Skip to content

Cidofovir in Renal Transplant Recipients With BKVN

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Study to Assess the Safety and Effect of Cidofovir in Renal Transplant Recipients With BK Virus Nephropathy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00138424
Enrollment
22
Registered
2005-08-30
Start date
2006-05-31
Completion date
2011-04-30
Last updated
2013-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

BK Virus (Nephropathy)

Keywords

Vistide®, Cidofovir, renal transplant, BK Virus Nephropathy

Brief summary

This study will look at the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of cidofovir in kidney transplant patients who have been diagnosed with BK virus nephropathy (BKVN), a viral condition that can cause patients to reject transplanted kidneys. Up to 48 adult (age 18 years and older) kidney or pancreas transplant recipients with newly diagnosed BKVN will receive 1 of 3 cidofovir dose levels or placebo (non medicated substance) to identify the maximum tolerated dose. Dosing will be administered intravenously (by a tube running into a blood vessel). In addition to the screening visit, volunteers will actively participate for approximately 8-10 weeks with a single follow up phone call at 4 months. Blood samples, urine samples, eye exams and physical exams are included in study procedures.

Detailed description

The primary objectives of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of 3 dose levels of cidofovir when administered to renal transplant recipients with BK virus nephropathy and to identify the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) among the 3 dose levels of cidofovir in renal transplant recipients with BK virus nephropathy. The secondary study objectives are to evaluate the antiviral effect of cidofovir at each of 3 dose levels; to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of cidofovir in renal transplant recipients with underlying renal impairment; to evaluate the pharmacodynamics (PD) of cidofovir in this setting; to evaluate allograft function at the completion of the study; and to assess allograft rejection at the completion of the study. Patients with BKVN (virus nephropathy) diagnosed by positive plasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or renal allograft biopsy will be randomized to receive study drug within 60 days of the date of the renal biopsy or plasma PCR assay that established the diagnosis of BKVN. The study consists of three dose cohorts (0.25 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg); each cohort will consist of approximately 12 subjects randomized 2:1 to receive either cidofovir or placebo (0.9% normal saline) to define the MTD among the three specified doses of cidofovir. Once the MTD is established, approximately 12 additional patients will be enrolled at that dose. The MTD is defined as the dose in which no more than 2 of the 8 cidofovir treated subjects experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). The target enrollment is 48 subjects if all dose cohorts are fully enrolled. A 25% over-enrollment may be tolerated to allow for continued enrollment of subjects in the lower dose cohort if data are under concomitant review by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) or to replace non-evaluable study participants. Study participants who have been randomized and have received cidofovir/placebo (in any cohort) will be considered non-evaluable if they discontinue from the study or die for any reason except toxicities definitely related to study treatment, including DLTs. These subjects may be replaced. There will be a 5-week drug administration period (4 doses) followed by a 2 week end-of-study observation and evaluation period for each cohort. At about 3 months after last dose of study infusion, a member of the research staff will assess the study participant and counsel on pregnancy status via a phone call. The study will be overseen by a DSMB who will review the data after each dose cohort is completed. The primary endpoint of the study will assess the safety and tolerability of cidofovir in kidney transplant recipients this will be assessed by enumeration of adverse events (AEs) reported by the subjects and/or investigator, and changes observed in the physical examination (including vital signs) and laboratory evaluations during the drug administration and end-of-treatment observation and evaluation periods. The severity and relationship of AEs to receipt of study drug will be determined because the primary endpoint is focusing on the safety. The secondary endpoints are the effect of cidofovir on BK virus as determined by: percentage of subjects who achieve an undetectable BK virus urine and plasma PCR between baseline and end of treatment; rate of reduction in urine and plasma BK virus load by quantitative PCR between baseline and end of treatment; and time to reduction in BK virus urine and plasma PCR; the detailed PK of cidofovir will be evaluated in subjects at the MTD; the PD of cidofovir will be assessed by quantitating the change in BK virus deoxyribonucleic aci

Interventions

DRUGCidofovir

Cidofovir is a marketed product for treatment of Cytomegalovirus disease (retinitis) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients. It is packaged as a sterile, hypertonic aqueous solution for intravenous infusion only. Dosages: 0.25 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg, and 1.0 mg/kg.

