Skip to content

Potentiation of Procedural Motor Learning in Health and Disease

Potentiation of Procedural Motor Learning by Pharmacological Neuromodulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Health and Disease

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00126087
Enrollment
18
Registered
2005-08-02
Start date
2005-07-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2013-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

dopamine, NMDA receptor, brain imaging, neuroplasticity, learning, transcranial direct current stimulation, rehabilitation, aging

Brief summary

The investigators plan to improve the learning of motor skills by pharmacological means (dopamine), and by noninvasive brain stimulation. They will study both healthy subjects and chronic stroke patients. In addition, they want to study the mechanisms of enhanced learning, on the molecular and the systems level.

Detailed description

Adaptive behavior requires procedural motor learning, i.e. the acquisition of motor skills. Procedural learning is particularly critical in the rehabilitation of chronic motor deficits after stroke. A potent modulator of motor function and learning is found in the endogenous dopaminergic system. The investigator's own work could demonstrate that formation of an elementary motor memory, which constitutes the first step in acquiring more complex motor skills, can be enhanced in both healthy subjects and chronic stroke patients by pre-medication with levodopa. The aim of the present proposal is to: * expand these exciting findings to procedural motor learning; * explore the interaction with age, brain lesions, add-on interventions such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); and * illuminate the underlying mechanisms. The effect of levodopa +/- tDCS on procedural motor learning and cortical excitability will be studied in healthy volunteers and stroke patients. Then the investigator plans to delineate the underlying mechanisms of this effect by exploring N-methyl-D-asparate (NMDA) receptor-dependency of levodopa-enhanced learning and changes in activation and connectivity (using functional magnetic resonance imaging) in the respective neural networks resulting from the interaction of learning and dopaminergic neuromodulation.

Interventions

DRUGdopamine

Sponsors

University Hospital Muenster
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Healthy Volunteers: * Normal neurological examination * Mini Mental State Examination of \> 27 * Right handedness Stroke Patients: * Cortical or subcortical stroke with an initial severe hemiparesis Medical Research Council (MRC) scale \< 2 that has recovered to a degree that patients are able to perform the proposed task (in general \> MRC 4.5, with low spasticity, work in progress on motor learning in stroke patients) * At least 1 year post-stroke * Mini Mental State Examination of \> 27 * Right-handedness

Exclusion criteria

Healthy Volunteers and Stroke Patients: * No antipsychotic, antidepressant drugs, and drugs affecting the dopaminergic system.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Procedural motor learning (decrease in reaction time in ms) after the respective intervention (dopamine, transcranial direct current stimulation), compared to placebo

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026