Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium in Patients With COPD and Concomitant Diagnosis of Asthma

A 12-week Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Tiotropium 18μg q.d. in Patients With COPD and a Concomitant Diagnosis of Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00152984
Enrollment
472
Registered
2005-09-12
Start date
2004-12-31
Completion date
2006-04-30
Last updated
2017-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of tiotropium compared to placebo in the treatment of patients with COPD and a concomitant diagnosis of asthma

Interventions

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of COPD and diagnosis of asthma before the age of 30 * Current or ex-smokers with a cigarette smoking history of at least 10 pack-years * Treatment with inhaled steroids at least 1 year before study entry * FEV1 increase of more than 12% 30 min. after 400 mcg salbutamol or documented reversibility of 12% documented during the past 5 years * FEV1 increase of more than 200 mL 30 min. after 400 mcg salbutamol or documented increase of 200 mL after reversibility test within the last 5 years * Post bronchodilator FEV1 less than 80% predicted normal (ECCS) at visit 1 * Post bronchodilator FEV1 less than 70% of FVC at visit 1

Exclusion criteria

* Respiratory infection or exacerbation 6 weeks prior to Visit 1 or during run-in period. * Significant diseases other than COPD or asthma * Myocardial infarction within the last 6 months * Unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention or change in therapy in the last year * Hospitalisation for heart failure (NYHA Class III or IV) within the last year * History of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction, cystic fibrosis or clinically evident bronchiectasis * Known active tuberculosis * History of thoracotomy with pulmonary resection * History of cancer within the last 5 years (excluding treated basal cell carcinoma) * Patients requiring oxygen therapy for more than 1 hour per day * Patients currently in a pulmonary rehabilitation programme or who have completed such a programme within 4 weeks before Visit 1 * Known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs or lactose

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
AUC(0-6) FEV1 (Area under the curve of change in FEV1 from baseline to 6 hours post dose)after 12 weeks of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Forced vital capacity (FVC)12 weeks
Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)12 weeks
Use of rescue medication12 weeks
AUC0-6hFEV1after first dose on Day 1 and after 4 weeks of treatment
Change in trough FEV1 (i.e. trough response) from baseline.after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment
Change in peak FEV1 from baseline (=peak response) after first doseafter 4 and 12 weeks of treatment
AUC0-6hFVC defined in the same way as for FEV1.Day 1, week 4
Trough FVC defined in the same way as for FEV1.Day 1, week 4
Peak FVC defined in the same way as for FEV1Day 1, week 4
Weekly average PEFR in the morning (a.m. pre-dose measurement) and in the evening (p.m. measurement).12 weeks
Weekly average number of puffs of rescue medication used12 weeks
Occurrence of adverse events12 weeks
Change from baseline in pulse rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (seated) measured just before spirometry12 weeks
Change from baseline in Physical examination12 weeks

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, South Africa

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026