Skip to content

Study of Enbrel (Etanercept) for the Treatment Sub-Acute Pulmonary Dysfunction After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant

Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor: Enbrel (Etanercept) for the Treatment of Sub-Acute Pulmonary Dysfunction Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. A Phase II Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00141726
Enrollment
34
Registered
2005-09-01
Start date
2003-10-31
Completion date
2009-02-28
Last updated
2015-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchiolitis Obliterans, Lung Injury, Acute, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult

Keywords

Enbrel, Stem Cell Transplantation, Lung Injury

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of etanercept in the treatment of patients with sub-acute lung injury following a bone marrow transplant. This study will also examine the toxicity of treatment with etanercept as well as whether there is an improved quality of life in these patients.

Detailed description

Lung or breathing problems can develop several months to years following a bone marrow transplant. In some cases, these breathing problems develop without any signs of germs or infection in the lungs. The name for this type of breathing problem is called Sub-Acute Lung Injury. Sub-acute lung injury often develops many months, even years following a bone marrow transplant. It is often characterized by shortness of breath, cough, wheezing and fatigue. Sub-acute lung injury can either lead to the formation of scar tissue in the lungs (making it difficult to take deep breaths), or it can cause the lungs to get weak (making people feel out of breath easily). Approximately 25 - 50% of patients with sub-acute lung injury may eventually die from the damage in their lungs. Typically, such patients die from infections that develop inside the damaged lungs. In this study, treatment with an experimental drug called Etanercept will be used. (Enbrel). The physicians feel there is the possibility that Etanercept may help improve breathing. Breathing ability will be assessed prior to treatment as well as during and after treatment so that comparisons can be made.

Interventions

DRUGEtanercept

Etanercept will be given on an open label, single arm basis to patients with non-infectious, sub-acute lung injury. 0.4 mg/kg/dose to a maximum of 25 mg, subcutaneously, twice weekly, for a total of 24 dosages.

Sponsors

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Recipients of allogeneic bone marrow, cord blood, or peripheral blood stem cell transplants are eligible * Age \>6 years and able to complete pulmonary function testing * Patients with evidence of sub-acute, non-infectious pulmonary dysfunction (OLD or RLD) * Recipients of sub-ablative transplant regimens are eligible * Recipients of donor leukocyte infusions (DLI) post-transplant are eligible * Patients must be \> 100 days post transplant

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with hypotension requiring inotropic agents other than dopamine \< 5mcg/ kg/ minute for blood pressure support. * Patients with a positive quantitative bacterial culture from the BAL fluid (≥ 104 CFU/ ml is considered positive) * Patients whose BAL fluid is positive for significant bacterial pathogens or pathogenic nonbacterial microorganisms (as defined by protocol) by special stain, culture or PCR analysis * Patients who are enrolled on a phase I or phase II trial for the prophylaxis or treatment of GVHD (acute or chronic) within 7 days of study entry. * Patients with known hypersensitivity to etanercept. * Patients who are pregnant. * Patients with CMV seropositivity at the time of study entry. Testing may include wither CMV PCR analysis or CMV pp65 testing. * Evidence for multi-system organ failure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Patients With a Greater Than or Equal to 10% Improvement in FEV1, or FVC, and DLCOweek 12 post therapyResponse was defined as a greater than or equal to 10% improvement in the absolute value for FEV1 (for obstructive defects) or FVC (for restrictive defects), and DLCO (Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide) .

