Skip to content

Advanced Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) - Follow On: Study of BMS-354825 in Subjects With CML

A Randomized Two-Arm, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase III Study of BMS-354825 Administered Orally at a Dose of 70 mg Twice Daily or 140 mg Once Daily in Subjects With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Accelerated Phase or in Myeloid or Lymphoid Blast Phase or With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Who Are Resistant or Intolerant to Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00123487
Enrollment
638
Registered
2005-07-25
Start date
2005-06-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2014-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Lymphoblastic, Acute, Philadelphia-Positive, Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Accelerated Phase

Keywords

Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Lymphoid Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Myeloid Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Philadelphia Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Brief summary

This is a phase III study of BMS-354825 in subjects with chronic myelogenous leukemia in accelerated phase, or in myeloid or lymphoid blast phase or with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib mesylate (Gleevec).

Interventions

DRUGdasatinib

Tablets, Oral, 70 mg BID, indefinitely, survival study

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

For more information regarding BMS clinical trial participation, please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com. Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with Philadelphia-Positive (Ph+) (or BCR/ABL+) accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia, Ph+ (or BCR/ABL+) blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia, or Ph+ (or BCR/ABL+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia whose disease has primary or acquired hematologic resistance to imatinib mesylate or who are intolerant of imatinib mesylate * Men and women, 18 years of age or older * Adequate hepatic function * Adequate renal function * Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for a period of at least 1 month before and at least 3 months after the study in such a manner that the risk of pregnancy is minimized * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score 0 - 2

