Skip to content

Corneal Versus Conjunctival Delivery Using a Delivery Device

Effect Of Corneal Versus Conjunctival Delivery On The Corneal Safety, Tolerability, and Antihypertensive Efficacy Of The Xalatan Ophthalmic Delivery Device

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00143429
Enrollment
0
Registered
2005-09-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Ocular Hypertension

Keywords

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Brief summary

Compare the antihypertensive efficacy of three methods for installing Xalatan

Interventions

Sponsors

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in 1 or both eyes

Exclusion criteria

* History of closed/barely open anterior chamber angle or a history of angle closure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
IOP level in the study eye

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in ocular safety assessments. Ocular and systemic adverse events throughout the study period

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026