DRUGPlacebo

The control for this study is sterile, 0.9% normal saline for intravenous use.

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged greater than or equal to 18 years. * Kidney or kidney/pancreas transplant recipient. * New onset BK Virus Nephropathy (BKVN) diagnosed by a positive plasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for BK virus deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or by a renal biopsy demonstrating BK virus (by immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy and/or in situ hybridization) obtained as part of standard medical care within 60 days prior to receipt of first dose of study drug. * BK virus load in plasma greater than 10,000 copies/mL within prior 21 days. * Glomerular filtration rate greater than 30 mL/min using Levey calculations. * Absolute neutrophil count greater than 1000/microliter \[with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) support as necessary\]. * Women must be post-menopausal, surgically sterile or willing to use adequate contraception (barrier method with spermicide, intrauterine device, oral contraceptives, implant or other licensed hormone method) from time of study enrollment through 1 month after the last dose of study treatment. Men must be surgically sterile or willing to use contraception (barrier method with spermicide) from time of study enrollment through 3 months after the last dose of study treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to provide valid informed consent. * History of intolerance to cidofovir or related compounds (i.e. other nucleotide derivatives \[adefovir or tenofovir\]). * Pregnant or breast feeding women. * Prior treatment with cidofovir within the last 2 weeks. * Receipt of another investigational drug with proven nephrotoxic drug interaction with cidofovir or known antipolyoma virus activity one month prior to study entry. * Contraindication to renal biopsy (e.g., anticoagulant medication, unwilling to undergo biopsy). * Currently receiving or anticipated to receive any of the following within 2 weeks of randomization: * Amphotericin preparation (intravenous) * Aminoglycosides (intravenous) * Platinum - based chemotherapeutic agents * NSAIDs - non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aspirin given for cardioprotective treatment is acceptable up to 650 mg per oral daily) * Foscarnet * Pentamidine (intravenous) * Probenecid * Leflunomide * Hypotony or uveitis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityBaseline through day 49The following lab values assessed during the 49 days of subject involvement were the following: hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, calcium, phosphorous, serum albumin, glucose, uric acid, magnesium, total protein, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), asparate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphate. The outcome measure is the number of subjects experiencing at least 1 grade 1 (mild) or higher event.
Safety and Tolerability of Cidofovir Assessed by Enumeration of Adverse Events Per SubjectBaseline through day 49The measure is the number of adverse events (ie: events that are change from baseline)experienced by subjects. The median or average number of events and the range of events across all subjects is reported.
Number of Adverse Events by Grade of EventBaseline through day 49.Adverse events are reported as grades: Toxicity Grade I: a mild event (an event that requires minimal or no treatment and does not interfere with the subject's daily activities. Toxicity Grade II: a moderate event (an event that results in a low level of inconvenience or concern with the therapeutic measures and may cause some interference with functioning. Toxicity Grade III: a severe event (an event that interrupts a subject's usual daily activity and may require systemic drug therapy or other treatment and may be incapacitating. Toxicity Grade IV: Life threatening (any adverse drug experience that places the patient or subject at immediate risk of death from the reaction as it occurred)
Number of Related Adverse EventsBaseline through day 49.The investigator's assessment of an AE's relationship to study drug is part of the documentation process. All adverse events had their relationship to study product assessed using the following terms: associated (related)or not associated (not related). To help assess, the following guidelines were used. * Associated - There was a known temporal relationship and/or, if re-challenge was done, the event abates with de-challenge and reappears with re-challenge and/or the event was known to occur in association study product or with a product in a similar class of study products * Not Associated -the AE was completely independent of study product administration; and/or evidence existed that the event was definitely related to another etiology.
Changes Observed in the Physical Examination : Respiratory Rate (Per Minute)Baseline through day 49.Respiratory rate is the number of breaths per minute.
Changes Observed in the Physical Examination: Blood Pressure (mm/hg)Baseline through day 49.Blood pressure (BP) is the pressure exerted by circulating blood upon the walls of blood vessels. Blood pressure usually refers to the arterial pressure of the systemic circulation. During each heartbeat, blood pressure varies between a maximum (systolic) and a minimum (diastolic) pressure. The measure is the difference between the baseline systolic and baseline diastolic value with the day 49 systolic and day 49 diastolic value.
Changes Observed in the Physical Examination: Body Temperature (Fahrenheit)Baseline through day 49.The temperature is a measure of body temperature in fahrenheit (F). The measure is a change between baseline temperature and day 49 temperature.
Changes Observed in the Physical Examination: Heart Rate (Per Minute)Baseline through day 49.The heart rate is the number of heart beats per minute. The outcome measure is the change from baseline heart rate to day 49 heart rate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Effect of Cidofovir on BK Virus Determined by Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Undetectable BK Virus in Urine and Plasma PCRDay 35.The outcome measure is the percent of subjects that achieved non-detectable BK virus in the urine and plasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at day 35 after staring study drug. Undetectable is a PCR viral load of less than 200.
Percentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitBaseline, and each visit: day 7, 21, 35 and 49.The percent change in viral load from baseline to day 7, day 21 and day 49 as measured in the urine and measured in the blood. A drop is identified by use of '-', an increase in viral load has no sign in front of the number.
Subjects Achieving 50% Reduction Viral Load in Plasma and UrineBaseline through day 49.
Number of Days to at Least 50% Reduction of Viral Load in Plasma and UrineBaseline through day 49.
Allograft Function at the Completion of the StudyDay 49.Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a test used to check how well the kidneys are working. Specifically, it estimates how much blood passes through the tiny filters in the kidneys, called glomeruli, each minute. The normal health GFR is about 90 - 120 mL/min/1.73 m2. Older people will have lower normal GFR levels, because GFR decreases with age. Abnormal Results are expected to be below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for 3 or more months are a sign of chronic kidney disease. A GFR result below 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 may be a sign of kidney failure.
Allograft Rejection.Day 49.Allograft rejection is the number of subjects that rejected their kidney by the end of the study.
The Pharmacodynamics of Cidofovir Will be Assessed by Correlating the Percent Change in BK Virus DNA in Urine and Plasma With Pharmacokinetic Changes Between Baseline Through Day 35Baseline through day 35PK parameter change from baseline to day 35 for Cmax.
The Pharmacodynamics of Cidofovir Will be Assessed by Correlating the Percent Change in BK Virus DNA in Urine and Plasma With Pharmacokinetic Changes Between Baseline and Day 35Baseline through day 35PK parameter change from baseline to day 35 for AUC4 and AUC12