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding * A serious uncontrolled medical disorder or active infection that would impair the ability of the subject to receive protocol therapy * Uncontrolled or significant cardiovascular disease * Medications that increase bleeding risk * Medications that change heart rhythms * Dementia or altered mental status that would prohibit the understanding or rendering of informed consent * History of significant bleeding disorder unrelated to CML * Concurrent incurable malignancy other than CML * Evidence of organ dysfunction or digestive dysfunction that would prevent administration of study therapy * Prior therapy with BMS-35425 * Prisoners or subjects who are compulsorily detained (involuntarily incarcerated) for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical (e.g., infectious disease) illness must not be enrolled into this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) With 6 Months of Follow-up From Date of Last Enrollment - Randomized PopulationRandomization up to 6 monthsMaHR defined by either complete hematologic response (CHR) or no evidence of leukemia (NEL). CHR defined as: white blood cells (WBC) ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN); absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^3; no blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood (PB); bone marrow (BM) blasts ≤ 5%; \<5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; basophils in PB \< 20%; no extra-medullar involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly). NEL defined by same criteria as CHR except that platelets and ANC had to satisfy at least one of the following (note that both lower limits had to be satisfied): platelets ≥ 20,000/mm\^3 and \< 100,000/mm\^3; ANC \> 500/mm\^3 and \<1,000/mm\^3. After Year 2, Amendment 3 allowed participants to switch from the BID to the QD dosing schedule. Percentage: number of participants with MaHR/number of randomized participants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) by Disease Group - Randomized PopulationRandomization up to 2 yearsMaHR was defined by either complete hematologic response (CHR) or no evidence of leukemia (NEL). CHR defined as: white blood cells (WBC) ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN); absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^3; no blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood (PB); bone marrow (BM) blasts ≤ 5%; \<5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; basophils in PB \< 20%; no extra-medullar involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly). NEL defined by same criteria as CHR except that platelets and ANC had to satisfy at least one parameter of the following (note that both lower limits had to be satisfied): platelets ≥ 20,000/mm\^3 and \< 100,000/mm\^3; ANC \> 500/mm\^3 and \<1,000/mm\^3. After Year 2, Amendment 3 allowed participants to switch from the BID to the QD dosing schedule.. Percentage: participants with MaHR/randomized participants.
Median Time to Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) - Randomized PopulationDay 1 up to 6 months (time of primary endpoint), 2 yearsA participants' time to MaHR was defined as the time from the first dosing date until criteria are first met for CHR or NEL, whichever occurred first. Non-responders were censored at the maximum of the date of last hematologic or cytogenetic assessment. Median time was measured in months.
Median Duration of a Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) in Those Participants Who Achieved a MaHR During the StudyDay 1 up to 5 yearsMaHR was defined by either CHR or no evidence of leukemia NEL. CHR was defined as: WBC ≤ ULN; ANC ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; - platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^3; - no blasts or promyelocytes in PB; BM blasts ≤ 5%; \< 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; basophils in PB \< 20%; no extra-medullar involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly). NEL defined by the same criteria as CHR except that platelets and ANC had to satisfy at least one of the following (note that both lower limits had to be satisfied): platelets ≥ 20,000/mm\^3 and \< 100,000/mm\^3; ANC \> 500/mm\^3 and \<1,000/mm\^3. Median duration was measured in months.
Percent of Participants With Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationRandomization up to 6 Months, 2 YearsOverall Hematologic Response (OHR) was defined as CHR, NEL or minor hematologic response (MiHR). CHR was defined as: WBC ≤ ULN; ANC ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; - platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^3; - no blasts or promyelocytes in PB; BM blasts ≤ 5%; \< 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; basophils in PB \< 20%; no extra-medullar involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly). NEL defined by the same criteria as CHR except that platelets and ANC had to satisfy at least one of the following (note that both lower limits had to be satisfied): platelets ≥ 20,000/mm\^3 and \< 100,000/mm\^3; ANC \> 500/mm\^3 and \<1,000/mm\^3. MiHR defined as: \< 15% blasts in BM and in PB; \< 30% blasts + promyelocytes in BM and PB; \< 20% basophils in PB; No extra-medullary disease other than spleen and liver. Percentage: participants with OHR/ randomized participants.
Number of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationRandomization up to 6 months, 2 yearsType of hematologic response: CHR defined as: WBC ≤ ULN; ANC ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; - platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^3; - no blasts or promyelocytes in PB; BM blasts ≤ 5%; \< 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; basophils in PB \< 20%; no extra-medullar involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly). NEL defined by the same criteria as CHR except that platelets and ANC had to satisfy at least one of the following (note that both lower limits had to be satisfied): platelets ≥ 20,000/mm\^3 and \<100,000/mm\^3; ANC \> 500/mm\^3 and \<1,000/mm\^3. Minor Hematologic Response (MiHR): \<15% blasts in BM and in PB; \< 30% blasts + promyelocytes in BM and PB; \< 20% basophils in PB; No extra-medullary disease other than spleen and liver. Major hematologic response (MaHR ) was CHR or NEL. Overall hematologic response was CHR or NEL or MiHR.
Percent of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) - Randomized PopulationRandomization up to 6 Months, 2 YearsCytogenetic assessments were performed only for the first 2 years of study. CyR was based on the number of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a BM sample. The criteria for CyR were as follows: Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Partial cytogenetic response (PCyR): 1% to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minor cytogenetic response: 36% to 65% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minimal cytogenetic response: 66% to 95% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; No cytogenetic response: 96% to 100% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was defined as CCyR or PCyR. Percentage: number of participants with MCyR and denominator is number of randomized participants.
