Skip to content

Study Of Irinotecan Hydrochloride (Campto(R)) And Cisplatin Versus Etoposide And Cisplatin In Small Cell Lung Cancer

Open Label, Randomised Multicentre Phase III Study Of Irinotecan Hydrochloride (Campto (Registered)) And Cisplatin Versus Etoposide And Cisplatin In Chemotherapy Naive Patients With Extensive Disease - Small Cell Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00143455
Enrollment
485
Registered
2005-09-02
Start date
2002-06-30
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2010-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Brief summary

To compare the effects of irinotecan hydrochloride with cisplatin to the standard regimen etoposide plus cisplatin on overall survival, in chemotherapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed Extensive Disease-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ED-SCLC).

Interventions

DRUGEtoposide + cisplatin

etoposide 100 mg/m2 days 1, 2 and 3 cisplatin 80 mg/m2 day 1 3 week cycle

DRUGIrinotecan + cisplatin

irinotecan 65 mg/m2 day 1 and 8 cisplatin 80mg/m2 day 1 3 week cycle

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically or cytologically proven Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) * WHO performance status : 0, 1

Exclusion criteria

* No previous radiotherapy is allowed except on bone metastases when newly diagnosed. Radiotherapy is not allowed for vena cava syndrome, a stent is recommended ; * No prior surgery on the primary tumor except for palliative purpose (stent for vena cava syndrome).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS) for the Full Analysis Population (FAP)Baseline to date of death (every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment)OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For a subject not expiring, the OS time was censored on the last date of contact that they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method.
Overall Survival for the Per Protocol (PP) PopulationBaseline to date of death (every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment)OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For a subject not expiring, the OS time was censored on the last date of contact that they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)Baseline to date of progression (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment until progression)TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of tumor progression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method.
Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed ResponseBaseline to first documentation of confirmed response (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months in follow up until progression)Objective disease response = subjects with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
Tumor Related Symptoms (Pain, Dyspnea, Cough, Hemoptysis, Weight, and the Use of Opioids and Non-Opioids Analgesics)Every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatmentImprovement of ≥ 1 tumor related symptom = clinical benefit responder. Pain improvement = decrease of ≥ 1 National Cancer Institute (NCI) grade from baseline of ≥ 1 symptom of NCI pain category, without pain symptom worsening. Cough, dyspnea and hemoptysis improvement = decrease of ≥ 1 NCI grade from baseline. Positive weight change ≥ 5 percent gain from baseline. Positive analgesic consumption = change from baseline from opioid to non-opioid category.
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)Baseline, at every cycle (Day -1, Day 1 of cycle before treatment), at the end of the treatment, and every 2 months during follow-upThe EORTC QLQ-C30 scales include 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a global health status/QL scale and 9 symptom scales: nausea and vomiting, pain, fatigue, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties. All scales and single-item measures range from 0 to 100. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, for the global health status/QL represents a high QL (better patient state), and for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems (worse patient state).
Duration of Response (DR)Baseline to first documentation of confirmed response (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months in follow up until progression)DR was defined as the time from start of the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Egypt, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrollment of Cohort 1 was terminated early per protocol amendment (29 September 2003). With limited number of subjects in Cohort 1, the efficacy analysis was exploratory. The amendment reduced Irinotecan dose from 80 to 65 mg/m2. With the study powered for Overall Survival in subjects recruited thereafter (Cohort 2) efficacy analysis is reported.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 1)
Each chemotherapy cycle was repeated every 21 days (3 weeks) and consisted of : Irinotecan hydrochloride 80 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 30 - 90 minutes on Day 1 and Day 8 followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes on Day 1.
39
Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 1)
Each chemotherapy cycle was repeated every 21 days (3 weeks) and consisted of: Etoposide 100 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) on Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes on Day 1.
38
Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)
Each chemotherapy cycle was repeated every 21 days (3 weeks) and consisted of : Irinotecan hydrochloride 65 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 30 - 90 minutes on Day 1 and Day 8 followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes on Day 1.
202
Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)
Each chemotherapy cycle was repeated every 21 days (3 weeks) and consisted of: Etoposide 100 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) on Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes on Day 1.
203
Total482

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Cohort 1Adverse Event8400
Cohort 1Death5200
Cohort 1Progressive Disease0600
Cohort 1Randomized But Not Treated0100
Cohort 1Withdrawal by Subject1400
Cohort 2Adverse Event004230
Cohort 2Death002012
Cohort 2Lost to Follow-up0014
Cohort 2No Longer Required Study Treatment0010
Cohort 2Other0076
Cohort 2Progressive Disease002027
Cohort 2Protocol Violation0011
Cohort 2Randomized But Not Treated0011
Cohort 2Withdrawal by Subject001312

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIrinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 1)Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 1)Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)Total
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
2 participants1 participants11 participants6 participants20 participants
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
27 participants24 participants134 participants130 participants315 participants
Age, Customized
> = 65 years
10 participants13 participants57 participants67 participants147 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants7 Participants48 Participants48 Participants110 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants31 Participants154 Participants155 Participants372 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
39 / 3938 / 38202 / 202203 / 203
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 394 / 3845 / 20229 / 203

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival for the Per Protocol (PP) Population

OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For a subject not expiring, the OS time was censored on the last date of contact that they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method.