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort I - Cidofovir
One dose (0.25 mg/kg/week-days 0, 7, 21, 35, 49)
9
Cohort I - Placebo
One dose (0.25 mg/kg/week-days 0, 7, 21, 35, 49)
5
Cohort II - Cidofovir
One dose (0.5 mg/kg/week-days 0, 7, 21, 35, 49)
5
Cohort II - Placebo
One dose (0.5 mg/kg/week-days 0, 7, 21, 35, 49)
3
Total22

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyPhysician Decision0100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCohort I - CidofovirCohort I - PlaceboCohort II - CidofovirCohort II - Placebo
Age, Customized
30-39 years old
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Age, Customized
< 30 years old
3 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants
Age, Customized
40-49 years old
4 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants
Age, Customized
50-59 years old
6 participants3 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants
Age, Customized
60-69 years old
7 participants4 participants0 participants2 participants1 participants
Age, Customized
>= 70 years old
2 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants9 participants5 participants5 participants3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants6 Participants4 Participants5 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 94 / 53 / 52 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 91 / 50 / 51 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Changes Observed in the Physical Examination: Blood Pressure (mm/hg)

Blood pressure (BP) is the pressure exerted by circulating blood upon the walls of blood vessels. Blood pressure usually refers to the arterial pressure of the systemic circulation. During each heartbeat, blood pressure varies between a maximum (systolic) and a minimum (diastolic) pressure. The measure is the difference between the baseline systolic and baseline diastolic value with the day 49 systolic and day 49 diastolic value.