Number of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationRandomization up to 6 Months, 2 YearsCytogenetic assessments were performed only for the first 2 years of study. CyR was based on the number of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a BM sample. The criteria for CyR were as follows: Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Partial cytogenetic response (PCyR): 1% to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minor cytogenetic response: 36% to 65% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minimal cytogenetic response: 66% to 95% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; No cytogenetic response: 96% to 100% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM.
Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) - Randomized PopulationRandomization up to 5 YearsPFS was defined as: Time from randomization until any of the following: Progression of disease (per investigator), or death. For those with blast phase CML or Ph+ ALL, disease progression was: loss of OHR; no decrease from on-study baseline percent blasts in PB or BM on all assessments over a 4-week period after starting maximum dose; absolute increase of at least 50% in PB blast count over a 2-week period after starting maximum dose. For those with accelerated phase CML: the list above also included: Development of blast phase CML at any time after initiation of therapy and development of extra-medullary sites other than spleen or liver. Participants who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of their last cytogenetic or hematologic assessment. Median duration was measured in months.
Percent of Participants With Major Hematological Response (MaHR) With 2 Years of Follow-up From Date of Last Enrollment - Randomized PopulationRandomization up to 2 yearsA MaHR was defined as a participant having either CHR or NEL. CHR was defined as: WBC ≤ ULN; ANC ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; - platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^3; - no blasts or promyelocytes in PB; BM blasts ≤ 5%; \< 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; basophils in PB \< 20%; no extra-medullar involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly). NEL defined by the same criteria as CHR except that platelets and ANC had to satisfy at least one of the following (both lower limits had to be satisfied): platelets ≥ 20,000/mm\^3 and \< 100,000/mm\^3; ANC \> 500/mm\^3 and \<1,000/mm\^3. After Year 2, Amendment 3 allowed participants to switch from the BID to the QD dosing schedule. Percent: number of participants with MaHR /number of participants randomized.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized Population24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 monthsPFS was defined as time from randomization until any of the following: Progression of disease (per investigator), or death. For those with blast phase CML or Ph+ ALL, disease progression was: loss of OHR; no decrease from on-study baseline percent blasts in PB or BM on all assessments over a 4-week period after starting maximum dose; absolute increase of at least 50% in PB blast count over a 2-week period after starting maximum dose. For those with accelerated phase CML: the list above also included: Development of blast phase CML at any time after initiation of therapy and development of extra-medullary sites other than spleen or liver. Participants who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of their last cytogenetic or hematologic assessment. OS was defined as time from randomization until date of death. Participants who had not died or were lost to follow-up were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Median duration was measured in months.
Number of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsBaseline to Year 2A12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained at baseline (baseline=within 2 weeks prior to randomization) and once between Days 8 and 29. Additional ECGs were done at the Investigator's discretion. ECGs were read centrally. The QT interval corrected with Fridericia formula is presented with categories of changes from baseline (BL) in milliseconds (msec).
Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation and Drug-related Fluid Retention AEs, up to Year 7 in Treated ParticipantsDay 1 to Year 7With protocol Amendment 6, the duration of the study was extended for 2 additional years (7 years total) for participants who continued to have clinical benefit and no feasible alternate access to dasatinib. However, after Year 5 the requirement to follow participants for survival and to collect other efficacy data was removed from the protocol for the remainder of the study. Only AEs and SAEs were collected up to Year 7. On-study AEs and SAEs were graded by severity according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. The investigator AE terms were coded and grouped by preferred term and system organ class using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), version 16.0.
Number of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsBaseline to Year 2Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI CTC) version 3.0. CTC Grade 3 and 4 criteria are defined as follows: White blood cells (WBC): Grade (Gr) 3:\<2.0 to 1.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<1.0\*10\^9/L. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC): Gr 3:\<1.0 to 0.5\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<0.5\*10\^9/L. Platelet count Gr 3:\<50.0 to 25.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<25.0 to 10\^9/L. Hemoglobin Gr 3:\<8.0 to 6.5 g/dL, Gr 4:\<6.5 g/dL. Baseline was laboratory value obtained within 2 weeks prior to randomization.
Number of Participants With Grade 4 Myelosuppression Determined From Hematology EvaluationsDay 1 up to Year 7Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI CTC) Version 3.0. Grade 4 hematology evaluations used to determine myelosuppression included: WBC: \<1.0\*10\^9/L. ANC: \<0.5\*10\^9/L. Platelet count \<25.0 to 10\^9/L.
Number of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsBaseline to Year 2Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the NCI CTC version 3.0. Grade 3 and 4 criteria were defined as follows: Upper limit of normal (ULN). Alanine transaminase (ALT) Grade (Gr) 3: \>5.0 to 20.0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>20.0\*ULN. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) Gr 3: \>5.0 to 20.0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>20.0\*ULN. Total bilirubin Gr 3: \>3.0 to 10..0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>10.0.0\*ULN. Serum creatinine (H) Gr 3: \>3.0 to 6.0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>6.0\*ULN. Calcium (L) Gr3: 6.0-7.0; Gr 4: \<6.0 mg/dL; Phosphorus (L): Gr 3: \<2.0 - 1.0 mg/dL , Gr 4: \<1.0 mg/dL. Non-hematologic laboratory results were not collected beyond Year 2. Baseline values were obtained within 2 weeks prior to randomization.
Number of Participants With Maximal QTcF Intervals up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsBaseline up to Year 2A12-lead ECG was obtained at baseline (baseline=within 2 weeks prior to randomization) and once between Day 8 and 29. Additional ECGs were done at the Investigator's discretion. ECGs were read centrally. QT Interval corrected with Fridericia formula was measured in msec.
Median Overall Survival (OS) - Randomized PopulationRandomization up to 5 YearsOS was defined as time from randomization until date of death. Participants who had not died or who were lost to follow-up were censored on the last date on which the participant was known to be alive. Median duration was measured in months.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study started June 2005; recruitment completed March 2006; study ended June 2013 (Year 7) when the study closed and all participants were off study treatment. Those participants who were resistant or intolerant to prior imatinib were enrolled.

