Skip to content

Pediatric Open-Label Extension Study of Etanercept in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis

An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety of Etanercept in Pediatric Subjects With Plaque Psoriasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00141921
Enrollment
182
Registered
2005-09-02
Start date
2005-08-11
Completion date
2017-08-16
Last updated
2017-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric Plaque Psoriasis

Keywords

Immunex, Amgen, Pediatric,, plaque psoriasis, clinical trial

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of etanercept in pediatric patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Detailed description

This study was a multicenter, open-label extension study for pediatric patients who participated in Study 20030211 (NCT00078819).

Interventions

DRUGEtanercept

Open-label at a dose of 0.8 mg/kg (up to an intended dose of 50 mg) given once weekly by subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Enrollment on previous Amgen study 20030211 (NCT00078819)

Exclusion criteria

* Serious or clinically significant adverse event on Amgen study 20030211 related to etanercept

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events264 WeeksA serious adverse events is any AE that * is fatal * is life threatening * requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * is a congenital anomaly/birth defect * other significant medical hazard. The severity assessment for adverse events and infections (except injection site reactions) was done using the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Version 2.0, where Grade 3 indicates a severe toxicity (incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity). An infectious event is an event that was considered by the investigator to be an infectious episode. An injection site reaction is a reaction at the site of the subcutaneous injection, commonly characterized, but not limited to symptoms of erythema (redness, usually raised), pruritis (itching), swelling, or pain that is persistent for 4 hours or longer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exposure-adjusted Adverse Event Rates264 weeksThe exposure adjusted event rate for a given event in a given time period is defined as the number of events reported in the given time period divided by total patient-years on investigational product during the period. Exposure-adjusted event rate per 100 patient years = total number of events / patient years \* 100. Multiple occurrences of the same event for a participant were counted as multiple events.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs264 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Laboratory Toxicities264 weeksThe severity assessment for adverse events and infections (not including injection site reaction) used the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Version 2.0, where Grade 1= Mild - aware of sign or symptom, but easily tolerated; Grade 2= Moderate - discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity; Grade 3 = Severe - incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity; Grade 4= Life-threatening - refers to an event in which the patient was, in the view of the investigator, at risk of immediate death at the time of event; Grade 5 = Fatal.
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-etanercept Antibodies264 weeksBinding antibodies to etanercept were detected using an anti-etanercept immunoassay. The positive samples in the immunoassay were further analyzed for the presence of neutralizing antibodies using a bioassay. Participants who developed anti-etanercept antibodies are those who were antibody positive post-baseline with a negative or no result at baseline.
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 Response (PASI 50)Baseline and weeks 12, 48, 96, 144, 192, 240 and 264A PASI 50 response is a 50% or greater improvement (reduction) from baseline in PASI score. The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis.
Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 ResponseBaseline and weeks 12, 48, 96, 144, 192, 240 and 264A PASI 75 response is a 75% or greater improvement (reduction) from baseline in PASI score. The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis.
Percentage of Participants With a PASI 90 ResponseBaseline and weeks 12, 48, 96, 144, 192, 240 and 264A PASI 90 response is a 90% or greater improvement (reduction) from baseline in PASI score. The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis.
Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in PASI ScoreStudy 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 12, 48, 96, 144, 192, 240 and 264The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.
Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions264 weeksAn injection site reaction is a reaction at the site of the subcutaneous injection, commonly characterized, but not limited to symptoms of erythema (redness, usually raised), pruritis (itching), swelling, or pain that is persistent for 4 hours or longer.
Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreStudy 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Very much). The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. If participants were ≥ 13 years old, the text instrument was completed by the participants themselves. Participants ≥ 8 but \< 13 years old used the cartoon version of the instrument and participants ≤ 7 years old used the cartoon version of the instrument completed with help from the parents or caregivers. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.
Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreStudy 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (Very much). The CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings Score includes 2 questions and ranges from 0 to 6, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.
Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreStudy 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (Very much). The CDLQI Leisure Score includes 3 questions and ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.
Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreStudy 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (Very much). The CDLQI School or Holidays Score includes 1 question (How much did your skin problem effect your school work/holiday plans over the last week?) and ranges from 0 to 3, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.
Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreStudy 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (Very much). The CDLQI Personal Relationships Score includes 2 questions and ranges from 0 to 6, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.
Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreStudy 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (Very much). The CDLQI Sleep Score includes 1 question (How much has your sleep been affected by your skin problems over the last week?) and ranges from 0 to 3, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.
Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreStudy 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (Very much). The CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction Score includes 1 question (How much of a problem has the treatment for your skin been over the last week?) and ranges from 0 to 3, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.
Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainStudy 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252 and 264Participants were asked to indicate how much joint pain they had experienced in the last 7 days on a visual analog scale (VAS) from no pain on the left end of the line (score = 0) to severe pain on the right side of the line (score = 10). Improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value).
Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1)Weeks 12, 48, 96, 144, 192, 240 and 264The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe) used to measure the severity of disease (induration, scaling, and erythema). A sPGA response is defined as a sPGA value of clear (score 0) or almost clear (score 1).

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was designed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of etanercept in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who participated in Study 20030211 (NCT00078819). The study was conducted at 38 sites in the United States and Canada.

Pre-assignment details

Results reported below are from the main analysis performed at year 5 (264 weeks).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etanercept
Participants received etanercept 0.8 mg/kg (up to a maximum dose of 50 mg) once weekly by subcutaneous injection for up to 264 weeks.
182
Total182

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdministrative Decision2
Overall StudyAdverse Event5
Overall StudyDisease Progression7
Overall StudyIneligibility Determined2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up19
Overall StudyNoncompliance17
Overall StudyOther8
Overall StudyPregnancy4
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation7
Overall StudyRemain on Study28
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtanercept
Age, Continuous12.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
13 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
10 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
17 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
138 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
90 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
92 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
148 / 181
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 181

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

A serious adverse events is any AE that * is fatal * is life threatening * requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * is a congenital anomaly/birth defect * other significant medical hazard. The severity assessment for adverse events and infections (except injection site reactions) was done using the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Version 2.0, where Grade 3 indicates a severe toxicity (incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity). An infectious event is an event that was considered by the investigator to be an infectious episode. An injection site reaction is a reaction at the site of the subcutaneous injection, commonly characterized, but not limited to symptoms of erythema (redness, usually raised), pruritis (itching), swelling, or pain that is persistent for 4 hours or longer.

Time frame: 264 Weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny adverse event161 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsNon-infectious adverse events149 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsInfections140 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsGrade 3 non-infectious adverse events14 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsGrade 3 infections5 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious non-infectious adverse events5 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious infections2 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsNon-infectious AEs leading to study withdrawal5 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsInfections leading to withdrawal from study1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsInjection site reactions16 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDeaths0 participants
Secondary

Exposure-adjusted Adverse Event Rates

The exposure adjusted event rate for a given event in a given time period is defined as the number of events reported in the given time period divided by total patient-years on investigational product during the period. Exposure-adjusted event rate per 100 patient years = total number of events / patient years \* 100. Multiple occurrences of the same event for a participant were counted as multiple events.

Time frame: 264 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptExposure-adjusted Adverse Event RatesAll adverse events215.8 events per 100 patient years
EtanerceptExposure-adjusted Adverse Event RatesNon-infectious Adverse Events115.9 events per 100 patient years
EtanerceptExposure-adjusted Adverse Event RatesInfections97.3 events per 100 patient years
EtanerceptExposure-adjusted Adverse Event RatesInjection Site Reactions2.6 events per 100 patient years
Secondary

Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint Pain

Participants were asked to indicate how much joint pain they had experienced in the last 7 days on a visual analog scale (VAS) from no pain on the left end of the line (score = 0) to severe pain on the right side of the line (score = 10). Improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value).

Time frame: Study 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who completed the joint pain assessment at Study 20030211 baseline, and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainStudy 20050111 baseline (N = 31)1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 12 (N = 29)2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 24 (N = 22)2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 36 (N = 22)1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 48 (N = 24)1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 60 (N = 14)1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 72 (N = 16)2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 84 (N = 14)2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 96 (N = 16)2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 108 (N = 14)2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 120 (N = 12)2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 132 (N = 15)1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 144 (N = 12)1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 156 (N = 12)2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 168 (N = 10)2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 180 (N = 11)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 192 (N = 11)2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 204 (N = 11)2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 216 (N = 9)2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 228 (N = 10)2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 240 (N = 9)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 252 (N = 8)3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
EtanerceptImprovement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Joint PainWeek 264 (N = 8)3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-etanercept Antibodies

Binding antibodies to etanercept were detected using an anti-etanercept immunoassay. The positive samples in the immunoassay were further analyzed for the presence of neutralizing antibodies using a bioassay. Participants who developed anti-etanercept antibodies are those who were antibody positive post-baseline with a negative or no result at baseline.

