Urinary Incontinence
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the effect of tolterodine ER plus tamsulosin versus placebo on patient perception of overall treatment benefit in men who have frequency and urgency, with or without urinary urge incontinence (UUI), with or without bladder outlet obstruction (BOO).
Interventions
Sponsors
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Male 40 years of age * Clinical signs and symptoms of frequency and urgency, with or without UUI, with or without BOO, for at least three months * Mean urinary frequency of 8 micturitions/24h verified by the Screening micturition diary
Exclusion criteria
* Post-void residual urine volume (PVR) of \> 200 ml as measured by an ultrasound * Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) of \< 5 ml/second as measured by a flowmeter; a voided volume of 75 ml is required in order to accurately record the Qmax * Prescribed and administered an antimuscarinic or antispasmodic within 1 month * Prescribed and administered an a-1-adrenergic antagonist within 2 weeks
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Patient Perception of Treatment Benefit at Week 12: | — |
| Treatment benefit, treatment satisfaction, and willingness to continue treatment questions at week 12 | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Change in number of micturitions per 24 hours at week 1, week 6 and 12 relative to baseline. | — |
| Change in number of daytime micturitions per 24 hours at week 1, week 6 and 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in number of nighttime micturitions per 24 hours at week 1, week 6 and 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in the average severity of the Urinary Sensation Scale at week 1, week 6, and week 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in number of OAB micturition episodes per 24 hours (OAB micturition is defined as micturition episodes associated with Urinary Sensation Scale score 3) at week 1, week 6 and week 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in number of daytime OAB micturition episodes per 24 hours (OAB micturition is defined as micturition episodes associated with Urinary Sensation Scale score 3) at week 1, week 6 and week 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in number of nighttime OAB micturition episodes per 24 hours. (severe OAB micturition is defined as micturition episodes associated with Urinary Sensation Scale score 4) at week 1, week 6 and week 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in number of severe OAB micturition episodes per 24 hours (severe OAB micturition is defined as micturition episodes associated with Urinary Sensation Scale score 4) at week 1, week 6 and week 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in number of daytime severe OAB micturition episodes per 24 hours (severe OAB micturition is defined as micturition episodes associated with Urinary Sensation Scale score 4) at week 1, week 6 and week 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in number of nighttime severe OAB micturition episodes per 24 hours (severe OAB micturition is defined as micturition episodes associated with Urinary Sensation Scale score 4) at week 1, week 6 and week 12 relative to baseline | — |
| International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS): | — |
| Change in I-PSS total score at weeks 1, 6 and 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Micturition Diary- Change in number of urge incontinence episodes per 24 hours at week 1, week 6 and 12 relative to baseline. | — |
| Change in I-PSS irritative domain (Sum of Q2, Q4, and Q7) at weeks 1, 6 and 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in I-PSS obstructive domain (Sum of Q1, Q3, Q5, and Q6) at weeks 1, 6 and 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in I-PSS index score (Sum Q1 to Q7) at weeks 1, 6 and 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in I-PSS QoL score (Q8) at weeks 1, 6 and 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Patient perception of urgency: | — |
| Change in the Perception of Urgency Scale (3 point scale) at week 1, week 6 and week 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in Patient's Perception of Bladder Condition at week 1, week 6 and week 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Patient Perception of Treatment benefit at week 1 and week 6 | — |
| Treatment benefit and treatment satisfaction questions will be completed at week 1 and week 6 | — |
| Change in International Continence Society Male (ICSmaleLF) Questionnaire (long form modified) individual item scores at Week 1, Week 6 and Week 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in the total score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OABq) and change in total scores for each domain of OABq at week 6 and week 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in the total score of International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and change in total scores for each domain of IIEF Questionnaire at week 6 and week 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in I-PSS individual item scores (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, and Q7) at weeks 1, 6 and 12 relative to baseline | — |
| Change in number of urge episodes per 24 hours at week 1, week 6 and 12 relative to baseline. | — |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed