Skip to content

A Placebo-Controlled Study of Safety and Effectiveness of Myozyme (Alglucosidase Alfa) in Patients With Late-Onset Pompe Disease

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Myozyme in Patients With Late-Onset Pompe Disease.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00158600
Enrollment
90
Registered
2005-09-12
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2007-09-30
Last updated
2015-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pompe Disease (Late-onset), Glycogen Storage Disease Type II (GSD-II), Acid Maltase Deficiency Disease, Glycogenosis 2

Keywords

Glycogen Storage Disease Type II, GSD-II, Pompe Disease

Brief summary

Pompe disease (also known as glycogen storage disease Type II) is caused by a deficiency of a critical enzyme in the body called acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA). Normally, GAA is used by the body's cells to break down glycogen (a stored form of sugar) within specialized structures called lysosomes. In patients with Pompe disease, an excessive amount of glycogen accumulates and is stored in various tissues, especially heart and skeletal muscle, which prevents their normal function. The overall objective is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of alglucosidase alfa treatment in patients with late-onset Pompe disease as compared to placebo.

Interventions

IV infusion of 20mg/kg; qow for 78 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo Comparator; qow for 78 weeks.

Sponsors

Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient must provide signed, informed consent prior to performing any study-related procedures. * Patient must have a diagnosis of Pompe disease based on deficient endogenous GAA activity in cultured skin fibroblasts of less than or equal to 40% of the normal mean of the testing laboratory and 2 confirmed GAA gene mutations; * Patient must be greater than or equal to 8 years of age at the time of enrollment; * Patient must be able to ambulate 40 meters (approximately 130 feet) in 6 minutes on each test performed on two consecutive days (use of assistive devices such as a walker, cane, or crutches, is permitted); * Patient must have an FVC of greater than or equal to 30% and \< 80% predicted in the upright position; * Patient must have a postural drop in FVC (liters) of at least 10% from the upright to the supine position; * Patient must have proximal muscle weakness in the lower limbs based on unilateral QMT of the knee extensors defined as \< 80% of the predicted value based on age, gender and body size * Patient must be able to tolerate pulmonary function testing (PFT) and muscle testing in the supine position; * Patient must have testable muscle in bilateral knee flexors and knee extensors, and testable muscle in bilateral elbow flexors and elbow extensors; * Patient must be able to provide reproducible muscle and pulmonary function test results; * Patient (and patient's legal guardian if patient is \< 18 years of age) must have the ability to comply with the clinical protocol; * A female patient of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (urine) at Baseline. Note: All female patients of childbearing potential and sexually mature males must use a medically accepted method of contraception throughout the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient requires the use of invasive ventilatory support; * Patient requires the use of noninvasive ventilatory support while awake and in an upright position; * Patient has received enzyme replacement therapy with GAA from any source; * Patient has used an investigational product within 30 days prior to study enrollment, or is currently enrolled in another study which involves clinical evaluations, unless prior approval is given by Genzyme; * Patient has a major congenital anomaly, medical condition, serious intercurrent illness, or other extenuating circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, may significantly interfere with study compliance, including all prescribed evaluations and follow-up activities;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Mean Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration(Tmax)weeks 0, 12, 52Time to maximum plasma concentration observed in blood samples taken at the following time points: 0 (before the start of the infusion), 1 and 2 hours after the start of infusion, end of the infusion, and then 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12,and 16 hours after the end of the infusion (with a 5-minute window for time-points after the start of infusion). Pooled figures combine the values for the three timeframes.
Recombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Area Under the Curve (AUC)weeks 0, 12 and 52Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 16 hours after the end of infusion. Blood sample time points were 0 (before the start of the infusion), 1 and 2 hours after the start of infusion, end of the infusion, and then 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12,and 16 hours after the end of the infusion (with a 5-minute window for time-points after the start of infusion). Pooled figures combine the values for the three timeframes.
Recombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration(Cmax)weeks 0, 12, 52Maximum plasma concentration observed in blood samples taken at the following time points: 0 (before the start of the infusion), 1 and 2 hours after the start of infusion, end of the infusion, and then 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12,and 16 hours after the end of the infusion (with a 5-minute window for time-points after the start of infusion). Pooled figures combine the values for the three timeframes.
Summary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Eventsweeks 0-78Overall safety summary of patients experiencing Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), treatment-related AEs, and Infusion Associated Reactions (IARs). Summary is based on Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), defined as AEs that occurred following the initiation of study treatment, i.e., alglucosidase alfa or placebo.
Mean Distance Walked as Measured by Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Weeks 0 and 78, and Mean Change From Baselineweeks 0, 78Mean distance walked gives an indication of functional endurance. The greater the distance, the greater the endurance. Mean values of distance walked in a six-minute walk test are offered for baseline, week 78 (or last available observation), and the mean change from baseline (at week 78 or last available post-baseline observation).
Percent of Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)weeks 0, 78Forced vital capacity is a standard pulmonary function test used to quantify respiratory muscle weakness. Forced vital capacity (FVC) is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in liters. Predicted forced vital capacity is based on a formula using sex, age and height of a person, and is an estimate of healthy lung capacity. Percent of predicted FVC = (observed value)/(predicted value) \* 100%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health-related Quality of Life Survey Values Related to Physical Components as Measured by the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form-36 Health Surveyweeks 0, 78The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (MOS SF)-36 questionnaire consists of 36 items grouped into 8 domains designed to assess generic health-related quality of life in healthy and ill adult populations. Physical Component Scores (PCS) report the four domains of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life. All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible. The PCS scores are reported.
Percent Predicted Proximal Muscle Strength of the Lower Limbs as Measured by Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT)weeks 0, 78Quantitative muscle testing (QMT) is a standardized system to measure muscle force production during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. QMT data were collected directly from sensors into laptop computers. Predicted normal values for QMT are based on a formula using sex, age and body mass index of a person, and is an estimate of healthy muscle force. Percent of predicted QMT = (observed value)/(predicted value) \* 100%. The QMT Leg Score is the average of the bilateral means for percent predicted knee flexors and extensors. A value of 100% indicates 'normal' muscle strength.

