Skip to content

Study Of SU011248 Administered On A Continuous Daily Dosing Schedule In Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

A Phase 2 Efficacy And Safety Study Of SU011248 Administered In A Continuous Daily Regimen In Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00137449
Enrollment
60
Registered
2005-08-29
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2008-04-30
Last updated
2009-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Brief summary

To evaluate the antitumor activity of SU011248 in advanced, imatinib mesylate-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) when administered on a continuous daily dosing schedule

Detailed description

Subjects experiencing clinical benefit after 1 year on study were offered continued treatment with SU011248 on a separate protocol.

Interventions

37.5 mg once daily on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Study medication continued as long as patient was obtaining clinical benefit, or until significant toxicity, or withdrawal of consent, for up to 1 year on study.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histopathologically proven diagnosis of malignant GIST that was not amenable to standard therapy. * Failed prior treatment with imatinib mesylate, defined either by progression of disease (according to Response Evaluation Criterion in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria), or by significant toxicity during treatment with imatinib mesylate that precluded further treatment. Intolerance to prior imatinib mesylate therapy was defined as follows: * Life-threatening adverse events (ie, Grade 4) at any dose (attempt to dose reduce or rechallenge not required) or Unacceptable toxicity induced by a moderate dose (eg, 400 mg/day), specifically, Grade 2 toxicity that was unacceptable to the patient (such as nausea) that persisted despite standard countermeasures * Evidence of unidimensionally measurable disease.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment on a SU011248 clinical trial. * Diagnosis of any second malignancy within the last 3 years, except basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell skin cancer, or in situ carcinoma, that had been adequately treated with no evidence of recurrent disease for 12 months. * History of or known brain metastases, spinal cord compression, or carcinomatous meningitis, or new evidence of brain or leptomeningeal disease. * Any of the following within the 12 months prior to starting the study treatment: myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, or pulmonary embolism. * Ongoing cardiac dysrhythmias of grade 2, atrial fibrillation of any grade, or QTc interval \>450 msec for males or \>470 msec for females. * Hypertension that could not be controlled by medications (\>150/100 mm/Hg despite optimal medical therapy).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) According to RECISTPlanned duration on this protocol of up to 1 yearCBR is defined as a confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 24 weeks on study according to RECIST. Confirmed responses are those that persisted on repeat imaging \>= 4 wks after initial response. Participants with no on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation counted as non-responders.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Overall Confirmed Objective Disease Response (ORR)Planned duration on this protocol of up to 1 yearOverall confirmed objective disease response is defined as a confirmed CR, or confirmed PR according to RECIST. Confirmed responses are those that persisted on repeat imaging \>= 4 wks after initial response.
Duration of Stable DiseasePlanned duration on this protocol of up to 1 yearDuration of SD is the time from the date of first documentation of stable disease to the date of first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause that occurred within 28 days after last dose of study medication, whichever occurred first.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Planned duration on this protocol of up to 1 yearPFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause that occurred on treatment including within 28 days after the last dose of study medication, whichever occurred first.
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)Planned duration on this protocol of up to 1 yearTTP was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of first documentation of objective tumor progression that occurred on treatment including within 28 days after the last dose of study medication.
Number of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTPlanned duration on this protocol of up to 1 yearBest confirmed response (BCR) defined as best response \[confirmed CR, confirmed PR, SD, PD(progressive disease), not evaluable (NE)\] recorded from start of treatment until disease progression / recurrence. Best response of SD must have met SD criteria at least once after first dose at minimum interval of 6 weeks.
Overall Survival (OS) and One-year Survival [Descriptive Statistics]Survival status was collected by telephone contact every 2 months for up to 2 years from study entry.Overall survival is defined as time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of death due to any cause. One year survival rate defined as the probability that a patient is alive 1 year after the date of first study medication.
Score of FACIT-Fatigue ScaleBaseline, Day 1 & 15 of each treatment cycleFACIT-Fatigue Scale: Overall score from 13-question questionnaire (measures fatigue/asthenia for patients with chronic, life-threatening illnesses). For each question, patient rates condition for the past week on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Maximum, minimum mean included data available for \>=10 subjects.
Score of EQ-VAS (Euro Quality of Life -Visual Analog Scale)Baseline, Day 1 &15 of each treatment cycle up to 1 year on studyEQ-VAS score on the self-rated thermometer, indicating the patient's own assessment of their health status from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) imaginable health state. Change: median score at observation minus median score at baseline. Maximum changes (Increase or Decrease from baseline) included data available for \>=10 subjects.
Score of EQ-5D (Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension) Weighted Health IndexBaseline, Day 1 & 15 of each treatment cycle up to 1 year on studyEQ-5D: health status in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, usual activities) with a weighted health Index based on general population values where 0.0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health. Change: median index score at observation minus median index score at baseline (includes data available for \>=10 subjects).
Duration of Tumor Response (DR) [Descriptive Statistics]Planned duration on this protocol of up to 1 yearDR was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause that occurred within 28 days after the last dose of study medication, whichever occurred first.

