assessment and baseline peak VO2 as the covariates.p-value: 0.195% CI: [-21.6, 1.93]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analyses were performed using analysis of covariance with etiology, weight, day of assessment and baseline peak VO2 as the covariates.p-value: 0.6495% CI: [-14.75, 9.11]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Anaerobic Threshold at Year 1.

Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to measure the anaerobic threshold at Week 16 and Year 1. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant.

Time frame: Baseline, Year 1

Population: An ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline. Only developmentally able participants were used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePercentage Change From Baseline in Anaerobic Threshold at Year 1.-1.22 PercentStandard Deviation 23.06
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePercentage Change From Baseline in Anaerobic Threshold at Year 1.1.99 PercentStandard Deviation 29.54
Sildenafil High/ High DosePercentage Change From Baseline in Anaerobic Threshold at Year 1.3.28 PercentStandard Deviation 29.36
Placebo/ Low DosePercentage Change From Baseline in Anaerobic Threshold at Year 1.7.23 PercentStandard Deviation 12.31
Placebo/ Medium DosePercentage Change From Baseline in Anaerobic Threshold at Year 1.-3.59 PercentStandard Deviation 28.29
Placebo/ High DosePercentage Change From Baseline in Anaerobic Threshold at Year 1.8.96 PercentStandard Deviation 32.55
Placebo Non-randomizedPercentage Change From Baseline in Anaerobic Threshold at Year 1.NA Percent
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in End Tidal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) at Year 1.

Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to measure the End Tidal CO2 at Year 1. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant.

Time frame: Baseline, Year 1

Population: An ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline. Only developmentally able participants were used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePercentage Change From Baseline in End Tidal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) at Year 1.7.83 PercentStandard Deviation 16.35
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePercentage Change From Baseline in End Tidal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) at Year 1.7.68 PercentStandard Deviation 18.74
Sildenafil High/ High DosePercentage Change From Baseline in End Tidal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) at Year 1.13.16 PercentStandard Deviation 31.38
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in End Tidal Oxygen (O2) at Year 1.

Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to measure the End Tidal O2 at Year 1. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant.

Time frame: Baseline, Year 1

Population: An ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline. Only developmentally able participants were used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePercentage Change From Baseline in End Tidal Oxygen (O2) at Year 1.0.59 PercentStandard Deviation 3.79
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePercentage Change From Baseline in End Tidal Oxygen (O2) at Year 1.-0.52 PercentStandard Deviation 3.55
Sildenafil High/ High DosePercentage Change From Baseline in End Tidal Oxygen (O2) at Year 1.0.08 PercentStandard Deviation 3.68
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Peak VO2 at Year 1.

Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to measure the percent predicted peak VO2 at Week 16 and Year 1. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant.

Time frame: Baseline, Year 1

Population: An ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline. Only developmentally able participants were used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePercentage Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Peak VO2 at Year 1.12.79 PercentStandard Deviation 22.71
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePercentage Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Peak VO2 at Year 1.7.65 PercentStandard Deviation 34.57
Sildenafil High/ High DosePercentage Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Peak VO2 at Year 1.5.83 PercentStandard Deviation 23.54
Placebo/ Low DosePercentage Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Peak VO2 at Year 1.8.70 PercentStandard Deviation 25.99
Placebo/ Medium DosePercentage Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Peak VO2 at Year 1.0.20 PercentStandard Deviation 22.32
Placebo/ High DosePercentage Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Peak VO2 at Year 1.-6.13 PercentStandard Deviation 7.46
Placebo Non-randomizedPercentage Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Peak VO2 at Year 1.NA Percent
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Respiratory Exchange Ratio at Year 1

This is the ratio of carbon dioxide (CO2) produced to O2 consumed \[VCO2/VO2\]. Exercise Tolerance Test was performed on developmentally able participants to determine the respiratory exchange ratio on week 16 and Year 1. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913).

Time frame: Baseline, Year 1

Population: An ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline. Only developmentally able participants were used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePercent Change From Baseline in Respiratory Exchange Ratio at Year 12.15 PercentStandard Deviation 8.73
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePercent Change From Baseline in Respiratory Exchange Ratio at Year 15.63 PercentStandard Deviation 13.37
Sildenafil High/ High DosePercent Change From Baseline in Respiratory Exchange Ratio at Year 10.68 PercentStandard Deviation 11.5
Placebo/ Low DosePercent Change From Baseline in Respiratory Exchange Ratio at Year 1-3.69 PercentStandard Deviation 7.24
Placebo/ Medium DosePercent Change From Baseline in Respiratory Exchange Ratio at Year 10.27 PercentStandard Deviation 11.04
Placebo/ High DosePercent Change From Baseline in Respiratory Exchange Ratio at Year 110.75 PercentStandard Deviation 17.76
Placebo Non-randomizedPercent Change From Baseline in Respiratory Exchange Ratio at Year 1NA Percent
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Time to Maximum VO2 at Year 1

Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to determine the time to maximum VO2. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant.