Time frame: Baseline to date of death (every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment)

Population: PP population = a subset of the Cohort 2 FAP. The subjects had to be eligible (subject had no major protocol deviations from inclusion and noninclusion criteria), evaluable for response, without any major protocol deviations during the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 1)Overall Survival for the Per Protocol (PP) Population10.5791 months
Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 1)Overall Survival for the Per Protocol (PP) Population9.4292 months
p-value: 0.01195% CI: [1.071, 1.701]Cox Proportional Hazard Model
Primary

Overall Survival (OS) for the Full Analysis Population (FAP)

OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For a subject not expiring, the OS time was censored on the last date of contact that they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method.

Time frame: Baseline to date of death (every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment)

Population: FAP = Full analysis population (all treated patients)analyzed in the arm they were assigned by randomization, assuming they had a confirmed small cell lung cancer. The enrollment of Cohort 1 was terminated early per protocol amendment (29 September 2003). With limited number of subjects in Cohort 1, the efficacy analysis was exploratory.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)Overall Survival (OS) for the Full Analysis Population (FAP)10.2177 months
Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)Overall Survival (OS) for the Full Analysis Population (FAP)9.6591 months
Comparison: A non-inferiority test was combined with a superiority test based on a closed testing procedure. The null hypothesis was to be rejected if the lower bound of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio (control/test) estimated from a Cox proportional hazards model, with an indicator for the control arm, was less than 0.80.p-value: 0.055695% CI: [0.995, 1.536]Cox Proportional Hazard Model
Secondary

Duration of Response (DR)

DR was defined as the time from start of the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method.

Time frame: Baseline to first documentation of confirmed response (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months in follow up until progression)

Population: FAP = Full analysis population (all treated patients) of Cohort 2 (after the 29 September 2003 protocol amendment), analyzed in the arm they were assigned by randomization, assuming they had a confirmed small cell lung cancer.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)Duration of Response (DR)5.5195 months
Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)Duration of Response (DR)4.8953 months
p-value: 0.083195% CI: [0.961, 1.908]Cox Proportional Hazard Model
Secondary

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)

The EORTC QLQ-C30 scales include 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a global health status/QL scale and 9 symptom scales: nausea and vomiting, pain, fatigue, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties. All scales and single-item measures range from 0 to 100. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, for the global health status/QL represents a high QL (better patient state), and for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems (worse patient state).

Time frame: Baseline, at every cycle (Day -1, Day 1 of cycle before treatment), at the end of the treatment, and every 2 months during follow-up

Population: Data were not analyzed.

Secondary

Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Response

Objective disease response = subjects with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

Time frame: Baseline to first documentation of confirmed response (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months in follow up until progression)

Population: FAP = Full analysis population (all treated patients)analyzed in the arm they were assigned by randomization, assuming they had a confirmed small cell lung cancer. The enrollment of Cohort 1 was terminated early per protocol amendment (29 September 2003). With limited number of subjects in Cohort 1, the efficacy analysis was exploratory.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Response79 participants
Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Response94 participants
p-value: 0.14395% CI: [0.905, 1.993]Chi-squared
Secondary

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of tumor progression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method.

Time frame: Baseline to date of progression (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment until progression)

Population: FAP = Full analysis population (all treated patients)analyzed in the arm they were assigned by randomization, assuming they had a confirmed small cell lung cancer. The enrollment of Cohort 1 was terminated early per protocol amendment (29 September 2003). With limited number of subjects in Cohort 1, the efficacy analysis was exploratory.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)5.3552 months
Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)6.2423 months
p-value: 0.754495% CI: [0.771, 1.208]Cox Proportional Hazard Model
Secondary

Tumor Related Symptoms (Pain, Dyspnea, Cough, Hemoptysis, Weight, and the Use of Opioids and Non-Opioids Analgesics)

Improvement of ≥ 1 tumor related symptom = clinical benefit responder. Pain improvement = decrease of ≥ 1 National Cancer Institute (NCI) grade from baseline of ≥ 1 symptom of NCI pain category, without pain symptom worsening. Cough, dyspnea and hemoptysis improvement = decrease of ≥ 1 NCI grade from baseline. Positive weight change ≥ 5 percent gain from baseline. Positive analgesic consumption = change from baseline from opioid to non-opioid category.

Time frame: Every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment

Population: Data were not analyzed.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026