Skip to content

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk and Prevention in Early Glucose Intolerance

CVD Risk and Prevention in Early Glucose Intolerance

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00122447
Enrollment
84
Registered
2005-07-22
Start date
2005-05-31
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2013-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impaired Glucose Tolerance, Prediabetic State

Keywords

Prediabetic state, Cardiovascular disease, Diabetes, Glucose intolerance

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers, β-cell function, and insulin sensitivity can be improved by targeting mechanisms of both diabetes and CVD - using an antioxidant, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an anti-inflammatory agent - in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a randomized, controlled trial.

Detailed description

Diabetes is a common, major health problem in the United States, and it significantly increases the risk of developing heart disease, which is the leading cause of death. Research studies have shown that the risk of heart disease is increased, even in the pre-diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) stage, before the onset of true diabetes. While many studies have shown that aggressive management of diabetes lowers the risk of heart disease, at the present time, it is not known how best to treat patients with impaired glucose tolerance (pre-diabetes) to prevent the development of heart disease. It is also not known where in the range of blood sugar levels risk begins to increase. The purpose of this study is to determine: * whether medications, which target pathways involved in the development of heart disease, can decrease the risk of heart disease in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance; and * whether a high blood sugar level measured one hour after drinking a standard high-sugar drink is associated with an increased risk of heart disease even in individuals who have no evidence of diabetes or pre-diabetes. The purpose of Aim 1 of this study is to determine whether medications, which target pathways involved in the development of heart disease, can decrease the risk of heart disease in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. One hundred-twenty volunteers with impaired glucose tolerance and 30 volunteers with normal glucose tolerance (normal blood sugars after ingesting a standard high-sugar drink) will be recruited from the Screening for Impaired Glucose Tolerance (SIGT) study. The 30 volunteers with normal glucose tolerance will not take any study medication, but will undergo medical testing to determine their risk of heart disease at the beginning of the study, after which their participation in the study will be complete. The 120 volunteers with impaired glucose tolerance will be randomly assigned to one of four medications to be taken over a one-year period: * alpha lipoic acid (an antioxidant, dietary supplement); * olmesartan (a drug used to treat high blood pressure); * aspirin (an anti-inflammatory drug); and * placebo (an inactive, dummy pill). Subjects with impaired glucose tolerance will undergo medical testing to determine their risk of heart disease at the beginning of the study (before beginning study medications), after 3 months of intervention, and again at the end of the study (12 months after enrollment). Test results will be compared between the subjects taking each of the active medications and those taking placebo, to determine if the medications lead to a significant reduction in the risk for the development of heart disease. The medical tests used in this study are currently used in medical practice, and include blood and urine specimens, ultrasound testing of the artery at the arm, and an insulin sensitivity test (test of how effectively the body uses sugar). All visits and tests will be conducted in the General Clinical Research Centers of Emory University Hospital and Grady Memorial Hospital. The purpose of Aim 2 of this study is to determine whether a high blood sugar level measured one hour after drinking a standard high-sugar drink (1-hour blood sugar level) is associated with an increased risk of heart disease even in individuals who have no evidence of diabetes or pre-diabetes. Seventy-five volunteers with normal glucose tolerance (normal blood sugars after ingesting a standard high-sugar drink) will be recruited from the SIGT study, as well as 15 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and 15 with diabetes. The subjects with normal glucose tolerance will be grouped into those with low, middle, and high 1-hour blood sugar levels. All subjects will undergo medical testing (as in Aim 1 above) to determine their risk of heart disease. Test results of subjects with low, middle, and high 1-hour blood sugar levels will be compared against one another, as well as against those of subjects with IGT and diabetes. If subjects with normal glucose tolerance but high 1-hour blood sugar levels are found to have increased risk for heart disease compared to those with low 1-hour blood sugar levels, then the 1-hour blood sugar levels may provide important information regarding an increased risk of heart disease even in individuals with normal glucose tolerance but high 1-hour blood sugar levels - a population which otherwise would not be identified with the current standard tests used for the diagnosis of diabetes and pre-diabetes. Over 40 million Americans have pre-diabetes (impaired glucose tolerance), which is associated with an increased risk of the development of both diabetes and heart disease. Findings from these studies will provide important insights into the pathways that lead to the development of heart disease related to pre-diabetes, prevention of heart disease in the pre-diabetic population, and identification of individuals at high risk for heart disease earlier in their natural history - even before the onset of pre-diabetes.

Interventions

DRUGAspirin

325 mg PO QD

DRUGAlpha lipoic acid

600 mg PO BID

DRUGOlmesartan

40 mg PO QD

DRUGPlacebo

Identical placebo for each active comparator: placebo aspirin 325 mg PO QD; placebo for alpha lipoic acid 600 mg PO BID; placebo for olmesartan 40 mg PO QD

Sponsors

Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Daiichi Sankyo
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Impaired glucose tolerance

