Skip to content

Study on the Efficacy and Mechanism of Cardiac Rehabilitation for Stem Cell Mobilization and Heart Failure Improvement

An Association Study Between Cardiac Rehabilitation and Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients With Myocardial Infarction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00154466
Enrollment
58
Registered
2005-09-12
Start date
2004-07-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2014-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

Myocardial infarction, stem cell, cardiac rehabilitation

Brief summary

One emerging concept is that some form of injury or inflammation is a prerequisite for the success of circulating-cell participation in differentiated tissue structure and function. Once reperfusion is achieved in acute myocardial infarction, an intense inflammatory cascade is unleashed. The architecture of the left ventricle rearranges, leading to ventricular remodeling. The homing processinvolves stem cell migration to the sites of injury or ischemia, which provides an environment that is favorable to growth and function. This microenvironment is a stimulus for homing and differentiation of stem cells of the appropriate lineage. It increases vascular permeability and expression of adhesion proteins like integrin, along with homing receptors that facilitate the attachment, which is mediated by cell-to-cell contact and chemoattractant release from local tissue injury.The migratory capacity of stem cells might be dependent on natural growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) , stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)and stem cell factor (SCF).The expression of VEGF ,SDF-1 and SCF is highly up-regulated in hypoxic tissue, supporting the hypothesis that these factors may represent homing signals crucial to the recruitment of circulating progenitor cells to assist the endogenous repair mechanisms in the infarcted tissue. This study will examine whether cardiac rehabilitation increases the concentration of stem cell factors released into the bloodstream and if these factors are correlated with the improvement of heart function.

Detailed description

Exercise training has beneficial hemodynamic effects in patients with congestive heart failure.A similar benefit may be seen after MI, with an improvement in functional capacity averaging 20 percent. More important, however, is the possible effect on survival. In a meta-analysis of 24 trials examining the effect of cardiac rehabilitation after MI, there was a significant reduction in mortality with rehabilitation (odds ratio 0.81). Previous studies focused on the effect of rehabilitation comes from the improvement of oxygen utilization in skeletal muscle. The effects on cardiac morphology and perfusion status were rather little to be addressed. In this study, we will collect the questionaires, blood sampling for assay of stem cell factors, maximal O2 consumption, and cardiac MRI before and after cardiac rehabilitation.SDF-1 (stromal cell derived factor-1), SCF(stem cell factor), and VEGF (vasculoendothelial growth factor) will be measured by ELISA. Cardiac MRI will provide the information about (1) LV function, (2) scar size, and (3) perfusion status (dipyridamole stress MRI).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALcardiac rehabilitation

Those in the training group participated in a 3-month rehabilitation training program at an exercise intensity of 55% to 70% of peak oxygen uptake (VO2); those in the nontraining group continued their usual lifestyle.

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
35 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

myocardial infarction with CK more than 3000, status post revascularization therapy, clinical stable with regular follow-up at OPD, NYHA II-III -

Exclusion criteria

sustained ventricular arrhythmia, hypertrophy cardiomyopathy, intolerance to exercise program \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myocardial Blood Flow at Baseline and 3-month Follow-up3 monthsFirst-pass, contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion images acquired for 80 heart beats in the left ventricle. Short-axis views were obtained after intravenous administration of gadodiamide. Perfusion studies were performed at rest and during the stress induced by a 4 min infusion of dipyridamole at a concentration of 0.14 mg/kg of body weight per minute.To determine absolute MBF values at rest and stress status, we adopted a model-independent deconvolution method proposed by Jerosch-Herold et al, a method that was previously validated in experimental animal studies by comparison with blood-flow measurements with radiolabelled microspheres.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-up3 monthsAngiogenic cytokines such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and stem cell factor (SCF) are known to increase the formation of new vessels at ischaemic sites and thus enhance myocardial perfusion. To rule out any effect of short-term exercise on cytokines levels, blood samples were always taken after at least 72 h of physical inactivity and overnight fasting when the subject had rested in the sitting position for at least 10 min. The plasma samples were immediately frozen and stored at -70°C. High-sensitivity ELISA (Bender MedSystems, R&D) were used to measure plasma levels of SCF, SDF-1 and VEGF according to the manufacturer's protocols.

Countries

Taiwan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This prospective randomised controlled study was approved by the ethics committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital. Between August 2004 and December 2005, 91 postinfarction patients were informed about the trial. Thirty-seven refused to participate and 15 did not meet the inclusion criteria.