Time frame: Baseline through day 49.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort I - CidofovirChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Blood Pressure (mm/hg)Systolic Blood Pressure10 mm Hg
Cohort I - CidofovirChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Blood Pressure (mm/hg)Diastolic Blood Pressure1 mm Hg
Cohort I - PlaceboChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Blood Pressure (mm/hg)Diastolic Blood Pressure6 mm Hg
Cohort I - PlaceboChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Blood Pressure (mm/hg)Systolic Blood Pressure-4 mm Hg
Cohort II - CidofovirChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Blood Pressure (mm/hg)Systolic Blood Pressure-3 mm Hg
Cohort II - CidofovirChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Blood Pressure (mm/hg)Diastolic Blood Pressure10 mm Hg
Cohort II - PlaceboChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Blood Pressure (mm/hg)Systolic Blood Pressure3 mm Hg
Cohort II - PlaceboChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Blood Pressure (mm/hg)Diastolic Blood Pressure-4 mm Hg
Primary

Changes Observed in the Physical Examination: Body Temperature (Fahrenheit)

The temperature is a measure of body temperature in fahrenheit (F). The measure is a change between baseline temperature and day 49 temperature.

Time frame: Baseline through day 49.

Population: Subject's last visit minus baseline visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort I - CidofovirChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Body Temperature (Fahrenheit)0.18 Temperature (F)
Cohort I - PlaceboChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Body Temperature (Fahrenheit)0.72 Temperature (F)
Cohort II - CidofovirChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Body Temperature (Fahrenheit)-0.42 Temperature (F)
Cohort II - PlaceboChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Body Temperature (Fahrenheit)0.3 Temperature (F)
Primary

Changes Observed in the Physical Examination: Heart Rate (Per Minute)

The heart rate is the number of heart beats per minute. The outcome measure is the change from baseline heart rate to day 49 heart rate.

Time frame: Baseline through day 49.

Population: Subject's whose heart rate was measured at baseline and day 49 visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort I - CidofovirChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Heart Rate (Per Minute)-3 Change in Beats per Minute
Cohort I - PlaceboChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Heart Rate (Per Minute)3 Change in Beats per Minute
Cohort II - CidofovirChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Heart Rate (Per Minute)4 Change in Beats per Minute
Cohort II - PlaceboChanges Observed in the Physical Examination: Heart Rate (Per Minute)-4 Change in Beats per Minute
Primary

Changes Observed in the Physical Examination : Respiratory Rate (Per Minute)

Respiratory rate is the number of breaths per minute.

Time frame: Baseline through day 49.

Population: subjects whose respiratory rate was measured at baseline visit and at day 49 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort I - CidofovirChanges Observed in the Physical Examination : Respiratory Rate (Per Minute)0 Change in Breaths per Minute
Cohort I - PlaceboChanges Observed in the Physical Examination : Respiratory Rate (Per Minute)0 Change in Breaths per Minute
Cohort II - CidofovirChanges Observed in the Physical Examination : Respiratory Rate (Per Minute)0 Change in Breaths per Minute
Cohort II - PlaceboChanges Observed in the Physical Examination : Respiratory Rate (Per Minute)-2 Change in Breaths per Minute
Primary

Number of Adverse Events by Grade of Event

Adverse events are reported as grades: Toxicity Grade I: a mild event (an event that requires minimal or no treatment and does not interfere with the subject's daily activities. Toxicity Grade II: a moderate event (an event that results in a low level of inconvenience or concern with the therapeutic measures and may cause some interference with functioning. Toxicity Grade III: a severe event (an event that interrupts a subject's usual daily activity and may require systemic drug therapy or other treatment and may be incapacitating. Toxicity Grade IV: Life threatening (any adverse drug experience that places the patient or subject at immediate risk of death from the reaction as it occurred)

