Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Conditions
Brief summary
To compare the effects of irinotecan hydrochloride with cisplatin to the standard regimen etoposide plus cisplatin on overall survival, in chemotherapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed Extensive Disease-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ED-SCLC).
Interventions
etoposide 100 mg/m2 days 1, 2 and 3 cisplatin 80 mg/m2 day 1 3 week cycle
irinotecan 65 mg/m2 day 1 and 8 cisplatin 80mg/m2 day 1 3 week cycle
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically or cytologically proven Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) * WHO performance status : 0, 1
Exclusion criteria
* No previous radiotherapy is allowed except on bone metastases when newly diagnosed. Radiotherapy is not allowed for vena cava syndrome, a stent is recommended ; * No prior surgery on the primary tumor except for palliative purpose (stent for vena cava syndrome).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) for the Full Analysis Population (FAP) | Baseline to date of death (every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment) | OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For a subject not expiring, the OS time was censored on the last date of contact that they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method. |
| Overall Survival for the Per Protocol (PP) Population | Baseline to date of death (every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment) | OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For a subject not expiring, the OS time was censored on the last date of contact that they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) | Baseline to date of progression (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment until progression) | TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of tumor progression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method. |
| Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Response | Baseline to first documentation of confirmed response (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months in follow up until progression) | Objective disease response = subjects with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. |
| Tumor Related Symptoms (Pain, Dyspnea, Cough, Hemoptysis, Weight, and the Use of Opioids and Non-Opioids Analgesics) | Every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment | Improvement of ≥ 1 tumor related symptom = clinical benefit responder. Pain improvement = decrease of ≥ 1 National Cancer Institute (NCI) grade from baseline of ≥ 1 symptom of NCI pain category, without pain symptom worsening. Cough, dyspnea and hemoptysis improvement = decrease of ≥ 1 NCI grade from baseline. Positive weight change ≥ 5 percent gain from baseline. Positive analgesic consumption = change from baseline from opioid to non-opioid category. |
| European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) | Baseline, at every cycle (Day -1, Day 1 of cycle before treatment), at the end of the treatment, and every 2 months during follow-up | The EORTC QLQ-C30 scales include 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a global health status/QL scale and 9 symptom scales: nausea and vomiting, pain, fatigue, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties. All scales and single-item measures range from 0 to 100. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, for the global health status/QL represents a high QL (better patient state), and for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems (worse patient state). |
| Duration of Response (DR) | Baseline to first documentation of confirmed response (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months in follow up until progression) | DR was defined as the time from start of the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method. |
Countries
Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Egypt, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Enrollment of Cohort 1 was terminated early per protocol amendment (29 September 2003). With limited number of subjects in Cohort 1, the efficacy analysis was exploratory. The amendment reduced Irinotecan dose from 80 to 65 mg/m2. With the study powered for Overall Survival in subjects recruited thereafter (Cohort 2) efficacy analysis is reported.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 1) Each chemotherapy cycle was repeated every 21 days (3 weeks) and consisted of : Irinotecan hydrochloride 80 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 30 - 90 minutes on Day 1 and Day 8 followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes on Day 1. | 39 |
| Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 1) Each chemotherapy cycle was repeated every 21 days (3 weeks) and consisted of: Etoposide 100 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) on Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes on Day 1. | 38 |
| Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2) Each chemotherapy cycle was repeated every 21 days (3 weeks) and consisted of : Irinotecan hydrochloride 65 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 30 - 90 minutes on Day 1 and Day 8 followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes on Day 1. | 202 |
| Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2) Each chemotherapy cycle was repeated every 21 days (3 weeks) and consisted of: Etoposide 100 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) on Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes on Day 1. | 203 |
| Total | 482 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 | Adverse Event | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Cohort 1 | Death | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Cohort 1 | Progressive Disease | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Cohort 1 | Randomized But Not Treated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Cohort 1 | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Cohort 2 | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 42 | 30 |
| Cohort 2 | Death | 0 | 0 | 20 | 12 |
| Cohort 2 | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Cohort 2 | No Longer Required Study Treatment | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Cohort 2 | Other | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| Cohort 2 | Progressive Disease | 0 | 0 | 20 | 27 |
| Cohort 2 | Protocol Violation | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cohort 2 | Randomized But Not Treated | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cohort 2 | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 13 | 12 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 1) | Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 1) | Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2) | Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 18 to 44 years | 2 participants | 1 participants | 11 participants | 6 participants | 20 participants |
| Age, Customized 45 to 64 years | 27 participants | 24 participants | 134 participants | 130 participants | 315 participants |
| Age, Customized > = 65 years | 10 participants | 13 participants | 57 participants | 67 participants | 147 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 48 Participants | 48 Participants | 110 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 32 Participants | 31 Participants | 154 Participants | 155 Participants | 372 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 39 / 39 | 38 / 38 | 202 / 202 | 203 / 203 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 9 / 39 | 4 / 38 | 45 / 202 | 29 / 203 |
Outcome results
Overall Survival for the Per Protocol (PP) Population
OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For a subject not expiring, the OS time was censored on the last date of contact that they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method.