Countries

France, Italy, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Must have failed prior treatment with imatinib mesylate (IM) \[defined as progression of disease using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST) or World Health Organization(WHO) criteria, or significant toxicity during treatment with IM precluding further treatment & Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) performance status of 0-1\]

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate
Subjects received sunitinib malate at a starting dose of 37.5 mg/day in repeated 4-week cycles and cycles could be repeated for up to 1 year in the absence of any withdrawal criteria. Subjects were randomized to receive either morning (AM) or afternoon (PM) dose. Doses could be increased to 50 mg daily.
30
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate
Subjects received sunitinib malate at a starting dose of 37.5 mg/day in repeated 4-week cycles and cycles could be repeated for up to 1 year in the absence of any withdrawal criteria. Subjects were randomized to receive either morning (AM) or afternoon (PM) dose. Doses could be increased to 50 mg daily.
30
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event31
Overall StudyDeath43
Overall StudyDisease Progression813
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAM Dose Sunitinib MalatePM Dose Sunitinib MalateTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0.0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
13 Participants12 Participants25.0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants18 Participants35.0 Participants
Age Continuous59.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
57.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants17 Participants32.0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants13 Participants28.0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
30 / —30 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / —12 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) According to RECIST

CBR is defined as a confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 24 weeks on study according to RECIST. Confirmed responses are those that persisted on repeat imaging \>= 4 wks after initial response. Participants with no on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation counted as non-responders.

Time frame: Planned duration on this protocol of up to 1 year

Population: ITT population (all subjects enrolled that received at least 1 dose of study medication) with measurable disease at baseline and correct histological cancer type. CR+PR+(SD for \>=24 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants With Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) According to RECIST15 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants With Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) According to RECIST17 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants With Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) According to RECIST32 participants
95% CI: [31.3, 68.7]F distribution
95% CI: [37.4, 74.5]F distribution
Comparison: Null hypothesis that the true CBR \<=20% vs the alternative hypothesis that the true clinical benefit rate is at least 35%. The sample size is determined using a single-stage design with an alpha level of 10% \& 90% power. If \>=17 CR, PR or SD for at least 24 weeks are observed, null hypothesis can be rejected with a 20% target false positive error rate. If \<= 16 CR, PR,or SD for at least 24 weeks are observed, null hypothesis can not be rejected with a target false negative error rate of 10%.95% CI: [40, 66.3]F distribution
Secondary

Duration of Stable Disease

Duration of SD is the time from the date of first documentation of stable disease to the date of first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause that occurred within 28 days after last dose of study medication, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Planned duration on this protocol of up to 1 year

Population: ITT population (all subjects enrolled that received at least 1 dose of study medication) with measurable disease at baseline and correct histological cancer type.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateDuration of Stable Disease>= 12 weeks19 Participants
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateDuration of Stable Disease>= 24 weeks12 Participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateDuration of Stable Disease>= 12 weeks14 Participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateDuration of Stable Disease>= 24 weeks12 Participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateDuration of Stable Disease>= 12 weeks33 Participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateDuration of Stable Disease>= 24 weeks24 Participants
Secondary

Duration of Tumor Response (DR) [Descriptive Statistics]

DR was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause that occurred within 28 days after the last dose of study medication, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Planned duration on this protocol of up to 1 year

Population: ITT population (all subjects enrolled that received at least 1 dose of study medication) with measurable disease at baseline and correct histological cancer type. Number of responders (AM=3, PM=5, Total=8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateDuration of Tumor Response (DR) [Descriptive Statistics]32.7 weeks
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateDuration of Tumor Response (DR) [Descriptive Statistics]40.3 weeks
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateDuration of Tumor Response (DR) [Descriptive Statistics]33.9 weeks
Secondary

Number of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECIST

Best confirmed response (BCR) defined as best response \[confirmed CR, confirmed PR, SD, PD(progressive disease), not evaluable (NE)\] recorded from start of treatment until disease progression / recurrence. Best response of SD must have met SD criteria at least once after first dose at minimum interval of 6 weeks.