Time frame: Baseline through day 49.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrade 22 Events
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrade 126 Events
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrade 40 Events
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrad3 30 Events
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrade 14 Events
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrade 26 Events
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrad3 32 Events
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrade 40 Events
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrad3 30 Events
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrade 110 Events
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrade 40 Events
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrade 21 Events
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrad3 30 Events
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrade 12 Events
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrade 22 Events
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Adverse Events by Grade of EventGrade 40 Events
Primary

Number of Related Adverse Events

The investigator's assessment of an AE's relationship to study drug is part of the documentation process. All adverse events had their relationship to study product assessed using the following terms: associated (related)or not associated (not related). To help assess, the following guidelines were used. * Associated - There was a known temporal relationship and/or, if re-challenge was done, the event abates with de-challenge and reappears with re-challenge and/or the event was known to occur in association study product or with a product in a similar class of study products * Not Associated -the AE was completely independent of study product administration; and/or evidence existed that the event was definitely related to another etiology.

Time frame: Baseline through day 49.

Population: Number of Related Events

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Related Adverse Events6 Events
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Related Adverse Events6 Events
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Related Adverse Events1 Events
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Related Adverse Events1 Events
Primary

Number of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory Abnormality

The following lab values assessed during the 49 days of subject involvement were the following: hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, calcium, phosphorous, serum albumin, glucose, uric acid, magnesium, total protein, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), asparate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphate. The outcome measure is the number of subjects experiencing at least 1 grade 1 (mild) or higher event.

Time frame: Baseline through day 49

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityPhosphorous5 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityPotassium1 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityTotal Protein4 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityGlucose7 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityCalcium5 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalitySerum Creatinine8 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityTotal Bilirubin2 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityChloride4 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityBUN9 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalitySodium3 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityALT (SGPT)3 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityHematocrit6 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalitySerum Albumin4 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityHemoglobin6 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityAST (SGOT)2 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityUric Acid1 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityBicarbonate5 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityPlatelets3 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityAlkaline Phosphate4 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityMagnesium5 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityWBC3 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityCalcium0 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityWBC3 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityHemoglobin5 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityChloride5 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalitySerum Creatinine5 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityGlucose2 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityUric Acid2 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityBicarbonate3 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityPotassium1 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityMagnesium2 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityTotal Protein3 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityPhosphorous2 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalitySodium2 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityTotal Bilirubin0 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityBUN5 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityALT (SGPT)0 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityPlatelets2 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityAST (SGOT)3 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalitySerum Albumin1 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityAlkaline Phosphate0 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityHematocrit5 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalitySerum Creatinine4 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityUric Acid0 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityPhosphorous1 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityCalcium2 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalitySerum Albumin1 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityGlucose3 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityMagnesium2 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityTotal Protein0 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityTotal Bilirubin0 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityALT (SGPT)0 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityAST (SGOT)0 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityAlkaline Phosphate2 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityWBC1 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityBUN4 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityHemoglobin4 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityHematocrit2 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityPlatelets3 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalitySodium0 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityPotassium1 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityChloride3 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityBicarbonate2 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityWBC0 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityAlkaline Phosphate0 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityPhosphorous0 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityHematocrit3 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityAST (SGOT)1 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityALT (SGPT)0 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityGlucose1 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityPlatelets1 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityTotal Bilirubin1 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityTotal Protein1 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityCalcium1 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalitySodium2 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityMagnesium1 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityUric Acid0 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalitySerum Creatinine3 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityBUN2 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityBicarbonate2 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityChloride1 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityPotassium0 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalitySerum Albumin2 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Laboratory AbnormalityHemoglobin2 Participants
Primary

Safety and Tolerability of Cidofovir Assessed by Enumeration of Adverse Events Per Subject

The measure is the number of adverse events (ie: events that are change from baseline)experienced by subjects. The median or average number of events and the range of events across all subjects is reported.