Countries

France, Netherlands, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

One hundred patients screened and 90 enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alglucosidase Alfa
Intravenous (IV) infusions of alglucosidase alfa at 20 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg) of body weight every other week (qow) for 78 weeks.
60
Placebo
Intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo every other week (qow) for 78 weeks.
30
Total90

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event21
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall Studyunable to commit time to study01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAlglucosidase AlfaPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.37
42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.63
44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.14
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or not reported
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
57 participants27 participants84 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants19 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants11 Participants45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
60 / 6030 / 3090 / 90
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 606 / 3019 / 90

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Distance Walked as Measured by Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Weeks 0 and 78, and Mean Change From Baseline

Mean distance walked gives an indication of functional endurance. The greater the distance, the greater the endurance. Mean values of distance walked in a six-minute walk test are offered for baseline, week 78 (or last available observation), and the mean change from baseline (at week 78 or last available post-baseline observation).

Time frame: weeks 0, 78

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population. Last observation carried forward. The last available distance walked for one patient was the Baseline visit; therefore, this patient was excluded from the change from baseline calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase AlfaMean Distance Walked as Measured by Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Weeks 0 and 78, and Mean Change From BaselineDistance Walked at Baseline332.20 metersStandard Deviation 126.69
Alglucosidase AlfaMean Distance Walked as Measured by Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Weeks 0 and 78, and Mean Change From BaselineDistance Walked at Last Available Observation357.85 metersStandard Deviation 141.32
Alglucosidase AlfaMean Distance Walked as Measured by Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Weeks 0 and 78, and Mean Change From BaselineChange at Last Available Observation from Baseline26.08 metersStandard Deviation 64.41
PlaceboMean Distance Walked as Measured by Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Weeks 0 and 78, and Mean Change From BaselineDistance Walked at Baseline317.93 metersStandard Deviation 132.29
PlaceboMean Distance Walked as Measured by Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Weeks 0 and 78, and Mean Change From BaselineDistance Walked at Last Available Observation313.07 metersStandard Deviation 144.69
PlaceboMean Distance Walked as Measured by Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Weeks 0 and 78, and Mean Change From BaselineChange at Last Available Observation from Baseline-4.87 metersStandard Deviation 45.24
Comparison: The difference between alglucosidase alfa and placebo treatment groups in change in distance walked from baseline to last observation was estimated by ANCOVA after adjusting for baseline value and randomization strata.p-value: 0.034795% CI: [2.07, 54.17]ANCOVA
Primary

Percent of Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Forced vital capacity is a standard pulmonary function test used to quantify respiratory muscle weakness. Forced vital capacity (FVC) is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in liters. Predicted forced vital capacity is based on a formula using sex, age and height of a person, and is an estimate of healthy lung capacity. Percent of predicted FVC = (observed value)/(predicted value) \* 100%.