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants That Experience Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Eventscontinuously (and week 4, week 8 and week 12, week 20)To evaluate the toxicity of etanercept therapy in patients with sub-acute lung injury \> 100 days post transplant, the percent incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events among evaluable patients was calculated.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study subjects were recruited from the Blood and Marrow Stem Cell Program at the University of Michigan Medical Center between 2001 and 2008, all subjects having received an allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) at least 100 days before study entry.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etanercept Treatment
Etanercept for lung injury Etanercept: Etanercept will be given on an open label, single arm basis to patients with non-infectious, sub-acute lung injury. 0.4 mg/kg/dose to a maximum of 25 mg, subcutaneously, twice weekly, for a total of 24 dosages.
34
Total34

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyCompleted <50% Scheduled Dosing3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtanercept Treatment
Age, Continuous39 years
Cell Source
Marrow
9 participants
Cell Source
Pluripotent Stem Cell (PSC)
25 participants
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Present
No
0 participants
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Present
Yes
34 participants
Diagnosis
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
3 participants
Diagnosis
AML/MDS/MF
16 participants
Diagnosis
Chronic Mylogenous Leukemia (CML)
5 participants
Diagnosis
Myeloma
2 participants
Diagnosis
NHL/CLL
6 participants
Diagnosis
Nonmalignant
2 participants
Donor Type
Matched Related Donor (MRD)
22 participants
Donor Type
Unrelated Donor (URD)
12 participants
Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Match
HLA Matched
31 participants
Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Match
Mismatch
3 participants
Lung Injury Pattern
Obstructive
25 participants
Lung Injury Pattern
Restrictive
9 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

Percent of Patients With a Greater Than or Equal to 10% Improvement in FEV1, or FVC, and DLCO

Response was defined as a greater than or equal to 10% improvement in the absolute value for FEV1 (for obstructive defects) or FVC (for restrictive defects), and DLCO (Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide) .

Time frame: week 12 post therapy

Population: 34 subjects were enrolled. Thirty-one of 34 subjects were evaluable for response, with three subjects completing \<50% of scheduled dosing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Etanercept TreatmentPercent of Patients With a Greater Than or Equal to 10% Improvement in FEV1, or FVC, and DLCO≥10% Improvement in FEV1 / FVC32 percent evaluable participants
Etanercept TreatmentPercent of Patients With a Greater Than or Equal to 10% Improvement in FEV1, or FVC, and DLCO≥10% Improvement in DLCO16 percent evaluable participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants That Experience Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Events

To evaluate the toxicity of etanercept therapy in patients with sub-acute lung injury \> 100 days post transplant, the percent incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events among evaluable patients was calculated.

Time frame: continuously (and week 4, week 8 and week 12, week 20)

Population: 34 subjects were enrolled and evaluated for adverse events.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Etanercept TreatmentPercentage of Participants That Experience Grade 3 to 4 Adverse EventsIncidence of Grad 3 to 4 Infection14 percentage of participants
Etanercept TreatmentPercentage of Participants That Experience Grade 3 to 4 Adverse EventsIncidence of Grade 3 to 4 Electrolyte Toxicities11 percentage of participants
Etanercept TreatmentPercentage of Participants That Experience Grade 3 to 4 Adverse EventsIncidence of Grade 3 to 4 Hyperglycemia8 percentage of participants
Etanercept TreatmentPercentage of Participants That Experience Grade 3 to 4 Adverse EventsIncidence of Grade 3 to 4 Renal/GU Toxicities6 percentage of participants
Etanercept TreatmentPercentage of Participants That Experience Grade 3 to 4 Adverse EventsIncidence of Grade 3 to 4 Hepatic Toxicities6 percentage of participants
Etanercept TreatmentPercentage of Participants That Experience Grade 3 to 4 Adverse EventsIncidence of Grade 3 to 4 Pain6 percentage of participants
Etanercept TreatmentPercentage of Participants That Experience Grade 3 to 4 Adverse EventsIncidence of Grade 3 to 4 Hypertension3 percentage of participants
Etanercept TreatmentPercentage of Participants That Experience Grade 3 to 4 Adverse EventsIncidence of Grade 3 to 4 GI Toxicities3 percentage of participants
Etanercept TreatmentPercentage of Participants That Experience Grade 3 to 4 Adverse EventsIncidence of Grade 3 to 4 CNS Toxicities3 percentage of participants
Etanercept TreatmentPercentage of Participants That Experience Grade 3 to 4 Adverse EventsIncidence of Grade 3 to 4 Thrombocytopenia3 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026