Skip to content

Non-Polymer-Based, Rapamycin-Eluting Stents to Prevent Restenosis

A Prospective, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Non-Polymer-Based Coating With Two Different Rapamycin-Dosages for the Prevention of Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00152308
Enrollment
333
Registered
2005-09-09
Start date
2004-12-31
Completion date
2007-02-28
Last updated
2020-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Disease

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectively of coating of coronary stents with two different doses of rapamycin for the prevention of coronary vessel re-blockage

Detailed description

In-stent restenosis remains the major problem limiting the efficacy of coronary stenting. Either sirolimus or paclitaxel drug-eluting stents have been demonstrated to decrease neointima proliferation resulting in a remarkable reduction of restenosis rate. However, despite the outstanding results achieved with this novel approach to restenosis, some caveats still remain. Although sirolimus markedly decreased the restenosis rate among diabetic patients in SIRIUS trial, the benefit of treatment was modest in those diabetics treated with insulin as well as with lesions longer than 15 mm located in vessels smaller than 2.5 mm. Additionally, in a recent study it was reported that the restenosis rate in high-risk lesions such as coronary bifurcations still remains a problem Data from patient populations other than those enrolled in randomized trials suggest even more caution in the evaluation of the impact of DES on restenosis in the real world, where the operator must deal with in-stent restenosis, bifurcation lesions, chronic total occlusions, small vessels, and long lesions. The identification of some of the traditional risk factors for restenosis as important predictors for in-DES restenosis could be explained as an insufficient inhibition of tissue reaction and neointimal growth by the antiproliferative action of the specific drug or dose used. This leads to the inference that an individualized approach should be adopted by tailoring the choice and the dosing of eluting drug(s) according to the specific lesion or patient characteristics. On the other hand, although drug-eluting stents are currently considered as the most effective way to reduce in-stent restenosis, their widespread use is hampered by the high costs. Therefore, it is important to develop new methods and techniques that would result in a more effective prevention of in-stent restenosis while being available for a larger number of patients. These considerations as well as the proven efficacy of rapamycin in lowering the rate of coronary restenosis, support the rationality of the concept of on-site coating of stents in the catheterization laboratory with individualized doses of rapamycin after the clinical and the angiographic profiles of the patient scheduled to coronary stenting have been determined

Interventions

DEVICE2% rapamycin-eluting YUKONdes PEARL-stent
DEVICE1% rapamycin-eluting YUKONdes PEARL-stent
DEVICEYUKONdes PEARL-stent coated with placebo (ethanol)

Sponsors

Translumina GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age 18-85 years; Symptoms (stable or unstable angina) or signs of myocardial ischemia; Single de novo diagnosed lesion in a native coronary artery (50-99% DS); Lesion length 8 - 25 mm; Vessel diameter 2.25-3.75 mm; Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Left main target lesion unprotected by a graft; Ostial and bifurcation target lesion; Severely calcified lesions; Thrombus in target lesion; Tortuosity or angulation of target vessel or lesion; Treatment of nontarget lesions in the same or a different coronary vessel during the index procedure; Contraindications to the study medications; Acute myocardial infarction (\< 48 h); Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 25%; Participation in another trial; Pregnancy or lack of protection against pregnancy during the study Coexisting conditions limiting the life expectancy to less 24 months or that could affect the compliance of patients with protocol; Serum creatinin \>2.0mg/dL; Hemorrhagic diathesis; Leukocyte count \<3500/ml\^3 Platelet count \<100.000/ml\^3

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Binary angiographic restenosis at follow-up angiogram

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Target vessel failure (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization of the target lesion)

Countries

Austria, Germany, Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026