Time frame: Baseline to date of death (every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment)
Population: PP population = a subset of the Cohort 2 FAP. The subjects had to be eligible (subject had no major protocol deviations from inclusion and noninclusion criteria), evaluable for response, without any major protocol deviations during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 1) | Overall Survival for the Per Protocol (PP) Population | 10.5791 months |
| Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 1) | Overall Survival for the Per Protocol (PP) Population | 9.4292 months |
Overall Survival (OS) for the Full Analysis Population (FAP)
OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For a subject not expiring, the OS time was censored on the last date of contact that they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method.
Time frame: Baseline to date of death (every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment)
Population: FAP = Full analysis population (all treated patients)analyzed in the arm they were assigned by randomization, assuming they had a confirmed small cell lung cancer. The enrollment of Cohort 1 was terminated early per protocol amendment (29 September 2003). With limited number of subjects in Cohort 1, the efficacy analysis was exploratory.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2) | Overall Survival (OS) for the Full Analysis Population (FAP) | 10.2177 months |
| Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2) | Overall Survival (OS) for the Full Analysis Population (FAP) | 9.6591 months |
Duration of Response (DR)
DR was defined as the time from start of the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method.
Time frame: Baseline to first documentation of confirmed response (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months in follow up until progression)
Population: FAP = Full analysis population (all treated patients) of Cohort 2 (after the 29 September 2003 protocol amendment), analyzed in the arm they were assigned by randomization, assuming they had a confirmed small cell lung cancer.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2) | Duration of Response (DR) | 5.5195 months |
| Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2) | Duration of Response (DR) | 4.8953 months |
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 scales include 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a global health status/QL scale and 9 symptom scales: nausea and vomiting, pain, fatigue, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties. All scales and single-item measures range from 0 to 100. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, for the global health status/QL represents a high QL (better patient state), and for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems (worse patient state).
Time frame: Baseline, at every cycle (Day -1, Day 1 of cycle before treatment), at the end of the treatment, and every 2 months during follow-up
Population: Data were not analyzed.
Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Response
Objective disease response = subjects with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
Time frame: Baseline to first documentation of confirmed response (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months in follow up until progression)
Population: FAP = Full analysis population (all treated patients)analyzed in the arm they were assigned by randomization, assuming they had a confirmed small cell lung cancer. The enrollment of Cohort 1 was terminated early per protocol amendment (29 September 2003). With limited number of subjects in Cohort 1, the efficacy analysis was exploratory.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2) | Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Response | 79 participants |
| Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2) | Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Response | 94 participants |
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)
TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of tumor progression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method.
Time frame: Baseline to date of progression (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment until progression)
Population: FAP = Full analysis population (all treated patients)analyzed in the arm they were assigned by randomization, assuming they had a confirmed small cell lung cancer. The enrollment of Cohort 1 was terminated early per protocol amendment (29 September 2003). With limited number of subjects in Cohort 1, the efficacy analysis was exploratory.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2) | Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) | 5.3552 months |
| Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2) | Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) | 6.2423 months |
Tumor Related Symptoms (Pain, Dyspnea, Cough, Hemoptysis, Weight, and the Use of Opioids and Non-Opioids Analgesics)
Improvement of ≥ 1 tumor related symptom = clinical benefit responder. Pain improvement = decrease of ≥ 1 National Cancer Institute (NCI) grade from baseline of ≥ 1 symptom of NCI pain category, without pain symptom worsening. Cough, dyspnea and hemoptysis improvement = decrease of ≥ 1 NCI grade from baseline. Positive weight change ≥ 5 percent gain from baseline. Positive analgesic consumption = change from baseline from opioid to non-opioid category.
Time frame: Every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment
Population: Data were not analyzed.