Skip to content

Bortezomib (Velcade) in Patients With Untreated Multiple Myeloma

Phase II Trial of Velcade (Bortezomib) in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00153920
Enrollment
66
Registered
2005-09-12
Start date
2003-12-31
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2019-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

multiple myeloma, Velcade, bortezomib

Brief summary

Bortezomib (Velcade) has just recently been approved by the FDA for the treatment of multiple myeloma in patients who have received at least two prior therapies and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy. This study will determine if Velcade is effective in treating patients with multiple myeloma that have had no prior treatment for the disease. We will also use whole-genome scanning to identify drug response biomarkers in bone marrow samples as well as nerve fiber studies to compare nerves prior to the use of Velcade and after treatment with Velcade.

Detailed description

Primary Objective • To evaluate the objective response rate (CR + PR) to bortezomib alone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Secondary Objectives * To evaluate the tolerability and toxicity. * To evaluate time to progression. * To assess the frequency and severity of peripheral neuropathy. * To evaluate the impact of early intervention with dose modification and explore symptomatic treatment of peripheral neuropathy. Exploratory Objectives • To perform pharmacogenomic analysis of molecular markers associated with response or non-response. Statistical Design A one stage design is used to evaluate ORR. With 60 evaluable participants, if at least 27 objective responses are observed then bortezomib will be considered promising. The probability of concluding the treatment promising is \>0.95 with a true ORR of 55% and \<0.07 with a true ORR of 35%.

Interventions

DRUGbortezomib

Sponsors

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Brigham and Women's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Emory University
CollaboratorOTHER
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of multiple myeloma based upon standard criteria * Measurable disease, defined as a monoclonal immunoglobulin spike on serum electrophoresis of \> 1 g/dl and/or urine monoclonal immunoglobulin spike of \> 200mg/24 hours. * Karnofsky performance status of \> 60 * Hemoglobin \> 8.0 g/dL * AST (SGOT) \< 3 x ULN * ALT \< 3 x ULN * Total bilirubin \< 2 x ULN * Is infertile or is practicing an adequate form of contraception * 18 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

* Prior treatment with systemic chemotherapy * Plasma cell dyscrasia with polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein and skin changes * Plasma cell leukemia * Calculated or measured creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/minute within 14 days of enrollment * Grade 2 or greater peripheral neuropathy * Hypersensitivity to bortezomib, boron or mannitol * Severe hypercalcemia * HIV positive * Known active hepatitis B or C * New York Hospital Association Class III or IV heart failure * Second malignancy requiring concurrent treatment * Other serious medical or psychiatric illness * Pregnant women * Dialysis dependent patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response (OR) RateResponse was assessed every two cycles on treatment. Treatment duration in months was a median (range) of 5.1 (0.8-6.1).Objective response was defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (Blade J et al Br J Haematol 1998). CR required all of the following: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine at two consecutive times for minimum 6 weeks; Disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas for at least 6 weeks; \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow on 2 determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks; No increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions. PR required all the following: ≥50% reduction in the level of the serum monoclonal protein on 2 determinations for minimum 6 weeks; If present, reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion either by ≥90% or to \<200 mg on 2 determinations for minimum 6 weeks; ≥50% reduction size of soft tissue plasmacytomas for minimum 6 weeks; No increase in the number or size of lytic bone lesions. Development of a compression fracture does not exclude response in either category.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) RateResponse was assessed every two cycles on treatment. Treatment duration in months was a median (range) of 5.1 (0.8-6.1).Very good partial response or better was defined per International Uniform Response criteria (Durie B, Harousseau JL, Miquel JS, et al Leukemia 2006). See CR requirements in primary outcome measure plus if serum and urine M protein were unmeasurable then immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC) must be in a normal ratio of 0.26-1.65 at two consecutive times. VGPR required the following: Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis; \>=90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component \<100 mg per 24 hours (by SPEP and UPEP); if the serum and urine M protein were unmeasurable then a \>90% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels.
Time to Progression (TTP)Disease was assessed every two cycles on treatment and every 6 weeks in long-term follow-up. Median follow-up was 29 months.TTP based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from start of treatment to documentation of disease progression (PD). Participants without evidence of PD were censored at the latest date of last disease assessment or date of initiation of non-protocol therapy. PD was established based European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (Blade J et al Br J Haematol 1998). PD required 1 or more of the following: \>25% increase in serum monoclonal protein with absolute minimum of 0.5 g/dL (confirmed on repeat investigation); \>25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion with minimum absolute increase of 200 mg/24 hrs (confirmed on repeat investigation); \>25% increase in bone marrow plasma cells with minimum absolute increase of 10%; Definite increase in size of existing or new soft tissue plasmacytomas and/or lytic lesions; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL not attributable to other cause).
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Disease was assessed every two cycles on treatment and every 6 weeks in long-term follow-up. Median follow-up was 29 months as of the data analysis.PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from study entry to the earliest documentation of disease progression (PD) or death. Participants alive without evidence of PD were censored at the earliest date of last disease assessment or date of initiation of non-protocol therapy. PD was established based European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (Blade J et al Br J Haematol 1998). PD required 1 or more of the following: \>25% increase in serum monoclonal protein with absolute minimum of 0.5 g/dL (confirmed on repeat investigation); \>25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion with minimum absolute increase of 200 mg/24 hrs (confirmed on repeat investigation); \>25% increase in bone marrow plasma cells with minimum absolute increase of 10%; Definite increase in size of existing soft tissue plasmacytomas and/or lytic lesions or new; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL not attributable to other cause).
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Sensory NeuropathyAssessed each cycle throughout treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment. Treatment duration in months was a median (range) of 5.1 (0.8-6.1).Number of participants experiencing any grade treatment-emergent sensory neuropathy events based on CTCAEv3 as reported on case report forms.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Neuropathic PainAssessed each cycle throughout treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment. Treatment duration in months was a median (range) of 5.1 (0.8-6.1).Number of participants experiencing any grade treatment-emergent neuropathic pain events based on CTCAEv3 as reported on case report forms.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

