Skip to content

Telemedicine and Anger Management Groups With PTSD Veterans in the Hawaiian Islands

Telemedicine and Anger Management Groups for PTSD Veterans in the Hawaiian Islands

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00122109
Enrollment
125
Registered
2005-07-21
Start date
2005-08-31
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2015-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Keywords

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Anger Management, Telemedicine modality

Brief summary

Telemedicine has the potential to profoundly influence the delivery of specialized care to the remote veteran population suffering with PTSD. Preliminary research supports telemedicine technology as a possible solution to improve access to mental health services for veterans with PTSD. The proposed research is a treatment-outcome study that will assess the clinical efficacy of conducting an Anger Management Therapy (AMT) group treatment intervention using a videoteleconferencing (VTC) modality as compared to the traditional in-person modality with veterans who have PTSD and reside in remote locations on the Hawaiian Islands. AMT is a manual-guided cognitive-behavioral, skill based group intervention that has been used nationwide in VA substance abuse programs and most recently has been adopted by many VA PTSD Clinical Teams to treat anger-related to the sequelae of PTSD.

Detailed description

Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent problem among military troops. Recovery from combat-related PTSD is often complicated by problems with anger. Veterans with difficulties managing PTSD-related anger may be particularly likely to live in remote geographical regions where access to specialized mental health care is often limited. Telemental health (TMH) has been touted as a potential means of increasing access to care in rural or remote areas. Objectives: This study compared the effectiveness of group Anger Management Therapy (AMT) delivered via videoteleconferencing (VTC) and in-person delivery in a sample of rural combat veterans with PTSD. The long-range objective of this project was to develop an empirically sound TMH protocol that will facilitate the extension of manual guided clinical services to remote sites via VTC. We hypothesized that providing a manualized group therapy intervention via VTC would result in similar reductions in anger symptoms as obtained from traditional in-person care. Further, we hypothesized that key process indicators (i.e., attrition, adherence, satisfaction, and therapeutic alliance) would not be significantly different between the VTC and in-person conditions. The specific objectives of this project were to: a) determine if group AMT delivered via VTC is as effective as the same intervention delivered in-person on clinical outcomes measuring reductions in anger symptoms and b) determine if group AMT delivered via VTC is as effective as the same intervention delivered in-person on group process outcomes. Methods: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of 125 male veterans with PTSD and anger difficulties was conducted at three Department of Veterans Affairs' outpatient clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to receive AMT delivered in a group setting with the therapist either in-person (N= 64) or via VTC (N= 61). Participants were assessed at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and 3 and 6-months post-treatment. The primary clinical outcome was reduction of anger difficulties, as measured by the Anger Expression and Trait Anger subscales of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI-2) and the Novaco Anger Total Scale (NAS). Process variables were measured to assess the feasibility of AMT delivered via VTC. SAS MEANS procedure was used to calculate means and standard deviations for change from baseline at subsequent assessment points for both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analysis.

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL12 sessions Anger Management Therapy.

Anger Management Treatment (AMT), a 12-session manual-driven cognitive-behavioral intervention developed and found efficacious for anger management treatment with substance abuse veterans and has been applied to the PTSD population. AMT is highly structured with both psychoeducational and psychotherapy components. AMT is aimed at reducing anger affect and aggression through increasing anger management skills.

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* male * PTSD diagnosis * anger level at Staxi Trait Score=22 or higher * stable medication regime

Exclusion criteria

* current substance dependence * current psychosis * suicidal * homicidal * cognitive impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
State-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression IndexBaselineAnger expression was measured using the STAXI-2's 32-item Anger Expression Index (range 0 - 96). The STAXI-2 subscale have robust psychometric properties including high internal consistency, external validity, and construct validity. The Anger Expression Index provides a general measure of anger expression; assessing one's experience, expression and efforts to control anger. Higher scores indicate more problematic levels of anger and its expression.
State-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression SubscalePost-treatment (2 weeks following last treatment session)Anger expression was measured using the STAXI-2's 32-item Anger Expression Index (range 0 - 96). The STAXI-2 subscale have robust psychometric properties including high internal consistency, external validity, and construct validity. The Anger Expression Index provides a general measure of anger expression; assessing one's experience, expression and efforts to control anger. Higher scores indicate more problematic levels of anger and its expression.
Novaco Anger Scale (NAS)BaselineAnger disposition was assessed using the total scale score from the Novaco Anger Scale. This 60-item measure (range = 60 - 180) is a well validated self-report instrument designed to measure cognitive, arousal, and behavioral aspects of anger in both clinical and non-patient populations. Higher scores indicate more anger-related symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PTSD Checklist-military Version (PCL-M)BaselineSelf report that measures severity of PTSD symptoms. The PCL-M measures the 17 cardinal symptoms of PTSD as described in the DSM-IV-TR. The scale ranges from 0 - 85 with higher scores indicating worse PTSD symptoms. PTSD symptoms were measured at baseline and post-treatment only.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment took place between 2005-2008. Participants were recruited across three VA Pacific Island Healthcare System clinical sites and Vet Centers across the Hawaiian Islands, Maui, and Oahu. Attempts were made to recruit 16 participants for each of 9 cohorts with 10 participants randomized into each conditon (VTC vs NP) within a cohort.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 125 veterans who entered treatment, 112 attended at least 9 of 12 treatment sessions and were included in our completer sample (NP = 57 and VTC = 55).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Videoteleconferencing AMT
The experimental arm is the group condition that received the CPT treatment intervention via a videoteleconferencing modality as compared to the control condition which is the traditional face-to-face modality. Anger Management Therapy (AMT) group treatment intervention: 12-session CBT Anger Management Treatment conducted over a videoteleconferencing modality.
61
Face to Face AMT
The control arm is the group condition that received the CPT treatment intervention via a traditional face to face modality as compared to the experimental condition which is the videoteleconferncing modality. Anger Management Therapy (AMT) group treatment intervention: 12-session CBT Anger Management Treatment conducted over a face to face modality.
64
Total125