Time frame: Baseline through day 49

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort I - CidofovirSafety and Tolerability of Cidofovir Assessed by Enumeration of Adverse Events Per Subject3 Event
Cohort I - PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of Cidofovir Assessed by Enumeration of Adverse Events Per Subject4 Event
Cohort II - CidofovirSafety and Tolerability of Cidofovir Assessed by Enumeration of Adverse Events Per Subject3 Event
Cohort II - PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of Cidofovir Assessed by Enumeration of Adverse Events Per Subject7 Event
Secondary

Allograft Function at the Completion of the Study

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a test used to check how well the kidneys are working. Specifically, it estimates how much blood passes through the tiny filters in the kidneys, called glomeruli, each minute. The normal health GFR is about 90 - 120 mL/min/1.73 m2. Older people will have lower normal GFR levels, because GFR decreases with age. Abnormal Results are expected to be below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for 3 or more months are a sign of chronic kidney disease. A GFR result below 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 may be a sign of kidney failure.

Time frame: Day 49.

Population: subjects that had GFR at each visit last visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort I - CidofovirAllograft Function at the Completion of the Study42.7 mL/min/1.73 m2
Cohort I - PlaceboAllograft Function at the Completion of the Study40.3 mL/min/1.73 m2
Cohort II - CidofovirAllograft Function at the Completion of the Study45.1 mL/min/1.73 m2
Cohort II - PlaceboAllograft Function at the Completion of the Study63.2 mL/min/1.73 m2
Secondary

Allograft Rejection.

Allograft rejection is the number of subjects that rejected their kidney by the end of the study.

Time frame: Day 49.

Population: Number of rejections

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort I - CidofovirAllograft Rejection.0 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboAllograft Rejection.0 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirAllograft Rejection.0 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboAllograft Rejection.0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Days to at Least 50% Reduction of Viral Load in Plasma and Urine

Time frame: Baseline through day 49.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Days to at Least 50% Reduction of Viral Load in Plasma and UrineUrine14.5 Days
Cohort I - CidofovirNumber of Days to at Least 50% Reduction of Viral Load in Plasma and UrinePlasma21.5 Days
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Days to at Least 50% Reduction of Viral Load in Plasma and UrinePlasma7.5 Days
Cohort I - PlaceboNumber of Days to at Least 50% Reduction of Viral Load in Plasma and UrineUrine35 Days
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Days to at Least 50% Reduction of Viral Load in Plasma and UrineUrine29 Days
Cohort II - CidofovirNumber of Days to at Least 50% Reduction of Viral Load in Plasma and UrinePlasma22 Days
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Days to at Least 50% Reduction of Viral Load in Plasma and UrineUrine20 Days
Cohort II - PlaceboNumber of Days to at Least 50% Reduction of Viral Load in Plasma and UrinePlasma20.5 Days
Secondary

Percentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each Visit

The percent change in viral load from baseline to day 7, day 21 and day 49 as measured in the urine and measured in the blood. A drop is identified by use of '-', an increase in viral load has no sign in front of the number.

Time frame: Baseline, and each visit: day 7, 21, 35 and 49.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort I - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 21 Plasma35.9 Percent Change
Cohort I - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 35 Urine27.6 Percent Change
Cohort I - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 7 Plasma21.6 Percent Change
Cohort I - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 49 Plasma56.5 Percent Change
Cohort I - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 7 Urine9.1 Percent Change
Cohort I - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 49 Urine42.4 Percent Change
Cohort I - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 35 Plasma44.8 Percent Change
Cohort I - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 21 Urine18.3 Percent Change
Cohort I - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 49 Plasma95.0 Percent Change
Cohort I - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 7 Plasma61.9 Percent Change
Cohort I - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 7 Urine19.1 Percent Change
Cohort I - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 21 Plasma75.6 Percent Change
Cohort I - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 21 Urine26.2 Percent Change
Cohort I - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 35 Plasma91.3 Percent Change
Cohort I - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 35 Urine29.9 Percent Change
Cohort I - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 49 Urine86.1 Percent Change
Cohort II - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 21 Plasma58.4 Percent Change
Cohort II - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 49 Plasma76.7 Percent Change
Cohort II - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 7 Urine-3.1 Percent Change
Cohort II - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 35 Plasma76.2 Percent Change
Cohort II - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 49 Urine-0.7 Percent Change
Cohort II - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 35 Urine25.5 Percent Change
Cohort II - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 7 Plasma21.2 Percent Change
Cohort II - CidofovirPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 21 Urine8.1 Percent Change
Cohort II - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 21 Urine11.1 Percent Change
Cohort II - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 21 Plasma53.9 Percent Change
Cohort II - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 7 Urine1.6 Percent Change
Cohort II - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 35 Urine8.3 Percent Change
Cohort II - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 49 Urine12.9 Percent Change
Cohort II - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 49 Plasma65.1 Percent Change
Cohort II - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 35 Plasma83.3 Percent Change
Cohort II - PlaceboPercentage Change of Viral Load in Urine and Plasma BK Virus by Quantitative PCR Between Baseline and Each VisitDay 7 Plasma7.9 Percent Change
Secondary

