Skip to content

Cognitive Therapy Versus Supportive Therapy in Borderline Personality Disorder

Cognitive Therapy Versus Supportive Therapy in Borderline Personality Disorder

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00131781
Enrollment
70
Registered
2005-08-19
Start date
2001-03-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2007-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Borderline Personality Disorder

Keywords

Borderline personality disorder, Controlled trials, Cognitive Therapy, Supportive Therapy, suicide, impulsivity

Brief summary

This is a randomised trial comparing cognitive therapy and supportive therapy administered along one year in borderline personality disorder. The follow-up is one year after treatments end. The therapists were the same in the two groups. Patients received one session a week during six months and one session every two weeks during the next six months

Detailed description

* Cognitive Therapy * Structured session * Conceptualization of the case with the patient * Cognitive methods * Guided discovery of the schemas * Work on life-scenarios * From scenarios to schemas * Empathic confrontation to the schemas * Building new schemas (Core belief work-sheet) * Affective methods: role playing * Interpersonal methods: counter transference issues * Behavioral experiment * Problem solving * Consolidation methods * Patients and therapists had manuals * Supportive Therapy * Therapist: active listening (face to face) * Empathy * Unconditional positive regard * Reformulation and clarification * Reflection of the patient's feelings * Reassurance * Therapist emphasizes the importance to ventilate problems * Therapist answers some factual questions * Therapist politely ignore or refuse requests for advice and directive attitudes * Therapist demonstrates warmth and genuineness * Patients and therapists had manuals

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive Therapy
BEHAVIORALSupportive Therapy

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

* DSM-4 DIBR \>=8 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Diagnostic inventory for borderline-revised)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical Global Impression (CGI): Improvement (1-7): score 3 ( a little better) associated with a hopelessness scale score < 8 (this means that the suicide risk is low)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hamilton depression
Beck Depression Inventory
Hopelessness
Young: Schema Questionnaire II
Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition Personality Disorders Personality Questionnaire (SCID II PQ)
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) (minimult)
CGI severity and improvement
Checklist: impulsive risky behaviors
Quality of life
Handicap (Sheehan)
Time: Pre test, six months, post test and one year post treatment follow-up
Therapeutic relationship evaluation scale (patients and therapists)
Eysenck: impulsivity scale

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026