Time frame: 264 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and had a post-baseline antibody result.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-etanercept AntibodiesBinding antibody positive18 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-etanercept AntibodiesNeutralizing antibody positive0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs

Time frame: 264 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Laboratory Toxicities

The severity assessment for adverse events and infections (not including injection site reaction) used the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Version 2.0, where Grade 1= Mild - aware of sign or symptom, but easily tolerated; Grade 2= Moderate - discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity; Grade 3 = Severe - incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity; Grade 4= Life-threatening - refers to an event in which the patient was, in the view of the investigator, at risk of immediate death at the time of event; Grade 5 = Fatal.

Time frame: 264 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesAny grade 4 toxicity0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesGrade 3 high creatinine1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesGrade 3 high hemoglobin1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesGrade 3 low hemoglobin1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesGrade 3 high alanine aminotransferase1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesGrade 3 high white blood cells1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions

An injection site reaction is a reaction at the site of the subcutaneous injection, commonly characterized, but not limited to symptoms of erythema (redness, usually raised), pruritis (itching), swelling, or pain that is persistent for 4 hours or longer.

Time frame: 264 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsAny injection site reaction16 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site erythema6 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site reaction4 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site pruritus3 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site haematoma2 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site swelling2 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site discolouration1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site irritation1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site pain1 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response

A PASI 75 response is a 75% or greater improvement (reduction) from baseline in PASI score. The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12, 48, 96, 144, 192, 240 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 75 ResponseWeek 12 (N = 181)67.4 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 75 ResponseWeek 48 (N = 168)67.3 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 75 ResponseWeek 96 (N = 138)60.9 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 75 ResponseWeek 144 (N = 114)62.3 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 75 ResponseWeek 192 (n = 92)69.6 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 75 ResponseWeek 240 (N = 74)64.9 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 75 ResponseWeek 264 (N = 66)63.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a PASI 90 Response

A PASI 90 response is a 90% or greater improvement (reduction) from baseline in PASI score. The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12, 48, 96, 144, 192, 240 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 90 ResponseWeek 12 (N = 181)35.4 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 90 ResponseWeek 48 (N = 168)32.7 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 90 ResponseWeek 96 (N = 138)29.7 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 90 ResponseWeek 144 (N = 114)28.1 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 90 ResponseWeek 192 (n = 92)35.9 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 90 ResponseWeek 240 (N = 74)36.5 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a PASI 90 ResponseWeek 264 (N = 66)28.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 Response (PASI 50)

A PASI 50 response is a 50% or greater improvement (reduction) from baseline in PASI score. The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12, 48, 96, 144, 192, 240 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 Response (PASI 50)Week 12 (N = 181)89.5 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 Response (PASI 50)Week 48 (N = 168)89.3 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 Response (PASI 50)Week 96 (N = 138)89.1 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 Response (PASI 50)Week 144 (N = 114)88.6 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 Response (PASI 50)Week 192 (n = 92)87.0 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 Response (PASI 50)Week 240 (N = 74)91.9 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 Response (PASI 50)Week 264 (N = 66)87.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1)

The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe) used to measure the severity of disease (induration, scaling, and erythema). A sPGA response is defined as a sPGA value of clear (score 0) or almost clear (score 1).

Time frame: Weeks 12, 48, 96, 144, 192, 240 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1)Week 12 (N = 181)53.6 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1)Week 48 (N = 168)48.8 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1)Week 96 (N = 139)47.5 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1)Week 144 (N = 114)45.6 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1)Week 192 (n = 92)47.8 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1)Week 240 (N = 74)50.0 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1)Week 264 (N = 66)37.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure Score

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (Very much). The CDLQI Leisure Score includes 3 questions and ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.

Time frame: Study 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product with baseline data and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreStudy 20050111 baseline (N = 165)51.088 percent improvementStandard Deviation 52.612
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreWeek 24 (N = 156)50.546 percent improvementStandard Deviation 58.606
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreWeek 48 (N = 148)51.792 percent improvementStandard Deviation 61.204
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreWeek 72 (N = 136)50.792 percent improvementStandard Deviation 70.769
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreWeek 96 (N = 129)48.686 percent improvementStandard Deviation 68.482
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreWeek 120 (N = 105)59.031 percent improvementStandard Deviation 49.472
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreWeek 144 (N = 104)57.125 percent improvementStandard Deviation 54.284
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreWeek 168 (N = 94)55.198 percent improvementStandard Deviation 52.141
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreWeek 192 (N = 81)47.989 percent improvementStandard Deviation 72.947
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreWeek 216 (N = 71)58.545 percent improvementStandard Deviation 60.44
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreWeek 240 (N = 64)55.727 percent improvementStandard Deviation 64.42
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Leisure ScoreWeek 264 (N = 56)50.072 percent improvementStandard Deviation 62.049
Secondary

Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships Score

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (Very much). The CDLQI Personal Relationships Score includes 2 questions and ranges from 0 to 6, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.