Subjects Achieving 50% Reduction Viral Load in Plasma and Urine

Time frame: Baseline through day 49.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort I - CidofovirSubjects Achieving 50% Reduction Viral Load in Plasma and UrineNumber of Subjects at 50% Reduction in Plasma6 Participants
Cohort I - CidofovirSubjects Achieving 50% Reduction Viral Load in Plasma and UrineNumber of Subject at 50% Reduction in Urine4 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboSubjects Achieving 50% Reduction Viral Load in Plasma and UrineNumber of Subject at 50% Reduction in Urine3 Participants
Cohort I - PlaceboSubjects Achieving 50% Reduction Viral Load in Plasma and UrineNumber of Subjects at 50% Reduction in Plasma4 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirSubjects Achieving 50% Reduction Viral Load in Plasma and UrineNumber of Subjects at 50% Reduction in Plasma5 Participants
Cohort II - CidofovirSubjects Achieving 50% Reduction Viral Load in Plasma and UrineNumber of Subject at 50% Reduction in Urine2 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboSubjects Achieving 50% Reduction Viral Load in Plasma and UrineNumber of Subjects at 50% Reduction in Plasma2 Participants
Cohort II - PlaceboSubjects Achieving 50% Reduction Viral Load in Plasma and UrineNumber of Subject at 50% Reduction in Urine1 Participants
Secondary

The Effect of Cidofovir on BK Virus Determined by Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Undetectable BK Virus in Urine and Plasma PCR

The outcome measure is the percent of subjects that achieved non-detectable BK virus in the urine and plasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at day 35 after staring study drug. Undetectable is a PCR viral load of less than 200.

Time frame: Day 35.

Population: Percentage of subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort I - CidofovirThe Effect of Cidofovir on BK Virus Determined by Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Undetectable BK Virus in Urine and Plasma PCRUrine0 percentage of subjects
Cohort I - CidofovirThe Effect of Cidofovir on BK Virus Determined by Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Undetectable BK Virus in Urine and Plasma PCRPlasma0 percentage of subjects
Cohort I - PlaceboThe Effect of Cidofovir on BK Virus Determined by Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Undetectable BK Virus in Urine and Plasma PCRUrine0 percentage of subjects
Cohort I - PlaceboThe Effect of Cidofovir on BK Virus Determined by Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Undetectable BK Virus in Urine and Plasma PCRPlasma20 percentage of subjects
Cohort II - CidofovirThe Effect of Cidofovir on BK Virus Determined by Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Undetectable BK Virus in Urine and Plasma PCRPlasma0 percentage of subjects
Cohort II - CidofovirThe Effect of Cidofovir on BK Virus Determined by Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Undetectable BK Virus in Urine and Plasma PCRUrine0 percentage of subjects
Cohort II - PlaceboThe Effect of Cidofovir on BK Virus Determined by Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Undetectable BK Virus in Urine and Plasma PCRPlasma0 percentage of subjects
Cohort II - PlaceboThe Effect of Cidofovir on BK Virus Determined by Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Undetectable BK Virus in Urine and Plasma PCRUrine0 percentage of subjects
Secondary