Time frame: Planned duration on this protocol of up to 1 year

Population: ITT population (all subjects enrolled that received at least 1 dose of study medication) with measurable disease at baseline and correct histological cancer type.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTProgressive disease (PD)2 participants
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTStable Disease (SD)20 participants
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTComplete Response (CR)0 participants
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTPartial Response (PR)3 participants
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTNot evaluable (NE)5 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTStable Disease (SD)20 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTComplete Response (CR)0 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTPartial Response (PR)5 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTProgressive disease (PD)4 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTNot evaluable (NE)1 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTNot evaluable (NE)6 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTProgressive disease (PD)6 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTComplete Response (CR)0 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTStable Disease (SD)40 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants by Best Confirmed Response Category According to RECISTPartial Response (PR)8 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Overall Confirmed Objective Disease Response (ORR)

Overall confirmed objective disease response is defined as a confirmed CR, or confirmed PR according to RECIST. Confirmed responses are those that persisted on repeat imaging \>= 4 wks after initial response.

Time frame: Planned duration on this protocol of up to 1 year

Population: ITT population (all subjects enrolled that received at least 1 dose of study medication) with measurable disease at baseline and correct histological cancer type.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants With Overall Confirmed Objective Disease Response (ORR)3 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants With Overall Confirmed Objective Disease Response (ORR)5 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateNumber of Participants With Overall Confirmed Objective Disease Response (ORR)8 participants
95% CI: [2.1, 26.5]F distribution
95% CI: [5.6, 34.7]F distribution
95% CI: [5.9, 24.6]F distribution
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) and One-year Survival [Descriptive Statistics]

Overall survival is defined as time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of death due to any cause. One year survival rate defined as the probability that a patient is alive 1 year after the date of first study medication.

Time frame: Survival status was collected by telephone contact every 2 months for up to 2 years from study entry.

Population: ITT population (all subjects enrolled that received at least 1 dose of study medication).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateOverall Survival (OS) and One-year Survival [Descriptive Statistics]Number of subjects alive16 participants
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateOverall Survival (OS) and One-year Survival [Descriptive Statistics]Number of subjects dead14 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateOverall Survival (OS) and One-year Survival [Descriptive Statistics]Number of subjects alive17 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateOverall Survival (OS) and One-year Survival [Descriptive Statistics]Number of subjects dead13 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateOverall Survival (OS) and One-year Survival [Descriptive Statistics]Number of subjects alive33 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateOverall Survival (OS) and One-year Survival [Descriptive Statistics]Number of subjects dead27 participants
95% CI: [40.5, 75]Kaplan-Meier method
95% CI: [60.3, 90.3]Kaplan-Meier method
95% CI: [56.3, 79.7]Kaplan-Meier method
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause that occurred on treatment including within 28 days after the last dose of study medication, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Planned duration on this protocol of up to 1 year

Population: ITT population (all subjects enrolled that received at least 1 dose of study medication) with measurable disease at baseline and correct histological cancer type.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateProgression-free Survival (PFS)Patient was censored12 participants
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateProgression-free Survival (PFS)Patient observed to have an event18 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateProgression-free Survival (PFS)Patient was censored10 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateProgression-free Survival (PFS)Patient observed to have an event20 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateProgression-free Survival (PFS)Patient was censored22 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateProgression-free Survival (PFS)Patient observed to have an event38 participants
Comparison: 95% CI calculated based on the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. Median reported is progression free survival weeks.95% CI: [22, 73.1]Kaplan-Meier method
Comparison: 95% CI calculated based on the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.Median reported is progression free survival weeks.95% CI: [24.4, 51.6]Kaplan-Meier method
Comparison: 95% CI calculated based on the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.Median reported is progression free survival weeks.95% CI: [24.1, 49]Kaplan-Meier method
Secondary

Score of EQ-5D (Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension) Weighted Health Index

EQ-5D: health status in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, usual activities) with a weighted health Index based on general population values where 0.0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health. Change: median index score at observation minus median index score at baseline (includes data available for \>=10 subjects).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 & 15 of each treatment cycle up to 1 year on study

