Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus With Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) in a Cyclosporine Microemulsion-free Regimen Compared to Standard Therapy in de Novo Renal Transplant Patients

Multi-center, Open-label, Prospective, Randomized, Parallel Group Study Investigating a CNI-free Regimen With Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) and Everolimus in Comparison to Standard Therapy With Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) and Cyclosporine Microemulsion in de Novo Renal Transplant Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00154310
Enrollment
300
Registered
2005-09-12
Start date
2005-06-30
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2013-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Transplantation

Keywords

Renal transplantation, everolimus, immunosuppressants, CNI-free

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess whether a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and everolimus is as safe and well-tolerated as the standard regimen containing enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and cyclosporine microemulsion, but results in better renal function.

Interventions

DRUGEverolimus

Everolimus tablets orally twice a day to maintain a level of 6- 10 ng/mL.

DRUGCyclosporine

Tablets orally twice a day to maintain protocol specific target blood levels

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium orally twice a day to achieve a target dose of 1440 mg/day.

DRUGCorticosteroids

Corticosteroids were added to the immunosuppressive regimen with a minimum dose of 5mg prednisolone or equivalent and had to be continued throughout the first year.

Sponsors

Novartis
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: The following inclusion criteria had to be present at BL 1 (Screening visit prior to transplantation): 1. Males or females, aged 18 - 65 years 2. Recipients of de novo cadaveric, living unrelated or living related kidney transplants 3. Females capable of becoming pregnant must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to or at BL 1, and are required to practice an approved method of birth control for the duration of the study and for a period of 6 weeks following discontinuation of study medication, even where there has been a history of infertility 4. Patients who are willing and able to participate in the study and from whom written informed consent has been obtained Of all patients included into the study at BL 1 (prior to transplantation), those who continued into the randomized study period had to meet the following condition at BL 2, prior to randomization: 5. Patients had to be on an immunosuppressive regimen with EC-MPS (target dose; 1440 mg/day, if tolerated; minimal dose: 720 mg/day), cyclosporine and corticosteroids 6. Patients with an actual serum creatinine =\< 3.0 mg/dl

Exclusion criteria

The following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Renal Function (Nankivell Formula) at Month 12 Post Transplantation.at Month 12 post transplantationRenal function at the end of the trial assessed as mean absolute values of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculated by Nankivell formula 12 months after renal transplantation. The Nankivell formula: GFR = 6.7 / Scr + BW / 4 - Surea / 2-100 / (height)\^2 + C ; where Scr is the serum creatinine concentration expressed in mmol/L, BW the body weight in kg, Surea the serum urea in mmol/L, height in m, and the constant C is 35 for male and 25 for female patients. Estimated GFR is expressed in mL/min per 1.73m\^2.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathUp to Month 12The number of participants with occurrence of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, or death up to Month 12 during the randomized treatment period. BPAR was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III according to Banff 97 classification. A graft core biopsy was performed prior to 24 hours following initiation of graft rejection therapy. The allograft is presumed to be lost on the day the patient starts dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss.
Number of Participants With Occurrence of Treatment Failuresup to or at Month 12Treatment failures defined as a composite endpoint of biopsy proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, loss to follow up and discontinuations due to lack of efficacy or toxicity, or conversion to another regimen (at least one condition must be present).
Changes in Cardiovascular Risk From Month 4.5 to Final Assessment at Month 12Month 4.5 and Month 12An updated 1991 Framingham coronary prediction algorithm was used to estimate the total risk of developing coronary heart diseases (CHD) over the course of 10 years. Risk was calculated separately for male and females. To calculate risk, points were assigned for each of the following risk factors: age, levels of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, cigarette smoking, and diabetes mellitus. The sum of the individual risk factor points gives a total point score, which ranges from -5 to 18 for men and -16 to 24 for women. Higher points indicate a higher risk for CHD.
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event or Serious Adverse EventAes from end of core study period (month 12) to end of follow-up period (month 60)Additional information about the number of participants who experienced Adverse Events (greater than 5%) or Serious Adverse Events can be found in the Adverse Event section.

Countries

Germany, Switzerland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was an open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multi-center study with two treatment groups, cyclosporine continuation and cyclosporine withdrawal starting from Month 4.5 post-transplant. Study started in June 2005 and ended in September 2008.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Everolimus + Mycophenolate Sodium
Everolimus tablets orally twice a day to maintain a level of 6- 10 ng/mL and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium orally twice a day to achieve a target dose of 1440 mg/day. Corticosteroids were added to the immunosuppressive regimen with a minimum dose of 5 mg prednisolone or equivalent and had to be continued throughout the first year. Cyclosporine withdrawal started from Month 4.5 post-transplant.
155
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate Sodium
Cyclosporine tablets orally twice a day to achieve protocol specific target levels and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium orally twice a day to achieve a target dose of 1440 mg/day. Corticosteroids were added to the immunosuppressive regimen with a minimum dose of 5mg prednisolone or equivalent and had to be continued throughout the first year.
145
Total300

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative problems01
Overall StudyAdverse Event199
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy54
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up08
Overall StudyProtocol Violation42
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject93

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEverolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumCyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumTotal
Age Continuous46.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.67
46.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.85
46.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.73
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants59 Participants112 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
102 Participants86 Participants188 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
155 / 155145 / 145
serious
Total, serious adverse events
103 / 15593 / 145

Outcome results

Primary

Renal Function (Nankivell Formula) at Month 12 Post Transplantation.

