Skip to content

Combination Chemotherapy, PEG-Interferon Alfa-2b, and Surgery in Treating Patients With Osteosarcoma

A Randomized Trial of the European and American Osteosarcoma Study Group to Optimize Treatment Strategies for Resectable Osteosarcoma Based on Histological Response to Pre-operative Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00134030
Acronym
EURAMOS-1
Enrollment
1334
Registered
2005-08-24
Start date
2005-11-14
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2023-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Localized Osteosarcoma, Metastatic Osteosarcoma

Brief summary

This randomized phase III trial is studying combination chemotherapy followed by surgery and two different combination chemotherapy regimens with or without PEG-interferon alfa-2b to compare how well they work in treating patients with osteosarcoma. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. Biological therapies, such as PEG-interferon alfa-2b, may interfere with the growth of tumor cells. Giving combination chemotherapy before surgery may shrink the tumor so it can be removed. Giving combination chemotherapy together with PEG-interferon alfa-2b after surgery may kill any remaining tumor cells. It is not yet known whether giving combination therapy together with PEG-interferon alfa-2b is more effective than two different combination chemotherapy regimens alone after surgery in treating osteosarcoma.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Compare whether adjuvant maintenance therapy comprising doxorubicin, cisplatin, and high-dose methotrexate (MAP) alone vs MAP combined with ifosfamide and etoposide improves event-free survival of patients with resectable high-grade osteosarcoma who achieve a poor histological response (HR) to neoadjuvant induction therapy comprising MAP. II. Compare whether adjuvant maintenance therapy comprising MAP alone vs MAP and PEG-interferon alfa-2b improves event-free survival of patients with resectable high-grade osteosarcoma who achieve a good HR to neoadjuvant induction therapy comprising MAP. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Compare overall survival of patients treated with these regimens. II. Compare short- and long-term toxicity of these regimens in these patients. III. Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens. IV. Compare event-free survival and overall survival of patients with localized osteosarcoma treated with these regimens. V. Correlate biological or clinical changes with histological response and outcomes in patients treated with these regimens. VI. Determine outcomes of patients treated with these regimens. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. INDUCTION THERAPY: (MAP; weeks 1-10) Patients receive doxorubicin IV continuously over 48 hours on days 1-2 and cisplatin IV over 4 hours on days 1 and 2 in weeks 1 and 6. Patients also receive high-dose methotrexate (MTX)\* IV over 4 hours on day 1 in weeks 4, 5, 9, and 10. Patients then proceed to surgery. NOTE: \*Patients must receive \>= 2 but =\< 6 doses of high-dose MTX. SURGERY: Patients undergo amputation or limb salvage surgery in week 11. Tumor tissue is evaluated for histological response to induction therapy. Patients whose tumor is not amenable to macroscopically complete surgical resection undergo radiotherapy and/or other investigational therapy off study. Patients who undergo macroscopically complete surgical resection of the primary tumor or metastases AND who have no disease progression or unacceptable toxicity proceed to maintenance therapy. MAINTENANCE THERAPY: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 groups according to histological response (good \[\< 10% viable tumor\] vs poor \[≥ 10% viable tumor\]). Patients in each group are stratified according to site of primary tumor and presence of metastases. GROUP 1: (good histological response) Patient are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms within 35 days after surgery. ARM I: (MAP; weeks 12-29) Patients receive doxorubicin IV continuously over 48 hours on days 1-2 in weeks 12, 17, 22, and 26 and cisplatin IV over 4 hours on days 1 and 2 in weeks 12 and 17. Patients also receive high-dose MTX IV over 4 hours on day 1 in weeks 15, 16, 20, 21, 24, 25, 28, and 29. ARM II: (MAPifn; weeks 12-104) Patients receive doxorubicin, cisplatin, and high-dose MTX as in arm I. Patients than receive PEG-interferon alfa-2b subcutaneously once daily on day 1 in weeks 30-104. GROUP 2: (poor histological response) Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms within 35 days after surgery. ARM I: (MAP; weeks 12-29) Patients receive doxorubicin, cisplatin, and high-dose MTX as in group 1 arm I. ARM II: (MAPIE; weeks 12-40) Patients receive doxorubicin IV continuously over 48 hours on days 1-2 in weeks 12, 20, 28, and 36 and cisplatin IV over 4 hours on days 1 and 2 in weeks 12 and 28. Patients also receive high-dose MTX IV over 4 hours on day 1 in weeks 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, and 40. Patients receive ifosfamide IV over 4 hours on days 1-5 in weeks 16, 24, and 32 and on days 1-3 in weeks 20 and 36 and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5 in weeks 16, 24, and 32. In both groups, treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed periodically. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 1½-3 months for 2 years, every 2-4 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 6 years, and then every 6-12 months thereafter. Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK

Interventions

DRUGCisplatin

Given IV

DRUGDoxorubicin Hydrochloride

Given IV

DRUGEtoposide

Given IV

DRUGIfosfamide

Given IV

DRUGMethotrexate

Given IV

BIOLOGICALPeginterferon Alfa-2b

Given subcutaneously

OTHERQuality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

PROCEDURETherapeutic Conventional Surgery

Undergo amputation or limb salvage surgery

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
University College, London
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical Research Council
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Children's Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed high-grade osteosarcoma, including second malignancies * Localized or metastatic disease * The primary tumor must be located in the limbs or axial skeleton, including any of the following sites\*: * Long bone of upper limb * Short bone of upper limb * Long bone of lower limb * Short bone of lower limb * Vertebral column * Ribs, sternum, clavicle, or scapula * Pelvic bones, sacrum, or coccyx * Tumor (primary, metastatic, or both) resectable OR is expected to become resectable after neoadjuvant induction chemotherapy * Suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy * Performance status - Lansky 50-100% (for patients under 16 years of age) * Performance status - Karnofsky 50-100%\* * Performance status - WHO or ECOG 0-2\* * Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³ * Neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm³ * WBC ≥ 3,000/mm³ * Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal * Creatinine clearance ≥ 70 mL/min * Creatinine based on age as follows: * No greater than 1.0 mg/dL (for patients 5 to 10 years of age) * No greater than 1.2 mg/dL (for patients 11 to 15 years of age) * No greater than 1.5 mg/dL (for patients over 15 years of age) * Ejection fraction ≥ 50% by radionuclide angiogram * Shortening fraction ≥ 28% by echocardiogram * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * No known HIV positivity * No prior chemotherapy for any disease * Prior radiotherapy for another malignancy allowed * No prior treatment for osteosarcoma * No patients with any of the following: * Craniofacial osteosarcoma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event-free Survival (EFS)From date of randomization to date of the event.EFS is defined as time from randomisation to the first of: death, detection of local recurrence or metastasis, progression of metastatic disease, or detection of a secondary malignancy. EFS will be assessed using the logrank test and expressed using hazard ratios with appropriate confidence intervals. Follow up per participant will be assessed for up to 10 years. The 3 year EFS is provided as a summary.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Overall SurvivalFrom date of randomization to date of death.Overall survival is time from randomization until death from any cause. Will be assessed using the logrank test and expressed using hazard ratios with appropriate confidence intervals. Participants will be assessed for up to 10 years. 5 year overall survival is provided as a summary.
Toxicity as Measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0Adverse events are assessed for up to 10 years per participant.Percentages of patients experiencing grade 3 and 4 adverse events. These will be compared using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests where appropriate.

Countries

Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Puerto Rico, Switzerland, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MAP-GR
Patients receive doxorubicin IV continuously over 48 hours on days 1-2 in weeks 12, 17, 22, and 26 and cisplatin IV over 4 hours on days 1 and 2 in weeks 12 and 17. Patients also receive high-dose MTX IV over 4 hours on day 1 in weeks 15, 16, 20, 21, 24, 25, 28, and 29. Cisplatin: Given IV Doxorubicin Hydrochloride: Given IV Methotrexate: Given IV Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Therapeutic Conventional Surgery: Undergo amputation or limb salvage surgery
359
MAPifn
Patients receive doxorubicin, cisplatin, and high-dose MTX as in arm I. Patients than receive PEG-interferon alfa-2b subcutaneously once daily on day 1 in weeks 30-104. Cisplatin: Given IV Doxorubicin Hydrochloride: Given IV Methotrexate: Given IV Peginterferon Alfa-2b: Given subcutaneously Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Therapeutic Conventional Surgery: Undergo amputation or limb salvage surgery
357
MAP-PR
Patients receive doxorubicin, cisplatin, and high-dose MTX as in group 1 arm I. Cisplatin: Given IV Doxorubicin Hydrochloride: Given IV Methotrexate: Given IV Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Therapeutic Conventional Surgery: Undergo amputation or limb salvage surgery
310
MAPIE
Patients receive doxorubicin IV continuously over 48 hours on days 1-2 in weeks 12, 20, 28, and 36 and cisplatin IV over 4 hours on days 1 and 2 in weeks 12 and 28. Patients also receive high-dose MTX IV over 4 hours on day 1 in weeks 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, and 40. Patients receive ifosfamide IV over 4 hours on days 1-5 in weeks 16, 24, and 32 and on days 1-3 in weeks 20 and 36 and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5 in weeks 16, 24, and 32. Cisplatin: Given IV Doxorubicin Hydrochloride: Given IV Etoposide: Given IV Ifosfamide: Given IV Methotrexate: Given IV Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Therapeutic Conventional Surgery: Undergo amputation or limb salvage surgery
308
Total1,334