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDid not meet criteria67

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVideoteleconferencing AMTFace to Face AMTTotal
Age, Continuous54.8 years54.6 years54.7 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
61 participants64 participants125 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
61 Participants64 Participants125 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 610 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 610 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Novaco Anger Scale (NAS)

Anger disposition was assessed using the total scale score from the Novaco Anger Scale. This 60-item measure (range = 60 - 180) is a well validated self-report instrument designed to measure cognitive, arousal, and behavioral aspects of anger in both clinical and non-patient populations. Higher scores indicate more anger-related symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Videoteleconferencing AMTNovaco Anger Scale (NAS)109.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Face to Face AMTNovaco Anger Scale (NAS)109.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Primary

Novaco Anger Scale (NAS)

Anger disposition was assessed using the total scale score from the Novaco Anger Scale. This 60-item measure (range = 60 - 180) is a well validated self-report instrument designed to measure cognitive, arousal, and behavioral aspects of anger in both clinical and non-patient populations. Higher scores indicate more anger-related symptoms.

Time frame: 6-Month Follow Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Videoteleconferencing AMTNovaco Anger Scale (NAS)97.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
Face to Face AMTNovaco Anger Scale (NAS)101.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Primary

Novaco Anger Scale (NAS)

Anger disposition was assessed using the total scale score from the Novaco Anger Scale. This 60-item measure (range = 60 - 180) is a well validated self-report instrument designed to measure cognitive, arousal, and behavioral aspects of anger in both clinical and non-patient populations. Higher scores indicate more anger-related symptoms.

Time frame: 3-Month Follow Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Videoteleconferencing AMTNovaco Anger Scale (NAS)96.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
Face to Face AMTNovaco Anger Scale (NAS)105.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.2
Primary

Novaco Anger Scale (NAS)

Anger disposition was assessed using the total scale score from the Novaco Anger Scale. This 60-item measure (range = 60 - 180) is a well validated self-report instrument designed to measure cognitive, arousal, and behavioral aspects of anger in both clinical and non-patient populations. Higher scores indicate more anger-related symptoms.

Time frame: Post-treatment (2 weeks following last treatment session)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Videoteleconferencing AMTNovaco Anger Scale (NAS)94.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
Face to Face AMTNovaco Anger Scale (NAS)99.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Primary

State-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression Index

Anger expression was measured using the STAXI-2's 32-item Anger Expression Index (range 0 - 96). The STAXI-2 subscale have robust psychometric properties including high internal consistency, external validity, and construct validity. The Anger Expression Index provides a general measure of anger expression; assessing one's experience, expression and efforts to control anger. Higher scores indicate more problematic levels of anger and its expression.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Videoteleconferencing AMTState-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression Index56.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Face to Face AMTState-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression Index55.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Primary

State-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression Subscale

Anger expression was measured using the STAXI-2's 32-item Anger Expression Index (range 0 - 96). The STAXI-2 subscale have robust psychometric properties including high internal consistency, external validity, and construct validity. The Anger Expression Index provides a general measure of anger expression; assessing one's experience, expression and efforts to control anger. Higher scores indicate more problematic levels of anger and its expression.

Time frame: 6-month Follow Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Videoteleconferencing AMTState-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression Subscale42.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
Face to Face AMTState-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression Subscale46.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Primary

State-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression Subscale

Anger expression was measured using the STAXI-2's 32-item Anger Expression Index (range 0 - 96). The STAXI-2 subscale have robust psychometric properties including high internal consistency, external validity, and construct validity. The Anger Expression Index provides a general measure of anger expression; assessing one's experience, expression and efforts to control anger. Higher scores indicate more problematic levels of anger and its expression.

Time frame: 3-month Follow Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Videoteleconferencing AMTState-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression Subscale41.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Face to Face AMTState-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression Subscale47.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
Primary

State-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression Subscale

Anger expression was measured using the STAXI-2's 32-item Anger Expression Index (range 0 - 96). The STAXI-2 subscale have robust psychometric properties including high internal consistency, external validity, and construct validity. The Anger Expression Index provides a general measure of anger expression; assessing one's experience, expression and efforts to control anger. Higher scores indicate more problematic levels of anger and its expression.

Time frame: Post-treatment (2 weeks following last treatment session)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Videoteleconferencing AMTState-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression Subscale42.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
Face to Face AMTState-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) Anger Expression Subscale46.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
Secondary

PTSD Checklist-military Version (PCL-M)

Self report that measures severity of PTSD symptoms. The PCL-M measures the 17 cardinal symptoms of PTSD as described in the DSM-IV-TR. The scale ranges from 0 - 85 with higher scores indicating worse PTSD symptoms. PTSD symptoms were measured at baseline and post-treatment only.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Videoteleconferencing AMTPTSD Checklist-military Version (PCL-M)64.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
Face to Face AMTPTSD Checklist-military Version (PCL-M)65.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Secondary

PTSD Checklist-military Version (PCL-M)

Self report that measures severity of PTSD symptoms. The PCL-M measures the 17 cardinal symptoms of PTSD as described in the DSM-IV-TR. The scale ranges from 0 - 85 with higher scores indicating worse PTSD symptoms. PTSD symptoms were measured at baseline and post-treatment only.

Time frame: Post-treatment (2 weeks following last treatment session)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Videoteleconferencing AMTPTSD Checklist-military Version (PCL-M)59.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Face to Face AMTPTSD Checklist-military Version (PCL-M)57.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026