Time frame: weeks 0, 78

Population: ITT population. Last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase AlfaPercent of Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Change at Week 78 from Baseline1.25 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.55
Alglucosidase AlfaPercent of Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Week 78 (or last observation)56.71 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 16.3
Alglucosidase AlfaPercent of Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Baseline (week 0)55.43 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 14.44
PlaceboPercent of Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Change at Week 78 from Baseline-2.30 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 4.33
PlaceboPercent of Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Baseline (week 0)53.00 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 15.66
PlaceboPercent of Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Week 78 (or last observation)50.70 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 14.88
Comparison: The difference between alglucosidase alfa and placebo treatment groups in change in % predicted FVC from baseline to last observation was estimated by ANCOVA after adjusting for baseline value and randomization strata.p-value: 0.005595% CI: [1.03, 5.77]ANCOVA
Primary

Recombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Area Under the Curve (AUC)

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 16 hours after the end of infusion. Blood sample time points were 0 (before the start of the infusion), 1 and 2 hours after the start of infusion, end of the infusion, and then 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12,and 16 hours after the end of the infusion (with a 5-minute window for time-points after the start of infusion). Pooled figures combine the values for the three timeframes.

Time frame: weeks 0, 12 and 52

Population: The subgroup of patients for whom pharmacokinetic samples were obtained was based on those study sites that could accommodate pharmacokinetic sampling needs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase AlfaRecombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Area Under the Curve (AUC)Week 02672.47 ug*h/mLStandard Deviation 1139.85
Alglucosidase AlfaRecombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Area Under the Curve (AUC)Week 122386.76 ug*h/mLStandard Deviation 555.09
Alglucosidase AlfaRecombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Area Under the Curve (AUC)Week 522699.28 ug*h/mLStandard Deviation 999.97
Alglucosidase AlfaRecombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Area Under the Curve (AUC)Pooled2586.17 ug*h/mLStandard Deviation 933.28
Primary

Recombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration(Cmax)

Maximum plasma concentration observed in blood samples taken at the following time points: 0 (before the start of the infusion), 1 and 2 hours after the start of infusion, end of the infusion, and then 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12,and 16 hours after the end of the infusion (with a 5-minute window for time-points after the start of infusion). Pooled figures combine the values for the three timeframes.

Time frame: weeks 0, 12, 52

Population: The subgroup of patients for whom pharmacokinetic samples were obtained was based on those study sites that could accommodate pharmacokinetic sampling needs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase AlfaRecombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration(Cmax)Week 12349269 ng/mLStandard Deviation 78620
Alglucosidase AlfaRecombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration(Cmax)Week 0385237 ng/mLStandard Deviation 105585
Alglucosidase AlfaRecombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration(Cmax)Week 52369744 ng/mLStandard Deviation 88203
Alglucosidase AlfaRecombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration(Cmax)Pooled368083 ng/mLStandard Deviation 91721
Primary

Recombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Mean Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration(Tmax)

Time to maximum plasma concentration observed in blood samples taken at the following time points: 0 (before the start of the infusion), 1 and 2 hours after the start of infusion, end of the infusion, and then 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12,and 16 hours after the end of the infusion (with a 5-minute window for time-points after the start of infusion). Pooled figures combine the values for the three timeframes.

Time frame: weeks 0, 12, 52

Population: The subgroup of patients for whom pharmacokinetic samples were obtained was based on those study sites that could accommodate pharmacokinetic sampling needs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase AlfaRecombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Mean Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration(Tmax)Week 03.62 hoursStandard Deviation 0.33
Alglucosidase AlfaRecombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Mean Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration(Tmax)Week 123.62 hoursStandard Deviation 0.28
Alglucosidase AlfaRecombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Mean Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration(Tmax)Week 523.64 hoursStandard Deviation 0.31
Alglucosidase AlfaRecombinant Human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rhGAA) Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Mean Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration(Tmax)Pooled3.63 hoursStandard Deviation 0.3
Primary

Summary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

Overall safety summary of patients experiencing Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), treatment-related AEs, and Infusion Associated Reactions (IARs). Summary is based on Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), defined as AEs that occurred following the initiation of study treatment, i.e., alglucosidase alfa or placebo.

