Skip to content

Efficacy of Amitriptyline for Painful Bladder Syndrome (PBS)

A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Amitriptyline for the Treatment of Painful Bladder Syndrome (PBS) in Newly Diagnosed Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00124306
Acronym
IC01
Enrollment
271
Registered
2005-07-27
Start date
2005-02-28
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Diseases, Interstitial Cystitis

Keywords

painful bladder syndrome, interstitial cystitis, newly diagnosed

Brief summary

This is a randomized clinical trial study to test the efficacy and safety of amitriptyline in the treatment of patients newly diagnosed with painful bladder syndrome (PBS). PBS is defined by symptoms--frequent urination day and night and increasing pain as the bladder fills--according to the International Continence Society. The syndrome includes interstitial cystitis (IC), which has been estimated to affect as many as 700,000 people, mostly women. Estimates for PBS vary widely, but as many as 10 million people may suffer from this condition. Although amitriptyline is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication used for depression, the way it works makes it useful for treating the pain of fibromyalgia, multiple sclerosis, and other chronic pain syndromes. Prior small studies in interstitial cystitis (IC) suggested the drug may be a wise choice for this syndrome as well, because it blocks nerve signals that trigger pain and may also decrease muscle spasms in the bladder, helping to relieve the symptoms of pain and frequent urination.

Detailed description

The current trial is recruiting newly diagnosed adults who have not yet received treatment. Approximately 270 participants will be randomly assigned to take up to 75 milligrams of amitriptyline or a placebo each day for 14 to 26 weeks. All participants will be given techniques to practice suppressing the urge to urinate for increasingly longer stretches until they can wait 3 or 4 hours before going to the bathroom. Participants will also regulate when and how much they drink and avoid bladder irritants such as alcohol, acidic foods and carbonated or caffeinated drinks. Staff and patients will find out who received the amitriptyline when the study is finished. Medications and tests are free to participants. Ten medical centers in the United States and Canada are recruiting adults newly diagnosed with either painful bladder syndrome (PBS) or interstitial cystitis (IC).The centers make up the Interstitial Cystitis Clinical Research Network, sponsored by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) at NIH.

Interventions

DRUGAmitriptyline

Amitriptyline will be titrated over a 6-week period as tolerated, to a maximum dose of 75mg. During the 6-week titration period, the patient who cannot tolerate a scheduled increased dose may adjust the medication dose for tolerance by tapering down one 25mg tablet.

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo will be dosed exactly as active arm.

Sponsors

University of Pennsylvania
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participant must report bladder pain/discomfort score of 3 or greater on a 0-10 Likert scale over the previous 4 weeks. * Participant must report a symptom score of abnormal urinary frequency of 3 or greater on a 0-10 Likert scale over the previous 4 weeks. * Symptoms of abnormal urinary frequency and bladder pain/discomfort must have been present for at least six weeks prior to screening visit.

Exclusion criteria

* Known allergy or intolerance to amitriptyline or any of its components. * Currently receives treatment with amitriptyline or other tricyclic antidepressant, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), or monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor antidepressants. * Previous treatment with amitriptyline or other tricyclics, hydroxyzine or other antihistamines for bladder symptoms; pentosanpolysulfate; DMSO or any other intravesical therapy, biofeedback or pelvic floor physical therapy for PBS symptoms