Pre-assignment details

638 participants were enrolled; 27 were not randomized due to: adverse event (1), death (5), other (5), poor/noncompliance (1), no longer met criteria (13), withdrew consent (2). A total of 611 were randomized to treatment; 609 were treated: 2 randomized but not treated due to death (1) and serious adverse event (1).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dasatinib 140 mg QD
Dasatinib was administered orally at a dose of 140 mg once a day (QD) until disease progression, drug toxicity, withdrawal of consent, investigator or sponsor decision, pregnancy, or decision to do stem cell transplant.
306
Dasatinib 70 mg BID
Dasatinib was administered orally at a dose of 70 mg twice a day (BID) until disease progression, drug toxicity, withdrawal of consent, investigator or sponsor decision, pregnancy, or decision to do stem cell transplant.
305
Total611

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
RandomizedDeath prior to starting treatment01
RandomizedSAE prior to starting treatment10
Treated With Study DrugAdverse Event2322
Treated With Study DrugDisease Progression141122
Treated With Study DrugOther5958
Treated With Study DrugPhysician Decision89
Treated With Study DrugStudy Drug Toxicity6280
Treated With Study DrugUnknown (case report form lost)01
Treated With Study DrugWithdrawal by Subject1113

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDasatinib 140 mg QDDasatinib 70 mg BIDTotal
Age, Customized
21 - 45 years
101 participants83 participants184 participants
Age, Customized
46 - 65 years
143 participants143 participants286 participants
Age, Customized
66 - 75 years
49 participants65 participants114 participants
Age, Customized
Greater than (>) 75 years
8 participants9 participants17 participants
Age, Customized
Less than (<) 21 years
5 participants4 participants9 participants
Age, Customized
Not Reported
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
ECOG PS 0
138 participants134 participants272 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
ECOG PS 1
121 participants109 participants230 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
ECOG PS 2
40 participants58 participants98 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
ECOG PS 3
7 participants2 participants9 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
Not Reported
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Imatinib Status
Acquired Resistance
192 participants190 participants382 participants
Imatinib Status
Intolerance
67 participants65 participants132 participants
Imatinib Status
Missing
4 participants1 participants5 participants
Imatinib Status
Primary Resistance
43 participants49 participants92 participants
Participants by Disease Phase
Accelerated Phase CML
158 participants159 participants317 participants
Participants by Disease Phase
Blast Phase CML - Lymphoid
33 participants28 participants61 participants
Participants by Disease Phase
Blast Phase CML - Myeloid
75 participants74 participants149 participants
Participants by Disease Phase
Ph+ ALL
40 participants44 participants84 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
38 participants38 participants76 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
17 participants18 participants35 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
13 participants9 participants22 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not reported
3 participants3 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
235 participants236 participants471 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
133 Participants134 Participants267 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
173 Participants171 Participants344 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
289 / 304290 / 305
serious
Total, serious adverse events
228 / 304236 / 305

Outcome results

Primary

Percent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) With 6 Months of Follow-up From Date of Last Enrollment - Randomized Population

MaHR defined by either complete hematologic response (CHR) or no evidence of leukemia (NEL). CHR defined as: white blood cells (WBC) ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN); absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^3; no blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood (PB); bone marrow (BM) blasts ≤ 5%; \<5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; basophils in PB \< 20%; no extra-medullar involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly). NEL defined by same criteria as CHR except that platelets and ANC had to satisfy at least one of the following (note that both lower limits had to be satisfied): platelets ≥ 20,000/mm\^3 and \< 100,000/mm\^3; ANC \> 500/mm\^3 and \<1,000/mm\^3. After Year 2, Amendment 3 allowed participants to switch from the BID to the QD dosing schedule. Percentage: number of participants with MaHR/number of randomized participants.

Time frame: Randomization up to 6 months

Population: Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to receive (not what they actually received). 95% exact confidence interval (CI) presented.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDPercent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) With 6 Months of Follow-up From Date of Last Enrollment - Randomized Population48.0 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDPercent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) With 6 Months of Follow-up From Date of Last Enrollment - Randomized Population47.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: Primary endpoint was to be assessed at 6-Months: Assuming a 45% MaHR rate in the 70 mg BID participants, the primary efficacy analysis required a total of 540 participants, approximately 270 in each dosing schedule, giving at least 80% power to deduce non-inferiority of the QD schedule relative to the BID schedule if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the difference in MaHR rates (MaHRRQD - MaHRRBID) is greater than -12%.95% CI: [-7.8, 8.1]
Secondary

Median Duration of a Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) in Those Participants Who Achieved a MaHR During the Study

MaHR was defined by either CHR or no evidence of leukemia NEL. CHR was defined as: WBC ≤ ULN; ANC ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; - platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^3; - no blasts or promyelocytes in PB; BM blasts ≤ 5%; \< 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; basophils in PB \< 20%; no extra-medullar involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly). NEL defined by the same criteria as CHR except that platelets and ANC had to satisfy at least one of the following (note that both lower limits had to be satisfied): platelets ≥ 20,000/mm\^3 and \< 100,000/mm\^3; ANC \> 500/mm\^3 and \<1,000/mm\^3. Median duration was measured in months.

Time frame: Day 1 up to 5 years

Population: Participants who achieved a MaHR during the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDMedian Duration of a Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) in Those Participants Who Achieved a MaHR During the Study21.1 Months
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDMedian Duration of a Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) in Those Participants Who Achieved a MaHR During the Study24.7 Months
Secondary

Median Overall Survival (OS) - Randomized Population

OS was defined as time from randomization until date of death. Participants who had not died or who were lost to follow-up were censored on the last date on which the participant was known to be alive. Median duration was measured in months.

