Skip to content

COREG MR Versus TOPROL-XL On Reduction Of Microalbuminuria In Patients With Hypertension And Microalbuminuria

A Randomized, Double-blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy of Carvedilol Phosphate Modified Release Formulation (COREG MR) and Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release (TOPROL-XL) on the Reduction of Microalbuminuria in Patients With Hypertension and Microalbuminuria

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00123903
Enrollment
1220
Registered
2005-07-26
Start date
2005-07-31
Completion date
2006-05-31
Last updated
2017-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Congestive and Microalbuminuria

Keywords

hypertension, urine albumin:creatinine ratio, microalbuminuria

Brief summary

This study was designed to determine whether COREG MR is more effective than TOPROL-XL in reducing microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic or non-diabetic patients with high blood pressure and microalbuminuria.

Interventions

DRUGlisinopril

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented history of hypertension. * Must have been taking an ACE (angiotensin converting enzyme) inhibitor either alone or as part of an antihypertensive regimen for at least 8 weeks. * Persistent microalbuminuria.

Exclusion criteria

* History of heart attack, stroke, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, type 1 or uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus, liver or renal disease. * Has been taking any non-ocular beta-blockers for any indication within three months prior to Pre-screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline in urine albumin: creatinine ratio (ACR) at six months of maintenance therapy.Baseline (Randomization Visit) and Month 6

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of participants who progressed to macroalbuminuria after 6 months of maintenance therapy.Month 6
Change from baseline to month 6 LOCF in High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)Baseline (Randomization Visit) and Month 6
Change from Pre-screening visit to month 6 LOCF in urine ACR.Pre-screening Visit and Month 6
Change from baseline to visit to month 6 LOCF in lipids including total cholesterol, low density lipid (LDL), high density lipid (HDL) and Triglycerides (TG)Baseline (Randomization visit) and Month 6
Percentage of participants who achieved normoalbuminuria at 6 months of maintenance therapy.Month 6
Changes from baseline in heart rate at month 6 of treatment.Baseline (Randomization visit) and Month 6
Percentage of participants who required add-on therapy to reach target blood pressure at any time during the study.Up to 6 months
Number of participants with clinical chemistry parameters and hematology parameters of potential clinical concern at any time on-treatment.Up to 6 months
Number of participants with vital signs of potential clinical concern at any time on-treatment.Up to 6 months
Changes from baseline in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) at month 6 of treatment.Baseline (Randomization Visit) and Month 6

Countries

Canada, Puerto Rico, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026