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of EQ-5D (Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension) Weighted Health IndexMaximum Increase0.1 score on scale
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of EQ-5D (Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension) Weighted Health IndexMaximum Decrease-0.1 score on scale
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of EQ-5D (Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension) Weighted Health IndexMaximum Increase0.0 score on scale
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of EQ-5D (Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension) Weighted Health IndexMaximum Decrease-0.8 score on scale
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateScore of EQ-5D (Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension) Weighted Health IndexMaximum Increase0.1 score on scale
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateScore of EQ-5D (Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension) Weighted Health IndexMaximum Decrease-0.1 score on scale
Secondary

Score of EQ-VAS (Euro Quality of Life -Visual Analog Scale)

EQ-VAS score on the self-rated thermometer, indicating the patient's own assessment of their health status from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) imaginable health state. Change: median score at observation minus median score at baseline. Maximum changes (Increase or Decrease from baseline) included data available for \>=10 subjects.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 &15 of each treatment cycle up to 1 year on study

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of EQ-VAS (Euro Quality of Life -Visual Analog Scale)Maximum Increase7.5 score on scale
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of EQ-VAS (Euro Quality of Life -Visual Analog Scale)Maximum Decrease0.0 score on scale
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of EQ-VAS (Euro Quality of Life -Visual Analog Scale)Maximum Increase10.0 score on scale
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of EQ-VAS (Euro Quality of Life -Visual Analog Scale)Maximum Decrease-10.0 score on scale
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateScore of EQ-VAS (Euro Quality of Life -Visual Analog Scale)Maximum Increase18.0 score on scale
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateScore of EQ-VAS (Euro Quality of Life -Visual Analog Scale)Maximum Decrease-7.5 score on scale
Secondary

Score of FACIT-Fatigue Scale

FACIT-Fatigue Scale: Overall score from 13-question questionnaire (measures fatigue/asthenia for patients with chronic, life-threatening illnesses). For each question, patient rates condition for the past week on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Maximum, minimum mean included data available for \>=10 subjects.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 & 15 of each treatment cycle

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of FACIT-Fatigue ScaleMaximum Post-Baseline Score40.6 score on scaleStandard Deviation 10.38
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of FACIT-Fatigue ScaleBaseline Score35.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 11.13
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of FACIT-Fatigue ScaleMinimum Post-Baseline Score26.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 12.39
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of FACIT-Fatigue ScaleMaximum Post-Baseline Score42.8 score on scaleStandard Deviation 8.61
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of FACIT-Fatigue ScaleBaseline Score36.3 score on scaleStandard Deviation 13.69
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateScore of FACIT-Fatigue ScaleMinimum Post-Baseline Score26.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 13.87
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateScore of FACIT-Fatigue ScaleBaseline Score36.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 12.35
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateScore of FACIT-Fatigue ScaleMinimum Post-Baseline Score26.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 13.06
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateScore of FACIT-Fatigue ScaleMaximum Post-Baseline Score41.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Secondary

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of first documentation of objective tumor progression that occurred on treatment including within 28 days after the last dose of study medication.

Time frame: Planned duration on this protocol of up to 1 year

Population: ITT population (all subjects enrolled that received at least 1 dose of study medication) with measurable disease at baseline and correct histological cancer type.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateTime to Tumor Progression (TTP)Patient observed to have an event12 participants
AM Dose Sunitinib MalateTime to Tumor Progression (TTP)Patient was censored18 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateTime to Tumor Progression (TTP)Patient observed to have an event17 participants
PM Dose Sunitinib MalateTime to Tumor Progression (TTP)Patient was censored13 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateTime to Tumor Progression (TTP)Patient was censored31 participants
Total (Equals AM Plus PM Dose) Sunitinib MalateTime to Tumor Progression (TTP)Patient observed to have an event29 participants
Comparison: 95% CI calculated based on the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.Time to progression in weeks reported as median.95% CI: [24.1, 73.1]Kaplan-Meier method
Comparison: 95% CI calculated based on the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.Time to progression in weeks reported as median.95% CI: [26.1, 65.9]Kaplan-Meier method
Comparison: 95% CI calculated based on the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.Time to progression in weeks reported as median.95% CI: [26.1, 65.9]Kaplan-Meier method

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026