Skip to content

Adherence to Guidelines for Antibiotic Use in Respiratory Infections at Hospitals

Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance in Hospitals: Promoting Appropriate Use of Antibiotics in Hospital Departments of Internal and Pulmonary Medicine

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00129883
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2005-08-12
Start date
2002-09-30
Completion date
2005-04-30
Last updated
2005-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Bronchitis, COPD, Pneumonia

Keywords

quality of care, antibiotic use, intervention, lower respiratory tract infections, Community acquired Pneumonia, Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Bronchitis or COPD

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test a strategy to improve the quality of antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) at hospitals. Therefore, a multifaceted intervention strategy is compared to a control strategy and the effectiveness and feasibility of the intervention is assessed.

Detailed description

Improving processes of care in patients with hospital LRTI has been related to better patient outcome. Inappropriate use of antibiotics has contributed to the emergence and spread of drug-resistant micro organisms and increased treatment costs. International guidelines provide recommendations for the initial evaluation and management of LRTI, including advice on judicious antibiotic therapy. Nonetheless, studies have demonstrated a wide variability in adherence to these guidelines. To implement key recommendations in clinical practice, various strategies have been used, with mixed results. Perhaps the most important aspect of choosing a potentially effective intervention is that the choice of intervention should be based upon assessment of potential barriers in the target group. Many intervention studies are flawed by failing to control for secular trends. The investigators performed a cluster randomised controlled trial, to study the effect of a multifaceted intervention strategy on the quality of antibiotic use for LRTI. Their intervention was tailored to the areas most in need for improvement and took perceived barriers in the target group into consideration at the individual hospital level.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALProcess analysis and redesign
BEHAVIORALProfessional education
BEHAVIORALImplementation of a Critical Care Pathway

Sponsors

Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
ECT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients admitted to a respiratory care or internal medicine ward with community-acquired pneumonia or acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Exclusion criteria

* Recent (\< 30 days) admission for LRTI * Patients with underlying immunodeficiency (HIV infection, neutropenia, treatment with immunomodulating drugs, active hematological malignancies, anatomical or functional asplenia and hypogammaglobulinemia) * Patients already on treatment with antibiotics for another culture proven infection at the time of admission * Patients from nursing homes * Patients who had been transferred to another hospital or ICU and patients who had died within 24 hours of admission * Patients with very poor prognosis (life expectancy \< 2 weeks on admission).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
adherence to key quality indicators for antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections (indicators were developed from current [inter]national guideline recommendations and a systematic review of the literature)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
process evaluation: how well was the intervention performed
length of hospital stay
cost
Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-transfer
30 day re-admission rate
in-hospital mortality

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026