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Response Assessment (GRA)12 WeeksThe primary efficacy analysis was based on intent to treat, comparing the proportion of responders between treatment arms on a patient reported GRA recorded at 12 weeks or study withdrawal. The 7-point GRA queried, As compared to when you started the current study, how would you rate your overall symptoms now? The 7 response options were markedly worse, moderately worse, slightly worse, the same, slightly improved, moderately improved and markedly improved. Participants who indicated that they were markedly or moderately improved were considered responders. Subjects who withdrew from the study for any reason and did not provide data on the primary outcome were considered treatment failures, and were included in the denominator for calculation of response rates.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 WeeksBaseline and 12 WeeksA number of secondary outcomes \[as detailed in the Baseline Measures section\] were assessed throughout the study. These outcomes include pain, urgency and frequency on 0 to 10-point Likert scales, a 24-hour voiding diary, the Health Status Questionnaire for Quality of Life (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Female Sexual Function Index or International Index of Erectile Function. When applicable, additional analyses of the symptom outcomes may include evaluation of secondary response rates defined by specific changes in symptoms. Associations between changes from baseline in secondary outcomes and GRA will be used to supplement the primary endpoint analysis, and to evaluate the validity of the symptom scales for assessing change.
Change in Urinary Symptoms MeasuresBaseline and 12 weeksThe O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Indices, and the University of Wisconsin Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Inventory The IC Symptom Index is a 4-question survey w/ a severity scale from min.0(not at all) to max.5(always). The IC Problem Index is a 4-question survey with a severity scale ranging from min.0 (no problem) to max.4 (big problem). Higher subscale responses for each index indicate more severe symptoms. A sub-set of the University of Wisconsin Symptom Survey is designated as the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Inventory w/ questions ranging from 0(not at all) to 6(a lot). Pts. reported symptoms the day of assessment. Scores ranged from 0 to 42. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms. Symptoms include: bladder pain; bladder discomfort; getting up at night to go to the bathroom; going to the bathroom frequently during the day; urgency to urinate; difficulty sleeping because of bladder problems; and burning sensation in the bladder.
Adherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)12 weeksAdherence to protocol treatment, to study drug and EBMP, at 6 weeks was assessed in 4 categories of 1) symptom management, 2) fluid management, 3) diet modification and 4) bladder training. For each of these EBMP categories adherence was defined as the overall percentage of participants who reported adhering to each component of the EBMP at each telephone contact or clinic visit. Subjects were classified into 3 groups based on the maximum dose obtained at 6 and 12 weeks as shown in the Outcome Measure Data Table below.
Change in Nighttime Voiding From Baseline to 12 WeeksBaseline and 12 weeksBaseline nighttime \[sleep period\] voiding frequency was collected by participant report on a Voiding Diary with entries for each void in a 24-hour period. Each void entry included the question: Did this void occur during your intended sleep period? Responses: 1=Yes, 0=No. The sum was totaled for Yes entries in response to this question.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1 - Active Comparator
Amitryptiline, increased during a 6-week period from 10 mg up to 75 mg, taken once daily. Amitriptyline: Amitriptyline will be titrated over a 6-week period as tolerated, to a maximum dose of 75mg. During the 6-week titration period, the patient who cannot tolerate a scheduled increased dose may adjust the medication dose for tolerance by tapering down one 25mg tablet.
135
2 - Placebo Comparator
Placebo will be dosed exactly as the active arm and taken once daily. Placebo: Placebo will be dosed exactly as active arm.
136
Total271

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAbnormal lab result01
Overall StudyAdverse Event72
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy36
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up106
Overall StudyOther20
Overall StudyPersonal constraints02
Overall StudyUse of unacceptable medication10

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic2 - Placebo Comparator1 - Active ComparatorTotal
24-Hr voiding frequency13.7 Voiding events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
13.9 Voiding events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
13.8 Voiding events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
Age, Continuous39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
38.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
Frequency score6.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
6.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
6.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index11.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
11.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
11.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index12.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
12.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
12.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
Nighttime voiding frequency3.0 Voiding events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
2.4 Voiding events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
2.7 Voiding events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
Pain score6.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
5.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
5.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
Participants ever diagnosed with IC/PBS75 Participants62 Participants137 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants18 Participants33 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
17 Participants21 Participants38 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
104 Participants96 Participants200 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
111 Participants115 Participants226 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants20 Participants45 Participants
University of Wisconsin Symptom Inventory26.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
25.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
26.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Urgency score6.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
6.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
6.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1350 / 136
other
Total, other adverse events
119 / 13598 / 136
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1353 / 136

Outcome results

Primary

Global Response Assessment (GRA)

The primary efficacy analysis was based on intent to treat, comparing the proportion of responders between treatment arms on a patient reported GRA recorded at 12 weeks or study withdrawal. The 7-point GRA queried, As compared to when you started the current study, how would you rate your overall symptoms now? The 7 response options were markedly worse, moderately worse, slightly worse, the same, slightly improved, moderately improved and markedly improved. Participants who indicated that they were markedly or moderately improved were considered responders. Subjects who withdrew from the study for any reason and did not provide data on the primary outcome were considered treatment failures, and were included in the denominator for calculation of response rates.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1 - Active ComparatorGlobal Response Assessment (GRA)Marked/moderate improvement74 Participants
1 - Active ComparatorGlobal Response Assessment (GRA)Slight improvement, same or worse61 Participants
2 - Placebo ComparatorGlobal Response Assessment (GRA)Marked/moderate improvement61 Participants
2 - Placebo ComparatorGlobal Response Assessment (GRA)Slight improvement, same or worse75 Participants
Secondary

Adherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)

Adherence to protocol treatment, to study drug and EBMP, at 6 weeks was assessed in 4 categories of 1) symptom management, 2) fluid management, 3) diet modification and 4) bladder training. For each of these EBMP categories adherence was defined as the overall percentage of participants who reported adhering to each component of the EBMP at each telephone contact or clinic visit. Subjects were classified into 3 groups based on the maximum dose obtained at 6 and 12 weeks as shown in the Outcome Measure Data Table below.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Consistent with intent to treat analytic strategies participants who did not provide data at 12 weeks, including 24 (18%) on amitriptyline and 17 (13%) on placebo, were considered treatment non-responders.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1 - Active ComparatorAdherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)50 mg or > achieved/maintained @ 12 wks62 Participants
1 - Active ComparatorAdherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)50 mg or > achieved, reduced < 50 by 12 wks27 Participants
1 - Active ComparatorAdherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)50 mg or greater not achieved46 Participants
2 - Placebo ComparatorAdherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)50 mg or > achieved/maintained @ 12 wks98 Participants
2 - Placebo ComparatorAdherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)50 mg or > achieved, reduced < 50 by 12 wks20 Participants
2 - Placebo ComparatorAdherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)50 mg or greater not achieved18 Participants
Secondary

