Skip to content

Safety of the Intramuscular Route of the Anti-Flu Vaccine in Patients Receiving Oral Anticoagulation Therapy

Phase IV, Simple Blind, 2-Parallel Groups Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Intramuscular Vs Subcutaneous Route for the Administration of the Anti-Flu Vaccine in Patients Receiving Oral Anticoagulation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00137579
Enrollment
216
Registered
2005-08-30
Start date
2003-09-30
Completion date
2004-05-31
Last updated
2005-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Influenza

Keywords

Influenza Vaccines, Acenocoumarol, Drug Administration Routes, Anticoagulants

Brief summary

Until now, the best administration route of the anti-flu vaccine for patients receiving long term oral anticoagulation therapy has been the subcutaneous one; the intramuscular route has not been recommended because it may increase the risk of muscular haematoma. Although this practice is widely extended, no significant differences between the safety of both routes have been found. Some authors, analysing a small group of patients, affirm that the anti-flu vaccine can be administered safely by the intramuscular route on patients receiving long term oral anticoagulation therapy, while a previous opinion article recommended the subcutaneous route without any scientific evidence. Due to this, the investigators have done a clinical trial with the aim of determining the safety and effectiveness of the flu-vaccine intramuscular route in patients receiving long term oral anticoagulation therapy and also to analyse the possible interactions between the vaccine and the oral anticoagulant treatment.

Detailed description

Phase IV, simple blind, 2-parallel groups, multicentric randomized trial where each patient will receive a single dose of the recommended by the WHO anti-flu vaccine for the 2003-2004 period, the control group will receive it subcutaneous and intervention group intramuscular. The assignation to each group will be randomized. The study included 4 basic areas of Barcelona city. Three visits have been scheduled for each patient: moment 0, 24 hours and 10 days after the vaccination, and a 7 month follow up period to control the incidence of the flu.

Interventions

PROCEDUREInfluenza vaccine intramuscular administration route

Sponsors

Catalan Institute of Health
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with oral anticoagulation therapy * Patients who agree to be vaccinated * Patients who agree to participate in the study * Patients older than 18

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy or hypersensibility to egg, chicken proteins, any component of the vaccine (neomycin, octoxinol-9 or formaldehyd) * INR greater than 4 in the past 2 months * Previous major bleeding * Patients with dementia or with legal tutoring

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
local pain (scores greater than 3 in the analogic visual scale of pain)
microbiologically diagnosed flu (yes/no)
International Normalized Ratio (INR) to check the interaction between the vaccine and the oral anticoagulation therapy

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
increase of the arm perimeter greater than 1 cm
local elemental skin lesions

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 5, 2026