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of diabetes * Taking an ACE inhibitor (ACE-I), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or aspirin * Have systolic blood pressure \>140 mm Hg * Have a chronic inflammatory disorder (i.e. rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, sinusitis) * Vascular disease (cardiac, peripheral, cerebral) * Renal insufficiency or hepatic abnormalities * Gastrointestinal bleeding (defined as gastric or duodenal ulcer, hematemesis, and/or blood in the stool) or significant other upper gastrointestinal problems (i.e. gastritis) within the previous 6 months * Anemia or a history of bleeding disorder * Have a history of ARB or aspirin allergy * Have the syndrome of asthma, rhinitis, and nasal polyps * Have other medical problems which would preclude taking potential study medications for 12 months * Are pregnant or have a positive pregnancy test * Are breast feeding * Are unable or unwilling to tolerate having one catheter in each arm for 4 hours * Have health status such that the envisioned blood sampling would confer a physiologic risk * Have other physical, social, or behavioral problems which would decrease the likelihood that they would remain in the study for 12 months * Do not appear capable of giving informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AIM 1: Change in Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) (%)12 months of interventionSurrogate measure of endothelial function defined as the percent change in dilation of the brachial artery after cuff compression of arm compared to before cuff compression

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AIM 1: Change in hsCRP (High Sensitivity C-reactive Peptide) Level12 months of interventionInflammatory marker

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
AIM 2: Difference in FMD (Measure of Endothelial Function)Cross-sectionalComparison of FMD (measure of endothelial function) between NGT, IGT and diabetes at baseline. FMD is a surrogate measure of endothelial function defined as the percent change in dilation of the brachial artery after cuff compression of arm compared to before cuff compression. No analysis was conducted due to under-recruitment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

266 subjects with IGT were contacted: 121 refused, 63 ineligible, 84 screened/enrolled. Among the 84 enrolled subjects: 1 was withdrawn, 13 dropped out before randomization, 70 were randomized (17 alpha lipoic acid, 18 aspirin, 18 olmesartan, 17 placebo). After randomization, 10 dropped out, and 3 were withdrawn.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Aspirin (ASA) 325 mg PO Once Daily
Anti-inflammatory agent
18
Olmesartan (ARB) 40 mg PO Once Daily
Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)
18
Alpha Lipoic Acid (ALA) 600 mg PO Twice Daily
Antioxidant
17
Placebo
Aspirin placebo PO once a day Olmesartan placebo PO once a day Alpha lipoic acid placebo PO twice a day
17
Total70

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAspirin (ASA) 325 mg PO Once DailyOlmesartan (ARB) 40 mg PO Once DailyAlpha Lipoic Acid (ALA) 600 mg PO Twice DailyPlaceboTotal
Age Continuous51.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
55.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
52.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
13 participants12 participants10 participants14 participants49 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
5 participants6 participants7 participants3 participants21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants10 Participants10 Participants6 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants8 Participants7 Participants11 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 181 / 180 / 170 / 170 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 180 / 170 / 171 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

AIM 1: Change in Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) (%)

Surrogate measure of endothelial function defined as the percent change in dilation of the brachial artery after cuff compression of arm compared to before cuff compression

Time frame: 12 months of intervention

Population: Based on the number of subjects who completed 12 months of intervention and testing

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aspirin (ASA) 325 mg PO Once DailyAIM 1: Change in Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) (%)-0.0012 percentage of arterial dilation changeStandard Deviation 0.03
Olmesartan (ARB) 40 mg PO Once DailyAIM 1: Change in Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) (%)0.018 percentage of arterial dilation changeStandard Deviation 0.032
Alpha Lipoic Acid (ALA) 600 mg PO Twice DailyAIM 1: Change in Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) (%)0.014 percentage of arterial dilation changeStandard Deviation 0.034
PlaceboAIM 1: Change in Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) (%)0.0053 percentage of arterial dilation changeStandard Deviation 0.03
Comparison: Null hypothesis: no difference between active treatment group compared to placebo.p-value: 0.94395% CI: [-0.025, 0.023]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.2895% CI: [-0.012, 0.039]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.31395% CI: [-0.012, 0.037]Regression, Linear
Secondary

AIM 1: Change in hsCRP (High Sensitivity C-reactive Peptide) Level

Inflammatory marker

Time frame: 12 months of intervention

Population: Based on the number of subjects who completed 12 months of intervention and testing

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aspirin (ASA) 325 mg PO Once DailyAIM 1: Change in hsCRP (High Sensitivity C-reactive Peptide) Level-1.27 mg/LStandard Error 0.86
Olmesartan (ARB) 40 mg PO Once DailyAIM 1: Change in hsCRP (High Sensitivity C-reactive Peptide) Level-2.34 mg/LStandard Error 1.1
Alpha Lipoic Acid (ALA) 600 mg PO Twice DailyAIM 1: Change in hsCRP (High Sensitivity C-reactive Peptide) Level0.23 mg/LStandard Error 0.7
PlaceboAIM 1: Change in hsCRP (High Sensitivity C-reactive Peptide) Level0.32 mg/LStandard Error 0.56
p-value: 0.44995% CI: [-3.435, 1.552]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.03495% CI: [-5.133, -0.221]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.94395% CI: [-2.367, 2.542]Regression, Linear
Other Pre-specified

AIM 2: Difference in FMD (Measure of Endothelial Function)

Comparison of FMD (measure of endothelial function) between NGT, IGT and diabetes at baseline. FMD is a surrogate measure of endothelial function defined as the percent change in dilation of the brachial artery after cuff compression of arm compared to before cuff compression. No analysis was conducted due to under-recruitment.

Time frame: Cross-sectional

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026