Skip to content

Comparison of Surveillance Versus Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Surveillance and Selective Surgical Treatment for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Less Than 5.5 cm in Diameter Versus Early Endovascular Treatment

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00118573
Acronym
CAESAR
Enrollment
360
Registered
2005-07-11
Start date
2004-09-30
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2015-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Endovascular

Keywords

abdominal aortic aneurysm, randomized controlled trial, endovascular aneurysm repair

Brief summary

Objective of the present study is to compare endovascular repair versus surveillance and, eventually delay treatment in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), with respect to patient survival, AAA rupture and AAA related death risks.

Detailed description

The study will include patients with small AAA (diameter 4.1 to 5.4 cm defined by Computed Tomographic scan) suitable for endovascular repair (EVAR). Randomization is designed with equal probability of assignment to each of the two groups (ie, immediate endovascular repair or surveillance group) by means of a computer-generated -random-number list . After eligibility is verified, assignment will be made using a computer database held at the Coordinating Centre. In the immediate repair group, endovascular repair with introduction of an aortic endograft (Cook Zenith) will be performed within six weeks from randomization. In the surveillance group, patients are followed without repair until the aneurysm reaches 5.5 cm in diameter, or enlarges at least 1.0 cm in one year, or until patient develops symptoms that are attributed to the aneurysm by the attending investigator. When one of these criteria is met, endovascular repair (if the patient remains a candidate for EVAR), or open repair will be carried out.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEVAR (Endovascular repair of Abdominal Aortic aneurysm)

AAA repair with endografting

PROCEDURESurveillance

Surveillance of AAA without any repair until AAA will reach 5.5cm, become tender or rapidly grow

Sponsors

William Cook Europe
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Of Perugia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of 50-80 years of age * Non symptomatic infrarenal AAA of 4.1 to 5.4 cm in diameter measured by CT performed within 3 months before randomization * Adequate infrarenal aortic neck (length \> 15 mm diameter \< 30 mm) and other anatomical configurations suitable for EVAR * Patients have a life expectancy of at least 5 years * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Ruptured or symptomatic AAA * AAA maximum diameter \>= 5.5 cm * Suprarenal or thoracic aorta aneurysm of more than 4.0 cm * Patient unsuitable for administration of contrast agent * Severe heart, lung, liver or renal disease (serum creatinine \>= 3mg/dl) * Need for adjunctive major surgical or vascular procedures within 1 month * High likelihood of non compliance with follow-up requirements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
all cause mortality at 3 years3 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
aneurysm rupture rates at 3 years3 years
perioperative or late complications30 days and 3 years
conversion to open repair30 days and 3 years
aneurysm related mortality at 3 years3 years
risks associated with delayed treatment30 days and 3 years
aneurysm growth rates3 years
quality of life30 days, 6 month, 1 year, 3 years
loss of treatment options3 years

Countries

Czechia, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026