Skip to content

Avandia™ + Amaryl™ or Avandamet™ Compared With Metformin (AVALANCHE™ Study)

Avandia™ + Amaryl™ or Avandamet™ Compared With Metformin: A 48-week Randomized, Open-label, Multicentre Phase IIIB Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Combination Therapy to Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00131664
Acronym
AVALANCHE
Enrollment
391
Registered
2005-08-19
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2008-01-31
Last updated
2013-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

The incidence of type 2 diabetes is on the increase. According to recent Canadian Diabetes Association guidelines glucose control, based on the A1C measurement, needs to be achieved within a 6-12 month period of time after the initial diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. The guidelines on the use of antihyperglycemic agents identify the potential benefits of sub-maximal oral combination therapy in order to achieve more rapid and improved glycemic control compared with higher dose monotherapy. Furthermore, many patients on prolonged oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy who then start on combination therapy may not achieve the required target glycemic control. Indeed early initiation of combination therapies may be necessary to achieve and maintain glycemic targets because of the progressive deterioration of pancreatic β cell function and glycemic control.

Detailed description

AvandametTM combines two oral antihyperglycemic agents, rosiglitazone maleate and metformin hydrochloride, with different but complementary mechanisms of action to improve glycemic control while reducing circulating insulin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. AvandiaTM and AmarylTM combine two antidiabetic agents, rosiglitazone maleate and glimepiride. Glimepiride is an effective antihyperglycemic agent which has a low incidence of hypoglycemia, symptomatic hypoglycemia, severe hypoglycemia, and confirmed hypoglycemia. Subjects in this study who are inadequately controlled on diet, exercise and a submaximal dose of metformin or sulfonylurea (SU) will be randomized to either a combination of metformin plus rosiglitazone (AvandametTM) or a combination of AvandiaTM + AmarylTM or a Metformin monotherapy arm. As per the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) guidelines, their fasting plasma glucose and A1C to be 7 (mmol/L / percent) or less throughout the study. If the subject does not achieve the target then either AvandametTM or AvandiaTM and AmarylTM or Metformin will be up-titrated in an effort to reach this CDA recommended target. This study will attempt to demonstrate that the either combination arm of rosiglitazone plus metformin (AvandametTM) or the other combination arm of AvandiaTM + AmarylTM will provide greater glycemic control while avoiding the side-effects associated with the use of maximal dose metformin.

Interventions

Avandamet 2 / 500 mg twice daily titration up to 4 mg / 1000 mg twice daily compared to Avandia 4 mg and Amaryl 1 mg once daily over 6 months or compared to Metformin 500 mg twice daily up to 1000 mg over 6 months.

DRUGAvandia and Amaryl

Avandia 4 mg and Amaryl 1 mg once daily compared to Avandamet 2 / 500 mg twice daily titration up to 4 mg / 1000 mg twice daily, or compared to Metformin 500 mg twice daily up to 1000 mg over 6 months.

DRUGMetformin

Metformin 500 mg twice daily up to 1000 mg over 6 months compared to Avandia 4 mg and Amaryl 1 mg once daily or compared to Avandamet 2 / 500 mg twice daily titration up to 4 mg / 1000 mg twice daily

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Canadian Heart Research Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Type 2 diabetes patients 2. 18 - 75 years old 3. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) drug naïve or on submaximal oral monotherapy \< 3 years 4. A1C criteria at screening: 1. 7.1-10% for drug naïve patients after failure of diet control and life-style modification 2. 7.1 - 9% on single therapy (e.g. not more 10 mg of Glyburide or 4 mg of Amaryl™ or 1000mg of Metformin) who will start after 2 weeks wash-out. During wash out the following will be done: i) diet and life style modification ii) Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), aspirin (80 mg), and statin if appropriate 5. Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Type 1 diabetes 2. Subjects currently treated with insulin 3. Subject treated for previous 3 month with any thiazolidinedione (TZD) 4. Evidence of clinically significant concomitant illnesses which are not controlled by medication and/or may limit participation in the study as judged by the investigator 5. Subjects who have hypersensitivity to any components of study drugs 6. Participation in a clinical trial and/or intake of an investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening. 7. Pregnant or nursing females 8. Females of childbearing potential who are not on adequate birth control 9. Liver enzymes (Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2.5 times upper limit of normal) 10. Renal impairment: serum creatinine ≥ 136umol/L (males) and ≥ 124 umol/L (females) 11. Congestive Heart Failure (CHF class III/IV) 12. Weight \>160 kg