Time frame: Randomization up to 5 Years

Population: Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to receive.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDMedian Overall Survival (OS) - Randomized Population17.7 Months
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDMedian Overall Survival (OS) - Randomized Population22.4 Months
Secondary

Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) - Randomized Population

PFS was defined as: Time from randomization until any of the following: Progression of disease (per investigator), or death. For those with blast phase CML or Ph+ ALL, disease progression was: loss of OHR; no decrease from on-study baseline percent blasts in PB or BM on all assessments over a 4-week period after starting maximum dose; absolute increase of at least 50% in PB blast count over a 2-week period after starting maximum dose. For those with accelerated phase CML: the list above also included: Development of blast phase CML at any time after initiation of therapy and development of extra-medullary sites other than spleen or liver. Participants who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of their last cytogenetic or hematologic assessment. Median duration was measured in months.

Time frame: Randomization up to 5 Years

Population: Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to receive.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDMedian Progression Free Survival (PFS) - Randomized Population7.8 Months
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDMedian Progression Free Survival (PFS) - Randomized Population10.4 Months
Secondary

Median Time to Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) - Randomized Population

A participants' time to MaHR was defined as the time from the first dosing date until criteria are first met for CHR or NEL, whichever occurred first. Non-responders were censored at the maximum of the date of last hematologic or cytogenetic assessment. Median time was measured in months.

Time frame: Day 1 up to 6 months (time of primary endpoint), 2 years

Population: Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to receive.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDMedian Time to Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) - Randomized Population2 Years1.9 Months
Dasatinib 140 mg QDMedian Time to Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) - Randomized Population6 Months1.9 Months
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDMedian Time to Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) - Randomized Population6 Months1.9 Months
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDMedian Time to Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) - Randomized Population2 Years1.9 Months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized Population

Type of hematologic response: CHR defined as: WBC ≤ ULN; ANC ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; - platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^3; - no blasts or promyelocytes in PB; BM blasts ≤ 5%; \< 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; basophils in PB \< 20%; no extra-medullar involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly). NEL defined by the same criteria as CHR except that platelets and ANC had to satisfy at least one of the following (note that both lower limits had to be satisfied): platelets ≥ 20,000/mm\^3 and \<100,000/mm\^3; ANC \> 500/mm\^3 and \<1,000/mm\^3. Minor Hematologic Response (MiHR): \<15% blasts in BM and in PB; \< 30% blasts + promyelocytes in BM and PB; \< 20% basophils in PB; No extra-medullary disease other than spleen and liver. Major hematologic response (MaHR ) was CHR or NEL. Overall hematologic response was CHR or NEL or MiHR.

Time frame: Randomization up to 6 months, 2 years

Population: Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to receive.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationComplete Response, 2 years108 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationMinor Response, 2 years29 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationNo Evidence of Leukemia, 6 months53 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationNo Response, 6 months125 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationMaHR, 6 months147 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationNo Evidence of Leukemia, 2 years47 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationMaHR, 2 years155 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationNo Response, 2 years122 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationOverall Response, 6 months181 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationMinor Response, 6 months34 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationOverall Response, 2 years184 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationComplete Response, 6 months94 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationOverall Response, 2 years180 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationComplete Response, 2 years110 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationNo Response, 6 months130 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationComplete Response, 6 months96 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationNo Evidence of Leukemia, 6 months50 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationNo Evidence of Leukemia, 2 years42 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationMinor Response, 6 months29 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationMinor Response, 2 years28 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationNo Response, 2 years125 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationMaHR, 6 months146 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationMaHR, 2 years152 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Hematologic Response, Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) and Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized PopulationOverall Response, 6 months175 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized Population

Cytogenetic assessments were performed only for the first 2 years of study. CyR was based on the number of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a BM sample. The criteria for CyR were as follows: Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Partial cytogenetic response (PCyR): 1% to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minor cytogenetic response: 36% to 65% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minimal cytogenetic response: 66% to 95% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; No cytogenetic response: 96% to 100% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM.

Time frame: Randomization up to 6 Months, 2 Years

Population: Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to receive.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationPartial CyR, 6 months24 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationComplete CyR, 6 months89 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationComplete CyR, 2 years97 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationPartial CyR, 2 years30 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationMinor CyR, 6 months19 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationMinor CyR, 2 years13 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationMinimal CyR, 6 months47 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationMinimal CyR, 2 years43 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationNo response, 6 months63 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationNo response, 2 years60 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationUnable to determine, 6 months64 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationUnable to determine, 2 years63 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationUnable to determine, 6 months66 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationMinimal CyR, 6 months45 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationComplete CyR, 6 months84 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationNo response, 2 years51 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationComplete CyR, 2 years98 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationPartial CyR, 6 months36 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationMinimal CyR, 2 years40 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationPartial CyR, 2 years28 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationUnable to determine, 2 years72 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationMinor CyR, 6 months18 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationNo response, 6 months56 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Cytogenic Response (CyR) - Randomized PopulationMinor CyR, 2 years16 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated Participants

A12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained at baseline (baseline=within 2 weeks prior to randomization) and once between Days 8 and 29. Additional ECGs were done at the Investigator's discretion. ECGs were read centrally. The QT interval corrected with Fridericia formula is presented with categories of changes from baseline (BL) in milliseconds (msec).

