Skip to content

Comparative Study of Mesh Versus No Mesh in Prolapse Surgery

Comparison of the Prosthesis Ugytex by the Trans-obturator Approach and Anterior Colporrhaphy for the Surgical Treatment of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00153257
Enrollment
162
Registered
2005-09-12
Start date
2005-04-30
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2019-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystocele, Vaginal Prolapse

Brief summary

Hypothesis / aims of study A RCT has shown that results of prolapse repair via vaginal approach could be improved when a polypropylene mesh is used as tissue support (1). However, non protected heavy-weight meshes were associated with a high rate of local complications such as vaginal erosions and dyspareunia (2). The aim of this multicentre study is to evaluate anatomical and functional results of an innovative low-weight polypropylene mesh protected by an absorbable hydrophilic film in the prolapse repair by vaginal route, in comparison by the standard anterior colporrhaphy. Study design, materials and methods This study involves 15 centres in French Private or Public Hospital. Patients will be randomly allocated to be operated by a standard anterior colporrhaphy or by an anterior repair reinforced by a specially designed mesh: UgytexTM (Sofradim, France). Ugytex is a low-weight (38g/m²) and highly porous (average porosity: 89%, pores over 1.5mm) polypropylene monofilament mesh offering tissue ingrowth and connective differentiation for a stable and long-term support. The mesh is coated with a hydrophilic film composed of atelocollagen, polyethylene glycol and glycerol. The absorbable coating protects delicate pelvic viscera from the risk of acute inflammation during the healing's inflammatory peak. Prolapse severity will be evaluated using the POP-Q system. In order to evaluate the patient's quality of life, the validated PFDI and the PFIQ questionnaires will be used preoperatively and during follow-up (3), as well as a validated questionnaire on sexual problems. The difference on one-year cure rate should be 15% (80% for the anterior colporrhaphy and 95% for the mesh repair). Then the estimated number of patient is 97 in each arm.

Interventions

DEVICEUgytex

Anterior repair reinforced by a specially designed mesh: UgytexTM

Sponsors

DRRC
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Medtronic - MITG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients older than 60 years-old * Anterior vaginal wall prolapse of stage 2 or more (POP-Q system) * Symptomatic prolapse * Informed consent signature obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Patient not able to read French language * Patient with a anterior prolapse of stage 1 * Urinary of vaginal infection * Hepatopathy with ascitis * Diabetes uncontrolled * Treatment by corticosteroids * Previous pelvic irradiation * Intraoperative bladder injury

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of anatomical recurrences of anterior vaginal wall prolapse of stage 2 or more (POP-Q system)1 yearPOP-Q score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perioperative and postoperative morbidity3 yearsNumber of Major and minor complication
Functionnal results following intervention3 yearsSymptoms and quality of life questionnaires
Rate of local complications of prosthesis (vaginal erosion, prosthesis shrinkage)3 years
Post-operative sexuality3 yearsPISQ score

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026