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values.
Number of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 4Month 4A1C responders were described as subjects having achieved A1C less than 7 percent at Month 4, with LOCF from Month 2.
Number of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 6Month 6A1C responders were described as subjects having achieved A1C less than 7 percent at Month 6, with LOCF from Month 2.
Number of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 12Month 12A1C responders were described as subjects having achieved A1C less than 7 percent at Month 12 with LOCF from Month 2.
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 4Baseline and Month 4Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 4 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values.
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values.
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values.
Number of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 4Month 4FPG responders were described as subjects having achieved FPG less than 7 mmol/L at Month 4 with LOCF from Month 2.
Mean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 4Baseline and Month 4Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 4 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values.
Number of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 12Month 12FPG responders were described as subjects having achieved FPG less than 7 mmol/L at Month 12 with LOCF from Month 2.
Mean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 2. The UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study) risk engine calculated was based on 5 years risk using gender, race, age at diagnosis of diabetes, duration of diabetes, smoking status, A1C, systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio at a specified visit. The UKPDS cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk engine is used to estimate the risk of having coronary heart disease in type II diabetes according to the UKPDS model. The possible risk scores can range from 0 to 100% and hence lower scores would predict a person is less likely to have an event.
Mean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 2. The UKPDS (U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study) risk engine calculated was based on 5 years risk using gender, race, age at diagnosis of diabetes, duration of diabetes, smoking status, A1C, systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol to HDL ratio at a specified visit. The UKPDS cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk engine is used to estimate the risk of having coronary heart disease in type II diabetes according to the UKPDS model. The possible risk scores can range from 0 to 100% and hence lower scores would predict a person is less likely to have an event.
Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value. LOCF was not used for this analysis. CRP was only done at baseline, months 6 and 8. The test was optional and performed only by participating sites.
Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 6. CRP was only done at baseline, months 6 and 12. The test was optional and performed only by participating sites.
Mean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 6Baseline and Month 6Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value. LOCF was not used for this analysis. Adiponectin was only done at baseline, months 6 and 12. The test was optional and performed only by participating sites.
Mean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 12Baseline and Month 12Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 6. Adiponectin was only done at baseline, months 6 and 12. The test was optional and performed only by participating sites.
Number of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 6Month 6FPG responders were described as subjects having achieved FPG less than 7 mmol/L at Month 6 with LOCF from Month 2.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

391 patients were randomized from 49 Canadian sites of General Practitioners and Community Endocrinologists during an 8 month recruitment period.

Pre-assignment details

This open-label, prospective, randomized multi-centre study included naïve or recently treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Recently treated patients (up to 3 years on single therapy of a low to moderate dose of Glyburide or Amaryl™ or Metformin) entered the study after a 2-week wash-out period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Avandia and Amaryl
4 mg + 1 mg once daily titration up to 8 mg + 2 mg once daily over 6 months
136
Avandamet
2 mg / 500 mg twice daily titration up to 4 mg / 1000 mg twice daily over 6 months
135
Metformin
500 mg twice daily titration up to 1000 mg twice daily over 6 months
120
Total391

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
First Period (First 6 Months)Administrative reasons205000
First Period (First 6 Months)Adverse Event945000
First Period (First 6 Months)Clinically significant lab abnormalities120000
First Period (First 6 Months)Death010000
First Period (First 6 Months)Lost to Follow-up733000
First Period (First 6 Months)Protocol Violation221000
First Period (First 6 Months)Withdrawal by Subject462000
Second Period (Additional Drug Added)Administrative reasons420010
Second Period (Additional Drug Added)Adverse Event010001
Second Period (Additional Drug Added)Clinically significant lab abnormalities000100
Second Period (Additional Drug Added)Lost to Follow-up302102
Second Period (Additional Drug Added)Protocol Violation011000
Second Period (Additional Drug Added)Withdrawal by Subject200000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAvandia and AmarylAvandametMetforminTotal
Age Continuous54.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
56.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Region of Enrollment
Canada
136 participants135 participants120 participants391 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants59 Participants57 Participants164 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
88 Participants76 Participants63 Participants227 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 1363 / 1170 / 104
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1360 / 1350 / 120

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with a value at baseline and at Month 6 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 6Baseline8.14 percentStandard Error 0.095
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 6Change from baseline-1.61 percentStandard Error 0.108
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 6Change from baseline-1.39 percentStandard Error 0.081
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 6Baseline7.96 percentStandard Error 0.076
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 6Change from baseline-1.02 percentStandard Error 0.092
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 6Baseline7.90 percentStandard Error 0.085
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 12