Time frame: Baseline, Year 1

Population: An ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline. Only developmentally able participants were used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePercent Change From Baseline in Time to Maximum VO2 at Year 125.47 PercentStandard Deviation 35.67
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePercent Change From Baseline in Time to Maximum VO2 at Year 113.08 PercentStandard Deviation 33.42
Sildenafil High/ High DosePercent Change From Baseline in Time to Maximum VO2 at Year 17.70 PercentStandard Deviation 33.01
Placebo/ Low DosePercent Change From Baseline in Time to Maximum VO2 at Year 121.17 PercentStandard Deviation 57.25
Placebo/ Medium DosePercent Change From Baseline in Time to Maximum VO2 at Year 136.68 PercentStandard Deviation 101.65
Placebo/ High DosePercent Change From Baseline in Time to Maximum VO2 at Year 1-9.64 PercentStandard Deviation 15.21
Placebo Non-randomizedPercent Change From Baseline in Time to Maximum VO2 at Year 1NA Percent
Secondary

Percent Change From Start of Sildenafil in Total Ventilation (VE) to Year 1

Exercise Tolerance Test (CPX test) was performed on developmentally able participants to determine the total ventilation. Participants were assumed to be developmentally able if they had a CPX exercise assessment at any visit during study A1481131 (NCT00159913). The CPX tests were performed as close to trough plasma levels of sildenafil as possible, i.e., prior to dosing and at least 4 hours after the previous dose. If participants were able to perform the CPX test in Study A1481131 (NCT00159913), they were expected to be able to perform the exercise paradigm in the extension study (A1481156) unless their clinical condition had deteriorated and the investigator considered this was unsafe for the participant.

Time frame: Year 1

Population: An ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline. Only developmentally able participants were used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePercent Change From Start of Sildenafil in Total Ventilation (VE) to Year 114.29 PercentStandard Deviation 21.38
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePercent Change From Start of Sildenafil in Total Ventilation (VE) to Year 112.38 PercentStandard Deviation 32.64
Sildenafil High/ High DosePercent Change From Start of Sildenafil in Total Ventilation (VE) to Year 111.80 PercentStandard Deviation 19.79
Secondary

Physician Global Assessment at Year 1

The physician global assessment of disease severity was assessed at Year 1 in this extension study. The number and percentage of participants with markedly improved, moderately improved, mild improvement, no change, slightly worse, moderately worse, markedly worse were evaluated. Participants who withdrew from study treatment after at least 10 weeks of treatment were requested to perform the global assessments.

Time frame: Year 1

Population: An ITT population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Moderately Worse0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Moderately Improved8 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Markedly Worse0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Died0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Missing1 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Mild Improvement19 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Markedly Improved6 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1No Change15 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Slightly Worse1 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Discontinued5 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Markedly Improved6 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Mild Improvement26 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Moderately Worse1 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Moderately Improved18 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Slightly Worse1 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Died0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Discontinued4 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1No Change16 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Missing2 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Markedly Worse0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Missing2 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Markedly Worse0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Markedly Improved6 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Moderately Improved27 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Mild Improvement37 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1No Change17 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Slightly Worse0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Moderately Worse0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Discontinued10 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DosePhysician Global Assessment at Year 1Died1 Participants
Secondary

Summary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.

The WHO PH functional classification was as follows: Class I : Participants with PH but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Class II : Participants with PH resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III : Participants with PH resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV : Participants with PH with inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Changes from baseline in functional class were summarised at Years 1, 2, 3, and 4. Numbers of participants improving by 3 classes, improving by 2 classes, improving by 1 class, not changing, worsening by 1 class, worsening by 2 classes or worsening by 3 classes from A1481131 baseline at Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 were evaluated.