The Pharmacodynamics of Cidofovir Will be Assessed by Correlating the Percent Change in BK Virus DNA in Urine and Plasma With Pharmacokinetic Changes Between Baseline and Day 35

PK parameter change from baseline to day 35 for AUC4 and AUC12

Time frame: Baseline through day 35

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort I - CidofovirThe Pharmacodynamics of Cidofovir Will be Assessed by Correlating the Percent Change in BK Virus DNA in Urine and Plasma With Pharmacokinetic Changes Between Baseline and Day 35AUC40.5 hr*mg/L
Cohort I - CidofovirThe Pharmacodynamics of Cidofovir Will be Assessed by Correlating the Percent Change in BK Virus DNA in Urine and Plasma With Pharmacokinetic Changes Between Baseline and Day 35AUC120.3 hr*mg/L
Cohort I - PlaceboThe Pharmacodynamics of Cidofovir Will be Assessed by Correlating the Percent Change in BK Virus DNA in Urine and Plasma With Pharmacokinetic Changes Between Baseline and Day 35AUC4-0.1 hr*mg/L
Cohort I - PlaceboThe Pharmacodynamics of Cidofovir Will be Assessed by Correlating the Percent Change in BK Virus DNA in Urine and Plasma With Pharmacokinetic Changes Between Baseline and Day 35AUC120.1 hr*mg/L
Comparison: Spearman correlation co-efficient utilized to determine viral load changes in plasma vs the PK AUC4 parameterp-value: 0.87Spearman Correlation
Comparison: Spearman correlation co-efficient utilized to determine viral load changes in urine vs the PK AUC4 parameterp-value: 0.46Spearman Correlation
Comparison: Spearman correlation co-efficient utilized to determine viral load changes in plasma vs the PK AUC4 parameterp-value: 0.49Spearman Correlation
Comparison: Spearman correlation co-efficient utilized to determine viral load changes in urine vs the PK AUC4 parameterp-value: 0.05Spearman Correlation
Comparison: Spearman correlation co-efficient utilized to determine viral load changes in plasma vs the PK AUC12 parameterp-value: 0.78Spearman Correlation
Comparison: Spearman correlation co-efficient utilized to determine viral load changes in urine vs the PK AUC12 parameterp-value: 0.18Spearman Correlation
Comparison: Spearman correlation co-efficient utilized to determine viral load changes in plasma vs the PK AUC12 parameterp-value: 0.75Spearman Correlation
Comparison: Spearman correlation co-efficient utilized to determine viral load changes in urine vs the PK AUC12 parameterp-value: 0.75Spearman Correlation
Secondary

The Pharmacodynamics of Cidofovir Will be Assessed by Correlating the Percent Change in BK Virus DNA in Urine and Plasma With Pharmacokinetic Changes Between Baseline Through Day 35

PK parameter change from baseline to day 35 for Cmax.

Time frame: Baseline through day 35

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort I - CidofovirThe Pharmacodynamics of Cidofovir Will be Assessed by Correlating the Percent Change in BK Virus DNA in Urine and Plasma With Pharmacokinetic Changes Between Baseline Through Day 35190.4 ng/mL
Cohort I - PlaceboThe Pharmacodynamics of Cidofovir Will be Assessed by Correlating the Percent Change in BK Virus DNA in Urine and Plasma With Pharmacokinetic Changes Between Baseline Through Day 35-233.9 ng/mL
Comparison: Spearman correlation co-efficient utilized to determine viral load changes in plasma vs the PK Cmax parameterp-value: 0.57Spearman Correlation
Comparison: Spearman correlation co-efficient utilized to determine viral load changes in urine vs the PK Cmax parameterp-value: 0.53Spearman Correlation
Comparison: Spearman correlation co-efficient utilized to determine viral load changes in plasma vs the PK Cmax parameterp-value: 0.62Spearman Correlation
Comparison: Spearman correlation co-efficient utilized to determine viral load changes in urine vs the PK Cmax parameterp-value: 0.1Spearman Correlation

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026