Skip to content

Study of HIV-1 Rgp-160 Administered by Mucosal Routes in Healthy Volunteers

Phase I Study Evaluating the Systemic and Mucosal Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant HIV-1 Gp 160 (MN/LAI) Administered by Transmucosal (Nasal or Vaginal) Routes, Alone or Formulated With DC-Chol, in HIV Negative Volunteers (ANRS VAC14)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00122564
Enrollment
36
Registered
2005-07-22
Start date
2003-06-30
Completion date
2005-04-30
Last updated
2005-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

HIV Vaccines, HIV Seronegativity

Brief summary

It is probable that a mucosal approach is necessary for a prophylactic HIV vaccine protecting against sexually transmitted infection. Mucosal immune responses have been almost non-existent in trials of HIV vaccine candidates in which the antigen was delivered systemically. This study will test the safety and immune response of a recombinant HIV-1gp160 by nasal and mucosal routes alone or formulated with DC-Chol in healthy volunteers.

Detailed description

It's probable that a mucosal approach is necessary for prophylactic HIV vaccine protecting against sexually transmitted infection. Although mucosal immune responses have been almost non-existent in trials of HIV vaccine candidates in which the antigen was delivered systematically. Several animal models have also demonstrated the importance or a mucosal IgA response for protection against viral infections. Mucosal S IgA are essential effectors having different mechanisms of action agglutination of pathogens, interaction with cellular receptor, transcytosis of immune complexes, intracellular clearance of virus. Gp 160 induces the majority of neutralizing Abs activity in patients serum and the immunogenicity of gp 160 can be improved by using and adjuvant such as DC-chol because of its properties to increase the permeation of the nasal epithelium and to facilitate systemic delivery of the vaccine antigen. Before beginning mucosal vaccine trial, we previously tested and validated procedures to collect and process secretion fluids on 6 HIV-1 infected women (K. Petitprez et al, 4th European mucosal immunology group meeting, Lyon France, 8-10 october 2004).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALHIV-1 gp 160
BIOLOGICALDC-Chol

Sponsors

Aventis Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women chosen in a uniform selection process specifically designed by the ANRS (French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis) * For women of child-bearing age : use of effective contraception * Normal clinical status * Ability to accept collection of secretion fluids; * Ability to sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Systemic and mucosal safety evaluated by 3 independent physicians at week 0, 4, 6 and 48 and 2 days after each mucosal administration

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Immune response by ELISA for anti-gp 160 IgA or IgG and by functional in vitro assay

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026