Skip to content

Comparing a Nucleoside-Analogue-Sparing Regimen and a Protease-Inhibitor-Sparing Regimen in HIV Infected Patients

Comparing a Nucleoside-Analogue-Sparing Regimen and a Protease-Inhibitor-Sparing Regimen in Patients With HIV. Influence on Morphological and Metabolic Disorders. A Randomized, Open-Label Multicenter Trial.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00135460
Enrollment
100
Registered
2005-08-26
Start date
2003-06-30
Completion date
2007-11-30
Last updated
2006-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome

Keywords

HIV, Lipoatrophy, Lipodystrophy, Treatment Naive, HIV Infections, Hypercholesterolemia

Brief summary

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has improved the long time survival of HIV infected individuals. However an increasing number of HIV-patients have developed metabolic and morphological alterations including peripheral lipoatrophy. There is limited knowledge about lipodystrophic adverse events in nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing regimens. The hypothesis is that nucleoside analogues are responsible for development of lipoatrophy, and, patients receiving an NRTI-sparing regimen will have little risk of peripheral lipoatrophy. The researchers plan to perform a randomized study recruiting 100 antiretroviral naive patients that will be randomized to receive a nucleoside analogue sparing HAART regimen or a protease-inhibitor sparing regimen. The main endpoint is changes in peripheral fat mass as determined by dual energy X-ray absortiometry (DEXA)-scanning.

Interventions

DRUGnucleoside analogue sparing HAART regimen

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Hvidovre University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Odense University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Aalborg University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Abbott
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Danish HIV Research Group
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Antiretroviral naïve patients * HIV-1 infection as documented by a licensed HIV-1 antibody ELISA. * Fulfilling the criteria for starting antiretroviral therapy. * Ability to understand and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Women being pregnant or breast-feeding. * Fertile women using no safe contraception. * Patients with active intravenous drug use. * Abuse of alcohol, which in the opinion of the treating physician will reduce the patient´s ability to follow a therapeutic regimen and evaluations of the protocol. * Ongoing medical treatment, which has a clinically significant interaction with lopinavir, ritonavir or efavirenz. * Creatinine \> 200 mmol/l. * ALT or AST \> 5 times upper normal value (200U/l).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in peripheral fat mass, determined by DEXA-changes
Changes in body composition from baseline, determined by patient and physician in a standardized questionnaire and by standardized clinical examination
Change from baseline in fasting lipids and subsets hereof
Development of impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients who have virological, immunological or clinical failure or treatment-limiting adverse events at week 24, 48 and 96
Change in plasma lactate from baseline
Time to discontinuation of the randomized therapy and reasons for this
Proportion of patients with HIV-RNA < 20 copies after 24, 48, 72 and 96 weeks
Development of osteopenia, judged by DEXA-scan
Compliance - proportion of patients who report to take 90%, respectively 95% of their medications at week 4, 48 and 96
Incidence of genotypical and virological resistance
Change in CD4 cell count from baseline after 24, 48, 72 and 96 weeks
Incidence of adverse events
Incidence of clinical disease progression

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026