Skip to content

Study of Tarceva and Targretin Oral Capsules in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer

A Phase II Clinical Study of Erlotinib (Tarceva) and Bexarotene (Targretin) Oral Capsules in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00125359
Enrollment
42
Registered
2005-08-01
Start date
2005-08-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2019-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Non-small-cell Lung

Keywords

tarceva, targretin, non-small cell lung cancer, Carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to learn about the effects of two new anticancer drugs, erlotinib (Tarceva) and bexarotene (Targretin), when treating patients with advanced lung cancer. Erlotinib is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Bexarotene is approved by the FDA for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. This combination of drugs is experimental.

Detailed description

This is a single institution open label phase II trial. Consecutive, eligible patients presenting with the diagnosis of advanced NSCLC are to be enrolled in this study. All eligible patients will receive continuous daily oral erlotinib 150 mg (Tarceva™) with daily bexarotene oral capsules 400 mg/m2 (Targretin®). The two agents will be taken at the same time. We anticipate the maximum accrual of 40 patients to this trial. Patients will be evaluated by history, physical examination, and laboratory assessment every 4 weeks. Radiographic disease assessments by chest radiograph will be obtained every 4 weeks and computer tomography every 8 weeks or longer if clinically indicated. Whole body PET scan will be obtained at 10 days and 8 weeks. All radiographic studies will be sent to Medical Metrix Solutions (MMS) for an independent radiographic review of tumor response.

Interventions

DRUGerlotinib and bexarotene

Daily Erlotinib 150mg and daily bexarotene oral capsules 400mg.

Sponsors

Ligand Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Genentech, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Konstantin Dragnev
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Advanced NSCLC * Prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy is allowed.

Exclusion criteria

* Hepatic or renal dysfunction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic Response RatesThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearResponse Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Through study completion, an average of 1 yearPET response is assessed based on the guidelines of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group (Eur J Cancer 1999; 35(13):1773-82). PET response refers to the presence and measurement of the most current PET scan imaging when compared to baseline imaging. The amount of reduction in the disease from baseline to current imaging determines the extent to which the cancer has responded to treatment. Radiographic response is per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR
Progression-free Survival and Overall SurvivalThrough study completion, an average of 1 year
Evaluation of EGFR Mutations in Tumor Biopsies and Correlation of EGFR Mutations With Objective Radiographic Responses.Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single Arm Erlotinib + Bexarotene
All eligible patients will receive continuous daily oral erlotinib 150mg with daily bexarotene oral capsules 400mg. erlotinib and bexarotene: Daily Erlotinib 150mg and daily bexarotene oral capsules 400mg.
42
Total42

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event5
Overall StudyDeath4
Overall StudyPhysician Decision14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle Arm Erlotinib + Bexarotene
Age, Continuous67 years
Disease Stage IV42 Participants
Histopathology
Adenocarcinomas
28 participants
Histopathology
Bronchioloalveolar type
5 participants
Histopathology
Non-small cell carcinomas not otherwise specified
10 participants
Histopathology
Squamous cell carcinoma
2 participants
Number of prior chemotherapies2 chemotherapies
Prior anti-EGFR therapy
Did not receive prior anti-EGFR therapy
33 Participants
Prior anti-EGFR therapy
Received prior anti-EGFR therapy
9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
42 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants
Smoking status
Current smoker
6 Participants
Smoking status
Former smoker
29 Participants
Smoking status
Never smoker
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
30 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Radiographic Response Rates

Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneRadiographic Response Rates19 Participants
Secondary

Correlation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.

PET response is assessed based on the guidelines of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group (Eur J Cancer 1999; 35(13):1773-82). PET response refers to the presence and measurement of the most current PET scan imaging when compared to baseline imaging. The amount of reduction in the disease from baseline to current imaging determines the extent to which the cancer has responded to treatment. Radiographic response is per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Population: Number of participants analyzed is reported per achieved disease response noted in individual rows.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography complete responseEarly PET metabolic response1 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography complete responseEarly PET metabolic progression0 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography partial responseEarly PET metabolic progression1 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography partial responseEarly PET metabolic response0 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography stable diseaseEarly PET progression1 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography disease progressionEarly PET metabolic response0 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography disease progressionEarly PET metabolic progression0 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography disease progressionEarly PET stable disease5 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography disease progressionEarly PET progression5 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography complete responseEarly PET stable disease0 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography complete responseEarly PET progression0 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography partial responseEarly PET stable disease0 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography partial responseEarly PET progression0 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography stable diseaseEarly PET metabolic response0 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography stable diseaseEarly PET metabolic progression0 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneCorrelation of Early PET Responses With Objective Radiographic Responses.Computed tomography stable diseaseEarly PET stable disease1 Participants
Secondary

Evaluation of EGFR Mutations in Tumor Biopsies and Correlation of EGFR Mutations With Objective Radiographic Responses.

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Population: Three patients had biopsies evaluated for EGFR mutations.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneEvaluation of EGFR Mutations in Tumor Biopsies and Correlation of EGFR Mutations With Objective Radiographic Responses.Complete Response (CR) in EGFR Wild-Type0 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneEvaluation of EGFR Mutations in Tumor Biopsies and Correlation of EGFR Mutations With Objective Radiographic Responses.Partial Response in EGFR Wild-Type2 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneEvaluation of EGFR Mutations in Tumor Biopsies and Correlation of EGFR Mutations With Objective Radiographic Responses.CR in Activating EGFR mutation at exon 211 Participants
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneEvaluation of EGFR Mutations in Tumor Biopsies and Correlation of EGFR Mutations With Objective Radiographic Responses.PR in Activating EGFR mutation at exon 210 Participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival and Overall Survival

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneProgression-free Survival and Overall SurvivalTime to progression7 Weeks
Single Arm Erlotinib + BexaroteneProgression-free Survival and Overall SurvivalOverall survival22 Weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026