Time frame: Study 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product with baseline data and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreStudy 20050111 baseline (N = 166)45.452 percent improvementStandard Deviation 65.038
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreWeek 24 (N = 156)49.797 percent improvementStandard Deviation 59.328
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreWeek 48 (N = 149)50.895 percent improvementStandard Deviation 60.179
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreWeek 72 (N = 136)54.669 percent improvementStandard Deviation 54.519
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreWeek 96 (N = 129)48.346 percent improvementStandard Deviation 60.414
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreWeek 120 (N = 105)51.206 percent improvementStandard Deviation 54.435
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreWeek 144 (N = 105)50.365 percent improvementStandard Deviation 49.636
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreWeek 168 (N = 94)44.557 percent improvementStandard Deviation 72.287
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreWeek 192 (N = 81)52.284 percent improvementStandard Deviation 56.125
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreWeek 216 (N = 71)61.737 percent improvementStandard Deviation 48.255
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreWeek 240 (N = 65)56.282 percent improvementStandard Deviation 52.042
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Personal Relationships ScoreWeek 264 (N = 57)56.140 percent improvementStandard Deviation 52.481
Secondary

Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays Score

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (Very much). The CDLQI School or Holidays Score includes 1 question (How much did your skin problem effect your school work/holiday plans over the last week?) and ranges from 0 to 3, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.

Time frame: Study 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product with baseline data and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreStudy 20050111 baseline (N = 165)31.616 percent improvementStandard Deviation 51.981
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreWeek 24 (N = 156)32.585 percent improvementStandard Deviation 52.75
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreWeek 48 (N = 148)36.149 percent improvementStandard Deviation 51.778
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreWeek 72 (N = 133)29.825 percent improvementStandard Deviation 53.025
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreWeek 96 (N = 129)29.457 percent improvementStandard Deviation 55.805
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreWeek 120 (N = 105)32.063 percent improvementStandard Deviation 55.166
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreWeek 144 (N = 105)33.333 percent improvementStandard Deviation 48.371
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreWeek 168 (N = 94)32.979 percent improvementStandard Deviation 50.563
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreWeek 192 (N = 81)31.070 percent improvementStandard Deviation 52.886
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreWeek 216 (N = 71)35.211 percent improvementStandard Deviation 48.103
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreWeek 240 (N = 65)26.923 percent improvementStandard Deviation 56.649
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI School or Holidays ScoreWeek 264 (N = 57)27.193 percent improvementStandard Deviation 51.815
Secondary

Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep Score

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (Very much). The CDLQI Sleep Score includes 1 question (How much has your sleep been affected by your skin problems over the last week?) and ranges from 0 to 3, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.

Time frame: Study 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product with baseline data and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreStudy 20050111 baseline (N = 161)36.646 percent improvementStandard Deviation 56.851
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreWeek 24 (N = 153)36.057 percent improvementStandard Deviation 60.349
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreWeek 48 (N = 144)31.597 percent improvementStandard Deviation 56.329
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreWeek 72 (N = 132)34.596 percent improvementStandard Deviation 57.39
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreWeek 96 (N = 127)32.940 percent improvementStandard Deviation 55.216
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreWeek 120 (N = 101)29.538 percent improvementStandard Deviation 61.503
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreWeek 144 (N = 102)41.013 percent improvementStandard Deviation 50.229
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreWeek 168 (N = 93)37.814 percent improvementStandard Deviation 49.888
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreWeek 192 (N = 81)34.774 percent improvementStandard Deviation 54.658
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreWeek 216 (N = 71)35.681 percent improvementStandard Deviation 50.811
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreWeek 240 (N = 65)39.231 percent improvementStandard Deviation 48.808
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Sleep ScoreWeek 264 (N = 56)36.012 percent improvementStandard Deviation 57.89
Secondary

Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings Score

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (Very much). The CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings Score includes 2 questions and ranges from 0 to 6, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.