Renal function at the end of the trial assessed as mean absolute values of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculated by Nankivell formula 12 months after renal transplantation. The Nankivell formula: GFR = 6.7 / Scr + BW / 4 - Surea / 2-100 / (height)\^2 + C ; where Scr is the serum creatinine concentration expressed in mmol/L, BW the body weight in kg, Surea the serum urea in mmol/L, height in m, and the constant C is 35 for male and 25 for female patients. Estimated GFR is expressed in mL/min per 1.73m\^2.

Time frame: at Month 12 post transplantation

Population: Intent to Treat Population (randomized patients); Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). One patient in

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumRenal Function (Nankivell Formula) at Month 12 Post Transplantation.71.84 mL/min /1.73m^2Standard Deviation 18.53
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumRenal Function (Nankivell Formula) at Month 12 Post Transplantation.61.24 mL/min /1.73m^2Standard Deviation 16.65
Secondary

Changes in Cardiovascular Risk From Month 4.5 to Final Assessment at Month 12

An updated 1991 Framingham coronary prediction algorithm was used to estimate the total risk of developing coronary heart diseases (CHD) over the course of 10 years. Risk was calculated separately for male and females. To calculate risk, points were assigned for each of the following risk factors: age, levels of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, cigarette smoking, and diabetes mellitus. The sum of the individual risk factor points gives a total point score, which ranges from -5 to 18 for men and -16 to 24 for women. Higher points indicate a higher risk for CHD.

Time frame: Month 4.5 and Month 12

Population: Safety Population for whom data was available at Month 4.5 and end of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumChanges in Cardiovascular Risk From Month 4.5 to Final Assessment at Month 12Male (n= 55, 37)0.5 PointsStandard Deviation 1.87
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumChanges in Cardiovascular Risk From Month 4.5 to Final Assessment at Month 12Female (n= 22, 35)0.0 PointsStandard Deviation 2.01
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumChanges in Cardiovascular Risk From Month 4.5 to Final Assessment at Month 12Total Population (n= 77, 72)0.4 PointsStandard Deviation 1.91
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumChanges in Cardiovascular Risk From Month 4.5 to Final Assessment at Month 12Male (n= 55, 37)0.1 PointsStandard Deviation 1.86
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumChanges in Cardiovascular Risk From Month 4.5 to Final Assessment at Month 12Female (n= 22, 35)0.8 PointsStandard Deviation 2.7
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumChanges in Cardiovascular Risk From Month 4.5 to Final Assessment at Month 12Total Population (n= 77, 72)0.4 PointsStandard Deviation 2.32
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event

Additional information about the number of participants who experienced Adverse Events (greater than 5%) or Serious Adverse Events can be found in the Adverse Event section.

Time frame: Aes from end of core study period (month 12) to end of follow-up period (month 60)

Population: Safety Population consisted of all participants in whom transplantation was performed and who were treated with at least one dose of any immunosuppressive medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event or Serious Adverse EventAdverse Events155 Participants
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event or Serious Adverse EventSerious Adverse Events95 Participants
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event or Serious Adverse EventAdverse Events145 Participants
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event or Serious Adverse EventSerious Adverse Events86 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or Death

The number of participants with occurrence of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, or death up to Month 12 during the randomized treatment period. BPAR was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III according to Banff 97 classification. A graft core biopsy was performed prior to 24 hours following initiation of graft rejection therapy. The allograft is presumed to be lost on the day the patient starts dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss.

Time frame: Up to Month 12

Population: Intent to Treat Population (Randomized Patients)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathGraft Loss: Yes0 Participants
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathBPAR: Yes15 Participants
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathGraft Loss: No154 Participants
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathDeath: No154 Participants
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathDeath: Yes0 Participants
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathBPAR: No139 Participants
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathDeath: Yes1 Participants
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathDeath: No145 Participants
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathBPAR: Yes5 Participants
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathGraft Loss: Yes0 Participants
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathGraft Loss: No146 Participants
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or DeathBPAR: No141 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Occurrence of Treatment Failures

Treatment failures defined as a composite endpoint of biopsy proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, loss to follow up and discontinuations due to lack of efficacy or toxicity, or conversion to another regimen (at least one condition must be present).

Time frame: up to or at Month 12

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (Randomized Patients).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Treatment FailuresTreatment failure: No125 Participants
Everolimus + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Treatment FailuresTreatment failure: Yes29 Participants
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Treatment FailuresTreatment failure: Yes23 Participants
Cyclosporine + Mycophenolate SodiumNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Treatment FailuresTreatment failure: No123 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026