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalMAPifnMAP-GRMAP-PRMAPIE
Age, Continuous14 years14 years14 years15 years15 years
Histological classification
Conventional
1219 Participants322 Participants320 Participants288 Participants289 Participants
Histological classification
Data missing
19 Participants7 Participants5 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Histological classification
High-grade surface
19 Participants5 Participants3 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Histological classification
Other
7 Participants2 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Histological classification
Small cell
8 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Histological classification
Telangiectatic
62 Participants20 Participants25 Participants11 Participants6 Participants
Location of tumour on the bone
Diapysis
48 Participants12 Participants13 Participants11 Participants12 Participants
Location of tumour on the bone
Distal
703 Participants189 Participants180 Participants166 Participants168 Participants
Location of tumour on the bone
N/A (not long bone)
54 Participants6 Participants10 Participants19 Participants19 Participants
Location of tumour on the bone
Proximal
529 Participants150 Participants156 Participants114 Participants109 Participants
Lung metastases
No/possible
1197 Participants321 Participants324 Participants272 Participants280 Participants
Lung metastases
Yes
137 Participants36 Participants35 Participants38 Participants28 Participants
Pathological fracture at diagnosis
Data missing
4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Pathological fracture at diagnosis
No
1175 Participants308 Participants321 Participants276 Participants270 Participants
Pathological fracture at diagnosis
Yes
155 Participants49 Participants37 Participants34 Participants35 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
13 participants3 participants2 participants3 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
20 participants5 participants2 participants5 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
44 participants14 participants14 participants9 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
47 participants9 participants20 participants7 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
6 participants0 participants3 participants2 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
12 participants6 participants2 participants2 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
3 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
298 participants90 participants85 participants60 participants63 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
19 participants6 participants5 participants5 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
65 participants18 participants21 participants16 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
5 participants2 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Norway
34 participants10 participants7 participants12 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
33 participants10 participants14 participants4 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
25 participants3 participants8 participants7 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
166 participants47 participants47 participants33 participants39 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
543 participants134 participants128 participants142 participants139 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
548 Participants147 Participants148 Participants136 Participants117 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
786 Participants210 Participants211 Participants174 Participants191 Participants
Site of tumour
Femur
690 Participants191 Participants179 Participants154 Participants166 Participants
Site of tumour
Fibula
64 Participants20 Participants14 Participants17 Participants13 Participants
Site of tumour
Humerus
135 Participants33 Participants36 Participants39 Participants27 Participants
Site of tumour
Other
8 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Site of tumour
Pelvis/sacrum
29 Participants5 Participants5 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Site of tumour
Radius
20 Participants5 Participants5 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Site of tumour
Rib
9 Participants0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Site of tumour
Scapula/clavicle
8 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Site of tumour
Tibia
366 Participants102 Participants113 Participants75 Participants76 Participants
Site of tumour
Ulna
5 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3590 / 3570 / 3100 / 308
serious
Total, serious adverse events
49 / 35976 / 35736 / 31043 / 308

Outcome results

Primary

Event-free Survival (EFS)

EFS is defined as time from randomisation to the first of: death, detection of local recurrence or metastasis, progression of metastatic disease, or detection of a secondary malignancy. EFS will be assessed using the logrank test and expressed using hazard ratios with appropriate confidence intervals. Follow up per participant will be assessed for up to 10 years. The 3 year EFS is provided as a summary.

Time frame: From date of randomization to date of the event.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MAP-GREvent-free Survival (EFS)74 Percentage EFS
MAPifnEvent-free Survival (EFS)77 Percentage EFS
MAP-PREvent-free Survival (EFS)55 Percentage EFS
MAPIEEvent-free Survival (EFS)53 Percentage EFS
p-value: 0.21495% CI: [0.61, 1.12]Log Rank
p-value: 0.8695% CI: [0.78, 1.23]Log Rank
Comparison: Secondary RMST analysis performed in poor response group, due to evidence of non-proportional hazards.p-value: 0.6995% CI: [-3.3, 4.9]Difference in RMST
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival

Overall survival is time from randomization until death from any cause. Will be assessed using the logrank test and expressed using hazard ratios with appropriate confidence intervals. Participants will be assessed for up to 10 years. 5 year overall survival is provided as a summary.

Time frame: From date of randomization to date of death.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MAP-GRPercentage of Patients With Overall Survival84 Percentage of participants
MAPifnPercentage of Patients With Overall Survival84 Percentage of participants
MAP-PRPercentage of Patients With Overall Survival68 Percentage of participants
MAPIEPercentage of Patients With Overall Survival68 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.80495% CI: [0.69, 1.33]Log Rank
p-value: 0.67495% CI: [0.81, 1.39]Log Rank
Secondary

Toxicity as Measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0

Percentages of patients experiencing grade 3 and 4 adverse events. These will be compared using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests where appropriate.

Time frame: Adverse events are assessed for up to 10 years per participant.

Population: Adverse events are only analyzed in participants who started treatment and for whom toxicity data were provided.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MAP-GRToxicity as Measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0348 Participants
MAPifnToxicity as Measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0340 Participants
MAP-PRToxicity as Measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0287 Participants
MAPIEToxicity as Measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0281 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026