Skip to content

Prevention of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in Rheumatic Diseases: Alendronate Versus Alfacalcidol.

Prevention of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases. The STOP-Study: a Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial With Alendronate Versus Alfacalcidol.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00138983
Enrollment
200
Registered
2005-08-30
Start date
2000-05-31
Completion date
2003-11-30
Last updated
2006-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Giant Cell Arteritis, Polymyalgia Rheumatica, Polymyositis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Wegener's Granulomatosis

Keywords

glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, rheumatic diseases, prevention, randomized double-blind, double placebo controlled trial, alendronate versus alfacalcidol

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine wich treatment is the most effective in prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in patients with rheumatic diseases. The STOP-study: a randomized placebo controlled trial with alendronate versus alfacalcidol.

Detailed description

Treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) is associated with bone loss initiated already early in therapy, causing increased (vertebral) fracture risk. Bone loss is caused by inhibition of bone formation by GCs. Active vitamin D analogues like alfacalcidol directly stimulate osteoblasts leading to an increase in bone formation. Bisphosphonates like alendronate induce apoptosis of osteoclasts leading to inhibition of bone resorption. We performed a randomized, double-placebo, double-blind clinical trial of 18 months duration in patients with a rheumatic disease, starting GCs in a dosage of 7.5 mg prednisone equivalent daily or higher. Two hundred one patients were allocated to receive either alendronate 10 mg and alfacalcidol-placebo daily or alfacalcidol 1 microgram and alendronate-placebo daily. Primary outcome was change in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in 18 months, secondary outcome incidence of (symptomatic) morphometric vertebral deformities.

Interventions

DRUGAlendronate versus alfacalcidol (1-alpha OH vitamin D)

Sponsors

Dutch Health Care Insurance Board
CollaboratorOTHER
UMC Utrecht
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a rheumatic disease. * Starting treatment with glucocorticoids in a dosage of 7.5 mg prednisone equivalent daily or higher. * All ethnic groups and races.

Exclusion criteria

* Glucocorticoid treatment in the past 12 months (except for 12 weeks preceding the study) * Primary hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism in last year * Metabolic bone disease * Creatinine clearance of \< 50 ml/min * Documented hypercalcemia or hypercalciuria, nephrolithiasis in the last 5 years * Pregnancy or lactation * Treatment in the last 12 months with hormone-replacement therapy * Anabolic steroids, calcitonin, active vitamin D3 analogues, fluoride or bisphosphonates.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent change in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (lumbar vertebrae 2 to 4) at 18 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percent change in bone mineral density of the femoral neck and total hip at 18 months and incidence of morphometrical vertebral deformities, symptomatic vertebral fractures and non-vertebral fractures.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 11, 2026