Skip to content

Combination Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis

An Exploratory Double-blind, Randomized, Vehicle-controlled, Paired Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Concomitant Use of Elidel Cream 1% and Cutivate Cream 0.05% in Patients With Severe Lesions of Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00119158
Enrollment
90
Registered
2005-07-13
Start date
2004-10-31
Completion date
2005-06-30
Last updated
2010-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Keywords

THerapy for acute moderate to severe flares

Brief summary

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic relapsing disease with acute flares. The standard therapy is to treat acute flares using topical medications. The two most common classes of topical medications for atopic dermatitis (AD) are topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors. Pimecrolimus and topical corticosteroids exert their activity by different mechanisms, there may be a synergistic effect of the combination therapy. Therefore, a combination therapy may provide a faster resolution of severe skin lesions and consequently reduce the duration of the topical corticosteroid treatment. Another benefit of the combination therapy maybe the use of a lower potency corticosteroid to achieve the same degree of clearance. The hypothesis of this trial is that the combination of the two agents will lead to faster clearance than the single agent of topical corticosteroids.

Detailed description

This trial is a double-blind controlled trial of fluticasone cream daily and pimecrolimus cream BID versus fluticasone cream daily and placebo cream BID for the treatment of acute flares of atopic dermatitis. While pimecrolimus cream 1% has been proven to be effective in mild and moderate Atopic dermatitis (AD), there is a need for a fast control of severe skin lesions. On the other hand, reducing the duration of the topical corticosteroid treatment is a reasonable approach to minimize the occurrence of adverse effects. Because pimecrolimus and topical corticosteroids exert their activity by different mechanisms, there may be a synergistic effect of the combination therapy. Therefore, a combination therapy may provide a faster resolution of severe skin lesions and consequently reduce the duration of the topical corticosteroid treatment. Another benefit of the combination therapy maybe the use of a lower potency corticosteroid to achieve the same degree of clearance. In vitro data have demonstrated that a combination of steroids and tacrolimus has synergistic effects on in vitro human lymphocyte proliferation. In addition, it has previously been reported, in a pilot investigation in two subjects, that a combination regimen of pimecrolimus 1% twice a day and fluticasone propionate cream 0.05% once daily was superior to fluticasone propionate cream 0.05% once daily in the acute treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). This study is conducted to validate these findings in a larger number of patients.

Interventions

DRUGCombination of pimecrolimus and fluticasone

Pimecrolimus cream twice a day and fluticasone cream once a day

DRUGpimecrolimus

apply daily with fluticasone cream for flares

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 2 to 65 years * Clinical diagnosis of (Atopic Dermatitis) AD according to the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) Consensus Conference (2001) * At least two lesions of AD on symmetrical part of the body (same location for each side of the body), of severe intensity (m-EASI is at least 7 on each site, with erythema of at least 3 (severe) and papulation/infiltration of at least 3 (severe)) and similar severity (m-EASI does not differ from more than 2 points on both sides) * Signed written informed consent * Willingness and ability to comply with the study requirements * Female is able to enter and participate in this study if she is of: * Non-childbearing potential (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant) or * Childbearing potential, has a negative pregnancy test (urine) at the screen visit and agrees to an adequate method of birth control throughout the study (which may, at the investigator's discretion, include abstinence)

Exclusion criteria

* History of immune deficiencies or history of malignant disease * Patients with moderate to severe lichenification at the target areas (i.e. score 2 or 3) * Active cutaneous bacterial, viral or fungal infections in target areas * History of other skin disorders, including Netherton syndrome, that could interfere with the evaluations * Use of any topical treatment known or suspected to have an effect on atopic dermatitis within one week prior to the screen visit (except for calcineurin inhibitors, for which the washout is 2 weeks) * Use of any systemic treatment (including phototherapy) known or suspected to have an effect on AD within four weeks prior to the screen visit \[(patients on a stable and low dose of inhaled steroids, on a stable dose of anti histamines, on stable dose of leukotriene antagonists, or receiving occasional short-acting b2-agonists for the treatment of asthma and topical corticosteroids (nasal spray) for the treatment of allergic rhinitis may participate). High-dose inhaled corticosteroids (\> 440 mcg of fluticasone a day) and anti-IgE products are not permitted\]. * Known sensitivity to pimecrolimus or vehicle (placebo) or fluticasone propionate cream or any of their ingredients * Patients with severe medical condition(s) that in the view of the investigator prohibits participation in the study * Use of any other investigational agent in the last 30 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the m-EASI (Eczema Area Severity Index) Score.up to 15 daysEczema Area severity index (EASI) is a composition of scores based on area of eczema involved, (0 = mild to 3 = severe) for four separate Atopic Dermatitis (AD) symptoms: erythema,infiltration ⁄population, excoriation and ichenification. Total score 0-12