Time frame: Baseline to Year 2

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had appropriate baseline and on-study ECG data available were analyzed. Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, not what they were randomized to receive.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsQTcF <-60 msec change from BL4 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated Participants-60 - < -30 msec change from BL13 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated Participants-30 - < 0 msec change from BL88 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated Participants0 - 30 msec change from BL114 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated Participants> 30 - 60 msec change from BL31 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated Participants> 60 msec change from BL19 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated Participants> 30 - 60 msec change from BL24 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsQTcF <-60 msec change from BL7 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated Participants0 - 30 msec change from BL125 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated Participants-60 - < -30 msec change from BL15 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated Participants> 60 msec change from BL21 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected With Fridericia Formula (QTcF) up to Year 2 in Treated Participants-30 - < 0 msec change from BL65 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation and Drug-related Fluid Retention AEs, up to Year 7 in Treated Participants

With protocol Amendment 6, the duration of the study was extended for 2 additional years (7 years total) for participants who continued to have clinical benefit and no feasible alternate access to dasatinib. However, after Year 5 the requirement to follow participants for survival and to collect other efficacy data was removed from the protocol for the remainder of the study. Only AEs and SAEs were collected up to Year 7. On-study AEs and SAEs were graded by severity according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. The investigator AE terms were coded and grouped by preferred term and system organ class using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), version 16.0.

Time frame: Day 1 to Year 7

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were analyzed. Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, not what they were randomized to receive.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation and Drug-related Fluid Retention AEs, up to Year 7 in Treated ParticipantsSAEs228 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation and Drug-related Fluid Retention AEs, up to Year 7 in Treated ParticipantsAEs Leading to Discontinuation118 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation and Drug-related Fluid Retention AEs, up to Year 7 in Treated ParticipantsDeath within 30 Days66 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation and Drug-related Fluid Retention AEs, up to Year 7 in Treated ParticipantsDrug-related Fluid Retention109 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation and Drug-related Fluid Retention AEs, up to Year 7 in Treated ParticipantsDeaths203 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation and Drug-related Fluid Retention AEs, up to Year 7 in Treated ParticipantsDrug-related Fluid Retention137 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation and Drug-related Fluid Retention AEs, up to Year 7 in Treated ParticipantsDeaths186 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation and Drug-related Fluid Retention AEs, up to Year 7 in Treated ParticipantsDeath within 30 Days63 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation and Drug-related Fluid Retention AEs, up to Year 7 in Treated ParticipantsAEs Leading to Discontinuation114 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation and Drug-related Fluid Retention AEs, up to Year 7 in Treated ParticipantsSAEs236 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Grade 4 Myelosuppression Determined From Hematology Evaluations

Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI CTC) Version 3.0. Grade 4 hematology evaluations used to determine myelosuppression included: WBC: \<1.0\*10\^9/L. ANC: \<0.5\*10\^9/L. Platelet count \<25.0 to 10\^9/L.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Year 7

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had laboratory evaluations available were analyzed. Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, not what they were randomized to receive.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Grade 4 Myelosuppression Determined From Hematology EvaluationsWBC (n=299, 303)64 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Grade 4 Myelosuppression Determined From Hematology EvaluationsPlatelets(n=299, 303)167 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Grade 4 Myelosuppression Determined From Hematology EvaluationsANC (n=299, 303)132 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Grade 4 Myelosuppression Determined From Hematology EvaluationsWBC (n=299, 303)72 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Grade 4 Myelosuppression Determined From Hematology EvaluationsPlatelets(n=299, 303)164 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Grade 4 Myelosuppression Determined From Hematology EvaluationsANC (n=299, 303)142 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Maximal QTcF Intervals up to Year 2 in Treated Participants

A12-lead ECG was obtained at baseline (baseline=within 2 weeks prior to randomization) and once between Day 8 and 29. Additional ECGs were done at the Investigator's discretion. ECGs were read centrally. QT Interval corrected with Fridericia formula was measured in msec.

