Skip to content

Comparison of Treatment Simplification by LPV/r vs Current Treatment Continuation in HIV-Infected Patients

A 48-Weeks National Multicenter Randomized Open Clinical Trial Evaluating Tolerance and Efficacy of a Treatment Simplification by Lopinavir/Ritonavir Versus Continuation of Current Treatment in HIV-Infected Patients With a Viral Load Inferior to 50 Copies/mL Since 6 Months At Least

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00140751
Acronym
KALESOLO
Enrollment
186
Registered
2005-09-01
Start date
2005-10-31
Completion date
2008-01-31
Last updated
2013-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

HIV-1, Treatment simplification, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Treatment Experienced, HIV Seropositivity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerance of a treatment simplification by a Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus continuation of current treatment in HIV-infected patients

Detailed description

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has made a significant impact on the natural history of HIV-1 infection, but toxicities and complexities of therapy limit long-term efficacy, and make simpler yet effective HAART regimens highly desirable. Previous attempts to 'de-intensify' protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy by discontinuing reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTI) after achieving viral suppression met with failure, probably because plasma levels of most individually administered PI are too low to inhibit viral replication consistently. Low-dose ritonavir substantially enhances lopinavir plasma levels, and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is effective as part of a combination therapy in both naive and PI-experienced patients. Furthermore, lopinavir is known to have a high genetic barrier to selection of resistance. LPV/r monotherapy could thus have the right combination of potency, favorable pharmacokinetics, and high genetic barrier needed to suppress viral replication and prevent the selection of lopinavir resistance. Preliminary results with maintenanceLPV/r monotherapy show interesting results but data from randomized studies are needed.

Interventions

DRUGLopinavir/ritonavir (drug)

Sponsors

Abbott
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> or = 18 years * Confirmed HIV-1 seropositivity * Antiretroviral treatment stable since 3 months at least * HIV-1 ARN load \< 50 copies/mL since 6 months at least * Signed consent form * No history of treatment failure (= viral load \> 1000 copies/mL) including a protease inhibitor * No opportunistic infection in the previous 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Neutrophils \< 750/mm3 * Hemoglobin \< 8 g/dL * Platelets \< 60,000/mm3 * Creatinin \> 150 micromoles/L * SGOT \> 5 NUL (Normal Upper Limit) * SGPT \> 5 NUL * Current IL-2 treatment * HBV infection treated or not by lamivudine or tenofovir * Pregnancy or feeding * Enrollment in another study not compliant with KALESOLO Study group assignment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of patients with a viral load < 50 copies/mL at S48 without any modification of antiretroviral treatment during studyW48

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evolution of lymphocytes CD4W48
ObservanceW48
Clinical and biological toleranceW48
Durability of viral responseW48
Cost-efficacy ratioW48
Predictive value of proviral DNA before treatment simplificationW48
Proportion of patients showing a lipodystrophy at J0 and S48W48
Quantitative and qualitative changes in quality of life dataW48

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026