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Time to the First Day When m-EASI is Scored by the Investigator as 2 or Lessup to one weekTime to partial clearance of the localized eczema lesion assessed by the investigator is measured in days
The Percentage of Target Areas Reaching a l-IGA (Localized Investigator Global Assessment (l-IGA) or 0 or 1)up to 15 daysThe Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) and l-IGA were graded on a scale of 0-4 (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe). The percentage of eczema lesions from the total population that reach almost clear
The Time to Clearance of the Diseaseassessed up to 30 days following drug applicationThe time to clearance of eczema measured in days
The Percentage of Target Areas Reaching a m-EASI (Modifed-Eczema Area Severity Index) Score of 2 or Lessup to one weekThe EASI is a measure of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) severity. A m-EASI score (0-12) was also calculated as the sum of severity (0 = mild to 3 = severe) for four separate AD symptoms: erythema, infiltration ⁄population, excoriation and lichenification. The percentage of participants whose eczema reaches almost clear
Change From Baseline in Patients' Self Assessment of Disease Severity (PSA) of Target Areas30 daysThe patient or caregiver assessment of eczema severity (PSA) was recorded daily in a diary using a 0-4 scale similar to that of the IGA.(0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease,4 = severe disease). Difference in value of PSA from baseline to end of study
The Percentage of Target Areas Improved (i.e., Decrease in Localized Investigator Global Assessmet (l-IGA) Score From Baseline)up to 15 daysThe percentage of eczema areas that show improvement in l-IGA score. The l-IGA were graded on a scale of 0-4 (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Medical clinics at academic centers

Pre-assignment details

Patients are self controls. Equivalent areas of eczema were compared

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Therapy
Patients had equivalent eczema on each side of the body. One side of the body was treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream twice a day and fluticasone cream once a day. The opposite side of the body was treated with placebo cream twice a day and fluticasone cream once a day
45
Placebo Arm
Patients had equivalent eczema on each side of the body. One side of the body was treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream twice a day and fluticasone cream once a day. The opposite side of the body was treated with placebo cream twice a day and fluticasone cream once a day
45
Total90

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo ArmActive TherapyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
22 Participants22 Participants44 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants23 Participants46 Participants
Age Continuous16.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4
16.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4
16.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4
Region of Enrollment
United States
45 participants45 participants90 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants27 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants18 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 450 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 450 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the m-EASI (Eczema Area Severity Index) Score.

Eczema Area severity index (EASI) is a composition of scores based on area of eczema involved, (0 = mild to 3 = severe) for four separate Atopic Dermatitis (AD) symptoms: erythema,infiltration ⁄population, excoriation and ichenification. Total score 0-12

Time frame: up to 15 days

Population: Analysis was per protocol, last observation carried forward

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TherapyChange From Baseline in the m-EASI (Eczema Area Severity Index) Score.5.04 units of a 0-12 scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Placebo ArmChange From Baseline in the m-EASI (Eczema Area Severity Index) Score.4.77 units of a 0-12 scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patients' Self Assessment of Disease Severity (PSA) of Target Areas

The patient or caregiver assessment of eczema severity (PSA) was recorded daily in a diary using a 0-4 scale similar to that of the IGA.(0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease,4 = severe disease). Difference in value of PSA from baseline to end of study

Time frame: 30 days

Secondary

The Percentage of Target Areas Improved (i.e., Decrease in Localized Investigator Global Assessmet (l-IGA) Score From Baseline)

The percentage of eczema areas that show improvement in l-IGA score. The l-IGA were graded on a scale of 0-4 (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease).

Time frame: up to 15 days

Secondary

The Percentage of Target Areas Reaching a l-IGA (Localized Investigator Global Assessment (l-IGA) or 0 or 1)

The Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) and l-IGA were graded on a scale of 0-4 (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe). The percentage of eczema lesions from the total population that reach almost clear

Time frame: up to 15 days

Secondary

The Percentage of Target Areas Reaching a m-EASI (Modifed-Eczema Area Severity Index) Score of 2 or Less

The EASI is a measure of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) severity. A m-EASI score (0-12) was also calculated as the sum of severity (0 = mild to 3 = severe) for four separate AD symptoms: erythema, infiltration ⁄population, excoriation and lichenification. The percentage of participants whose eczema reaches almost clear

Time frame: up to one week

Secondary

The Time to Clearance of the Disease

The time to clearance of eczema measured in days

Time frame: assessed up to 30 days following drug application

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TherapyThe Time to Clearance of the Disease9.22 daysStandard Error 4.5
Placebo ArmThe Time to Clearance of the Disease7.88 daysStandard Error 3.88
Secondary

The Time to the First Day When m-EASI is Scored by the Investigator as 2 or Less

Time to partial clearance of the localized eczema lesion assessed by the investigator is measured in days

Time frame: up to one week

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026