Time frame: Baseline up to Year 2

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had appropriate ECG data available were analyzed. Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, not what they were randomized to receive.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal QTcF Intervals up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsMaximum QTcF Interval < 450 msec252 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal QTcF Intervals up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsMaximum QTcF Interval 450 - 500 msec21 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal QTcF Intervals up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsMaximum QTcF Interval > 500 msec7 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal QTcF Intervals up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsMaximum QTcF Interval < 450 msec239 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal QTcF Intervals up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsMaximum QTcF Interval 450 - 500 msec26 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal QTcF Intervals up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsMaximum QTcF Interval > 500 msec5 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated Participants

Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the NCI CTC version 3.0. Grade 3 and 4 criteria were defined as follows: Upper limit of normal (ULN). Alanine transaminase (ALT) Grade (Gr) 3: \>5.0 to 20.0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>20.0\*ULN. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) Gr 3: \>5.0 to 20.0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>20.0\*ULN. Total bilirubin Gr 3: \>3.0 to 10..0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>10.0.0\*ULN. Serum creatinine (H) Gr 3: \>3.0 to 6.0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>6.0\*ULN. Calcium (L) Gr3: 6.0-7.0; Gr 4: \<6.0 mg/dL; Phosphorus (L): Gr 3: \<2.0 - 1.0 mg/dL , Gr 4: \<1.0 mg/dL. Non-hematologic laboratory results were not collected beyond Year 2. Baseline values were obtained within 2 weeks prior to randomization.

Time frame: Baseline to Year 2

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were analyzed. Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, not what they were randomized to receive. Participants who did not have a parameter reported at baseline are indicated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsALT not reported at baseline4 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsHypocalcemia14 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsElevated AST3 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsBilirubin not reported at baseline2 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsAST not reported at baseline3 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsCalcium not reported at baseline5 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsElevated Bilirubin4 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsPhosphorus not reported at baseline14 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsElevated Serum Creatinine4 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsElevated ALT8 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsSerum Creatinine not reported at baseline1 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsHypophosphatemia28 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsSerum Creatinine not reported at baseline3 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsHypophosphatemia26 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsPhosphorus not reported at baseline20 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsHypocalcemia9 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsCalcium not reported at baseline13 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsElevated ALT4 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsALT not reported at baseline4 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsElevated AST2 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsAST not reported at baseline6 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsBilirubin not reported at baseline7 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsElevated Serum Creatinine2 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Biochemistry Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsElevated Bilirubin3 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated Participants

Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI CTC) version 3.0. CTC Grade 3 and 4 criteria are defined as follows: White blood cells (WBC): Grade (Gr) 3:\<2.0 to 1.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<1.0\*10\^9/L. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC): Gr 3:\<1.0 to 0.5\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<0.5\*10\^9/L. Platelet count Gr 3:\<50.0 to 25.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<25.0 to 10\^9/L. Hemoglobin Gr 3:\<8.0 to 6.5 g/dL, Gr 4:\<6.5 g/dL. Baseline was laboratory value obtained within 2 weeks prior to randomization.

Time frame: Baseline to Year 2

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were analyzed. Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, not what they were randomized to receive. Those participants who did not have a parameter reported at baseline are indicated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsWBC129 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsWBC not reported at baseline2 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsPlatelets64 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsPlatelets not reported at baseline2 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsHemoglobin12 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsHemoglobin not reported at baseline2 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsANC127 participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsANC not reported at baseline9 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsANC not reported at baseline8 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsWBC114 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsHemoglobin13 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsWBC not reported at baseline2 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsANC143 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsPlatelets79 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsHemoglobin not reported at baseline2 participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Normal Baseline Versus Worst Grade 3/4 Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities up to Year 2 in Treated ParticipantsPlatelets not reported at baseline2 participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) - Randomized Population

Cytogenetic assessments were performed only for the first 2 years of study. CyR was based on the number of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a BM sample. The criteria for CyR were as follows: Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Partial cytogenetic response (PCyR): 1% to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minor cytogenetic response: 36% to 65% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minimal cytogenetic response: 66% to 95% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; No cytogenetic response: 96% to 100% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was defined as CCyR or PCyR. Percentage: number of participants with MCyR and denominator is number of randomized participants.

Time frame: Randomization up to 6 Months, 2 Years

Population: Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to receive.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDPercent of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) - Randomized Population6 Months36.9 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDPercent of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) - Randomized Population2 Years41.5 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDPercent of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) - Randomized Population6 Months39.3 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDPercent of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) - Randomized Population2 Years41.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Major Hematological Response (MaHR) With 2 Years of Follow-up From Date of Last Enrollment - Randomized Population

A MaHR was defined as a participant having either CHR or NEL. CHR was defined as: WBC ≤ ULN; ANC ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; - platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^3; - no blasts or promyelocytes in PB; BM blasts ≤ 5%; \< 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; basophils in PB \< 20%; no extra-medullar involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly). NEL defined by the same criteria as CHR except that platelets and ANC had to satisfy at least one of the following (both lower limits had to be satisfied): platelets ≥ 20,000/mm\^3 and \< 100,000/mm\^3; ANC \> 500/mm\^3 and \<1,000/mm\^3. After Year 2, Amendment 3 allowed participants to switch from the BID to the QD dosing schedule. Percent: number of participants with MaHR /number of participants randomized.

