Skip to content

Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Pediatric Painful Sickle Crisis

Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Pediatric Painful Sickle Crisis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00142051
Enrollment
18
Registered
2005-09-02
Start date
2005-04-30
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2023-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sickle Cell Disease

Keywords

sickle cell disease, pain crisis, vaso-occlusive crisis, nitric oxide

Brief summary

Randomized, double blind placebo controlled clinical trial to evaluate effectiveness and safety of inhaled nitric oxide for the treatment of sickle cell painful crisis in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease.

Detailed description

The specific aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of inhaled nitric oxide (INO) for the treatment of acute vaso-occlusive pain crisis in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease. Nitric oxide (NO) deficiency is known to be central to the pathophysiology of vaso-occlusion. The aim is unchanged from the original application. The study is a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical trial with eligible patients randomized to receive either NO (with 21% O2 final concentration) for 16 hrs with 8 hr wean (80 ppm 0-8 hrs, 40 ppm 9-16 hrs, 20 ppm 17-20 hrs, 10 ppm 21-24 hrs) or placebo (21% O2 alone) for 24 hrs. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in change in mean pain score after 16 hours between patients treated with NO and placebo. The primary outcome measure of the study remains the difference in mean change in pain scores between groups as assessed using a 10 cm visual analogue pain scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures also remain the same. The study is a next step to our completed FDA Orphan Product Development Grant funded study (FD-R-001686) that evaluated safety and efficacy of NO used for 4 hrs for treatment of vaso-occlusive crisis in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease.

Interventions

DRUGnitric oxide

80 ppm 8 hrs, 40 ppm 8 hrs, 20 ppm 4 hrs, 10 ppm 4 hrs

DRUGoxygen

oxygen fi02 21% (room air)

Sponsors

FDA Office of Orphan Products Development
CollaboratorFED
Boston Children's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 22 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Hemoglobin SS, Hemoglobin Sß0thal or Hemoglobin SC documented by prior hemoglobin electrophoresis. 2. Age 9 years or greater, age 22 years or less; pediatric age range, old enough to comply with mask and give reliable pain assessment score. 3. Acute pain crisis defined as pain in abdomen, back and/or extremities that cannot be explained by a diagnosis other than sickle cell disease. 4. Initial pain score at least 6 cm; to optimize the likelihood of observing a significant difference in change in pain score between INO treated and placebo groups. Based on data from our previous study, it is anticipated that patients will have an average pre-inhalation pain score of approximately 8 cm.

Exclusion criteria

1. \> 24 pain crises in the last 12 months. Patients with very frequent pain crisis may have biologic and/or psychosocial pathophysiology that differs from those with fewer pain crises. 2. Pain crisis treated at a medical facility within the last 12 hours. 3. Use of investigational drugs other than hydroxyurea within the last 30 days. 4. Significant respiratory compromise (initial SaO2 \< 90%) and/or patients likely to have acute chest syndrome (chest pain and infiltrate) will be eliminated. 5. Clinically significant acute or chronic cardiac dysfunction. 6. Acute priapism. 7. New focal neurologic symptoms. 8. Concurrent documented or suspected bacterial or parvovirus infection. 9. Temperature \> 38.4ºC. These patients may have concomitant infection. 10. Transfusion within 30 days or chronic transfusion therapy. 11. Pregnant female 12. Cigarette smoker \> 1/2 ppd. 13. Allergy to morphine \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in change in mean pain score (visual analog scale) after 16 hours of treatment between patients treated with INO and placebo.every 4 hrs x duration of hospitalization

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Longitudinal analyses of change in VAS pain score over 16 hours.every 4 hrs, duration of hospitalization
Change in pain score using a 5 point descriptive scale and a 5 point relief scale.every 4 hours duration of hospitalization
Time to pain score less than 5 cm for 2 consecutive VAS pain assessments 4 hours apart and not using parenteral narcotics.every 4 hrs, duration of hospitalization
Use of pain medication: cumulative dose of parenteral narcotic pain medications.While patient on parenteral narcotic
Duration of hospitalization.Time of discharge
Secondary outcome measures to evaluate efficacyDuration of hospitalization, followup
Secondary outcome measures to evaluate safety are:4, 8, 16, 24 hrs methb, constant NO2, 02 during inhalation
Maximum concentration of methemoglobin.0, 4, 8, 16, 24 hrs
Maximum concentration of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) delivered.continuous over 24 hrs of inhalaiton
Minimum percent oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (by pulse oximetry).continuous over 24 hrs of inhalation then every 4 hrs for duration of hospitalization
Maximum and minimum vital signs: pulse, respiratory rate, blood pressure.every 4 hrs during hospitalization
Inflammatory markers/mediators.0, 16 and q 24 hrs during hospitalization

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026