Change in Nighttime Voiding From Baseline to 12 Weeks

Baseline nighttime \[sleep period\] voiding frequency was collected by participant report on a Voiding Diary with entries for each void in a 24-hour period. Each void entry included the question: Did this void occur during your intended sleep period? Responses: 1=Yes, 0=No. The sum was totaled for Yes entries in response to this question.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Changes in nighttime voids from baseline to 12 weeks were reported by treatment arm for those with available data at those points. Nighttime \[sleep period\] voiding frequency was collected by participant report on a Voiding Diary with entries for each void in a 24-hour period. Each void entry included the question: Did this void occur during your intended sleep period? Responses: 1=Yes, 0=No. The sum was totaled for Yes entries in response to this question.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1 - Active ComparatorChange in Nighttime Voiding From Baseline to 12 Weeks-0.9 Change in voiding eventsStandard Deviation 2.4
2 - Placebo ComparatorChange in Nighttime Voiding From Baseline to 12 Weeks-0.9 Change in voiding eventsStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

Change in Urinary Symptoms Measures

The O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Indices, and the University of Wisconsin Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Inventory The IC Symptom Index is a 4-question survey w/ a severity scale from min.0(not at all) to max.5(always). The IC Problem Index is a 4-question survey with a severity scale ranging from min.0 (no problem) to max.4 (big problem). Higher subscale responses for each index indicate more severe symptoms. A sub-set of the University of Wisconsin Symptom Survey is designated as the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Inventory w/ questions ranging from 0(not at all) to 6(a lot). Pts. reported symptoms the day of assessment. Scores ranged from 0 to 42. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms. Symptoms include: bladder pain; bladder discomfort; getting up at night to go to the bathroom; going to the bathroom frequently during the day; urgency to urinate; difficulty sleeping because of bladder problems; and burning sensation in the bladder.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Change between the Baseline and 12-week time points is reported for each measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1 - Active ComparatorChange in Urinary Symptoms MeasuresIC Symptom Index-4.8 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 3.7
1 - Active ComparatorChange in Urinary Symptoms MeasuresIC Problem Index-5.2 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 3.9
1 - Active ComparatorChange in Urinary Symptoms MeasuresWisconsin Symptom Survey-13.1 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 10.2
2 - Placebo ComparatorChange in Urinary Symptoms MeasuresIC Symptom Index-3.3 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 3.9
2 - Placebo ComparatorChange in Urinary Symptoms MeasuresIC Problem Index-3.9 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 4
2 - Placebo ComparatorChange in Urinary Symptoms MeasuresWisconsin Symptom Survey-9.3 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 9.3
Comparison: IC Symptom Index - change from baseline to 12 weeks95% CI: [-2.5, -0.5]
Comparison: IC Problem Index - change from baseline to 12 weeks95% CI: [-2.3, -0.2]
Comparison: Wisconsin Symptom Survey - change from baseline to 12 weeks95% CI: [-6.3, -1.3]
Secondary

Changes in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 Weeks

A number of secondary outcomes \[as detailed in the Baseline Measures section\] were assessed throughout the study. These outcomes include pain, urgency and frequency on 0 to 10-point Likert scales, a 24-hour voiding diary, the Health Status Questionnaire for Quality of Life (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Female Sexual Function Index or International Index of Erectile Function. When applicable, additional analyses of the symptom outcomes may include evaluation of secondary response rates defined by specific changes in symptoms. Associations between changes from baseline in secondary outcomes and GRA will be used to supplement the primary endpoint analysis, and to evaluate the validity of the symptom scales for assessing change.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1 - Active ComparatorChanges in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 WeeksPain score-2.6 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 2.5
1 - Active ComparatorChanges in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 WeeksUrgency-3.0 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 2.5
1 - Active ComparatorChanges in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 WeeksFrequency-3.5 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 2.3
1 - Active ComparatorChanges in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 Weeks24-Hr voiding frequency-4.4 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 5.4
2 - Placebo ComparatorChanges in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 Weeks24-Hr voiding frequency-2.0 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 3.9
2 - Placebo ComparatorChanges in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 WeeksPain score-2.3 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 2.4
2 - Placebo ComparatorChanges in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 WeeksFrequency-2.6 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 2.5
2 - Placebo ComparatorChanges in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 WeeksUrgency-2.5 Change in score baseline to 12 weeksStandard Deviation 2.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026