Time frame: Randomization up to 2 years

Population: Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to receive.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDPercent of Participants With Major Hematological Response (MaHR) With 2 Years of Follow-up From Date of Last Enrollment - Randomized Population50.7 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDPercent of Participants With Major Hematological Response (MaHR) With 2 Years of Follow-up From Date of Last Enrollment - Randomized Population49.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) by Disease Group - Randomized Population

MaHR was defined by either complete hematologic response (CHR) or no evidence of leukemia (NEL). CHR defined as: white blood cells (WBC) ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN); absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^3; no blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood (PB); bone marrow (BM) blasts ≤ 5%; \<5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; basophils in PB \< 20%; no extra-medullar involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly). NEL defined by same criteria as CHR except that platelets and ANC had to satisfy at least one parameter of the following (note that both lower limits had to be satisfied): platelets ≥ 20,000/mm\^3 and \< 100,000/mm\^3; ANC \> 500/mm\^3 and \<1,000/mm\^3. After Year 2, Amendment 3 allowed participants to switch from the BID to the QD dosing schedule.. Percentage: participants with MaHR/randomized participants.

Time frame: Randomization up to 2 years

Population: Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to receive. n=number of participants in disease group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDPercent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) by Disease Group - Randomized PopulationLymphoid Blast Phase (n=33,28)42.4 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDPercent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) by Disease Group - Randomized PopulationAccelerated Phase (n=158, 159)66.5 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDPercent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) by Disease Group - Randomized PopulationPh+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (n=40,44)37.5 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDPercent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) by Disease Group - Randomized PopulationMyeloid Blast Phase (n=75,74)28.0 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDPercent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) by Disease Group - Randomized PopulationPh+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (n=40,44)31.8 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDPercent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) by Disease Group - Randomized PopulationMyeloid Blast Phase (n=75,74)28.4 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDPercent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) by Disease Group - Randomized PopulationLymphoid Blast Phase (n=33,28)32.1 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDPercent of Participants With Major Hematologic Response (MaHR) by Disease Group - Randomized PopulationAccelerated Phase (n=158, 159)67.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized Population

Overall Hematologic Response (OHR) was defined as CHR, NEL or minor hematologic response (MiHR). CHR was defined as: WBC ≤ ULN; ANC ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; - platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^3; - no blasts or promyelocytes in PB; BM blasts ≤ 5%; \< 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; basophils in PB \< 20%; no extra-medullar involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly). NEL defined by the same criteria as CHR except that platelets and ANC had to satisfy at least one of the following (note that both lower limits had to be satisfied): platelets ≥ 20,000/mm\^3 and \< 100,000/mm\^3; ANC \> 500/mm\^3 and \<1,000/mm\^3. MiHR defined as: \< 15% blasts in BM and in PB; \< 30% blasts + promyelocytes in BM and PB; \< 20% basophils in PB; No extra-medullary disease other than spleen and liver. Percentage: participants with OHR/ randomized participants.

Time frame: Randomization up to 6 Months, 2 Years

Population: Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to receive.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDPercent of Participants With Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized Population6 Months59.2 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDPercent of Participants With Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized Population2 Years60.1 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDPercent of Participants With Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized Population6 Months57.4 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDPercent of Participants With Overall Hematologic Response - Randomized Population2 Years59.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized Population

PFS was defined as time from randomization until any of the following: Progression of disease (per investigator), or death. For those with blast phase CML or Ph+ ALL, disease progression was: loss of OHR; no decrease from on-study baseline percent blasts in PB or BM on all assessments over a 4-week period after starting maximum dose; absolute increase of at least 50% in PB blast count over a 2-week period after starting maximum dose. For those with accelerated phase CML: the list above also included: Development of blast phase CML at any time after initiation of therapy and development of extra-medullary sites other than spleen or liver. Participants who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of their last cytogenetic or hematologic assessment. OS was defined as time from randomization until date of death. Participants who had not died or were lost to follow-up were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Median duration was measured in months.

Time frame: 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months

Population: Participants were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to receive. Kaplan-Meir estimates of PFS or OS (95% Confidence Interval) are provided below.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib 140 mg QDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationPFS at 24 Months29.5 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationOS at 24 Months43.3 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationPFS at 48 Months19.8 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationOS at 36 Months37.1 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationPFS at 36 Months24.1 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationOS at 48 Months32.7 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationPFS at 60 Months16.9 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 140 mg QDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationOS at 60 Months28.8 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationPFS at 60 Months15.9 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationPFS at 24 Months33.1 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationPFS at 36 Months26.6 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationPFS at 48 Months20.5 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationOS at 60 Months36.1 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationOS at 24 Months48.7 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationOS at 36 Months42.5 percentage of participants
Dasatinib 70 mg BIDProgression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months - Randomized PopulationOS at 48 Months38.2 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026