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 2. The UKPDS (U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study) risk engine calculated was based on 5 years risk using gender, race, age at diagnosis of diabetes, duration of diabetes, smoking status, A1C, systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol to HDL ratio at a specified visit. The UKPDS cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk engine is used to estimate the risk of having coronary heart disease in type II diabetes according to the UKPDS model. The possible risk scores can range from 0 to 100% and hence lower scores would predict a person is less likely to have an event.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 12-0.72 percentStandard Error 0.392
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 12-0.62 percentStandard Error 0.252
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 12-1.11 percentStandard Error 0.234
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 2. The UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study) risk engine calculated was based on 5 years risk using gender, race, age at diagnosis of diabetes, duration of diabetes, smoking status, A1C, systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio at a specified visit. The UKPDS cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk engine is used to estimate the risk of having coronary heart disease in type II diabetes according to the UKPDS model. The possible risk scores can range from 0 to 100% and hence lower scores would predict a person is less likely to have an event.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 6 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 6-1.09 percentStandard Error 0.246
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 6-1.05 percentStandard Error 0.169
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 6-1.54 percentStandard Error 0.234
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 12

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 12-1.50 percentStandard Error 0.115
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 12-1.56 percentStandard Error 0.086
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 12-1.14 percentStandard Error 0.111
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 4

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 4 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 4

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 4 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 4-1.44 percentStandard Error 0.099
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 4-1.28 percentStandard Error 0.083
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 4-0.94 percentStandard Error 0.097
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 12

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 6. Adiponectin was only done at baseline, months 6 and 12. The test was optional and performed only by participating sites.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 124.95 µg/mLStandard Error 0.902
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 128.21 µg/mLStandard Error 1.804
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 121.453 µg/mLStandard Error 0.371
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value. LOCF was not used for this analysis. Adiponectin was only done at baseline, months 6 and 12. The test was optional and performed only by participating sites.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 6 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 65.73 microgram per millilitre (µg/mL)Standard Error 0.869
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 66.37 microgram per millilitre (µg/mL)Standard Error 1.453
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 60.23 microgram per millilitre (µg/mL)Standard Error 0.299
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 12

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 6. CRP was only done at baseline, months 6 and 12. The test was optional and performed only by participating sites.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 12-0.40 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.323
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 12-1.52 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.642
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 12-1.52 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.817
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value. LOCF was not used for this analysis. CRP was only done at baseline, months 6 and 8. The test was optional and performed only by participating sites.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: All Primary and secondary endpoints were calculated on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population where each patient had at least one dose of the medication and at least one valid observation. Missing values were carried forward (using Last Observation Carried Forward method) except for the calculation of the composite variables.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 6-1.20 milligram per decilitre (mg/dL)Standard Error 0.419
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 6-1.68 milligram per decilitre (mg/dL)Standard Error 0.64
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 6-1.25 milligram per decilitre (mg/dL)Standard Error 0.804
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 6 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12-2.71 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.274
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12-2.76 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.225
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12-2.12 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.231
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 4

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 4 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 4

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 4 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 4-2.86 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.247
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 4-2.33 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.181
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 4-1.75 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.204
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 6 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Avandia and AmarylMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 6-2.98 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.259
AvandametMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 6-2.55 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.2
MetforminMean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 6-1.86 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.192
Secondary

Number of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 12

A1C responders were described as subjects having achieved A1C less than 7 percent at Month 12 with LOCF from Month 2.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 12 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Avandia and AmarylNumber of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 1295 participants
AvandametNumber of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 12111 participants
MetforminNumber of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 1282 participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 4

A1C responders were described as subjects having achieved A1C less than 7 percent at Month 4, with LOCF from Month 2.

Time frame: Month 4

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 4 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Avandia and AmarylNumber of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 483 participants
AvandametNumber of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 496 participants
MetforminNumber of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 469 participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 6

A1C responders were described as subjects having achieved A1C less than 7 percent at Month 6, with LOCF from Month 2.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline Month 6 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Avandia and AmarylNumber of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 694 participants
AvandametNumber of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 698 participants
MetforminNumber of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 669 participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 12

FPG responders were described as subjects having achieved FPG less than 7 mmol/L at Month 12 with LOCF from Month 2.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 6 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Avandia and AmarylNumber of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 1264 participants
AvandametNumber of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 1286 participants
MetforminNumber of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 1251 participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 4

FPG responders were described as subjects having achieved FPG less than 7 mmol/L at Month 4 with LOCF from Month 2.

Time frame: Month 4

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 4 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Avandia and AmarylNumber of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 458 participants
AvandametNumber of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 465 participants
MetforminNumber of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 438 participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 6

FPG responders were described as subjects having achieved FPG less than 7 mmol/L at Month 6 with LOCF from Month 2.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid observation. For withdrawn subjects or missing values, the last on-treatment observation was carried forward (LOCF). Only subjects with values at baseline and Month 6 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Avandia and AmarylNumber of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 661 participants
AvandametNumber of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 676 participants
MetforminNumber of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 643 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026