66 participants were enrolled between December 2003 and September 2005.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bortezomib
Participants received intravenous bortezomib on a 3-week dosing cycle: 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 followed by 10 day rest period for up to 8 cycles or for 2 cycles beyond complete response. Participants with progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity discontinued treatment.
64
Total64

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event9
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyLack of Response3
Overall StudyNon-Protocol Therapy1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision3
Overall StudyProgressive Disease9
Overall StudyProgressive Disease before Trt1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1
Overall StudyWithdrawal of Consent before Trt1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBortezomib
Age, Continuous60 years
ISS Stage
ISS Stage I
32 participants
ISS Stage
ISS Stage II
26 participants
ISS Stage
ISS Stage III
4 participants
ISS Stage
Unknown
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-White
5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
59 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
64 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
44 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
62 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
33 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response (OR) Rate

Objective response was defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (Blade J et al Br J Haematol 1998). CR required all of the following: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine at two consecutive times for minimum 6 weeks; Disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas for at least 6 weeks; \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow on 2 determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks; No increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions. PR required all the following: ≥50% reduction in the level of the serum monoclonal protein on 2 determinations for minimum 6 weeks; If present, reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion either by ≥90% or to \<200 mg on 2 determinations for minimum 6 weeks; ≥50% reduction size of soft tissue plasmacytomas for minimum 6 weeks; No increase in the number or size of lytic bone lesions. Development of a compression fracture does not exclude response in either category.

Time frame: Response was assessed every two cycles on treatment. Treatment duration in months was a median (range) of 5.1 (0.8-6.1).

Population: The analysis population is comprised of eligible and treated participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BortezomibObjective Response (OR) Rate0.41 proportion of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Neuropathic Pain

Number of participants experiencing any grade treatment-emergent neuropathic pain events based on CTCAEv3 as reported on case report forms.

Time frame: Assessed each cycle throughout treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment. Treatment duration in months was a median (range) of 5.1 (0.8-6.1).

Population: The analysis population is comprised of eligible and treated participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BortezomibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Neuropathic Pain8 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Sensory Neuropathy

Number of participants experiencing any grade treatment-emergent sensory neuropathy events based on CTCAEv3 as reported on case report forms.

Time frame: Assessed each cycle throughout treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment. Treatment duration in months was a median (range) of 5.1 (0.8-6.1).

Population: The analysis population is comprised of eligible and treated participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BortezomibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Sensory Neuropathy41 participants
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from study entry to the earliest documentation of disease progression (PD) or death. Participants alive without evidence of PD were censored at the earliest date of last disease assessment or date of initiation of non-protocol therapy. PD was established based European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (Blade J et al Br J Haematol 1998). PD required 1 or more of the following: \>25% increase in serum monoclonal protein with absolute minimum of 0.5 g/dL (confirmed on repeat investigation); \>25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion with minimum absolute increase of 200 mg/24 hrs (confirmed on repeat investigation); \>25% increase in bone marrow plasma cells with minimum absolute increase of 10%; Definite increase in size of existing soft tissue plasmacytomas and/or lytic lesions or new; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL not attributable to other cause).

Time frame: Disease was assessed every two cycles on treatment and every 6 weeks in long-term follow-up. Median follow-up was 29 months as of the data analysis.

Population: The analysis population is comprised of eligible and treated participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BortezomibProgression-Free Survival (PFS)17.0 months
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from start of treatment to documentation of disease progression (PD). Participants without evidence of PD were censored at the latest date of last disease assessment or date of initiation of non-protocol therapy. PD was established based European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (Blade J et al Br J Haematol 1998). PD required 1 or more of the following: \>25% increase in serum monoclonal protein with absolute minimum of 0.5 g/dL (confirmed on repeat investigation); \>25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion with minimum absolute increase of 200 mg/24 hrs (confirmed on repeat investigation); \>25% increase in bone marrow plasma cells with minimum absolute increase of 10%; Definite increase in size of existing or new soft tissue plasmacytomas and/or lytic lesions; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL not attributable to other cause).

Time frame: Disease was assessed every two cycles on treatment and every 6 weeks in long-term follow-up. Median follow-up was 29 months.

Population: The analysis population is comprised of eligible and treated participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BortezomibTime to Progression (TTP)17.3 months
Secondary

Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) Rate

Very good partial response or better was defined per International Uniform Response criteria (Durie B, Harousseau JL, Miquel JS, et al Leukemia 2006). See CR requirements in primary outcome measure plus if serum and urine M protein were unmeasurable then immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC) must be in a normal ratio of 0.26-1.65 at two consecutive times. VGPR required the following: Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis; \>=90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component \<100 mg per 24 hours (by SPEP and UPEP); if the serum and urine M protein were unmeasurable then a \>90% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels.

Time frame: Response was assessed every two cycles on treatment. Treatment duration in months was a median (range) of 5.1 (0.8-6.1).

Population: The analysis population is comprised of eligible and treated participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BortezomibVery Good Partial Response (VGPR) Rate.17 proportion of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026