Urinary Tract Infections
Conditions
Keywords
Urinary tract infections, Children, Antibiotic prophylaxis, Renal scintigraphy, Vesico ureteral reflux
Brief summary
Our hypothesis is that long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis does not reduce the recurrence of infection and the risk of appearance of kidney scars in children with a documented previous upper UTI.
Detailed description
Background Upper urinary tract infections (UTI) are common in children, especially when functional and anatomical abnormalities of the urinary tract co-exist, such as vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR), urinary tract obstruction uropathy and bladder dysfunction. They are associated with the risk of long-term complications, including permanent renal damage (renal scarring), which occurs in 15% of cases. The objective of the diagnosis and medical treatment of UTI in children is the prevention of such complications. Medical treatment includes long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis to be continued for periods ranging from 6 months to 2 years. Recent studies have revealed the emergence of therapy-induced resistance. A review of the literature has highlighted the lack of properly designed, large clinical trials, demonstrating the efficacy of long-term low-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis in terms of reduction in UTI recurrence. Methods and design The study is a controlled, randomised, open-label, 3-armed, parallel-group clinical trial comparing no prophylaxis (group 1) with prophylaxis with co-trimoxazole 15 mg/kg daily (group 2) and with amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 15 mg/kg daily (group 3) for 12 months. Assuming that the incidence of recurrences is 20%, defining efficacy as an incidence of 10% per group and setting error = 0.05 and power = 90%, 220 patients per group (i.e. a total of 660 patients) are required The study population will consist of children aged between 2 months and 6 years, with normal renal function (creatinine clearance 70 ml/min/1.73m2) and a first episode of documented UTI, who presents at least one of the following: an acute pyelonephritic lesion at the DMSA scan and/or a VUR at the baseline micturating cystography. Patients will be followed-up for 12 months. Urinalysis and urine cultures will be performed every month and clinical examinations after 6 and 12 months; both will be performed whenever UTI is suspected. Sonography, Doppler sonography (optional) and DMSA scintigraphy will be performed at baseline and at the end of the study.
Interventions
DRUGantibiotic to reduce the recurrence of infection
Sponsors
Regione Veneto
IL Sogno di Stefano
University of Padova
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Months to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age between 2 months and 6 years * Creatinine clearance (calculated according to Schwartz) 70 ml/min/1.73 m2 (for children in their first year of life, serum creatinine levels within normal range for age and sex) * First documented upper UTI (diagnostic criteria in Table 1) * Imaging Diagnostic work-up completed (Table 2) with at least the presence of an acute lesion at the DMSA scan and or a primary non severe reflux ( 1st or 3rd degree) * Informed consent of parents
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with chronic renal insufficiency or 30% relative function of one kidney at DMSA scan * Patients with urinary tract disorders, such as vesico-ureteral reflux due to complex malformations of the urinary tract, obstruction of the posterior urethra, ureterocele or single kidney, neurogenic bladder * Patients with reflux 4th degree * Patients with pyelonephritis that developed during prophylaxis instituted because of prenatal diagnosis of urinary tract dilatation Hypersensitivity to one of the two selected antimicrobial agents
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary end-point is UTI Recurrence Rate during the 12-month observation period and the Development of renal damage (parenchymal scar) after 12 months. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The secondary objectives are the comparison, in terms of efficacy and effectiveness, between two antimicrobial agents that are currently approved for prophylactic use: co-trimoxazole 15 mg/kg daily versus amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 15 mg/kg daily. | — |
Countries
Italy
Outcome results
None listed