Skip to content

Ketamine Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Prospective Study on the Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Ketamine to Midazolam-Sufentanil Sedation Regimen in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00122759
Enrollment
100
Registered
2005-07-22
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2007-09-30
Last updated
2007-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Psychomotor Agitation, Respiratory Insufficiency

Keywords

Mechanical ventilation, Agitation

Brief summary

* Adequate sedation is of paramount importance to avoid stress and pain in mechanically ventilated patients. It is usually achieved by infusing sedatives (benzodiazepine) and analgesic (opiate) drugs. * This combined sedation may not be sufficient in some instances. * The aim of this study is to evaluate whether addition of a third substance, ketamine, allows the achievement of better sedation and avoids the use of neuromuscular blocking agents.

Detailed description

* Mechanical ventilation is widely used in critically ill patients. Sedation is used in most instances to alleviate symptoms of pain and distress. It usually consists of an association of opiates and benzodiazepines. * In some instances, pain and agitation persist despite this combined sedation regimen. In such cases, the clinicians have the choice between increasing dosage of these 2 substances which may increase their adverse effects (mainly hypotension) and/or adding a neuromuscular blocking agent which is not devoid of adverse effects (mainly the onset of neuromyopathy of critical illness). * This study will assess the safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of adding ketamine, a well known anesthetic agent, to a combination of midazolam and sufentanil when this combination is not sufficient to reach acceptable sedation target.

Interventions

DRUGketamine

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Mechanically ventilated patients who receive adequate dosing of sedative agents (midazolam \> 0.15 mg/kg/h plus sufentanil \> 0.3 mcg/kg/h) * Persistence of agitation indicating that sedation is not appropriate, as assessed by validated sedation scales (Harris scare; Motor Activity Assessment scale).

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Patient who already receives neuromuscular blocking agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of the adequacy of sedation in patients receiving benzodiazepine plus opiate or this combination plus adjunctive ketamine
Comparison of the cost of sedation with both regimens

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Overall duration of mechanical ventilation
Need to administer neuromuscular blocking agents

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactDidier D Dreyfuss, MD
didier.dreyfuss@lmr.ap-hop-paris.fr33 1 47 60 61 93

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026