Time frame: Baseline, Year 2

Population: An ITT population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Improved by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Improved by 2 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Improved by 1 Class11 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.No change28 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Worsened by 1 Class3 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Worsened by 2 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Worsened by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Discontinued9 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Died1 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Missing3 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Died2 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Improved by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Worsened by 2 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Worsened by 1 Class2 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Improved by 2 Classes1 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Missing2 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Discontinued9 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Improved by 1 Class11 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Worsened by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.No change47 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Discontinued16 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.No change55 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Worsened by 1 Class5 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Worsened by 2 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Died5 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Worsened by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Improved by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Missing2 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Improved by 2 Classes1 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 2.Improved by 1 Class16 Participants
Secondary

Summary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.

The WHO PH functional classification was as follows: Class I : Participants with PH but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Class II : Participants with PH resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III : Participants with PH resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV : Participants with PH with inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Changes from baseline in functional class were summarised at Years 1, 2, 3, and 4. Numbers of participants improving by 3 classes, improving by 2 classes, improving by 1 class, not changing, worsening by 1 class, worsening by 2 classes or worsening by 3 classes from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline at Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 were evaluated.

Time frame: Baseline, Year 3

Population: An ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Improved by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Improved by 2 Classes1 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Improved by 1 Class11 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.No change21 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Worsened by 1 Class3 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Worsened by 2 Classes1 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Worsened by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Discontinued14 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Died2 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Missing2 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Died3 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Improved by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Worsened by 2 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Worsened by 1 Class3 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Improved by 2 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Missing3 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Discontinued13 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Improved by 1 Class16 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Worsened by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.No change36 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Discontinued19 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.No change44 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Worsened by 1 Class5 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Worsened by 2 Classes1 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Died9 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Worsened by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Improved by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Missing4 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Improved by 2 Classes1 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 3.Improved by 1 Class17 Participants
Secondary

Summary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.

The WHO PH functional classification was as follows: Class I : Participants with PH but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Class II : Participants with PH resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III : Participants with PH resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV : Participants with PH with inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Changes from baseline in functional class were summarised at Years 1, 2, 3, and 4. Numbers of participants improving by 3 classes, improving by 2 classes, improving by 1 class, not changing, worsening by 1 class, worsening by 2 classes or worsening by 3 classes from A1481131 baseline at Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 were evaluated.

Time frame: Baseline, Year 4

Population: An ITT population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Improved by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Improved by 2 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Improved by 1 Class13 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.No change15 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Worsened by 1 Class6 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Worsened by 2 Classes1 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Worsened by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Discontinued15 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Died2 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Missing3 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Died5 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Improved by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Worsened by 2 Classes2 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Worsened by 1 Class4 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Improved by 2 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Missing2 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Discontinued18 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Improved by 1 Class14 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Worsened by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.No change29 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Discontinued20 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.No change41 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Worsened by 1 Class5 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Worsened by 2 Classes1 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Died13 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Worsened by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Improved by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Missing2 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Improved by 2 Classes2 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in WHO PH Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 4.Improved by 1 Class16 Participants
Secondary

Summary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.

The WHO PH functional classification was as follows: Class I : Participants with PH but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Class II : Participants with PH resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III : Participants with PH resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV : Participants with PH with inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Changes from baseline in functional class were summarized at Years 1, 2, 3, and 4. Numbers of participants improving by 3 classes, improving by 2 classes, improving by 1 class, not changing, worsening by 1 class, worsening by 2 classes or worsening by 3 classes from A1481131 baseline at Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 were evaluated.

Time frame: Baseline, Year 1

Population: An ITT population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication in base study and certain analyses were conducted at pre-specified time points: 1, 2 years and 3, 4 and 5 years (where data quantity allowed) from A1481131 (NCT00159913) baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Improved by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Improved by 2 Classes1 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Improved by 1 Class13 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.No change30 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Worsened by 1 Class4 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Worsened by 2 Classes1 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Worsened by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Discontinued5 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Died0 Participants
Sildenafil Low/Low DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Missing1 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Died0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Improved by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Worsened by 2 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Worsened by 1 Class6 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Improved by 2 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Missing1 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Discontinued4 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Improved by 1 Class15 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Worsened by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil Medium/ Medium DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.No change48 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Discontinued10 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.No change64 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Worsened by 1 Class3 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Worsened by 2 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Died1 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Worsened by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Improved by 3 Classes0 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Missing2 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Improved by 2 Classes1 Participants
Sildenafil High/ High DoseSummary of Shift in Changes From Start of Sildenafil in World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension (WHO PH) Functional Class by A1481156 Treatment Group at Year 1.Improved by 1 Class19 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026