Pre-assignment details

Inclusion criteria:a successful primary stenting, a clinically stable course after MI, and no ischemia on exercise testing. Exclusion criteria: effort angina, Af, sustained ventricular arrhythmia, NYHA functional class IV, exercise-limiting diseases, severe pulmonary or renal disease, an implanted pacemaker, or claustrophobia.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Postinfarction Training Patients
39 postinfarction patients randomised to either a 3-month training group (n=20) or a nontraining group (n=19), and 19 normal controls.
20
Postinfarction Nontraining Patients
39 postinfarction patients randomised to either a 3-month training group (n=20) or a nontraining group (n=19), and 19 normal controls.
19
Healthy Controls
39 postinfarction patients randomised to either a 3-month training group (n=20) or a nontraining group (n=19), and 19 normal controls.
19
Total58

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPostinfarction Nontraining PatientsHealthy ControlsPostinfarction Training PatientsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
19 Participants19 Participants20 Participants58 Participants
Age, Continuous52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
19 participants19 participants20 participants58 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants19 Participants20 Participants58 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 190 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 190 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Myocardial Blood Flow at Baseline and 3-month Follow-up

First-pass, contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion images acquired for 80 heart beats in the left ventricle. Short-axis views were obtained after intravenous administration of gadodiamide. Perfusion studies were performed at rest and during the stress induced by a 4 min infusion of dipyridamole at a concentration of 0.14 mg/kg of body weight per minute.To determine absolute MBF values at rest and stress status, we adopted a model-independent deconvolution method proposed by Jerosch-Herold et al, a method that was previously validated in experimental animal studies by comparison with blood-flow measurements with radiolabelled microspheres.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the training group, which underwent a 3-month cardiac rehabilitation program, or the nontraining group in which patients continued their usual lifestyle. Healthy controls underwent the test of myocardial perfusion only at baseline. The analysis was intention-to-treat.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Post-infarction TrainingMyocardial Blood Flow at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of stress MBF in the remote myocardium0.62 ml/min/gStandard Deviation 0.83
Post-infarction TrainingMyocardial Blood Flow at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of stress MBF in the infarcted myocardium0.44 ml/min/gStandard Deviation 0.71
Post-infarction NontrainingMyocardial Blood Flow at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of stress MBF in the remote myocardium-0.27 ml/min/gStandard Deviation 0.56
Post-infarction NontrainingMyocardial Blood Flow at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of stress MBF in the infarcted myocardium0 ml/min/gStandard Deviation 0.46
Secondary

Angiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-up

Angiogenic cytokines such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and stem cell factor (SCF) are known to increase the formation of new vessels at ischaemic sites and thus enhance myocardial perfusion. To rule out any effect of short-term exercise on cytokines levels, blood samples were always taken after at least 72 h of physical inactivity and overnight fasting when the subject had rested in the sitting position for at least 10 min. The plasma samples were immediately frozen and stored at -70°C. High-sensitivity ELISA (Bender MedSystems, R&D) were used to measure plasma levels of SCF, SDF-1 and VEGF according to the manufacturer's protocols.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: We calculated that we would need 18 patients in each group to achieve a power of at least 80% to detect a 20% difference in MBF change between study groups, with a two-sided significance level of p\<0.05, and a 20% increase for the stress MBF change from baseline to 3 months' follow-up. The analysis was intention-to-treat.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Post-infarction TrainingAngiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of vascular endothelial growth factor0.70 pg/mlStandard Deviation 1.41
Post-infarction TrainingAngiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of stromal-derived factor-1-196 pg/mlStandard Deviation 209
Post-infarction TrainingAngiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of stem cell factor20 pg/mlStandard Deviation 120
Post-infarction NontrainingAngiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of vascular endothelial growth factor0.95 pg/mlStandard Deviation 1.46
Post-infarction NontrainingAngiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of stromal-derived factor-1-68 pg/mlStandard Deviation 175
Post-infarction NontrainingAngiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of stem cell factor17 pg/mlStandard Deviation 47
Healthy ControlsAngiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of stromal-derived factor-1-57 pg/mlStandard Deviation 200
Healthy ControlsAngiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of stem cell factor-18 pg/mlStandard Deviation 60
Healthy ControlsAngiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-upChange of vascular endothelial growth factor-1.2 pg/mlStandard Deviation 2.92

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026