Time frame: weeks 0-78

Population: All patients who received any amount of study treatment comprise the safety population. Patients were considered, for safety analysis, to be in the treatment group of the treatment they actually received.~Missing or invalid safety or resource utilization data were not replaced.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Alglucosidase AlfaSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients with Infusion-Associated Reactions17 participants
Alglucosidase AlfaSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients with Any AEs60 participants
Alglucosidase AlfaSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients with SAEs13 participants
Alglucosidase AlfaSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients with Severe AEs14 participants
Alglucosidase AlfaSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients who Discontinued Due to AEs (incl death)3 participants
Alglucosidase AlfaSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients with Treatment-Related AEs32 participants
Alglucosidase AlfaSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients who Died1 participants
PlaceboSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients who Died0 participants
PlaceboSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients with Any AEs30 participants
PlaceboSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients with Treatment-Related AEs17 participants
PlaceboSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients with Infusion-Associated Reactions7 participants
PlaceboSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients with Severe AEs10 participants
PlaceboSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients who Discontinued Due to AEs (incl death)1 participants
PlaceboSummary of Patients Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPatients with SAEs6 participants
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life Survey Values Related to Physical Components as Measured by the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form-36 Health Survey

The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (MOS SF)-36 questionnaire consists of 36 items grouped into 8 domains designed to assess generic health-related quality of life in healthy and ill adult populations. Physical Component Scores (PCS) report the four domains of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life. All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible. The PCS scores are reported.

Time frame: weeks 0, 78

Population: ITT population. Last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase AlfaHealth-related Quality of Life Survey Values Related to Physical Components as Measured by the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form-36 Health SurveyPCS at Baseline (week 0)34.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.93
Alglucosidase AlfaHealth-related Quality of Life Survey Values Related to Physical Components as Measured by the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form-36 Health SurveyPCS at Week 78 (or last available observation)35.11 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.84
PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life Survey Values Related to Physical Components as Measured by the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form-36 Health SurveyPCS at Baseline (week 0)34.91 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.26
PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life Survey Values Related to Physical Components as Measured by the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form-36 Health SurveyPCS at Week 78 (or last available observation)36.47 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.57
Comparison: The difference between alglucosidase alfa and placebo treatment groups in change in PCS from baseline to last observation was estimated by ANCOVA after adjusting for baseline value and randomization strata.p-value: 0.833395% CI: [-3.83, 3.09]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Predicted Proximal Muscle Strength of the Lower Limbs as Measured by Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT)

Quantitative muscle testing (QMT) is a standardized system to measure muscle force production during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. QMT data were collected directly from sensors into laptop computers. Predicted normal values for QMT are based on a formula using sex, age and body mass index of a person, and is an estimate of healthy muscle force. Percent of predicted QMT = (observed value)/(predicted value) \* 100%. The QMT Leg Score is the average of the bilateral means for percent predicted knee flexors and extensors. A value of 100% indicates 'normal' muscle strength.

Time frame: weeks 0, 78

Population: ITT population. Last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alglucosidase AlfaPercent Predicted Proximal Muscle Strength of the Lower Limbs as Measured by Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT)Baseline (week 0)37.69 percent predicted QMTStandard Deviation 18.88
Alglucosidase AlfaPercent Predicted Proximal Muscle Strength of the Lower Limbs as Measured by Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT)Week 78 (or last available observation)39.05 percent predicted QMTStandard Deviation 21.83
Alglucosidase AlfaPercent Predicted Proximal Muscle Strength of the Lower Limbs as Measured by Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT)Change at Week 78 from Baseline1.22 percent predicted QMTStandard Deviation 9.88
PlaceboPercent Predicted Proximal Muscle Strength of the Lower Limbs as Measured by Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT)Baseline (week 0)32.49 percent predicted QMTStandard Deviation 18.24
PlaceboPercent Predicted Proximal Muscle Strength of the Lower Limbs as Measured by Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT)Week 78 (or last available observation)30.40 percent predicted QMTStandard Deviation 20.54
PlaceboPercent Predicted Proximal Muscle Strength of the Lower Limbs as Measured by Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT)Change at Week 78 from Baseline-2.08 percent predicted QMTStandard Deviation 5.11
Comparison: The difference between alglucosidase alfa and placebo treatment groups in change in QMT from baseline to last observation was estimated by ANCOVA after adjusting for baseline value and randomization strata.p-value: 0.109395% CI: [-0.73, 7.08]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026