Time frame: Study 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product with baseline data and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreStudy 20050111 baseline (N = 165)54.869 percent improvementStandard Deviation 56.213
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreWeek 24 (N = 155)55.366 percent improvementStandard Deviation 64.039
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreWeek 48 (N = 149)53.792 percent improvementStandard Deviation 65.857
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreWeek 72 (N = 136)51.005 percent improvementStandard Deviation 68.117
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreWeek 96 (N = 128)55.430 percent improvementStandard Deviation 57.43
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreWeek 120 (N = 105)53.302 percent improvementStandard Deviation 67.555
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreWeek 144 (N = 104)56.250 percent improvementStandard Deviation 58.194
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreWeek 168 (N = 94)58.901 percent improvementStandard Deviation 49.431
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreWeek 192 (N = 81)55.700 percent improvementStandard Deviation 56.352
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreWeek 216 (N = 71)71.056 percent improvementStandard Deviation 41.396
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreWeek 240 (N = 65)67.538 percent improvementStandard Deviation 43.418
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Symptoms and Feelings ScoreWeek 264 (N = 57)56.725 percent improvementStandard Deviation 52.965
Secondary

Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction Score

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (Very much). The CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction Score includes 1 question (How much of a problem has the treatment for your skin been over the last week?) and ranges from 0 to 3, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.

Time frame: Study 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product with baseline data and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreStudy 20050111 baseline (N = 161)23.085 percent improvementStandard Deviation 64.713
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreWeek 24 (N = 152)13.268 percent improvementStandard Deviation 74.987
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreWeek 48 (N = 144)18.634 percent improvementStandard Deviation 67.75
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreWeek 72 (N = 134)23.383 percent improvementStandard Deviation 73.21
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreWeek 96 (N = 128)17.969 percent improvementStandard Deviation 72.561
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreWeek 120 (N = 105)17.778 percent improvementStandard Deviation 65.709
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreWeek 144 (N = 104)21.795 percent improvementStandard Deviation 62.924
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreWeek 168 (N = 93)20.430 percent improvementStandard Deviation 73.849
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreWeek 192 (N = 81)26.955 percent improvementStandard Deviation 68.443
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreWeek 216 (N = 71)31.455 percent improvementStandard Deviation 59.598
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreWeek 240 (N = 65)30.513 percent improvementStandard Deviation 57.703
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in CDLQI Treatment Satisfaction ScoreWeek 264 (N = 56)37.500 percent improvementStandard Deviation 64.842
Secondary

Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total Score

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) was used to assess the impact of psoriasis on subject health-related quality of life. The CDLQI has 10 items assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with skin disease each measured on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Very much). The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating better quality of life. If participants were ≥ 13 years old, the text instrument was completed by the participants themselves. Participants ≥ 8 but \< 13 years old used the cartoon version of the instrument and participants ≤ 7 years old used the cartoon version of the instrument completed with help from the parents or caregivers. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.

Time frame: Study 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product with baseline data, and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreStudy 20050111 baseline (N = 164)59.492 percent improvementStandard Deviation 73.501
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreWeek 24 (N = 155)54.978 percent improvementStandard Deviation 69.744
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreWeek 48 (N = 148)59.229 percent improvementStandard Deviation 65.259
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreWeek 72 (N = 136)57.549 percent improvementStandard Deviation 79.389
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreWeek 96 (N = 127)61.084 percent improvementStandard Deviation 66.169
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreWeek 120 (N = 105)64.059 percent improvementStandard Deviation 75.298
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreWeek 144 (N = 103)69.732 percent improvementStandard Deviation 42.008
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreWeek 168 (N = 93)67.531 percent improvementStandard Deviation 42.261
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreWeek 192 (N = 81)65.622 percent improvementStandard Deviation 53.359
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreWeek 216 (N = 70)76.121 percent improvementStandard Deviation 43.217
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreWeek 240 (N = 64)73.631 percent improvementStandard Deviation 54.704
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total ScoreWeek 264 (N = 56)63.291 percent improvementStandard Deviation 63.555
Secondary

Percent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in PASI Score

The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value \* 100.

Time frame: Study 20030211 baseline, Study 20050111 baseline and weeks 12, 48, 96, 144, 192, 240 and 264

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of investigational product with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in PASI ScoreStudy 20050111 baseline (N = 179)74.429 percent improvementStandard Deviation 22.146
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in PASI ScoreWeek 12 (N = 181)78.286 percent improvementStandard Deviation 21.079
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in PASI ScoreWeek 48 (N = 168)77.546 percent improvementStandard Deviation 20.682
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in PASI ScoreWeek 96 (N = 138)75.355 percent improvementStandard Deviation 24.139
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in PASI ScoreWeek 144 (N = 114)75.052 percent improvementStandard Deviation 23.839
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in PASI ScoreWeek 192 (n = 92)77.815 percent improvementStandard Deviation 23.965
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in PASI ScoreWeek 240 (N = 74)78.924 percent improvementStandard Deviation 23.497
EtanerceptPercent Improvement From Study 20030211 Baseline in PASI ScoreWeek 264 (N = 66)74.605 percent improvementStandard Deviation 29.327

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026